Citations

Abstract Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted T cell engagers (TCEs) have emerged as a highly potent immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, both primary and acquired resistance significantly limit the durability of responses. Antigen escape and development of dysfunctional T cell responses are a significant driver of relapse post-therapy. Here, we preclinically interrogate if continual versus intermittent/response-adapted dosing differently affects development of resistance, the translatability to clinical resistance mechanisms, and how tumor-intrinsic or microenvironmental factors shape the development of resistance to BCMA-TCEs. Methods: We utilized a syngeneic transplantable Vk*MYC MM model which permits clonal tracking through unique immunoglobulin rearrangements. Two cohorts of tumor-bearing mice were treated with a murine surrogate BCMA-TCE using distinct strategies: (1) continuous weekly dosing until disease progression, and (2) an “ intermittent/response-adapted” strategy, where treatment was paused after initial response and resumed upon detection of M-spike. At time of relapse on therapy, RNA-seq was performed on isolated tumor cells to investigate mutations in- or loss of Tnfrsf17/BCMA. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was also performed on 189,025 cells isolated from bone marrow and extramedullary sites. Results: Both continuous and intermittent treatment regimens resulted in similar overall survival. BCMA-TCE treatment induced a distinctive pattern of disease progression, with para- and extra-medullary dissemination observed in 31% (17/54) of treated mice—regardless of treatment schedule. Given this treatment-induced dissemination hasn't been historically observed in our model, we further profiled BCMA expression and infiltrating immune cells to understand relapse mechanisms at these sites. Furthermore, we noted lower BCMA expression in tumors from continuously treated mice compared to untreated or stop-and-go cohorts. Importantly, reduced BCMA expression occurred without loss of plasma cell identity indicating that lineage switching may not be occurring as observed in other hematological malignancies treated similarly (Ruella, 2023, Nat Rev Drug Discov); malignant cells retained high expression of canonical plasma cell markers Irf4, Prdm1, Xbp1, Sdc1. We identified three mechanisms of acquired resistance:Genomic BCMA loss: Complete and irreversible loss of BCMA due to retrotransposition of IAP particles into the first intron of Tnfrsf17, disrupting transcription of downstream exons. This represented a genomic mechanism of antigen escape occurring with continual and prolonged TCE dosing, disrupting transcription and eliminating surface BCMA.Transient BCMA downregulation: Transient downregulation of BCMA expression associated with rapid disease relapse under continuous treatment. Tumors exhibited low BCMA levels and widespread dissemination in paramedullary sites. However, re-transplantation into naïve hosts led to restoration of BCMA expression and re-sensitization to TCE, indicating antigen loss was not permanent.Resistance without antigen loss: In the intermittent dosing regimen, several cases achieved complete remission after two doses, relapsed after treatment pause, and were not controlled after subsequent retreatment. Despite preserved BCMA expression and absence of BCMA mutations or deletions, tumors were refractory to retreatment, suggesting a tumor extrinsic mechanism of resistance. scRNA-seq analysis of the tumor microenvironment is ongoing and the role of uniquely identified immune infiltrates, like NK-like lymphocytes and distinct macrophages, in shaping the cell responses is under consideration. Conclusion: Resistance to BCMA-TCE therapy in the Vk*MYC model of MM arises through multiple mechanisms including genomic antigen loss and transient antigen downregulation. Continuous therapy drives selective pressure leading to target loss via genomic or epigenetic routes, while intermittent dosing preserves antigen but permits resistance to TCE, potentially through immune escape mediated by microenvironmental changes. These insights underscore the translatability of the Vk*MYC model for evaluating rational combination therapies to mitigate these resistance mechanisms. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an IACUC or through an ethical review process.

Abstract Background: For patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), extramedullary relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) carries an extremely unfavorable prognosis. As a new immunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has shown remarkable effects in refractory or relapsed B-ALL (r/r B-ALL). However, there is still a lack of evidence for its efficacy and safety in patients with extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic CAR-T in such high-risk populations. Method: We conducted a prospective clinical study, during which 7 patients with B-ALL who experienced extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT were enrolled between October 2019 and January 2025. These patients all received allogeneic CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. We prospectively evaluated the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes following CAR-T treatment. This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (No. ChiCTR2000036350). Results: This study included 7 patients with extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT. Median age was 21 years (range: 15 - 46 years), and the median follow-up time was 415 days (range: 130 - 1320 days). The last follow-up was conducted until July 5, 2025. All the patients were classified as high-risk patients before transplantation. Four of them were Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL positive (Ph+). The sites of extramedullary relapse included: 5 cases of central nervous system (among which 2 cases were accompanied by BCR-ABL molecular relapse in the bone marrow), 1 case of testicular relapse, and 1 case of extensive extramedullary relapse. The median interval from transplantation to extramedullary relapse was 628 days (44 - 1225 days). All patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or targeted therapy to reduce tumor burden before infusion. The infusion dose of CAR-T cells was 4 - 10 × 10⁶/kg. After infusion, one patient developed grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and grade 4 immune effector cell-related neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), while the remaining patients did not experience grade 2 or higher CRS or ICANS. No patients developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and all adverse events were resolved. In terms of therapeutic efficacy, one patient was considered unresponsive at the first assessment after infusion (54 days after infusion). The remaining 6 patients all achieved complete remission (CR) efficacy. The median duration of CR was 275 days (range: 120 - 1305 days). During the follow-up period, one patient suffered from central nervous system relapse again at 275 days post-infusion, while the other 5 maintained a continuous CR. The expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood peaked between days 8 to 15 post-infusion, with a median peak of 1.90E+05 copies/μg DNA (range: 1.78E+04 – 3.18E+05 copies/μg DNA), and the longest duration of detectable expansion was 1320 days. Furthermore, CAR-T cells were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of three patients, indicating their capability for targeted migration and central nervous system infiltration. Conclusion: Overall, allogeneic CAR-T therapy has demonstrated excellent safety and durable anti-leukemia effects in high-risk ALL patients with extramedullary relapse after transplantation.

Abstract Background: The addition of the CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager, blinatumomab, to standard consolidation chemotherapy in adults with ALL who achieved a measurable residual disease negative (MRDneg) remission (CR), demonstrated an improvement in 3-year overall survival (OS, 85% vs 68%, HR 0.41, P=0.002) and 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS, 80% vs 64%, HR 0.53) compared to conventional chemotherapy in the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 study (Litzow et al, NEJM 2024). Given the complex therapy in this study, treatment delays and modifications are expected. We herein explored the impact of such delays on patient outcomes. Methods: In the phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN E1910 trial (NCT02003222), adults aged 30-70 years with newly diagnosedALL who had achieved MRDneg CR following induction and intensification were randomized to consolidation chemotherapy with blinatumomab (blina arm) or chemotherapy alone (chemo arm). We examined the association between the timing of the initiation of maintenance therapy and OS and RFS. The expected duration of consolidation was 252 days vs 126 days for patients on the blina and chemo arms, respectively. For this analysis, participants were classified into two groups (no/short delay or long delay) depending on whether they started on time/before or after the median time between the beginning of consolidation and start of maintenance therapy for their treatment group (medians: 335 days, range, 181-457 days vs 176 days, range, 139-265 days for blina and chemo arms, respectively). Multivariate analyses of OS and RFS were performed to examine the effect of no/short delay vs. long delay in starting maintenance. Patients were stratified according to their assigned consolidation treatment arm, and the models were further adjusted for age, sex, white blood cell count, platelets, hemoglobin, peripheral blood blasts, bone marrow blasts, performance status and genetic-genomic risk at diagnosis. Results: Of the 488 patients enrolled, 224 MRDneg patients were randomized to consolidation chemotherapy with or without blinatumomab and 135 of the 224 went on to maintenance therapy on study (N= 66 on blina arm and 69 on chemo arm, respectively). The median follow-up from the time of maintenance registration was 43.4 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients in either arm who experienced no/short delay or long delay. In the blina group, 60 of 66 patients (90.9%) received all 8 cycles of consolidation therapy of which 31 (45.6%) had long delays. Sixty-eight of 69 patients on the chemo arm (98.5%) received all cycles of consolidation therapy, of which 34 (50%) had a long delay. Strikingly, patients who had a long delay before initiation of maintenance had a significant improvement in OS in multivariate analysis compared to patients who had no/short delay (HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.91; P =0.03). However, within each treatment group, OS benefit did not reach statistical significance (blina arm: HR 0.04, 95% CI: 0.001-1.64; P =0.09; chemo arm: HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.08-1.38; P =0.13). Similar results were observed for RFS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-1.01; P =0.05), though this impact on improved RFS was noted in the chemo arm but not in blinatumomab treated patients (blina arm: HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.10-3.24; P =0.52; chemo arm: HR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.83; P=0.03). Additionally, patients who had no/short delay before starting maintenance experienced a longer median duration of maintenance treatment (blina arm, 548 days; chemo arm, 708 days) compared to patients who had a long delay (blina arm 488 days; chemo arm 598 days) before initiation of maintenance (P=0.0008). Conclusion: In the phase 3 randomized ECOG-ACRIN E1910 clinical trial, long delays between initiation of consolidation therapy and start of maintenance therapy were associated with improved OS compared to no/short delays. However, within each treatment group (blina or chemo), no significant difference of OS was observed. We postulate that these longer delays allowed more patients to receive all of the recommended protocol-assigned therapy thereby resulting in improved survival. Furthermore, patients who had no/short delays had a significantly longer duration of maintenance therapy. These data indicate that treatment delays during consolidation do not worsen survival. Further studies are being done to better understand why patients with long delays had better overall survival.

Abstract Background: Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) remain challenging to treat, particularly in older patients and those with a T-cell phenotype. Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown preclinical synergy with vincristine (VCR) in multiple preclinical ALL models. Following the previously reported establishment of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D), we now report the results of the Phase II (Ph2) portion of EA9152 (VEN 600 mg daily with weekly L-VCR 2.25 mg/m² IV or VCR 1.5 mg/m2 IV capped at 2 mg), evaluating efficacy and safety in this high-risk population. Methods: This open-label, multicenter Phase II study enrolled adults (≥18 years) with R/R B- or T-cell ALL or LL. The phase II portion of this trial was a single-arm, open-label study evaluating the combination of VEN (600 mg po D1–28) with either L-VCR (2.25 mg/m² IV weekly x4) or vincristine sulfate (VCR) (1.4 mg/m² IV weekly x4). Following the market withdrawal of L-VCR in the United States in April 2022, no new patients were initiated on this formulation and patients already receiving L-VCR were transitioned to VCR at the start of their next treatment cycle or sooner if necessitated by drug availability. Prior VCR but not VEN exposure was permitted in Ph2. The primary endpoint was achievement of a complete response or complete response with incomplete count recovery CR + CRi rate by end of cycle 3. Secondary endpoints included measurable residual disease (MRD) response, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The association of phenotype with response and time-to-event were evaluated using Fisher's exact test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients were treated (B-cell ALL/LL: n=12; T-cell ALL/LL: n=9). The trial was terminated early after 22/56 patients were accrued on account of withdrawal of sponsor support. Median age was 50 years and 76.2% were male. Performance status was 0–1 in 85.7%. All patients had received prior chemotherapy; 47.6% had undergone prior transplant. Median number of treatment cycles was 1 (2 for B-cell, 1 for T-cell). By end of cycle 3, no patients in the B-cell cohort (0/12; 90% CI, 0.00–0.22) achieved CR or CRi, 8 had stable disease (SD). In the T-cell cohort, 1 of 9 patients (11.1%; 90% CI, 0.01–0.43) achieved CR, 1 achieved PR and 1 had SD. There was no statistically significant difference in CR + CRi rate between phenotypes (p=0.43). None of the patients achieved an MRD-negative CR/CRi by flow cytometry or molecular methods. At the time of this analysis, 16 of 21 patients had died. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months (95% CI, 1.5–22.0) for B-cell and 10.2 months (95% CI, 2.0–16.4) for T-cell patients (HR 1.32, p=0.60). Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.7–3.7) for B-cell and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.7–4.6) for T-cell cohorts (HR 2.18, p=0.18). Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in most patients. One T-cell patient experienced grade 5 respiratory failure. Among 16 patients enrolled under the revised protocol using VCR, only 1 experienced grade 3 peripheral motor neuropathy, and no peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported (combined AE rate 0.06; 90% CI, 0.00–0.26). Tumor lysis syndrome was not observed in this cohort. Conclusions: The combination of VEN at the established RP2D and L-VCR/VCR was feasible and had an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R ALL/LL. However, response rates, including CR/CRi and MRD negativity, were limited, particularly in the B-cell cohort. Median OS and PFS remain poor in both subtypes, highlighting the need for improved strategies in this high-risk population. Venetoclax, in combination with other chemotherapy regimens, has shown encouraging response rates warranting continued exploration of its benefit in ALL.

Abstract In this study, we investigated tumor intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to cevostamab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting Fc receptor-like protein 5 (FCRL5) and CD3 that has shown promising clinical activity and durable responses in advanced MM. Longitudinal bone marrow aspirates from nine MM patients treated with cevostamab were analyzed. All patients had previously been treated with both immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PI) and eight patients had received daratumumab prior to cevostamab, which was, on average, the 6th line of treatment (mean treatment duration 220±273 days). Five of nine patients responded with ≥PR. Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing was performed on sorted CD138+ MM cells at baseline, and whole exome and transcriptome sequencing was performed on five and three samples, respectively, following cevostamab discontinuation. Baseline FCRL5 expression levels did not correlate with clinical response. However, in one non-responder patient, FCRL5 expression increased four-fold after 28 days of treatment. Given the location of the FCRL5 gene on chromosome 1q—commonly amplified in advanced MM—we evaluated the presence of Gain(1q) in our study cohort. All patients whose best response was ≤PR (n=6) harbored a Gain(1q), whereas it was absent in those who achieved VGPR and sCR (n=3). Crucially, one of the patients that achieved sCR was initially treated with 60 mg of cevostamab for one year and then escalated to a higher dose cohort (90 mg) in the second year. At progression, a clonal FCRL5E115A missense mutation (allelic frequency = 56%) and a subclonal FCRL5G455Efs*19(allelic frequency = 5%) frameshift deletion mutation were detected, both absent at baseline. The missense mutation was located on the extracellular domain of FCRL5 targeted by cevostamab. To validate the functional impact of FCRL5E115Aand FCRL5G455Efs*19 on the sensitivity to cevostamab in vitro, we generated a FCRL5 knockout (KO) model utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 technology in OPM2 MM cells. In vitro cevostamab cytotoxicity assay with PBMCs and pan T cells from healthy donors at various effector to target (E:T) ratios confirmed a complete loss of cevostamab sensitivity in our FCRL5KO models. cDNA encoding patient-derived FCRL5 alterations (FCRL5E115Aand FCRL5G455Efs*19) as well as FCRL5wtwere cloned into mammalian expression vector and reintroduced into FCRL5KO cells. Cevostamab sensitivity was reinstated by FCRL5wt expression in KO cells. In contrast, FCRL5E115A conferred complete resistance to cevostamab (p<0,001) and FCRL5G455Efs*19 depicted a significant decline in cevostamab sensitivity relative to FCRL5wt expressing models. Additional experiment utilizing direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) are ongoing to monitor the membrane localization of FCRL5 mutants. By integrating genomic, transcriptomic and functional data with clinical outcomes, this work is the first to report on acquired FCRL5 mutations causing resistance to cevostamab. We hypothesize that the prolonged treatment duration may have contributed to the acquisition of the target mutations and note a subsequent durable sCR response to BCMA-targeted immunotherapy in the same patient, suggesting immune-related factors such as T cell exhaustion, were not drivers of cevostamab resistance. Due to the limited sample size, these findings require validation in larger cohorts. Nonetheless, our findings begin to elucidate tumor intrinsic mechanisms associated with cevostamab resistance.

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a complex hematologic malignancy, where patients often display one or more potentially high risk cytogenetic alterations associated with poor outcomes. Traditional high risk cytogenetics events in myeloma, such as NSD2 t(4;14) translocations, gain of 1q21, or deletion of 17p13, have often been studied in isolation, but emerging evidence suggests the combination of these high risk alterations has a greater negative prognostic impact than any on their own. This has been recently reflected in risk stratification guidelines from IMS and IMWG, which consider certain events, such as t(4;14), as high risk only in combination with gain of 1q21 or deletion of 1p32. Still, the mechanisms through which multi-hit high risk events disrupt the microenvironment and promote poor outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesize that myelomas with multiple high risk alterations remodel the immune environment to promote tumor progression and immune escape. Methods: To study the role of multi-hit high risk cytogenetics on the immune microenvironment, we analyzed CD138-bone marrow aspirate single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data from 337 newly diagnosed MM patients from the MMRF CoMMpass study, generated as part of the Immune Atlas initiative. Cytogenetic alterations for these patients were derived from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of CD138+ bone marrow aspirates from the MMRF CoMMpass cohort. Patients were classified as multi-hit high-risk MM if they exhibited either (i) two high-risk cytogenetic events, including NSD2 t(4;14), MAF t(14;16), del(17p13), or (ii) one high-risk event with gain of 1q21. Results: Based on cytogenetic information, 33 patients in the Immune Atlas cohort were classified as 'multi-hit’ high-risk, while 34 patients had only a single high-risk alteration. These multi-hit high risk patents displayed significantly worse progression free survival compared to standard risk patients, adjusting for age, therapy, and ASCT (HR=2.34, p<7.2e-5), while single-hit patients showed a non-significant trend towards worse outcomes (HR=1.51, p=0.071). The most frequent multi-hit risk event in the cohort was NSD2 t(4;14) in combination with 1q21, observed in 23 patients. Compositional analysis of the immune populations in the scRNAseq data revealed that relative to both standard and single-hit high risk patients, multi-hit high risk patients displayed significant reductions in IFN-I stimulated CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, marked by decreased expression for antiviral response markers such as ISG15, XAF1, and IFI44L. Enrichment of inflammatory CD16+ non-classical monocytes was also observed. Further analysis of the most frequent multi-hit risk event, NSD2 with 1q21, revealed distinct enrichment of late-activated cytotoxic HLA+ CD8+T cells and cytotoxic CD4+.T cells. Neither alteration was observed in patients with single-hit NSD2 or 1q21. Further analysis on the interactions between high risk events revealed distinct transcriptomic profiles dependent on the high risk events involved, particularly in multi-hit events involving mutations or deletions of TP53 or gain of 1q21. Reduction in IFN-I signaling across various immune populations was primarily restricted to multi-hit risk events involving gain of 1q21. Conversely, patients with biallelic loss of TP53 displayed significant enrichment of these same IFN-I populations. Given this contrast in IFN-I signaling spanning multiple immune subtypes, we hypothesized that the malignant myeloma cells might similarly display altered IFN-I activity. Utilizing CD138+ myeloma bulk RNA sequencing data from CoMMpass, we found that IFN-I response scores strongly correlated between paired scRNA immune and bulk RNAseq tumor datasets (R2: 0.75, p=1.63e-32). Across 660 patients with bulk RNAseq and cytogenetic data, we confirmed significant reductions in IFN-I response scores in tumor cells in multi-hit high risk involving 1q21, and significant enrichment in those with complete loss of TP53 relative to standard-risk MM. Conclusions: Overall, we do observe that MM patients with multiple high risk cytogenetic alterations display distinct immunologic traits relative to standard risk or single-hit high risk patients in addition to significantly worse outcomes. Furthermore, we find variability in the immune alterations observed based on the cytogenetic events involved, further illustrating the heterogeneity in how MM shapes the immune microenvironment.

Abstract Introduction: Achieving rapid and deep hematological responses is essential for improving organ function and reducing early mortality in AL amyloidosis. While daratumumab has transformed the management of newly diagnosed disease, many daratumumab-treated patients will not clear amyloidogenic serum free light chains or will relapse. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly active modality in multiple myeloma, capable of inducing deep and durable remissions. Whether this strategy can be safely and effectively adopted in AL amyloidosis remains an important unanswered question. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved 8 US academic medical centers within the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. We included patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who received BCMA-targeted CAR T therapy to treat AL amyloidosis with concurrent myeloma to investigate the safety, and efficacy of this approach. Results: Between September 2021 and March 2025, we identified 33 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with CAR T (n=9 ide-cel, n=24 cilta-cel). The median age was 69-years (IQR: 60, 72); 48% were female. Most patients were kappa light-chain isotype (61%, n=20), 4 patients (13%) had the t(11;14) translocation. Although baseline plasma cell burden was unknown in 2 cases, all patients had a concurrent diagnosis of myeloma, and 88% of patients had ≥20% bone marrow plasma cells (BPMC) at diagnosis. The median number of prior lines was 6 (range: 3-13), all patients had previous anti-CD38 exposure, and 27 patients (82%) had received previous autologous stem cell transplant. Regarding organ involvement, 11 patients (33%) had cardiac, 9 (27%) renal, 8 (24%) gastrointestinal, 3 (9%) peripheral nerve and 1 (3%) autonomic nerve involvement. Five patients had AL amyloid deposition without known organ involvement. Prior to CAR T, cardiac staging was unavailable or unknown in 19 cases. Of the remaining 14 cases, 6 cases were European Modification of Mayo 2004 stage 3A with no stage 3B cases. Prior to lymphodepletion the median BMPC was 6% (IQR: 1, 20). The overall rate of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 64% (Grade 1, G1: n=15, Grade 2, G2: n=4, Grade 3, G3: n=2), and immune cell associated neurological syndrome (ICANS) was 15% (G1: n=3, G3: n=2). The rate of CRS was 56% for ide-cel (G1: 33%, G2: 22%) and 67% for cilta-cel (G1: 50%, G2: 8%, G3: 8%). The median time to CRS onset was 1 day for ide-cel and 6 days for cilta-cel. The median duration of CRS was 1 day for ide-cel and 2 days for cilta-cel. The rate of ICANS was 11% for ide-cel (G1: n=1), and 16% for cilta-cel (G1: n=2, G3: n=2). There were no cases of non-ICANS neurotoxicity. Ten patients (30%) experienced infections (≥Grade 3 = 9%). The overall response rate (ORR) by AL amyloidosis response criteria (Palladini et al. 2012) was 91%, including n=5 very good partial responses (VGPRs) and n=24 complete responses (CRs). The ORR for ide-cel was 78% (n=6 CRs, n=1 VGPR), and for cilta-cel was 96% (n=18 CRs, n=4 VGPRs). Among responders, the median time to VGPR or better was 30 days (IQR: 29, 32). One cilta-cel recipient died of infection on day 17 prior to disease reassessment. At a median follow up of 17.8 months, the 12 and 18-month overall survival rates were 88% (95%CI: 76%-100%) and 83% (95%CI: 68%-100%), respectively. There were 5 deaths; 3 were related to underlying disease, 1 related to infection, and 1 unrelated. Seven patients were eligible for cardiac response assessment (NTproBNP>650 OR BNP>150) at the time of CAR T, and of those, three obtained a cardiac response (2 Cardiac PR, 1 Cardiac VGPR). Three patients were eligible for renal response assessment (>1g proteinuria/day) at the time of CAR T; of those, two obtained a renal PR. Conclusion: We demonstrate that commercial BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy induces deep and rapid hematological responses in a cohort of heavily pretreated patients with AL amyloidosis. Although all patients exhibited overlapping features with concurrent multiple myeloma (≥10% plasma cells at diagnosis), CAR T-cell therapy was feasible to administer, with modest rates of CRS and only isolated cases of severe CRS or ICANS. Nearly all patients achieved a deep hematological response, which appeared to translate into meaningful organ improvement among those who were evaluable.

Abstract Introduction: The attainment of rapid and deep hematologic responses is key to restoring organ function and reducing mortality in AL amyloidosis. Despite the introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, ~50% of AL patients will respond sub optimally to 1st-line therapy, and many will relapse. Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) have produced unprecedented outcomes in relapsed myeloma, and whether they can be safely applied to AL amyloidosis is a key clinical question. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study involving 9 US academic medical centers within the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. We included patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who received bispecific TCE therapy targeting either BCMA or GPRC5D to investigate the safety, and efficacy of this approach. Results: Between February 2023 and March 2025, we identified 29 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with TCEs (n=19 teclistamab, n=6 elranatamab, n=4 talquetamab). The median age was 72-years (IQR: 66, 75), with a female predominance (59%, n=17). Most patients had lambda light-chain isotype (59%, n=17), 31% (n=9) had t(11;14). Diagnostic bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) burden was unknown in 6 cases, of the remaining cases 74% had ≥10% and 65% had ≥20% BMPCs. Ten patients (34%) had either ≥60% BMPCs at diagnosis or an involved FLC ratio >100 prior to TCE. The median number of prior lines was 5 (IQR: 4, 6), all patients had previous anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody exposure, 55% (n=16) had received an autologous stem cell transplant, and 28% (n=8) had received prior BCMA-directed therapy (n=4 antibody drug conjugates [ADCs], n=3 CAR T, n=1 ADC + TCE). Immediately prior to TCE therapy, 8% (n=2) were stage 3A and 19% (n=5) were stage 3B according to the European modification of the Mayo 2004 prognostic score. Staging was unknown in n=3 cases. Regarding organ involvement, 66% (n=19) had cardiac, 59% (n=17) had renal, 24% (n=7) had gastrointestinal (biopsy-proven), 10% (n=3) had peripheral nerve and 3% (n=1) had autonomic nerve involvement. The rate of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 45% (Grade 1, G1: n=8, Grade 2, G2: n=5, Grade ≥3,G3+: n=0), and immune cell associated neurological syndrome (ICANS) was 14% (G1: n=3, G2: n=1, G3+: n=0). Seven patients (24%) received tocilizumab as treatment, a further one patient received prophylactic tocilizumab. One-third of the cohort experienced at least one infection (n=10), and 20 (n=6) experienced a ≥grade 3 infection. The overall response rate was 76% (n=22) by AL amyloidosis response criteria, including a 66% (n=19) complete response (CR), 7% (n=2) very good partial response (VGPR), and 3% (n=1) partial response (PR) rate. Two patients did not undergo disease reassessment; one due to an early treatment-emergent death, and one who was lost to follow-up before cycle 2. Among responders, the median time to a VGPR or better was 29 days (IQR: 18, 56). At a median follow up of 8.8 months, the 1-year overall survival rate was 77% (95%CI: 62%-95%). Of the 6 deaths which occurred, 3 occurred while on TCE therapy (VF arrest during step up not associated with CRS, cardiac failure, and infectious complication), and 3 deaths occurred off therapy (unknown, progressive disease, and as a complication of surgery). Of 14 patients eligible for cardiac response assessment at the time of TCE therapy (NTproBNP>650 OR BNP>150), 9 (64%) obtained a response (CarPR=4, CarVGPR=2, CarCR=3). Of 4 patients eligible for renal response assessment at the time of TCE initiation (>1g proteinuria/day), all 4 patients obtained a response (RenPR=1, RenVGPR=2, RenCR=1). Conclusion: This is the largest cohort of TCE therapy in AL amyloidosis. TCE therapy produced a high rate of rapid and deep haematological responses. Despite a high prevalence of cardiac and renal involvement, rates of CRS were low with no grade ≥3 events, however, infectious complications were frequent. Non-relapse mortality reflected our cohort's advanced disease and prior treatment, including 2 deaths (7%) unequivocally related to cardiac causes. Although follow-up was limited, there was a high rate of early organ responses, consistent with the deep hematological response rates observed. Although our cohort exhibited overlapping features with multiple myeloma, such as a high baseline plasma cell burden, the pattern of organ involvement was consistent with typical AL amyloid populations, supporting the broader application of this therapy in AL amyloidosis.

Abstract Introduction Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, mass fix) represents a sensitive and specific alternative to electrophoresis and immunofixation for quantifying monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report real world data utilizing mass fix and compare its test characteristics to a gold standard of minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification utilizing next generation sequencing (NGS). Results All patients who had obtained mass fix and MRD testing by NGS as part of routine clinical care at Mayo Clinic Arizona were screened for this study. In total, 343 pairs of mass fix and NGS testing within 50 days of each other representing 269 unique patients with secretory multiple myeloma were included. Cases of IgD myeloma and those secreting only free light chains were excluded. The threshold of MRD negativity was set at <1x10-6(less than one malignant cell in one million) and was assessed utilizing the clonoSEQ NGS assay. The median age of our cohort is 67, it is 44% female, and primarily Caucasian (88%) with a median follow-up of 7.3 months from testing date. FISH testing was performed in 96% of patients and at least one high risk cytogenetic abnormality (t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p)) was found in 23% of patients. The t(11;14) translocation was found in 18%, +1q in 26%, and amp(1q) in 6% of evaluated patients. Notably, patients at all stages of treatment or disease status were included in our study. Induction treatment for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM, 133 patients) was mostly daratumumab-containing quadruplet (63%) or triplet drug regimens (36%). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 79% of NDMM and 80% of relapsed refractory MM patients (RRMM, 138 patients). Of the RRMM patients, 94% were triple class exposed and 41% were penta-exposed. Overall agreement between NGS and mass fix results was 65% (Kappa statistic: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.22 – 0.41). Most discordant cases were instances of mass fix negativity and NGS positivity (n = 89, 26% of all testing pairs). Only 7% of cases (n= 30) represented mass fix positivity with NGS negativity. Mass fix was able to define therapeutic monoclonal antibody by its unique mass spectrometric profile in 38 of the total test pairs that otherwise would have been considered disease associated. Of the 30 patients testing mass fix positive and NGS negative, 25 (83%) represent post-treatment evaluations. Thus, ongoing mass fix positivity represents monoclonal protein washout kinetics. All of these cases are noted to have declining mass fix levels at last follow up and 40% had undetectable monoclonal protein. The discordant mass fix negative and NGS positive cases were evenly distributed across NDMM and RRMM representing 32% and 20% of test pairs in each group, respectively. Amongst these 89 total test pairs, the median abundance of malignant clone by NGS was 10 cells per million (range 0.06 to 297,895). This is in contrast to 136 concordantly positive test pairs where the median was 2960 cells per million (range 0.353 to 1,017,360). The median monoclonal protein identified (in those with a quantifiable M-spike) was 0.30 g/dL. Receiver operating characteristic curves using NGS as gold standard found the optimal mass fix threshold to be 0.010g/dL (specificity 95%, sensitivity 51%) for NDMM patients and 0.046g/dL (specificity 84%, sensitivity 55%) in RRMM patients. Conclusions Development of a MRD assay based on peripheral blood sampling could greatly improve the ease and speed of obtaining these assessments. Our experience highlights both the great potential and need to identify appropriate clinical contexts for optimal use of mass fix MRD assessment. A significant limitation of our data is that low level monoclonal proteins without a previous reference above a threshold of 20mg/dL are not reported as positive and may account for a significant fraction of discordant cases reported here. All clonoSEQ NGS samples are referenced to a positive control greatly increasing specificity. The currently reported dataset is biased against mass fix as not all test pairs reported are known to have a positive reference. Further delineation of these cases is forthcoming. Previous reports have also noted that mass fix test characteristics can improve with time from treatment which will be assessed with future follow-up.

Abstract Background and Significance Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other LBCLs account for 35–40% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases in North America, Europe, and East Asia. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard first-line treatment for DLBCL, achieving cure rates in approximately 60–70% of patients. However, 30–40% of patients will relapse or become refractory (R/R) to treatment, facing poor prognosis. Patients with high International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores (3–5) and those with IPI 1–2 who have bulky disease and/or very high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are recognized as high-risk (HR) subsets with suboptimal outcomes (Maurer et al, ASH 2023, #4512). Novel combination strategies are an area of focus for improving efficacy in this population. GOLCA is a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD agent designed for the treatment of lymphoma, with preferential distribution to lymphoid organs and enhanced activity in lymphoma cell lines. GOLCA drives the closed, active conformation of cereblon to induce rapid and deep degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos, leading to direct cell killing (agnostic of cell of origin [COO]) and immunomodulatory activity. In the Phase 1b study CC-220-DLBCL-001, GOLCA in combination with R-CHOP demonstrated a predictable and manageable safety profile with high rates of durable responses, irrespective of COO, in previously untreated aggressive B-cell lymphomas (BCL), including promising activity in HR patients (Amzallag et al, ASH 2024, #579). The median relative dose intensity for GOLCA and CHO components was high (97–99%), indicating uncompromised delivery of curative standard-of-care treatment and combinability. GOLCA ± rituximab has also shown encouraging efficacy and safety in patients with R/R DLBCL (Bachy et al, ICML, #148). These findings support the further study of GOLCA + R-CHOP combination in the Phase 3 setting. Study Design and Methods GOLSEEK-1 (NCT06356129) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study evaluating GOLCA + R-CHOP versus placebo + R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated HR LBCL. Approximately 850 patients with previously untreated LBCL will be randomized 1:1 to either GOLCA + R-CHOP or placebo + R-CHOP. Eligible patients include those with histologically confirmed LBCL per WHO 2022 criteria—including DLBCL (not otherwise specified [NOS], ABC/GCB), high-grade BCL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements or NOS, T-cell/histiocyte–rich LBCL, or Epstein Barr Virus-positive DLBCL. HR status is defined by IPI ≥3, or IPI 1–2 with HR features: LDH >1.3× upper limit of normal and/or bulky disease (≥7 cm lesion). All patients must have measurable disease as defined by Lugano criteria. Key exclusion criteria are other lymphoma subtypes such as primary mediastinal LBCL; primary cutaneous DLBCL-leg type, grade 3b follicular lymphoma (FL); transformed indolent lymphoma; anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive LBCL; primary effusion lymphoma; and Burkitt lymphoma and known or suspected central nervous system involvement. Randomization will be stratified by IPI score (HR 1–2 and 3 vs 4–5) and bulky disease status (≥7 cm vs <7 cm). After a screening period of ≤4 weeks, patients will receive either GOLCA (0.4 mg) or placebo orally once daily for 7 consecutive days in each of 6 cycles, combined with R-CHOP every 21 days. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment per Lugano Response Criteria. Key secondary endpoints include PFS in non–high-grade BCL, event-free survival, independently assessed complete metabolic response, undetectable minimal residual disease by PhasED-Seq (defined as undetectable circulating tumor DNA levels at end of treatment), and overall survival. Patients will be followed up for up to approximately 67 months after beginning treatment. This study is currently recruiting at 309 sites in 36 countries , across the United States, Europe, Latin America, and East Asia. Acknowledgement BMS Artificial Intelligence was used to revise existing text with human author oversight.