Ganesh, Ravindra

Objectives Long-term symptoms following infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) or Long COVID (LC), persist beyond 90 days and may impact at least 10% of patients with acute infection. The exact cause of LC remains unknown, but several theories include persistent viral particles, immune dysfunction, and autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalance, particularly involving the vagus nerve. Given the role of the vagus nerve in inflammation regulation, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is being explored as a treatment option. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and exploratory effects of a handheld external transcutaneous cervical non-invasive VNS (tcVNS) on the primary endpoint of Post-COVID Functional Status (PCFS) grade, alongside secondary outcomes such as LC-related fatigue and other symptoms. Methods Participants from our Post COVID Care Clinic were randomized into treatment (tcVNS treatments two minutes, three times a day) and control (no VNS) groups for a study period of 12 weeks. Participants completed validated questionnaires, PET-CT scans, and inflammatory cytokines at baseline and 12 weeks. Results All randomized patients (8 tcVNS, 10 control) completed the 12-week study. Participants randomized to tcVNS were observed to have improvements in PHQ-9, PROMIS-F, and COMPASS-31 when compared to controls, but these differences were not statistically significant. Cortisol and DHEA were also observed to increase less in the tcVNS group when compared to the control group, but these changes were also not statistically significant. Conclusions tcVNS was well tolerated and may be a promising therapeutic approach for LC, a chronic disease with no approved treatments and very low rates of complete recovery.

Objective Long COVID (LC) refers to the long-term symptoms occurring after SARS-CoV-2 infection and resolution of the initial disease prodrome. While LC is increasingly recognized, knowledge about its biomarkers is still limited. This study examines imaging findings in 18 F-FDG PET-CT scans in 40 patients with LC from an academic LC Clinic, for potential imaging biomarkers. Methods This study included patients aged 18 and older with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test and at least 28 days post-symptom onset. 18 F-FDG PET-CT scans were performed, and brain metabolic activity was compared to a control database to generate Z-scores. Participants were grouped based on their clinical phenotype and Z-scores of different brain regions were analyzed using t-tests. Results The study group was mainly female (70%), with a median age of 53 years, and predominantly non-Hispanic White (90%). Most had pre-existing conditions such as gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, endocrine, and psychiatric disorders. The findings showed significant cerebral hypometabolism in 29 patients with fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM), particularly in the left sensorimotor cortex (p=0.0253) and bilateral primary visual cortex (right: p=0.0096, left: p=0.0016), which persisted up to two years after infection. Conclusions In summary, this study identified persistent cerebral hypometabolism in LC patients, especially those with fatigue with PEM, up to two years post-infection. These results suggest that 18 F-FDG PET-CT could be a valuable tool for diagnosing and managing LC. Further research is essential to confirm these findings and improve treatment strategies for patients with LC.

Abstract Rationale Long COVID (LC) has affected approximately 400 million people worldwide, with about 20 million in the US. LC is characterized by a host of new symptoms, including neuropsychiatric disorders including cognitive impairment. Disruption of the gut microbiome has been correlated with symptoms of LC. This study examined whether gut microbiome modulation via intake of probiotic fermented foods mitigated psychiatric and cognitive impairments. Methods This was a pilot trial performed at a single academic medical center that enrolled and randomized patients with LC 1:1 into the treatment vs. control arm. Those enrolled into the treatment arm received teaching on the gut microbiome, its relationship to LC, and were encouraged to eat a diet high in probiotic fermented foods for 12 weeks. Those in the control arm did not receive the teaching and were encouraged to eat their normal diet. Diets were tracked using the Mayo Clinic Diet application on a smart phone at least three days per week, and those in the treatment arm received routine calls to discuss protocol adherence and gather subjective feedback on the trial. Neuropsychiatric questionnaires (HADS, IES-R, EQ-5D-5L, and MoCA Blind) were completed at enrollment and upon completion of the trial. Questionnaire scores were evaluated for changes using a paired t-test, with statistical significance defined as a p-value <0.05. Correlation between the fermented food intake and improvements in questionnaires was completed using the Spearman test. Results 43 patients were enrolled; 18 patients in the treatment arm and 20 patients in the control arm completed the trial. Groups did not differ by age, race, education, or baseline neuropsychiatric testing. There was a significant increase in fermented food intake in the treatment arm over the duration of the study. Those in the treatment arm had improvements in questionnaires related to anxiety, PTSD, and quality of life. Those in the control arm only had improvements in reported overall quality of life. Intra-group changes can be seen in Table 1. Correlations between fermented food intake and change in questionnaire scoring showed numerical but not statistically significant improvements in many of the questionnaires, except for the MOCA questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L Self-Care question. Conclusion Implementing a diet high in fermented foods in patients with LC appears to have some signal for improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms. Completing a larger trial would help clarify if changes would be statistically significant. This abstract is funded by: Mayo Clinic Critical Care Research Committee

Despite the increasing prevalence and median severity of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), medical education on the disease is scant, leading to a diagnostic crisis in which the majority of people with ME/CFS are undiagnosed. We created a care process algorithm in AskMayoExpert accessible to all Mayo Clinic medical providers as a source for information on diagnosis and management of ME/CFS. To evaluate whether the algorithm was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy, we compared concordance before versus after the algorithm was introduced, where concordance was defined as agreement between an appropriately coded referral to Mayo Clinic’s Chronic Fatigue Specialty Clinic and the specialty clinic with an expert diagnosis of ME/CFS. Referrals to the Chronic Fatigue Specialty Clinic increased overall and were more likely to show concordance between specialist diagnosis and referral after the introduction of the ME/CFS AskMayoExpert algorithm. Particularly in diseases that are prevalent and poorly understood, a point-of-care clinical tool may offer just-in-time opportunities to improve diagnosis and management.

Objective: This study evaluated the feasibility and satisfaction of using a wearable brain activity sensing device for stress reduction among patients experiencing Long COVID (LC). Patients and Methods: Patients with LC (N = 45) were invited to participate in an open-label pilot study. Participants were asked to use a brain-sensing electroencephalogram (S-EEG) wearable device (Muse-S™) daily for 90 days and followed for an additional 90 days (180 days total participation). Study enrollment began June 28, 2022, and ended July 28, 2023. Results: Patients were predominantly female (82%), white (96%), and with an average age of 47.6 (±12.5) years. At the end of treatment (90 days), cognition, sleep, self-efficacy, and quality-of-life quality of life improved ( P < .001 to P = .04). In addition, stress and anxiety were significantly reduced ( P < .001). These significant changes persisted by end-of-study (180 days). For stress ( P = .023) and anxiety ( P = .033), a change from the baseline during follow-up was significantly associated with the amount of S-EEG usage. The end-of-study satisfaction survey indicated that patients were very satisfied with the S-EEG device, and 97% planned to continue using it. Conclusion: Results suggest that the S-EEG device improved cognition in LC, which is one of the main severe symptoms we see in our LC clinic. In addition, it helped reduce stress and anxiety. These findings have important clinical implications for LC patients using S-EEG as an adjunct to concurrent LC clinical care which includes pharmacotherapies.

Objectives: To identify patient characteristics, health concerns, and barriers to care based on overweight or obesity. Methods: A 50-question anonymous survey was administered to patients. Data were compared by body mass index (BMI). Results: Among 3976 distributed surveys, 899 were returned and 682 were analyzed. Most respondents were women (60%), White (94%), and married/partnered (65%) and had some college education (80%). Younger and unmarried persons had higher BMI ( P < .001). Concern for quality of life ( P < .001) and importance of lifestyle changes ( P = .006) increased with BMI, but confidence in making changes decreased as BMI increased ( P < .001). Perceived good health decreased with increasing BMI ( P < .001), whereas depression and other comorbid conditions increased. Self-esteem decreased and stigma increased with higher BMI (both P < .001). Weight discussions with clinicians ( P < .001) and belief that clinicians should be involved in weight management ( P = .002) increased with BMI, yet self-perception of being judged by clinicians also increased ( P < .001). As BMI increased, delays in seeking health care increased ( P < .001). Conclusions: This survey study highlights perceived health concerns and barriers to care among persons with overweight and obesity. With higher BMI, self-esteem decreased, and stigma, self-perception of poor health, perception of being judged by clinicians, and delay in seeking medical care increased.

Objective To describe the immediate clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating long COVID symptoms. Long COVID currently impacts approximately 5.3% of US adults, presenting with persistent fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive impairments, and social function decline. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has improved these symptoms in some studies. Methods Five patients (ages 52–63 years, 3 female patients) underwent accelerated rTMS using intermittent theta burst stimulation (600 pulses over 3 minutes 20 seconds, 80%–120% of resting motor threshold) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The treatment consisted of twice-daily sessions over 20–30 treatments. Outcomes were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires, assessing fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, and social function at baseline and immediately posttreatment. Results One patient discontinued immediately due to intolerable scalp pain. Posttreatment PROMIS scores showed the following: fatigue decreased from 74.5 to 61.8, depression from 60.3 to 51.5, and anxiety from 62.0 to 54.0. Scores increased for cognitive (26.8 to 32.3) and social (31.0 to 32.5) function. These changes, although not statistically significant, indicate a trend toward symptom reduction. Subjectively, 3 of 4 patients who completed the rTMS course reported improvements. Conclusion This case series suggests that rTMS may offer symptomatic relief in long COVID patients. Although the observed improvements in PROMIS were not statistically significant, even minimal improvements are clinically significant for patients enduring prolonged suffering. These preliminary findings are encouraging and underscore the need for further research with larger cohorts to validate the efficacy of rTMS in long COVID symptom relief.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of airways has shown increased luminal area in patients with COVID-19 and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 when compared with healthy controls. These findings suggest the role of large conducting airways in the pathogenesis of post-acute sequelae of COVID 19.

Background: In addition to the morbidity and mortality associated with acute infection, COVID-19 has been associated with persistent symptoms (>30 days), often referred to as Long COVID (LC). LC symptoms often cluster into phenotypes, resembling conditions such as fibromyalgia, postural orthostatic tachycardiac syndrome (POTS), and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). LC clinics have been established to best address the needs of LC patients and continuity of care. We developed a cross-sectional survey to assess treatment response through our LC Clinic (LCC). Methods: A 25-question survey (1-10 Likert scale) was expert- and content-validated by LCC clinicians, patients, and patient advocates. The survey assessed LC symptoms and the helpfulness of different interventions, including medications and supplements. A total of 852 LCC patients were asked to complete the survey, with 536 (62.9%) responding. Results: The mean time from associated COVID-19 infection to survey completion was 23.2 ± 6.4 months. The mean age of responders was 52.3 ± 14.1 (63% females). Self-reported symptoms were all significantly improved ( P < .001) from the initial visit to the LCC (baseline) to the time of the follow-up survey. However, only 4.5% (24/536) of patients rated all symptoms low (1-2) at the time of the survey, indicating low levels of full recovery in our cohort. The patients rated numerous interventions as being helpful, including low-dose naltrexone (45/77; 58%), vagal nerve stimulation (18/34; 53%), and fisetin (28/44; 64%). Conclusions: Patients report general improvements in symptoms following the initial LCC visit, but complete recovery rates remain low at 23.2 ± 6.4 months.

Background: Over 30% of patients with COVID-19 have persistent symptoms that last beyond 30 days and referred to as Long COVID. Long COVID has been associated with a persistent elevation in peripheral cytokines including interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α. This study reports cytokine profiles of patients in our clinic across SARS-COV-2 variant epochs. Methods: The clinical cytokine panel was analyzed in patients with Long COVID during periods that were stratified according to variant epoch. The 4 variant epochs were defined as: (1) wild-type through alpha, (2) alpha/beta/gamma, (3) delta, and (4) omicron variants. Results: A total of 390 patients had the clinical cytokine panel performed; the median age was 48 years (IQR 38-59) and 62% were female. Distribution by variant was wild-type and alpha, 50% (n = 196); alpha/beta/gamma, 7.9% (n = 31); delta, 18% (n = 72); and omicron, 23% (n = 91). Time to cytokine panel testing was significantly longer for the earlier epochs. Tumor necrosis factor-α ( P < .001) and interleukin 1β ( P < .001) were significantly more elevated in the earlier epochs (median of 558 days in wild-type through Alpha epoch vs 263 days in omicron epoch, P < .001)). Nucleocapsid antibodies were consistently detected across epochs. Discussion: When stratified by variant epoch, patients with early epoch Long COVID had persistently elevated peripheral pro-inflammatory cytokine levels when compared to later epoch Long COVID. Patients with Long COVID have similar clusters of symptoms across epochs, suggesting that the underlying pathology is independent of the peripheral cytokine signature.