Citations

ABSTRACT Background Optimal management in patients presenting with persistent atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and atrial as well as ventricular dyssynchrony with left bundle branch block is unclear. Results and Methods A 67‐year‐old female patient presented with persistent atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy with a newly reduced ejection fraction (EF), increased P wave duration on electrocardiogram (ECG) and left bundle branch block. After shared decision making, the patient elected to proceed with Bachman bundle/left bundle branch area pacing plus atrioventricular (AV) node ablation. At 6‐month follow‐up post procedure, a repeat echocardiogram showed normalized atrial size and EF (65%). Device interrogation demonstrated no recurrent atrial fibrillation with the patient off antiarrhythmic and heart failure medical therapy. Conclusions Integrated atrial and ventricular synchronization through Bachmann bundle and left bundle branch area pacing may help break the cycle of dyssynchrony, remodeling, and arrhythmia. In combination with AV node ablation, it may be considered as an alternative treatment option in certain cases after shared decision making.

Abstract Objective VEXAS syndrome is a severe systemic haemato-inflammatory disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Most patients experience recurrent inflammatory flares despite anti-inflammatory therapy. The lack of accepted definitions of flare in these patients is preventing development of disease activity tools that are essential for conducting clinical trials. We aimed to develop a consensus definition of a VEXAS flare for use in clinical trials. Methods A nine-member international expert advisory committee established a consensus definition of VEXAS flare using modified Delphi methodology. Clinical inflammatory manifestations of VEXAS syndrome were identified through a systematic literature review. Committee members developed a conceptual framework for flare definition, proposed revisions and voted on changes until consensus (≥75% concurrence) was reached. Results Consensus defined VEXAS flare as active inflammatory manifestation(s) of VEXAS syndrome requiring escalation in glucocorticoid therapy. Three flare categories were established: (i) recurrence of a prior documented VEXAS manifestation; (ii) development of a new VEXAS-defining inflammatory manifestation; or (iii) emergence of a new inflammatory manifestation not meeting criteria for A or B. The panel endorsed an independent adjudication committee to assess Category C flares in clinical trials. Conclusions This study proposes a standardized definition of VEXAS flare, providing uniform criteria for identifying VEXAS disease activity. Future research will evaluate its performance in clinical trials.

Abstract Introduction This is the first International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM) position paper on sexual health in older adults. Physical, cognitive, and psychosocial factors create a unique set of challenges related to sexuality in older adults. Objectives This study explores the impact of the physiological aspects of aging, state of health, psychological, relationship-related, and sociocultural factors, on sexual health in older adults. The goal of this review is to provide recommendations for the comprehensive evaluation and treatment of this population. Methods A narrative review was conducted under the auspices of the ICSM, as part of its ongoing efforts to develop expert, evidence-based guidance in the field of sexual health. A multidisciplinary panel of international experts composed of specialists in urology, gynecology, psychiatry, sexual medicine, social work, and sex therapy was convened. A comprehensive literature review was conducted based on a search of psychological sources (PsycInfo), medical databases (PubMed, Medline), and Google Scholar. All retrieved articles were reviewed and critically assessed. Recommendations were then formulated using a modified Delphi method. Results Although there is extensive literature on the prevalence and risk of sexual challenges of adults over the age of 65, there is limited evidence regarding the quality of treatment modalities. In particular, there is scant data on women in this age group. This population faces specific and multifactorial challenges, which point to the need for a comprehensive approach to their care. Conclusion Any approach to sexual health in older adults needs to take all the factors that affect sexual health into account, while endorsing the full spectrum of sexual expression in a non-judgmental way. Individuals in a relationship should be offered a couple-centered approach. Special attention is needed for individuals in cognitive decline. Healthcare providers must be aware of ageist biases, which may prevent them from providing appropriate care.

Summary Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for evaluating esophageal motility disorders but can be limited by patient intolerance. With increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for obesity and type 2 diabetes, delayed gastric emptying raises concerns for HRM feasibility and safety. This study assessed HRM tolerability in patients on GLP-1RAs. We conducted a retrospective case–control study of adult patients who underwent HRM at our tertiary care center between January 2014 and November 2024. Patients actively taking GLP-1RAs during HRM were identified as cases, while an equal number of consecutive eligible patients not on GLP-1RAs served as controls. Patients with established gastrointestinal dysmotility, prior foregut surgery, esophageal mechanical obstruction, large hiatal hernias, malignancy, or recent opioid use were excluded. From a prospective database of 7194 HRM attempts, 83 cases and 83 matched controls were identified. Among 166 patients, 15 (9.0%) had incomplete HRM due to intolerance, with similar rates between GLP-1RA users and controls (10.84% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.59). Predictors of incomplete HRM included younger age (44.9 ± 17.4 vs. 60.4 ± 13.7 years, P < 0.01), globus (P = 0.02), dyspepsia (P = 0.02), and depression (P = 0.04). No aspiration or adverse events occurred in either group. Duration of HRM before abortion was similar between cases and controls. GLP-1RA use was not associated with increased risk of HRM abortion or adverse events, suggesting these medications do not significantly impact HRM feasibility or safety.

Abstract Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus improves motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Using functional MRI, optimal DBS response networks have been characterized. However, neural activity associated with Parkinsonian symptoms is magnitudes faster than what can be resolved by this method. Although both spatial and temporal domains of these networks appear crucial, no single study has yet investigated both domains simultaneously. Here, we aimed at closing this gap by analysing electrophysiological data from a total of n = 127 hemispheres. Using subthalamic local field potentials that were recorded concurrently alongside whole-brain magnetoencephalography in a multi-centre cohort of patients who underwent subthalamic DBS for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (n = 100 hemispheres), we analysed the DBS response network in both spatial and temporal domains. In every cortical vertex, cortico-subthalamic coupling was correlated with stimulation outcomes. This network spatially resembled functional MRI-based findings (R = 0.40, P = 0.039) and explained significant amounts of variance in clinical outcomes (βstd = 0.30, P = 0.002), whereas theta–alpha and low beta coupling did not show significant associations with DBS response (theta–alpha: βstd = −0.02, P = 0.805; low beta: βstd = −0.08, P = 0.426). The ‘optimal’ high beta coupling map was robust when subjected to various cross-validation designs (10-fold cross-validation: R = 0.29, P = 0.009; split-half design: R = 0.31, P = 0.026) and was able to predict outcomes across DBS centres [R = 0.74; P(1) = 8.9 × 10−5]. We identified a DBS response network that resembles the previously defined MRI network and operates in the high beta band. Maximal connectivity to this network was associated with optimal DBS outcomes and was able to cross-predict clinical improvements across DBS surgeons and centres.

Objectives: The goals of this study are to assess primary care provider (PCP) knowledge of and attitudes toward pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to identify variations in practice patterns. Design: A cross-sectional survey including the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes in Children (OSAKA-KIDS) questionnaire was administered to PCPs from August to December 2021. Univariable analyses and multivariable linear regressions were performed to analyze associations between demographics and knowledge, attitudes, and screening frequency. Results: Eighty-two PCPs completed the survey (age 43.4 ± 9.6 years, 69.6% female, 90.2% non-Hispanic White). Specialties included Pediatrics (65.9%) and Family Medicine (32.9%). Respondents answered a mean 84.9 ± 10.7% questions correctly on the knowledge portion. Years in practice, provider training, and academic affiliation were not associated with knowledge scores. Less than half (45.1%) of respondents screened for OSA “most of the time” (32.9%) or “always” (12.2%). Higher screening frequency was associated with clinics with higher Medicaid beneficiaries ( P = .002) and a lower proportion of Black patients ( P = .033). Providers who felt more confident in managing OSA were more likely to screen “most of the time” ( B = 0.532, 95% CI [0.120-0.926], P = .012), or “always” ( B = 0.708, 95% CI [0.129-1.29], P = .017). Conclusion: these results suggest guideline-recommended screening for OSA is low among PCPs. Higher confidence in OSA management was associated with higher screening rates. Further studies on interventions aimed to increase screening and confidence may improve equitable care.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

Abstract The “triple threat” surgeon—one who excels as a clinician, researcher, and educator—has long represented the ultimate achievement in academic medicine. This model has guided generations of surgeons aspiring to excellence. The importance of leadership skills has also been recognized, leading to the modern concept of the “quadruple threat.” Over the last decades, many challenges have threatened the existence of this model, including increasing competition for limited funding, declining reimbursement, and increasing administrative burdens. While some view the “triple threat” unachievable or unsustainable in the current environment, others use this as an opportunity to adapt the model to contemporary practice. This review examines the historical origins of the triple threat surgeon, the current challenges to this model and the steps necessary to ensure its success.