Citations

Abstract Introduction: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), features bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and abnormal blood cell production. Aberrant JAK/STAT signaling, elevated cytokines or hyperactive NFκB are implicated in MPN pathogenesis; however, their interplay remains unclear. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) alleviate PMF symptoms, but they don't fully address disease progression or mitigate cytokine storms. NFκB inhibitors have shown promise in MPN models but are associated with off-target effects and toxicities. This study aims to elucidate the mechanisms of JAKi resistance and develop novel therapeutic strategies targeting hyperactive NFκB in vitro and in vivo, offering potential benefits beyond current JAKi therapies. Methods: To investigate JAKi resistance in PMF, ruxolitinib-resistant HEL cells were generated and NFκB/JAK2/STAT signaling was examined by Western blot. Biomarkers associated with JAKi response were identified in PMF patients treated with BMS-9115437 (Gangat et al, Blood Cancer J, 2023) via Western blot. Molecular mechanisms of MPN pathogenesis were further elucidated using Affymetrix HG-U133Plus2 assay on RNA from treatment-naïve PMF, essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) patients and healthy donors, followed by KEGG and gene set enrichment (GSE) analysis. In vitro, NFκB was inactivated by shRNA, Ixazomib or emetine followed by Western blot for NFκB/JAK2/STAT phosphorylation as well as flow cytometry and clonogenic assays for cell growth. NFκB DNA binding activity was determined by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays (EMSA). The therapeutic and preventive effects of Ixazomib and emetine were evaluated in HEL-engrafted nude mice by assessing tumor formation, development, and underlying mechanisms using Western blot, H&E and IHC staining. Results: Short-term JAKi (BMS-911543, ruxolitinib) exposure altered JAK2 phosphorylation, increasing Tyr1008 phosphorylation and decreasing Tyr221, Tyr570, and STAT5 phosphorylation. Notably, JAK2, STAT3 and STAT5 were phosphorylated in ruxolitinib-resistant HEL cells or after treatment cessation, implying sustained signaling activity. Western blot analysis and clinical data in PMF patients (n=3) receiving BMS-911543 showed no hyperphosphorylation of JAK2 Tyr1008 with diverse responses independent of JAK2V617F status. A lack of correlation between JAK2 and STAT5 expression/phosphorylation suggests that other factors contribute to hyperactive STAT5 in PMF. Symptomatic improvement in a JAK2V617F-positive patient correlated with decreased STAT5 protein expression and phosphorylation, potentially serving as a predictor for JAKi response. Transcriptomic analysis in MPN patients (PMF (n=11), ET (n=6), PV (n=4), HD (n=5)) pinpointed the transcriptomic dissimilarities between PMF and PV or ET, and highlighted the higher NFκB activity in PMF compared to PV or ET. The importance of NFκB in PMF was further evidenced by the network analysis for the overproduction of circulating cytokines in PMF patients (Tefferi et al, JCO, 2011). In vitro studies revealed that NFκB overexpression promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis through enhanced IL-6/IL-6R expression and JAK2/STAT5 phosphorylation. Inactivating NFκB using shRNA, emetine, or ixazomib reversed these effects. Further, IL-6 treatment increased JAK2 phosphorylation. In vivo studies showed that Ixazomib significantly reduces tumor volume (734 ±133 to 98 ±14 mm3; P <0.001) and weight (582 ±156 to 87 ±22 mg; P =0.0005) compared to controls. Emetine similarly suppressed tumor growth dose-dependently without affecting spleen weight and even prevented tumor formation when administered prior to cell engraftment. Mechanistically, both Ixazomib and emetine inhibited NFκB and JAK2 phosphorylation while increasing cleaved caspase-3 in tumors. Conclusions: We discovered that STAT inactivation independently predicts improved outcomes in PMF and that NFκB hyperactivity holds particular significance for PMF compared to other MPN subtypes. We identified a NFκB-IL-6-JAK2-STAT axis in regulating PMF growth regardless of JAK2V617F status. Targeting NFκB with novel inhibitors Ixazomib and emetine disrupts the NFκB-IL-6-JAK2-STAT axis, suppressing PMF growth and offering potential therapeutic alternatives to overcome current JAKi limitations.

Abstract Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogenous disease with varied expressions of CD30. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and rituximab (R). In the phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283), BV + Len + R showed significant overall survival (OS) benefit compared with placebo + Len + R in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Subgroup analysis from this study showed that BV + Len + R provided clinical benefit regardless of CD30 expression level. We hypothesized that even sub-threshold levels of CD30 expression, below the detection limits of immunohistochemistry (IHC), may be sufficient to elicit the antitumor activity of BV. Here, we further investigated whether trace amounts of CD30 staining are required for patients to benefit from BV + Len + R. Methods In the ECHELON-3 study, patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were randomized 1:1 to receive BV + Len + R or placebo + Len + R. The primary endpoint was OS, with progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), per Lugano 2014, as key secondary endpoints. CD30 expression was assessed by IHC by central and/or local testing. CD30 positivity was scored as the percentage of CD30 positive cells out of neoplastic cells or out of total lymphocytes, when neoplastic cells could not be distinguished. In this updated analysis, patients with CD30 <1% staining by central laboratory IHC were further grouped into CD30 <1% with trace staining and CD30 <1% with no staining. Results Overall, 60 patients in the BV + Len + R group had CD30 <1% expression; of these, 34 had CD30 <1% with trace staining and 26 had CD30 <1% with no staining. In the placebo + Len + R group, 63 patients had CD30 <1% expression; of these, 36 had CD30 <1% with trace staining and 27 had CD30 <1% with no staining. In the overall CD30 <1% groups, numerically greater OS and PFS benefits were observed with BV + Len + R vs placebo + Len + R (HR for OS, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89 and HR for PFS, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82). In patients with CD30 <1% with trace staining, BV + Len + R showed a numerically higher OS compared with placebo + Len + R, with HR of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.26-0.90); median OS was 15.6 vs 5.2 months. In patients with CD30 <1% with no staining, there was a trend toward higher OS with BV + Len + R vs placebo + Len + R, with HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.34-1.28); median OS was 14.8 vs 11.8 months. Similarly, in patients with CD30 <1% with trace staining, BV + Len + R showed a trend toward longer PFS compared with placebo + Len + R, with HR of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.33-1.11); median PFS was 2.8 vs 1.5 months. In patients with CD30 <1% with no staining, a numerically longer PFS benefit was observed with BV + Len + R vs placebo + Len + R, with HR of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.21-0.79); median PFS was 4.2 vs 2.7 months. In the overall groups, ORR was 60.0% with BV + Len + R and 34.9% with placebo + Len + R. Higher ORR was observed with BV + Len + R compared with placebo + Len + R in both CD30 <1% with trace staining (55.9% vs 25.0%) and CD30 <1% with no staining (65.4% vs 48.1%) groups. Conclusions Results from this updated analysis indicate that visible CD30 detection by IHC is not required for response to BV + Len + R in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Treatment with BV + Len + R showed efficacy benefit compared with placebo + Len + R regardless of CD30 expression level, including in patients with no visible CD30 IHC staining. These results are consistent with those from the overall ECHELON-3 study population, in which significant improvement in OS was demonstrated with BV + Len + R compared with placebo + Len + R.

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is marked by wide variability in clinical phenotypes and severity due to environmental, clinical, and genetic factors. Variants in iron-regulatory genes are well described modifiers of clinical presentation in different diseases, but their role in modulating SCD phenotype has been sparsely studied in African populations. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in iron-regulatory genes in SCD severity and lifetime transfusion(Tx) requirement. Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board of Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records and patient interviews using a structured questionnaire. Participants were recruited in steady state and were stratified according to the severity score previously described by Shah et al. (Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:625). Biochemical analyses included serum transferrin and serum iron; transferrin saturation (TS) was calculated. Genotyping was performed using the Axiom Precision Medicine Research Array (PMRA; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Seventy-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes implicated in iron metabolism were analyzed, including SLC40A1 (ferroportin), HFE (homeostatic iron regulator), HJV (hemojuvelin), HAMP (hepcidin), and TFR2 (transferrin receptor 2). SNPs whose variants were not represented in this cohort, including HFE C282Y and H63D, were excluded. Ensembl and NCBI databases were used to describe the wild-type (WT)/variant alleles and gene consequences. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze binary outcomes, and age-adjusted linear regression for Tx burden. Odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β) were estimated using the WT as the reference. Multiple-testing correction was performed as necessary. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.4.1, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: We included 60 genotyped, confirmed HbSS patients; median age was 22 years (range: 18–43), 22 (37.3%) were female, 42 (70.0%) were classified as mild severity (Class I), 5 (8.0%) as Class II, and 13 (22.0%) as severe (Class III). Twenty-seven (45.0%) had never received a blood Tx, while 33 (55.0%) had received Tx, median of 2units (range: 1-10). On univariate analysis (UVA), five SNPs (rs10218795, rs10188230, rs114250626, rs4287798, and rs634349) were significantly associated with severe phenotype; three of these remained significant on multivariable analysis (MVA). Two were associated with higher odds of severe phenotype: rs10177654 (OR = 28.9, 95% CI: 3.0–100.0, p = 0.03) and rs10218795 (OR = 15.0, 95% CI: 2.4–327.0, p<0.01), while rs10188230 was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.008–0.28, p<0.01). Results remained consistent after adjusting for age. For lifetime transfusion burden, both UVA and MVA identified two significant SNPs: rs4667289, associated with higher transfusion burden (β = 2.6, 95% CI: 0.04–5.2, p = 0.047) and rs11568344, associated with lower transfusion burden (β = –1.8, 95% CI: –3.5 to –0.36, p = 0.02). Genotype distributions for the five significant SNPs were as follows: rs10177654 (SLC40A1, transcription factor binding site), TT(WT) 12 (20.3%), TC 30 (50.8%), CC 17 (28.8%); rs10188230 (SLC40A1, intron variant), TT (WT) 32 (54.2%), TC 22 (37.3%), CC 5 (8.5%); rs10218795 (HJV, intron variant), CC (WT) 22 (37.3%), TC 29 (49.2%), TT 8 (13.6%); rs4667289 (SLC40A1 proximal intergenic), GG (WT) 46 (78.0%), AG 10 (16.9%), AA 3 (5.1%); rs11568344 (SLC40A1 splice region variant), GG (WT) 47 (79.7%), AG 9 (15.3%), AA 3 (5.1%). Compared with the homozygous WT, patients with rs10188230 had a lower median TS (21.65% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.04), while those with rs4667289 had a higher median TS (83% vs. 31%, p<0.01). When adjusted for age and lifetime Tx, rs4667289 remained significant (β = 47.8, 95% CI 3.6-82.8, p = 0.03). No other SNPs showed association with TS. Conclusion: We present novel genetic data on iron-regulatory variants in African patients with sickle cell disease, identifying SNPs in SLC40A1 and HJV associated with disease severity. Most of these are yet to be fully described in the literature, and their intronic locations suggest possible regulatory roles. We hope to further validate these findings in larger cohorts and through functional studies to clarify their impact on iron metabolism and clinical significance.

Abstract Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the leading cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Clinical scoring systems (e.g., EBMT, HCT-CI, DRI, etc.) can stratify risk but show modest predictive performance (C-statistics 0.49–0.67) when it comes to GVHD. To address this gap, we developed GVHD-Intel 1.0, a real-time, scalable, and interpretable machine learning (ML) framework from an international study to predict both acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), providing individual and bulk predictions using common input variables and HLA alleles. Methods: This retrospective global study, approved by respective institutional review boards, included electronic health records from three tertiary care centers in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Jordan, from 2009 to 2023. The model was developed in phases. The UAE399 cohort (399 HSCT recipients) served as the baseline dataset. To enhance model generalizability, 55 adult allo-HSCT recipients from KHCC were added to the training set. Two distinct test cohorts were used: UAE46 (46 allogeneic HSCT recipients from UAE) and KHCC150 (150 adult allogeneic HSCT recipients from KHCC), collected later and independently of training data. Variables included donor type, sex mismatch, disease status, time from diagnosis to transplant, and agents used in conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis (e.g., TBI, ATG, alemtuzumab use etc.). HLA alleles (A, B, C, DQ, DR) were symbolically encoded and transformed via one-hot encoding. GVHD events were classified as aGVHD (<100 days) or cGVHD (≥100 days). Missing values were excluded, and class imbalance was handled via class weighting. GVHD-Intel 1.0, co-developed with MBZ University of Artificial Intelligence, features modular ensemble architecture, drug-level feature engineering, novel HLA encoding for low-resolution compatibility scoring, and built-in interpretability using SHAP and LIME. The framework is cloud-deployable for both real-time and batch predictions. Results: The GVHD-Intel 1.0 was externally tested on two independent, temporally and institutionally distinct cohorts (UAE46 and KHCC150), demonstrating strong and consistent predictive performance for both acute and chronic GVHD. For cGVHD prediction, the model achieved an AUC (area under the curve or C-statistic for binary outcomes) of 0.832, F1 score of 0.896, accuracy of 82.7%, PPV of 0.930, sensitivity of 0.864, Brier score of 0.178, and log loss of 0.543. For aGVHD, performance metrics included an AUC of 0.802, F1 score of 0.860, accuracy of 77.6%, PPV of 0.930, sensitivity of 0.799, Brier score of 0.196, and log loss of 0.581. Model calibration remained strong across both tasks, with Brier scores <0.20. Conclusions: GVHD-Intel 1.0 is a robust, interpretable machine learning framework developed from real-world, multicenter data. By integrating widely available clinical variables and HLA allele data, it outperforms conventional clinical risk scores in predicting both acute and chronic GVHD in allo-HSCT recipients. Slightly reduced performance in aGVHD prediction is likely due to the lack of relevant variables. Next steps include prospective validation across multiple transplant centers globally and continued refinement through expanded data integration. GVHD-Intel 1.0 holds strong potential as a clinically valuable, scalable decision-support tool that can be enacted widely and easily by practicing transplant physicians worldwide in all types of settings.

Abstract Introduction Although chemo-free regimens are increasingly used in elderly patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), most still receive conventional chemoimmunotherapy. Patients up to 75–80 years old are usually treated with full-dose R-CHOP, while 80+ patients receive the attenuated R-miniCHOP regimen as standard of care. Prior studies have shown that in patients aged 65+ years, R-CHOP was associated with improved survival based on propensity score matching (PSM) analysis (Al-Sarayfi, Am J Hematol, 2023), though this did not include comorbidity data. Furthermore, no formal studies have focused specifically on 80+ patients. We aimed to perform a PSM comparison of R-CHOP versus R-miniCHOP to better inform treatment decisions in this population. Methods We harmonized and pooled data from 237 LBCL patients receiving chemotherapy with rituximab (out of all 263 80+ patients) from the prospective LEO cohort (USA, n=147; 2015–2020) and NiHiL registry (Czech Republic, single center, n=116; 2010–2023). Of them, 205 (86%) receiving anthracycline(A)-based regimens were included. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes were collected. PSM (1:1, caliper 0.2) was performed to compare R-CHOP and R-miniCHOP using age, ECOG performance status (PS), clinical stage, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and major comorbidities (heart disease, history of stroke, and other recent cancer) as matching variables. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and lymphoma-specific survival (LSS, defined as death attributed to lymphoma progression). Results Among 205 A-treated patients, median age was 83 years (range 80–99); 30% had ECOG PS 2–4, 67% clinical stage III–IV, 34% ≥2 involved extranodal sites, 59% elevated LDH, and 58% had International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores 3–5. Median follow-up was 5.5 years; median OS and EFS were 4.1 and 3.4 years, resp. A-based regimens comprised full-dose R-CHOP-like (n=79; 39%; R-CHOP n=74, DA-EPOCH-R n=5) and R-miniCHOP (n=126; 61%). Patients receiving R-CHOP-like regimens had more favorable baseline characteristics (median age 82 vs 83 years, P=0.04; ECOG PS 2–4: 16% vs 39%, P<0.01; IPI 3–5: 46% vs 66%, P=0.03) and a lower, though not statistically significant, comorbidity burden (mean 1.14 vs 1.39; heart disease 35% vs 45%, P=0.22; history of stroke 4% vs 6%, P=0.64; other cancer 6% vs 5%, P=0.87). R-CHOP-like regimens vs R-miniCHOP had superior OS (median 6.3 vs 3.4 years; HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.90; P=0.01) and EFS (median 5.3 vs 2.1 years; HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.40–0.83; P<0.01), with no significant difference in LSS (2-year 89% vs 82%, HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.39–1.54, P=0.46). To mitigate selection bias, we performed PSM on patients with available baseline characteristics treated with R-CHOP (n=69) and R-miniCHOP (n=121), resulting in 63 matched pairs. Matched cohorts were well-balanced on age (median 82 years in both cohorts; P=0.68), ECOG PS 2–4 (17% vs 19%; P=0.82), IPI 3–5 (52% vs. 59%; P=0.41), and comorbidity burden (mean 1.10 vs. 1.29; P=0.30). The presence of heart disease (40% in both cohorts), history of stroke (5% vs 6%), and cancer (5% vs 6%) were similar. Survival modestly favored R-CHOP, but differences were not significant: median OS 5.3 vs 3.5 years (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.46–1.15; P=0.17), median EFS 3.8 vs 2.8 years (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.49–1.18; P=0.23), and 2-year LSS 88% vs 84% (HR=1.09; 95% CI 0.45–2.63; P=0.85). Treatment-related mortality was similar in both cohorts (16%). Among R-miniCHOP patients, survival outcomes did not differ between matched (n=63) and unmatched (n=63) groups (OS P=0.72; EFS P=0.23; LSS P=0.27). Unmatched (n=16) R-CHOP patients had a trend toward improved survival compared to matched (n=63) individuals (OS P=0.10; EFS P=0.049; LSS P=0.24). Conclusion This is the first PSM-based analysis comparing R-CHOP and R-miniCHOP in LBCL patients 80+ years old. Despite inherent limitations of a non-randomized design and limited number of matched patients, our findings – derived from two prospective cohorts – suggest that R-miniCHOP may offer outcomes comparable to R-CHOP, particularly with respect to LSS. While these results support R-miniCHOP as an appropriate frontline option, treatment decisions remain highly individualized. These data may help inform clinical decision-making and provide a basis for designing future trials targeting this population, where R-miniCHOP could serve as a comparator arm. Funding: NU21-03-00411, U01 CA195568.

Abstract Introduction: Liso-cel, an autologous, CD19-directed CAR T cell product, has demonstrated consistent efficacy in a broad population of pts with B-cell malignancies, including R/R LBCL. Its well-established safety profile has made OP delivery commonplace. This, combined with recent changes to postinfusion monitoring requirements, offers pts the potential for greater access to care. Here, we describe real-world safety and effectiveness outcomes for pts with R/R LBCL who received liso-cel as standard of care (SOC) therapy in the inpatient (IP) or OP setting. Methods: This was an observational study of pts in the US with R/R LBCL who received commercial liso-cel as second-line (2L) or later treatment (tx) in the IP or OP setting between 02/2021 and 02/2025 and had ≥1 postinfusion assessment reported in the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Safety outcomes included rates of AEs of special interest and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Postinfusion hospitalizations in the OP group were also assessed. Effectiveness outcomes included ORR, CR rate, duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. All results are reported descriptively. Results: Of 1116 eligible pts, 34% (n=375) were intended for OP tx, as reported to the CIBMTR, including 82 of 195 (42%) pts who received liso-cel as 2L tx. Among pts treated in the IP vs OP setting, median (range) age was 71.5 y (21.5–91.2) and 69.8 y (25.0–86.1), respectively, and most pts were male (59% and 61%). Proportions of pts with high-grade B-cell lymphoma (16% and 12%), ≥2 extranodal involvement sites (26% and 26%), and secondary CNS involvement (5% and 4%) were similar for the IP and OP groups, respectively. In contrast, 48% vs 37% of pts in the IP vs OP groups, respectively, had elevated LDH before infusion and 10% vs 3% had ECOG PS ≥2. One or more comorbidities were reported for 72% and 65% (including cardiac, 36% and 32%; pulmonary, 30% and 26%; active infections requiring ongoing tx, 6% and 3%) of pts in the IP and OP groups, respectively. Median (range) number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (1–13) in the IP group and 3 (1–16) in the OP group. Use of bridging therapy was reported in 65% of the IP group and 62% of the OP group. Median (95% CI) follow-up for this study was 12.7 mo (12.5–13) in the IP group and 12.6 mo (12.4–12.8) in the OP group. Safety was similar in both settings; any-grade CRS was reported in 52% of IP vs 49% of OP setting pts, with low rates of grade 2 CRS (15% vs 11%) and grade ≥3 CRS (3% vs 2%) in both groups. Any-grade immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) rates were also similar in pts in the IP vs OP setting (28% vs 23%), with low rates of grade 2 ICANS (5% vs 4%) and grade ≥3 ICANS (10% vs 8%). Prolonged cytopenia (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia at 30 d after infusion) was reported in 12% and 14% in the IP and OP groups; clinically significant infections at any time after infusion occurred in 48% of IP and 42% of OP setting pts. In the IP and OP groups, 37% and 30% of pts died, most commonly due to PD (25% and 21%) and the NRM rates at 12 mo were 7.1 (95% CI, 5.2–9.4) and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.2–6.8). Among OP setting pts, 46% were not hospitalized after infusion; of those hospitalized after OP infusion, median (IQR) time to hospitalization was 5 d (3-8) and duration of stay was 5 d (3-9). Response rates were high in both the IP (ORR, 80% [95% CI, 77–83]; CR rate, 70% [95% CI, 66–73]) and OP setting (ORR, 83% [95% CI, 79–87]; CR rate, 74% [95% CI, 69–79]). At ~12 mo follow-up, median (95% CI) DOR was not reached (NR; NR–NR) in either group with 12-mo DOR rates of 59% (95% CI, 54–63) and 63% (95% CI, 56–69), respectively. Median (95% CI) PFS was 11.8 mo (8.8–NR) in the IP group vs NR (NR–NR) in the OP group, with 12-mo PFS rates of 49% (95% CI, 45–53) and 56% (95% CI, 50–61), respectively. Median (95% CI) OS was NR (NR–NR) in both groups with 12-mo OS rates of 65% (95% CI, 61–68) in the IP group and 74% (95% CI, 68–78) in the OP group. Conclusions: These results continue to demonstrate that one-time tx with liso-cel results in deep, clinically meaningful efficacy in the SOC setting across a broad population of pts with R/R LBCL. Despite the few differences reported in baseline characteristics, outcomes were consistent among pts treated in the IP and OP care settings. The well-established safety profile of liso-cel is conducive to OP tx, allowing ~50% of pts to remain out of the hospital postinfusion.

Abstract Introduction CAR T cell treatment is the standard of care for patients (pts) with primary refractory and relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) within the first 12 months of chemoimmunotherapy, or for those unfit for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) regardless of timing of relapse. Consequently, the role of ASCT is limited to pts with late relapse (>12 months) who achieve a complete or partial response (CR or PR) to salvage therapy and are deemed eligible for ASCT based on comorbidities and performance status. In this report, we evaluated post-ASCT outcomes in this population of pts. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using publicly available data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Adult pts (age ≥18 years) with DLBCL, NOS, and high-grade large B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) who relapsed after having responded to initial treatment and who remained on response for at least 12 months since diagnosis were selected. We considered for this analysis only pts who achieved a CR or PR after salvage treatment at the time of relapse, documented on pre-ASCT CT or PET scan (per the 2014 Lugano definition). CIBMTR databases used for this study included pts who received ASCT from 2013 to 2021. We compared baseline characteristics between ASCT in CR vs PR using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables after ignoring missing data. Primary endpoints included Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rate were among the secondary endpoints. Results 182 were included in the analysis: 100 were in CR and 82 in PR before ASCT. The median age at ASCT was 60 years (range, 26-79). Race distribution was similar across CR and PR pts. Advanced-stage disease at diagnosis (stage III–IV) was seen in 61% of CR pts and 55% of PR pts. High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements was similar in the CR and PR groups (7% vs 4%). The median number of lines of treatment before ASCT were identical in CR and PR pts (N=2). BEAM was the most frequently used transplant conditioning regimen in both groups (80%). Median follow-up after ASCT was 34 months (range, 1–95): it was 37 months (range 1-95) in the CR group and 26 months (range 1-79) in the PR group For the entire cohort, OS at 3 years was 67.6% and PFS was 50.6%. NRM was 1.7% at 100 days and 3.4% at 1 year. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 43.9%. The NRM analysis showed no statistically significant difference between pts in CR and PR. The 3-year OS for CR pts was 73.9%% compared to 59.4% for PR pts (95% CI, 0.334-0.99; p=.044). The 3-year PFS for CR pts was 59.8%, compared to 38.6% for PR pts (95% CI, 0.321-0.784; p=.001). The median PFS for CR pts was 52.01 months, compared to 14.05 months for PR pts. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years in CR and PR pts was 35.2% vs 55.7%, respectively (95% CI, 0.311-0.811; p=.003.). Higher age (HR 1.03; p=.026) and number of previous lines of treatment (HR 1.43; p=.002) were associated with inferior OS. For PFS, no variables showed any significant impact in univariable analysis. The stepwise multivariable analysis showed that only the number of previous treatments had a significant impact on the OS (p=.009), while undergoing ASCT on a PR was the only factor significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.82; p=.029). Conclusion This dataset supports that ASCT provides high efficacy in pts experiencing late relapses (after 12 months) achieving CR following pre-transplant savage and validates the value of achieving CR. Outcomes for PR are inferior, and this analysis provides a benchmark for future investigations. At this time, until convincing on other non-transplant treatment show superior outcomes in this setting, ASCT remains a standard of care for fit pts with chemo-sensitive late relapsed DLBCL. In this group of patients, who have a better prognosis compared to patients who relapse within a year the major hurdle is achieving a remission pre-ASCT.

Abstract Introduction: IRAKLIA is an international, open-label, non-inferiority (NI) trial (NCT05405166) investigating isatuximab (Isa) subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) administration, plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone (Pd) and the first Phase 3 multiple myeloma (MM) trial using an on-body injector (OBI). IRAKLIA demonstrated NI in its co-primary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR) and steady state trough concentration (Ctrough; Cycle(C) 6 Day(D) 1 predose). IsaOBI offers hands-free administration of flat-dose Isa, a small, hidden, retractable needle to prevent sharps injury and low-pressure delivery. Here, we examine the effect of body weight (BW) on pharmacokinetics (PK) as well as efficacy and safety outcomes with flat-dose IsaOBI vs IV + Pd in IRAKLIA. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM ≥18 years (yr) with ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) were randomized 1:1 to IsaOBI (1400mg; n=263) or IV (10mg/kg; n=264 weekly in C1, then every 2 weeks + P (4mg/day, D1–21) + d (40mg [20mg if ≥75yr] weekly) in 4-week cycles. This analysis is run by BW (≤65kg, >65–≤85kg, >85kg) which was a stratification factor, and extreme BW (≤50kg, >50–≤100kg, >100kg). Results: Number of pts per BW group were: ≤50kg [OBI n=16, IV n=14], ≤65kg [OBI n=84, IV n=85], >65–≤85kg [OBI n=117, IV n=118], >85kg [OBI n=62, IV n=65], and >100kg [OBI n=22, IV n=22]. Baseline (BL) demographic and disease characteristics were generally balanced across BW groups for IsaOBI vs IV, including age (median 66yr) and prior LOT (median 2). However, in the >100kg group, more IsaOBI vs IV pts exhibited poor prognostic characteristics including plasmacytoma, International Staging System Stage II/III disease, beta 2-microglobulin level ≥5.5mg/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2 and a lower very good partial response (VGPR) rate as best overall response at last regimen. Flat-dose IsaOBI showed adequate exposure (C2D1 Ctrough) for all BW groups, with geometric mean ratios (90% CI) vs IV >1: ≤65kg (1.628 [1.294–2.048]), >65–≤85kg (1.303 [1.089–1.560]) and >85kg (1.006 [0.817–1.239]). IsaOBI ORRs were comparable to IV across BW: ≤65kg, 66% vs 71% (relative risk [RR]: 0.928), >65–≤85kg, 70% vs 70% (RR: 1.009), and >85kg, 81% vs 72% (RR: 1.115). For extreme BW groups, ORRs (95% CI) were similar between IsaOBI and IV for ≤50kg group [56% vs 60%] and for >50–≤100kg [72(66–78)% vs 70(63–76)%] but lower [68% vs 86%] in >100kg group. An exposure-response (E-R) analysis showed the impact of BW on response: IsaOBI pts ≤50kg tended to respond less vs IsaOBI pts >50kg despite correct exposure because they were confounded by BL disease characteristicsincluding a higher proportion of high-risk cytogenetics and plasma cells in the bone marrow vs other BW group pts. For IsaOBI and IV, Grade (Gr)≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and Gr≥3 treatment-related TEAEs decreased with increasing BW. They were similar between arms in ≤65kg group (OBI vs IV, Gr≥3 TEAEs: 87% vs 88%; Gr≥3 treatment-related TEAEs: 73% vs 77%). A similar trend was observed in extreme BW groups along with similar incidences between arms in ≤50kg group. While TE serious AEs (TESAEs) and treatment-related TESAEs decreased with increasing BW for IsaIV, incidence was stable in the IsaOBI arm. OBI arm OBI Gr5 TEAEs were similar between groups and arms, except for higher incidence in ≤65kg group (12% vs 5%) with OBI vs IV that was not reflected in ≤50 or >50–≤100kg groups. Treatment discontinuation rates for all drugs with IsaOBI vs IV were 14% vs 6% (≤65kg), 8% vs 10% (>65–≤85kg), and 2% vs 10% (>85kg). Similar incidence of Gr≥3 laboratory (lab) neutropenia was observed across BW in IsaOBI: 86.9% (≤65kg), 83.5% (>65–≤85kg) and 83.9% (>85kg). Higher rates of Gr≥3 lab neutropenia were observed in ≤50kg group (93.8%, IsaOBI vs 71.4%, IsaIV), which did not translate into higher rates of neutropenic complications (18.8% vs 14.3%). The E-R analysis revealed no relationship between Isa PK exposure and safety for OBI and IV arms. Conclusions: No notable impact from IsaOBI flat dosing was observed across BW groups. Flat-dose Isa OBI showed consistent safety and efficacy across different BW groups, with differences likely linked to BL disease characteristics according to the E-R analysis. The IsaOBI C2D1 Ctrough, a time-independent predictor of efficacy, was similar to, or higher vs IsaIV in each BW group, supportive of a flat dose providing adequate exposure without need for adjustment.

Abstract Background: Clonotypic peptide detection by mass spectrometry (MS) leverages monoclonal protein (M-protein) de novo sequencing and peptide quantification to enable ultra-sensitive blood-based monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM) patient M-protein kinetics. Etentamig is a 2nd generation BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody that has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) MM (Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43;16:suppl.7527). In the current study, we explored the depth and kinetics of MS M-protein response to etentamig monotherapy in serum samples from Phase 1 M22-466 (NCT03933735) study patients. The correlation between blood-based MS M-protein levels and bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity as determined by next generation sequencing (NGS) was also evaluated. Method: Clonotypic peptide MS using M-Insight (Sebia/Corgenix) was performed on serum samples from a subset of MRD evaluable patients enrolled into the Phase 1 (NCT03933735) clinical trial of etentamig monotherapy in patients with RRMM. Bone marrow MRD negativity (<10-5 and 10-6) analysis was determined by NGS (clonoSEQ, Adaptive Biotechnologies). Patient pre-treatment (Cycle [C] 1 Day [D] 1) serum samples were digested with proteolytic enzymes to permit sequencing of the M-protein heavy and light chain. Clonotypic peptides specific to the patient's complementarity-determining regions were selected for quantification by MS. Clonotypic peptide quantification by MS was performed on available tracking peripheral blood samples at C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, and C5D1 time points post etentamig monotherapy treatment. Results: Twenty patients who were MRD evaluable and treated with 40 mg and 60 mg doses of etentamig with available serum samples collected from C1D1–C5D1 time points were selected for M-Insight evaluation. Of the 20 patients, 16 (80%) had at least one clonotypic peptide identified prior to etentamig treatment that was utilized for tracking at subsequent time points. Rapid decline in MS M-protein levels was observed in patients treated with etentamig, which strongly correlated with the patients' best International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response. At C3D1 post etentamig treatment, patients with complete response (CR)/stringent CR (n=9) demonstrated a significant decline from MS M-protein levels (median: 1.8±0.9 g/dL at C1D1 to 0.03±0.2 g/dL at C3D1) (P<0.001). All evaluable subjects (n=16) had detectable MS M-protein at all time points (n=80). The lowest detectable M-protein level observed in the current dataset was 44 mg/dL (lower limit of quantitation of assay: 10 mg/dL). Subsequent analysis of differences in kinetics between MRD-negative (<10-5) (n=8) and MRD-positive (n=8) patients revealed a deeper reduction in M-protein levels for MRD-negative patients (median 0.02±0.2 g/dL at C3D1 compared with 0.4±0.3 g/dL at C3D1 for MRD-positive patients). Among the 8 patients who achieved MRD negativity at 10-5 threshold, 5 patients also achieved <10-6 threshold, and serum MS M-protein levels remained detectable in these patients (0.07±0.2 g/dL). Conclusions: Using MS-based clonotypic peptide detection, rapid and deep decline in serum M-protein levels was observed in RRMM patients treated with etentamig. Strong concordance was observed between MS M-protein levels and IMWG response, including in patients achieving MRD-negative CR at <10-5 and 10-6thresholds. Non-invasive and ultra-sensitive M-protein detection is feasible in MM and may serve as a key biomarker for enhancing the detection of residual disease in the future.

Abstract Background Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by uncontrolled terminal complement activation leading to intravascular hemolysis (IVH), thrombosis, and premature mortality. The complement C5 inhibitor (C5i) ravulizumab provides immediate, complete, and sustained inhibition of terminal complement activity through an 8-weekly weight-based dosing interval, resulting in control of IVH, reduced morbidity (thrombosis rate) and mortality (improved survival). Pivotal trials of ravulizumab have shown durable efficacy and safety (Kulasekararaj et al. Ann Hematol 2025). While real-world evidence supporting its use is accumulating, further data are needed to more comprehensively characterize its effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice.Aims To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of ravulizumab among US patients with PNH over 1 year, based on physician chart review data. Methods Medical chart data from 127 US patients with PNH who started ravulizumab between June 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023 were randomly selected and abstracted by 50 hematologists/oncologists from academic (n=25) or community (n=25) settings. Included patients were aged ≥18 years on the date of ravulizumab initiation (index), had ≥12 months of medical data pre- and post-index, and continued ravulizumab for ≥12 months, unless the patient died. Complement inhibitor (Ci)-experienced patients had previous eculizumab or pegcetacoplan use pre-index; Ci-naive patients had no previous use of any Ci pre-index. Outcomes included changes in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin (Hb), and absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) up to 12 months post-index. Breakthrough IVH (BT-IVH) events (defined as LDH ≥2 × upper limit of normal [ULN; 246 U/L] and ≥1 of the following: anemia, dyspnea, hemoglobinuria, or fatigue) were assessed from index to earliest of death, loss to follow-up, ravulizumab discontinuation, or chart abstraction. Event rate was calculated per 10 person-years (PY).Results The sample included 69 Ci-naive (mean [standard deviation; SD] age: 51.4 [14.1] years; 59.4% male) and 58 Ci-experienced patients (mean [SD] age: 45.0 [14.7] years; 51.7% male; previous eculizumab: n=52; previous pegcetacoplan: n=6). In both respective cohorts, ravulizumab was associated with significant reductions in mean (SD) LDH level at month 12 (−348 [424] U/L and −20 [75] U/L; p<0.001 and p<0.05), with improvements observed from 1-month post-index. Similarly, mean (SD) Hb levels significantly increased over 12 months (2.2 [1.8] g/dL and 1.3 [1.5] g/dL, respectively; p<0.001 for both), with improvements seen as early as 1-month post-index. Significant reductions in mean (SD) ARC were observed 1-month post-index and were maintained for up to 12 months in Ci-naive patients (−45 [52] × 103/μL; p<0.001). This effect was not observed in Ci-experienced patients (−7 [85] × 103/μL; p=0.536). Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years (Ci-naive) and 1.6 years (Ci-experienced), 4 BT-IVH events occurred in 4 Ci-naive patients (5.8%; event rate: 0.30 per 10 PY), and 7 events occurred in 5 Ci-experienced patients (8.6%; event rate: 0.69 per 10 PY). All events were resolved without transfusion, dose modification, or discontinuation of ravulizumab, and no events resulted in thrombosis. Summary/Conclusion These real-world data from US adults with PNH showed that ravulizumab was associated with early and sustained significant and clinically meaningful improvements in hematological markers for PNH, in both Ci-naive patients and those with prior eculizumab or pegcetacoplan use. Ravulizumab treatment was associated with a low incidence of BT-IVH events, and all events were resolved without the need for transfusion, dose adjustment, or treatment discontinuation. Importantly, no thrombotic events occurred during these events. Despite the known differences in data collection between clinical trial and real-world populations, these findings align with an analysis of long-term clinical trial data from Kulasekararaj et al. (2025), which reported BT-IVH in 14.8% of C5i-naive (event rate: 1.0 per 10 PY) and 7.8% of eculizumab-experienced patients (event rate: 0.33 per 10 PY) with PNH over a follow-up period of up to 6 years (median: 3.9 and 2.7 years, respectively). Overall, this analysis supports the use of ravulizumab, with only 6–7 infusions per year, as an effective treatment for patients with PNH in the real-world setting.