Citations

Background The rising number of spinal surgeries has been paralleled by an increase in postoperative spine infections (PSIs), now identified as the third most common surgical complication. The absence of a standardized PSI definition complicates clinical management and research. This meta-epidemiological study was conducted to establish clear diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians and researchers in consistently identifying and reporting PSIs. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE on March 14, 2024, by a medical librarian. Studies were considered eligible if they reported clear diagnostic definitions of PSI in at least ten adult patients. The primary objective was to review existing PSI diagnostic criteria and classify them into thematic clusters. We developed standardized diagnostic combinations based on 13 predefined criteria sourced from clinical practice guidelines and previous research (see Table 1). Results From an initial pool of 1,466 studies, 101 were included. The vast majority were retrospective (91/101, 92.1%), with most studies (77/101, 76.2%) utilizing established criteria, such as those from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) or the CDC. Seven studies combined these predefined criteria with additional detailed descriptions. Among studies using independent definitions, clinical signs and symptoms were the most commonly reported criteria (13/24, 54.2). The criteria were grouped into clinical, microbiological, and radiological categories, with most studies employing clinical criteria either alone or alongside microbiological or imaging findings (Figure 1). Conclusion These findings highlight the urgent need for a standardized definition of PSI that integrates clinical, microbiological, and radiological elements. Implementing such a unified diagnostic framework could enhance accuracy, address limitations related to hardware complications, wound drainage interpretation, and imaging ambiguities, and improve current surveillance practices. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Aim Cefazolin, a first generation cephalosporin, is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Research has shown that prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates are significantly higher when non-cefazolin antibiotics are used for perioperative TKA and THA prophylaxis. Cefazolin contains an R1 side chain that has not shown cross reactivity with other cephalosporins. Despite these data, the declaration of a cephalosporin allergy causes uncertainty regarding the optimal antibiotic choice in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of administering perioperative cefazolin in patients with a cephalosporin allergy undergoing joint arthroplasty. Methods We identified all patients (n=1267) with a documented cephalosporin allergy who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty at a high volume academic medical center from 2016-2024. We compared patients who received perioperative cefazolin despite the presence of a cephalosporin allergy (n=481) to patients who received alternative antibiotic prophylaxis (n=786). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions within the first 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complication rates including PJI, C. difficile infection, adverse events and readmission. Results The incidence of allergic reaction in cephalosporin allergic patients who received cefazolin was 0.0% (0/481) compared to 0.51% (4/786) in patients who received alternative antibiotics prophylaxis (p=0.12). There were no significant differences in the incidences of PJI (0.23% vs. 0.30%; p=0.83), C. difficile infection (0.0% vs. 0.0%) or readmission (3.95% vs. 4.34%; p=0.75) within 90 days. There was one adverse event related to cefazolin administration which was urethral irritation and was self-limited. There were three adverse events related to alternative antibiotic prophylaxis including cutaneous manifestations, GI distress and headache in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. All four allergic reactions in the alternative antibiotic prophylaxis cohort required supportive treatment with IV corticosteroids, fluids and antihistamines. Conclusion In this cohort of hip and knee arthroplasty patients, cefazolin administration in the setting of a cephalosporin allergy resulted in a 0.0% incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions. These data and the fact that cefazolin's unique R1 side chain is not shared by any other cephalosporins suggests that cefazolin can safely be administered to most patients with a documented cephalosporin allergy.

ABSTRACT Introduction In hospitalised patients with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN, premorbid body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ), estimated from premorbid weight (i.e., weight at the onset of weight loss preceding eating disorder development) and admission height, strongly predicts admission weight loss (i.e., premorbid weight minus admission weight). We hypothesised that maximal weight loss (i.e., maximal historical weight minus minimal weight since eating disorder onset) is also correlated with maximal BMI. Methods In 520 female adolescents with AN ( n = 503) and atypical AN ( n = 17), relationships between admission age, admission and maximal weight loss, and maximal and minimal BMI were analysed with non‐parametric Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Like premorbid BMI in previous studies, maximal BMI was strongly correlated with maximal weight loss. Discussion Maximal BMI appears to be a sound substitute for premorbid BMI in correlations with admission weight loss in hospitalised adolescents with AN and atypical AN. Consistent use of maximal (vs. premorbid) BMI and admission (vs. maximal) weight loss in research would align with the metric weight suppression (derived from both maximal and current weight), thus facilitating cross study comparisons. Additional studies should assess correlations between both premorbid and maximal BMI and admission or maximal weight loss to attempt to identify the variables with the highest predictive value.

Abstract Background Deep learning auto segmentation (DLAS) tools are widely used for radiation therapy planning, yet limited information exists on how patient positioning impacts their performance, particularly in head and neck (HN) computed tomography (CT) imaging. Purpose This study investigates the impact of abnormal neck tilt on the accuracy of DLAS‐generated contours in HN CT scans. We hypothesize that abnormal positioning degrades auto segmentation performance, particularly for organs at risk (OARs) influenced by cervical spine orientation. Methods A total of 35 HN CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. Neck tilt was quantified using principal component analysis of the spinal cord contours from C1 to C4, with patients stratified into normal and abnormal tilt groups based on percentile thresholds. Seven FDA‐cleared DLAS tools were evaluated for OAR segmentation accuracy across brainstem, parotid glands, submandibular glands, brachial plexus, and optic nerves. Gold‐standard contours were curated from manually created clinical contours and compared to DLAS output using Sorenson's volumetric dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface Dice similarity coefficient with a 2 mm threshold (sDSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA) and difference in mean dose. Statistical differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests ( p < 0.05). Results Among the evaluated OARs, the parotid glands showed consistent and statistically significant degradation in contouring accuracy for patients with abnormal neck tilt across all metrics (DSC, sDSC, MDA) and across all seven DLAS tools. Changes in contouring accuracy resulted in significant differences in both absolute and signed difference in mean dose. No consistent differences were observed for other structures across multiple DLAS tools. Conclusions Abnormal neck tilt is associated with reduced DLAS accuracy and greater dose variability for parotid gland segmentation in HN radiotherapy planning. These findings underscore the need for enhanced patient quality assurance strategies for patients with abnormal positioning when using clinical DLAS workflows. Future work should explore automated detection of anatomical outliers and site‐specific model retraining to ensure accurate contouring delineation for patients with atypical positioning or anatomy.

Objective To examine real‐world patterns in pain management among adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we focused on the sequencing of pain modalities, polypharmacy, and demographic variation. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from adults with SLE treated at a single academic medical center between 2005 and 2024. We included patients who received at least one pain‐related therapy, including glucocorticoids, opioids, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, and nonpharmacologic interventions. We used sequence analysis and Sankey diagrams to map treatment trajectories and compared patterns across two periods: 2005 to 2014 and 2015 to 2024. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving five or more pain‐related prescriptions within 12 months. We examined trends by age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Results Among 769 patients, initiation of glucocorticoids and opioids declined over time (58%–51% and 28%–22%, respectively), whereas NSAID use increased (19%–29%). The median number of pain prescriptions decreased, and polypharmacy prevalence dropped from 53% to 45%. In recent years, younger adults and men received more prescriptions, with 69% of men receiving five or more compared with 43% of women. Racial disparities narrowed overall in recent years but persisted in sensitivity analyses excluding glucocorticoids. Conclusion Pain management in SLE is shifting away from high‐risk therapies; however, prescribing intensity remains high and varies by demographic group. Visualizations serve as a complementary lens to traditional prescription counts, allowing representation of polypharmacy not only by volume but also by the diversity and sequencing of therapeutic classes over time.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.