Citations

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.

BACKGROUND Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) techniques have the potential to revolutionize molecular diagnostics; however, a thorough evaluation of these technologies is necessary to ensure their performance meets or exceeds that of current clinical sequencing methods. METHODS We evaluated the NimbleGen Sequence Capture 385K Human Custom Arrays for enrichment of 22 genes. We sequenced each sample on both the Roche 454 Genome Sequencer FLX (GS-FLX) and the Illumina Genome Analyzer II (GAII) to compare platform performance. RESULTS Although the sequence capture method allowed us to rapidly develop a large number of sequencing assays, we encountered difficulty enriching G+C–rich regions. Although a high proportion of reads consistently mapped outside of the targeted regions, >80% of targeted bases for the GAII and >30% of bases for the GS-FLX were covered by a read depth of ≥20, and >90% of bases for the GAII and >80% of bases for the GS-FLX were covered by a read depth of ≥5. We observed discrepancies among sequence variants identified by the different platforms. CONCLUSIONS Although oligonucleotide arrays are quick and easy to develop, some problematic regions may evade capture, necessitating sequential redesigning for complete optimization. Neither sequencing technology was able to detect every variant identified by Sanger sequencing because of well-known drawbacks of the NGS technologies. The rapidly decreasing error rates and costs of these technologies, however, coupled with advancing bioinformatic capabilities, make them an attractive option for molecular diagnostics in the very near future.