Francis, Fadi

ABSTRACT Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) share chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation. Aim We evaluated the incidence of MPNs among patients with IBD and clinical outcomes of IBD–MPN coexistence. Methods Two retrospective cohort analyses were conducted using the TriNetX database. First, adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were compared with matched non‐IBD controls to estimate incident MPN risk. A coexistence second analysis included patients with UC or CD who developed MPNs and then were matched to IBD without MPN controls to assess 5‐year outcomes, including IBD‐related complications, surgical interventions, colorectal cancer (CRC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Medication subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate associations with MPN risk. Results After matching, 3873 patients with UC–MPN and 3474 patients with CD–MPN were included. Compared with matched non‐IBD controls, incident MPN risk was higher in UC (HR 1.60, p = 0.01) and CD (HR 1.56, p < 0.001). In CD, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.52, p = 0.012), intestinal fistula (HR 2.84, p < 0.001), obstruction (HR 2.05, p < 0.001), perforation (HR 2.37, p < 0.001), small bowel resection (HR 3.69, p < 0.001) and colectomy (HR 2.10, p < 0.001). In UC, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.50, p = 0.001), PSC (HR 1.75, p = 0.03) and pouchitis (HR 1.68, p = 0.003). Exposure to thiopurines (HR 1.28, p < 0.001) was associated with increased MPN risk, whereas TNF, IL‐23 and JAK inhibitors were not. Conclusions IBD is associated with increased MPN risk, and IBD–MPNs coexistence is associated with worse IBD‐related complications and malignancy risk.

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) may require solid organ transplants (SOTs) for multiple reasons, making its prevalence slightly higher than the general population. Although immunosuppression used in SOT may help control IBD-related inflammation, many patients still require additional immunosuppressive medications. We aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of SOT-related immunosuppression and IBD medications in patients with liver, kidney, or heart transplantation. We conducted a clinical review using PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for our search. We included data from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports to assess the safety, effectiveness, and side effect profile of immunomodulators, biologic therapies, and small molecules in patients with SOT. Our review encompassed 25 liver, 6 kidney, and 1 heart transplant studies involving patients with IBD. Common liver transplant immunosuppressants included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and steroids. Anti-TNF agents, widely used in all SOT types, showed no significant safety issues, though infections and malignancies were noted. Patients with liver transplant on tacrolimus responded well to anti-integrins and ustekinumab without major complications. For kidney transplants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus were prevalent, and their combination with anti-TNF or ustekinumab was generally safe, with rare reports of malignancy or infection. Hence, the use of anti-TNF, anti-integrin agents, and ustekinumab appears to be safe in patients with SOT, regardless of their transplant related immunosuppression. More studies are needed in patients with kidney and heart transplants and in patients treated with small molecules for their IBD.

Abstract Introduction Pouchitis is the most common complication in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), which can develop in up to 66% of patients. There is limited data on the effect of orthoptic liver transplantation (OLT) on the risk of developing pouchitis. We aimed to objectively assess whether OLT itself significantly modifies the risk of developing pouchitis in patients with overlap PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Method We searched Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases from inception through September 2023 for studies that describe the outcomes of IPAA in patients with PSC and IBD who also have a history of OLT. Pooled proportions, Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for data were calculated utilizing a random effects model. Using the Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation (FTT) method, the pooled weight-adjusted estimate of event rates for clinical outcomes in each group was also calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q statistic (I2). Results Seven studies with a total of 291 patients with a history of PSC, IBD, and OLT were identified. The pooled overall risk of pouchitis in PSC/IBD patients with a history of OLT was 65% (95% CI: 0.57–0.72), with no heterogeneity observed in the analysis (I2 = 0%). In a subgroup analysis of patients who had IPAA followed by OLT, 3 studies with 28 patients were included; the pooled risk of pouchitis after IPAA and OLT was 83% (95% CI: 0.71–0.94; I2 = 0%), which was significantly higher (P &lt; .001) than the OLT followed by IPAA group (59%; 95 CI: 0.48–0.71; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in the risk of pouchitis between OLT and non-OLT groups (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 0.37–5.0). Conclusions Our meta-analysis revelaed that pouchitis is common in patients who underwent OLT for PSC, especially in those who had IPAA before the OLT. OLT before IPAA may reduce the risk of pouchitis. Further larger studies are warranted to reproduce this and investigate the reason behind this difference.

Introduction: Diet is thought to play an important role in the clinical course and quality of life (QOL) of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, dietary habits of patients with IBD are still unknown. This case–control study aims to compare the dietary habits of patients with IBD to healthy controls and evaluate differences in disease severity and QOL. Materials and methods: Food frequency, severity scores using the Harvey–Bradshaw and Ulcerative colitis activity index, and QOL were assessed using online questionnaires. Dietary habits were compared for patients with active disease and remission and for those with low QOL (LQOL) and high QOL (HQOL). Results: We recruited 61 patients with IBD and 101 controls. Significance was set at p = 0.05. Controls consumed significantly more daily calories (2546 vs. 1641, p = 0.001). However, patients with IBD consumed a higher percentage of carbohydrates (50% vs. 45%, p = 0.001), more red meat (p = 0.024), and less fiber, sucrose, and lactose (p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.036). Patients with active disease had higher lipid intake, lower protein intake, and lower QOL (47 vs. 58, p = 0.001). Dietary differences between LQOL and HQOL mirrored those between active disease and remission. Conclusion: This study is the first to provide valuable insights into the nutritional profile of Lebanese patients with IBD.