Fischer, Karen M.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) leads to increased exercise capacity (VO 2 peak) and risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Women exhibit blunted VO 2 peak improvements following CR. The purpose was to examine sex differences in the clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR. Methods From 1999 to 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after CR were included. Sex differences in peak exercise metrics in response to CR were compared. Multiple logistic regression models were fit to assess clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement (defined as >0% from pre‐CR) and MACEs following CR for men and women. Results A total of 513 men and 158 women were included. Men had greater increases in VO 2 peak than women following CR ( P =0.001). For men, independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement following CR included higher CR session attendance (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06]), peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25–0.86]), and pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]) (all, P <0.02). Independent predictors of lower odds of MACEs following CR in men included higher number of CR sessions (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95–0.99]), pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]), surgical CR indication (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]), and no history of peripheral artery disease (OR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.60–5.38]) (all, P <0.02). For women, the selected clinical characteristics were not statistically significant independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement or odds of MACEs (except for diabetes) following CR. Conclusions These findings suggest that clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR are sex specific.

Objective To evaluate patient satisfaction with the experience of using an autonomous wheelchair to transport patients in a large outpatient clinical environment. Methods The autonomous wheelchair pilot was approved as a feasibility pilot by the institutional committees and deemed a quality improvement project by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). A total of 409 adult patients using an autonomous wheelchair at a large academic medical center who volunteered to complete a paper survey were included. The survey was administered immediately after autonomous wheelchair use, using a cross-sectional, anonymous survey, between 15 Oct 2025 and 14 Jan 2026. Of 409 completed surveys, six were excluded because participants did not identify their endpoint for stratification purposes. Descriptive analysis included frequencies and percentages of responses. Results No collisions or adverse events were observed during the pilot, and the system operated reliably within the predefined routes. Most survey respondents were first-time users (335/402 [83.3%]). A majority reported they would use the autonomous wheelchair again (341/395 [86.3%]) and would recommend it to others (364/397 [91.7%]). Overall, the experience was rated better than expected by 293 of 393 participants (74.6%). When given a choice, 271 of 379 respondents (71.5%) preferred the autonomous wheelchair over a staff-operated wheelchair. Conclusion These findings suggest that autonomous wheelchairs are feasible and acceptable to patients in a controlled outpatient setting and support continued piloting and prospective evaluation.

Abstract Background Anxiety is a common symptom experienced by patients with cancer, who are increasingly interested in non-pharmacologic symptom management. Acupressure, a noninvasive intervention thought to impact the neurohormonal axis, has shown promise in reducing anxiety. However, research on acupressure for anxiety in patients with cancer has been limited. Methods Individuals receiving chemotherapy, who reported baseline anxiety, were eligible for this study. Consenting participants received one 15-minute nurse-led acupressure session and completed pre- and post-intervention surveys. The primary endpoint was a change in anxiety. Participants were also asked about symptoms of nausea, pain, well-being, relaxation, worry, and distress. Participants were invited to learn self-acupressure techniques. These participants were asked to complete a final survey 1-week post-intervention. Results Thirty adult patients participated in this study. Mean baseline anxiety was 5 on a 0 to 10 Likert scale. Immediate post-intervention anxiety scores significantly improved for all thirty patients to an average of 2.0 (P &lt; .001). Mean nausea scores improved from 1.5 at baseline to 0 post-intervention (P &lt; .001), and pain scores improved from 2.0 at baseline to 1.0 post-intervention (P = .001). Participants reported significant improvement in sense of wellbeing (P = .0004), distress (P &lt; .001), ability to achieve relaxation (P &lt; .001), and ability to control their worries (P &lt; .001). The improvement in anxiety, well-being, and relaxation was sustained at one week. 100% of participants stated that they would recommend acupressure for symptom management. Conclusion Acupressure is a promising non-pharmacologic intervention for the management of cancer-associated anxiety.

Objectives: To assess how social risk factors and socioeconomic status (SES) affect health care costs at a large, integrated health system of 45 clinics in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed administrative patient cost data from January 1 through December 31, 2022. Social risk factors (lack of financial resources, food insecurity, intimate partner violence, unmet transportation needs, and housing instability) were determined with patient questionnaires. Cost z -scores were compared across all risk-factor quartiles. We used a housing-based measure to objectively determine SES. Results: We analyzed data from 410 624 patients empaneled with 689 family medicine clinicians. Self-reported risk factor data were incomplete for 219 321 patients. Costs were higher for those with higher social risk (mean cost z -score: high risk = 0.38, low risk = 0.11; P < .001). In addition, higher costs were associated with increasing age, greater medical complexity (higher Adjusted Clinical Group scores), White race, and lack of financial resources. Although we observed geographic variations in cost, urban and rural locations did not have significant cost differences. Costs were similar across all quartiles of SES, and the absolute difference in cost z -scores between the highest and lowest SES quartiles was only 0.04. The multivariate analysis, which adjusted for age, medical complexity, race, sex, and objective SES, showed that these specific associations were substantially decreased and no longer significantly associated with mean cost z -scores. Conclusions: Patient-reported social risk factors were significantly associated with increased cost of care in a large, multispecialty health system in the midwestern US. These associations were decreased in the multivariate analysis. Results should be interpreted cautiously for readers outside the midwestern US, given potential responder bias and the racial homogeneity (92% White) of the study cohort.

Introduction/Objective: As fewer physicians enter primary care, Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) play an increasingly important role in meeting the demand for patient care. Factors contributing to work status changes among primary care APPs are not well studied. We aimed to evaluate differences in primary care APP work status across electronic health record (EHR) workload measures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study within a Midwestern healthcare system from 2020 to 2022, evaluating the relationship between primary care APP work status defined as retention at current full-time equivalent (FTE), reduction of FTE within primary care, or relocation outside of primary care and 3 time-based EHR workload metrics. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariable analyses were reported. Results: There were no differences between work status (retained, reduced, or relocated) across the EHR workload measurements of in-basket time per appointment, system time per appointment and note time per appointment ( P > .05) on univariate analysis. With multivariable analysis, there was no difference in likelihood of combined relocation/reduction adjusting for EHR workload variables ( P > .05). Conclusion: The EHR workload was not associated with work status changes for primary care APPs in our study. Further exploration is needed to identify factors that may contribute to reduction in primary care APP workforce capacity.

Abstract Background and Objectives To assess the efficacy of a local volunteer program, delirium optimization with volunteer engagement (DOVE), in preventing in-hospital delirium. Research Design and Methods Between February 2023 and June 2024, volunteers provided structured interventions to patients at risk for delirium, as identified by the Delirium Risk Assessment (DRA) score. Interventions are humanities-based and included sensory aide assistance, completion of “get to know me” forms, and conversation. Data were retrospectively acquired from electronic health records and compared to a control cohort from another medical unit. Delirium occurrence was captured when the nursing confusion assessment method (CAM) documentation was positive, or a clinician documented delirium diagnoses. Cohorts were matched 1:2 (DOVE vs Control) by age, gender, DRA score, month/year of admission, and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 168 patients received interventions by DOVE volunteers, of which 139 were matched with 261 controls. In-hospital delirium occurrence was lower in the DOVE cohort compared to the control cohort (46.8% vs 56.7%; p = .015). Conditional logistic regressions demonstrated a lower odds ratio (OR) for delirium occurrence, 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.34–0.89; p = .015) associated with DOVE intervention. Subgroup analyses of delirium occurrence among patients with DRA score of 3–4 demonstrated an OR of 0.56 (95% CI; 0.31–1.01; p = .053) between the DOVE and control cohorts. Discussion and Implications In-hospital delirium occurrence was ∼10% lower among DOVE cohort patients. This humanities-based intervention offers a feasible strategy, particularly during times of staffing shortages, and should be considered for broader implementation across healthcare institutions.

Background: Patients with non-English Language Preference are at risk of adverse health outcomes, particularly at end of life and during serious illness. Medical interpreters often feel unprepared to interpret conversations about serious illness. Best practice guidelines recommend a pre-encounter huddle between clinician and interpreter to better prepare both providers. The CHECK-IN (Check in for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information) guide is a simple communication tool designed to facilitate this pre-encounter huddle. We describe the results of a pilot feasibility study of the CHECK-IN guide performed in a simulation environment. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary performance of the CHECK-IN guide. Methods: This U.S.-based study is a single-center simulation-based nonblinded randomized pilot feasibility study. Participating clinicians were randomized to usual practice (control) vs. introduction to the CHECK-IN guide (intervention). Clinicians completed pre- and post-session surveys. Participating clinicians were evaluated using the Faculty Observation Rating Scale (FORS), Interpreter Scale (IS), and Interpreter Impact Rating Scale (IIRS). Results: Participants had a highly favorable opinion on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the CHECK-IN tool; 91% of participants agreed/strongly agreed on the acceptability of the tool, 91% agreed/strongly agreed on the appropriateness of the tool, and 100% agreed/strongly agreed on the feasibility of the tool. There were no statistical differences between control and intervention groups for the IS, IIRS, and FORS scores. Conclusion: The CHECK-IN guide is a promising tool to guide a pre-encounter huddle between clinician and interpreter, thereby improving interpreter-mediated communication when having conversations about serious illness.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of community paramedic (CP)-delivered, in-home diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) for adults with poorly managed diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a pragmatic, single-arm pilot trial, adults with HbA1c ≥9% and a recent emergency department or hospital visit received a 1-month CP-led DSMES intervention. Outcomes included HbA1c, health care engagement, and patient-reported satisfaction. RESULTS Seventy participants (median age 61 years, 50% rural, 84% with type 2 diabetes) completed the intervention. HbA1c declined from 9.8% to 8.2% at 4 months (P &lt; 0.001). Engagement with primary care, endocrinology, and DSMES improved. Satisfaction was high (mean rating 9 out of 10). CONCLUSIONS CP-led DSMES improved glycemic management and care engagement in underserved populations. This scalable model warrants further study.

Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a prevalent, disabling condition worldwide. Tuina, a traditional Chinese manual therapy, has shown potential benefits, but evidence remains limited. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Tuina therapy in managing CNLBP in a U.S. population. Methods: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester campus (February 2020-April 2024). 204 participants with CNLBP were randomized into 3 groups: Tuina (N = 68), physical therapy (N = 68), or a combination of both (N = 68). Each group received 6 treatments over 2 months. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS); secondary outcomes included disability (ODI), quality of life (SF-36), and adverse events. Additionally, participants completed a satisfaction survey at the end of the trial. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was used for survey data collection. Data was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the multiple repeated measurements, Kruskal-Wallis tests, while Chi-square tests, and Bonferroni correction in SAS software. Results: 185 subjects completed the study. Significant decreases in VAS, ODI, and SF-36 Overall Physical scores were found from baseline, to post treatment and follow-up in all groups ( P < .05), while there were no significant differences in VAS, ODI, or SF-36 outcomes between the Tuina group and the other 2 groups. There were 4 adverse events observed in the trial, 1 in the Physical therapy group and 3 in the Mixed group. Only 1 transient low back pain after Tuina therapy was observed in the Mixed group but did not require treatment. The high percentage of patients who received the Tuina program was extremely helpful (n = 94/126, 77.0%). The willingness to recommend was significantly higher for Tuina compared to physical therapy (Mixed group [N = 59/62, 95.2%], Tuina group [N = 57/64, 91.9%], and physical therapy group [N = 31/59, 59.6%] ( P < .05). Conclusion: Tuina therapy showed comparable benefits to physical therapy and combined treatment of both in improving pain, function, and quality of life in patients with CNLBP. With high patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile, Tuina appears to be a safe and acceptable non-invasive treatment option. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in the future.