Citations

BackgroundClinical alarms are designed to signal an unsatisfactory patient physiological state and alert staff members to malfunctioning medical equipment. Alarm desensitization and fatigue can occur when clinicians are exposed to an overwhelming number of clinical alarms, particularly nonactionable alarms.Local ProblemAlarm fatigue and alarm management competency related to use of Philips monitoring systems were noted to be problematic among nurses working in the 27-bed surgical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in northeastern Florida.MethodsA quality improvement project was conducted to reduce alarm fatigue and improve nursing competency in managing alarms. The CEASE (Communication, Electrodes, Appropriateness, Setup, and Education) evidence-based alarm management bundle was implemented on the unit, and a representative from the alarm manufacturer conducted in-service training sessions. A clinical alarms survey developed by the Healthcare Technology Foundation was distributed both before and after the intervention to 115 nurses working in the unit. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to assess for differences between the preintervention and postintervention periods.ResultsNurse participants demonstrated improved alarm management competency, resulting in significant improvements in their perceptions of alarm functionality, settings, response time, and policy adherence. There was a statistically significant decrease in self-reported alarm fatigue, and the CEASE bundle was found to influence nursing practice.ConclusionsThe Joint Commission’s 2022 goal of improving clinical alarm safety remains a top priority nationwide. Implementation of the CEASE alarm management bundle was effective in reducing surgical intensive care unit nurses’ alarm fatigue and improving their alarm management practices.

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesConvalescent COVID‐19 plasma (CCP) was developed and used worldwide as a treatment option by supplying passive immunity. Adult studies suggest administering high‐titer CCP early in the disease course of patients who are expected to be antibody‐negative; however, pediatric experience is limited. We created a multi‐institutional registry to characterize pediatric patients (<18 years) who received CCP and to assess the safety of this intervention.MethodsA REDCap survey was distributed. The registry collected de‐identified data including demographic information (age, gender, and underlying conditions), COVID‐19 disease features and concurrent treatments, CCP transfusion and safety events, and therapy response.ResultsNinety‐five children received CCP: 90 inpatients and 5 outpatients, with a median age of 10.2 years (range 0–17.9). They were predominantly Latino/Hispanic and White. The most frequent underlying medical conditions were chronic respiratory disease, immunosuppression, obesity, and genetic syndromes. CCP was primarily given as a treatment (95%) rather than prophylaxis (5%). Median total plasma dose administered and transfusion rates were 5.0 ml/kg and 2.6 ml/kg/h, respectively. The transfusions were well‐tolerated, with 3 in 115 transfusions reporting mild reactions. No serious adverse events were reported. Severity scores decreased significantly 7 days after CCP transfusion or at discharge. Eighty‐five patients (94.4%) survived to hospital discharge. All five outpatients survived to 60 days.ConclusionsCCP was found to be safe and well‐tolerated in children. CCP was frequently given concurrently with other COVID‐19‐directed treatments with improvement in clinical severity scores ≥7 days after CCP, but efficacy could not be evaluated in this study.

Background: Risk for venous thromboembolism has a strong genetic component. Whole genome sequencing from the TOPMed program (Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine) allowed us to look for new associations, particularly rare variants missed by standard genome-wide association studies. Methods: The 3793 cases and 7834 controls (11.6% of cases were individuals of African, Hispanic/Latino, or Asian ancestry) were analyzed using a single variant approach and an aggregate gene-based approach using our primary filter (included only loss-of-function and missense variants predicted to be deleterious) and our secondary filter (included all missense variants). Results: Single variant analyses identified associations at 5 known loci. Aggregate gene-based analyses identified only PROC (odds ratio, 6.2 for carriers of rare variants; P =7.4×10 −14 ) when using our primary filter. Employing our secondary variant filter led to a smaller effect size at PROC (odds ratio, 3.8; P =1.6×10 −14 ), while excluding variants found only in rare isoforms led to a larger one (odds ratio, 7.5). Different filtering strategies improved the signal for 2 other known genes: PROS1 became significant (minimum P =1.8×10 −6 with the secondary filter), while SERPINC1 did not (minimum P =4.4×10 −5 with minor allele frequency <0.0005). Results were largely the same when restricting the analyses to include only unprovoked cases; however, one novel gene, MS4A1 , became significant ( P =4.4×10 −7 using all missense variants with minor allele frequency <0.0005). Conclusions: Here, we have demonstrated the importance of using multiple variant filtering strategies, as we detected additional genes when filtering variants based on their predicted deleteriousness, frequency, and presence on the most expressed isoforms. Our primary analyses did not identify new candidate loci; thus larger follow-up studies are needed to replicate the novel MS4A1 locus and to identify additional rare variation associated with venous thromboembolism.

Objective: The purpose of this feasibility pilot study was to evaluate safety and adherence of a wearable brain sensing wellness device designed to reduce stress among healthcare professionals (HCP). Methods: A total of 40 HCP were invited to participate in an open-label pilot study. Participants were asked to use a brain sensing wearable device (MUSE-S™) on a daily basis to reduce their stress, for a total of 90 days. Total study participation duration was 180 days. Study enrollment began in August 2021 and ended December 2021. The exploratory outcomes included stress, depression, sleep, burn-out, resilience, quality of life, and cognition. Results: Among the 40 HCP in study, the majority were female (85%), white (87.5%) and with an average age of 41.3 ± 11.0 years (SD). Participants used the wearable device an average of 23.8 times over a 30-day period with a mean duration of 5.8 min with each use. Study results demonstrate the positive impact of guided mindfulness using the wearable device MUSE-S™ and its accompanying application (APP). A statistically significant improvement was found for a reduction in stress ( P < .001) and improvement in resilience ( P = .02), quality of life ( P = .003), and cognition ( P < .001). The majority (91.9%) of the participants indicated they felt more relaxed after using the device, and 73% indicated they would continue to use this device at end-of-study. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Study results show that 3 to 10 min of guided meditation during work hours through the use of a brain sensing wearable device is safe and acceptable, with associated health benefits for HCP.

Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for meningioma, the most common primary intracranial tumor, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and current indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. Recent studies have proposed prognostic meningioma classification systems using DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants, DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, histology, or integrated models based on multiple combined features. Targeted gene expression profiling has generated robust biomarkers integrating multiple molecular features for other cancers, but is understudied for meningiomas. Methods Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on 173 meningiomas and an optimized gene expression biomarker (34 genes) and risk score (0 to 1) was developed to predict clinical outcomes. Clinical and analytical validation was performed on independent meningiomas from 12 institutions across 3 continents (N = 1856), including 103 meningiomas from a prospective clinical trial. Gene expression biomarker performance was compared to 9 other classification systems. Results The gene expression biomarker improved discrimination of postoperative meningioma outcomes compared to all other classification systems tested in the independent clinical validation cohort for local recurrence (5-year area under the curve [AUC] 0.81) and overall survival (5-year AUC 0.80). The increase in area under the curve compared to the current standard of care, World Health Organization 2021 grade, was 0.11 for local recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.17, P < 0.001). The gene expression biomarker identified meningiomas benefiting from postoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37–0.78, P = 0.0001) and re-classified up to 52.0% meningiomas compared to conventional clinical criteria, suggesting postoperative management could be refined for 29.8% of patients. Conclusions A targeted gene expression biomarker improves discrimination of meningioma outcomes compared to recent classification systems and predicts postoperative radiotherapy responses.

Background The recognition of venous sinus stenosis as a contributing factor in the majority of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension coupled with increasing cerebral venography and venous sinus stenting experience have dramatically improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving this disease. There is now a dense, growing body of research in the neurointerventional literature detailing anatomical and physiological mechanisms of disease which has not been widely disseminated among clinicians. Methods A literature search was conducted, covering the most recent neurointerventional literature on idiopathic intracranial hypertension, the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and management strategies (including venous sinus stenting), and subsequently summarized to provide a comprehensive review of the most recently published studies on idiopathic intracranial hypertension pathophysiology and management. Conclusion Recent studies in the neurointerventional literature have greatly improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its associated conditions. The ability to make individualized, patient-specific treatment approaches has been made possible by advances in our understanding of how venous sinus stenosis and cerebral venous hypertension fundamentally contribute to idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Background: Cerebrovascular disease is a life-threatening neurological event and a leading cause of long-term disability and death worldwide. Early detection of characteristic behavioral and physiological changes associated with cerebrovascular disease is critical to improving patient outcomes and quality of life measures. The growing prevalence of remote monitoring tools, from wearable devices to smartphone applications, that facilitate in situ observation of patients and the environments of daily life holds promise for more timely recognition and possible prevention of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) like stroke. Objective: The goal of this scoping review is to examine and establish categories of innovation with digital sensors that monitor physiological and behavioral variables in situ to augment the current screening and diagnostic processes for patients with cerebrovascular disease. Methods: Guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist, a robust search strategy for spanning multiple databases from 2012 to September 30, 2022, excluding review articles, articles including interventions, and articles not published in English, was implemented. Among the databases searched were Web of Science; Scopus; Ovid Embase; Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; and Ovid MEDLINE and Epub ahead of print, in-process and other nonindexed citations, and daily. Results: This search strategy aggregated 689 articles, of which 101 (14.7%) articles met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Articles were divided into two categories based on their focus: physiological and behavioral. Articles with a physiological focus were sorted into one of nine subcategories according to the signal(s) monitored: motor function, heart rhythm, heart rate, kinematic analysis, physical activity, blood pressure, sensory deficit, electrodermal activity, and intracranial pressure. Articles focusing on behavioral variables were sorted into two subcategories: mood and fatigue. Most studies used an ECG-enabled smartwatch, like an Apple Watch 3, or passive smartphone sensors. Conclusions: This scoping review identified disparate methods and conclusions associated with the use of digital sensors for in situ physiological and behavioral monitoring of cerebrovascular disease patients. While most articles evaluated pilot validation and feasibility trials, the lack of randomized controlled trials is a critical literature gap specific to this evolving research area.

Every effort must be made by the leaders in our field, as well as by every individual cardiothoracic surgeon, to assure equal opportunity for all cardiothoracic surgeons, regardless of race, gender or any other sociodemographic source of bias. Every effort must be made by every surgeon, not just those in particular leadership roles. Opportunities for advancement must be equal in multiple domains, including clinical practice, patient referral, clinical leadership, academic leadership, institutional leadership and leadership in professional medical and surgical societies. Such actions to minimize bias and promote inclusivity will also ensure that cardiothoracic surgical care is provided by a workforce that represents the diversity of patients whom we serve. In the final analysis, it is an absolute fact that gender differences in payments to cardiothoracic surgeons are absolutely unacceptable and cannot be tolerated.

Abstract Background In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence‐based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence‐based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.