Citations

4032 Background: RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442) is the first global study to investigate anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in combination with different chemotherapy (chemo) options in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At interim analysis (IA), tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemo demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) plus chemo, with a manageable safety profile. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum 3 years’ follow-up after study unblinding at IA. Methods: Adults with unresectable locally advanced recurrent/metastatic ESCC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled and randomized (1:1; stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg (Arm A) or PBO (Arm B) IV every 3 weeks plus chemo (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine or platinum plus paclitaxel), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), all per INV, and safety. Results: In total, 649 patients (pts) were randomized (Arm A, n=326; Arm B, n=323). At a minimum study follow-up of 36.0 months, improvements in OS, PFS, and DoR in Arm A versus B (Table) were maintained relative to the IA. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with TIS plus chemo versus PBO plus chemo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.83). Similar to the IA, incidences of any-grade (96.6% vs 96.3%) or grade ≥3 (67.0% vs 64.5%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable between Arms A and B, respectively; treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were higher in Arm A (32.1%) versus B (22.1%). In Arm A versus B, respectively, serious TRAEs occurred in 29.9% vs 19.6% of pts; TRAEs leading to death occurred in 1.9% and 1.2%. Conclusions: After minimum 3 years’ follow-up, 1L TIS plus chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS and durable antitumor response benefit versus PBO plus chemo in pts with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . [Table: see text]

e15589 Background: Most patients with mCRC eventually develop disease progression or intolerance to first- and second-line therapy. Fruquintinib, a selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs 1, 2, and 3, has emerged as a novel treatment option for refractory mCRC. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of Fruquintinib for the treatment of refractory mCRC compared to placebo in specific patient subgroups of interest. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting Fruquintinib efficacy. The data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines and our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023477783). Summary hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using a random-effects model. The likelihood of Fruquintinib being associated with adverse events (AEs) was expressed by odds ratios (ORs). Results: Of the 1138 studies yielded by the search, three were included, totaling 1178 patients, of whom 786 (67%) received Fruquintinib. This meta-analysis of three randomized trials assessed the clinical outcomes of Fruquintinib in the intervention group compared with placebo in refractory mCRC. Pooled results from all three studies suggested the superiority of Fruquintinib in PFS (HR: 0.29 [0.25, 0.34], 95% CI, I² = 10%, p < 0.01) and OS (HR: 0.66 [0.57, 0.76], 95% CI, p < 0.01). Notably, subgroup analysis showed that Fruquintinib was associated with improved PFS in patients with prior use of VEGF inhibitors (HR: 0.32 [0.27, 0.38], 95% CI, p < 0.01) and those with more than three prior lines of treatment (HR: 0.37 [0.25, 0.53], 95% CI, p < 0.01), RAS wild-type status (HR: 0.25 [0.13, 0.35], 95% CI, p < 0.01), or RAS mutated (HR: 0.33 [0.28, 0.40], 95% CI, p < 0.01). In the safety analysis, fruquintinib and placebo showed no significant differences in serious AEs; nonetheless, the VEGFR inhibitor was associated with more frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR: 3.13 [1.15, 8.53], 95% CI, p = 0.03). Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of Fruquintinib for refractory mCRC regardless of previous use of VEGF inhibitors, the number of previous treatment lines, and gene RAS mutational status, without a significant increase in serious adverse events. [Table: see text]

2526 Background: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) is expressed on effector CD8+, CD4+, and regulatory T (Treg) cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and myeloid cells. Activation of TNFR2 is anticipated to yield effective anti-tumor immunity by stimulating T-cell and NK-cell activation and proliferation in the tumor microenvironment. HFB200301 is a first-in-class anti-TNFR2 agonistic monoclonal antibody that triggers both innate and adaptive immune stimulation by binding to a specific epitope on TNFR2. We report initial results of an ongoing Phase I dose escalation, multicenter study (NCT05238883) of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with tislelizumab (TIS) in patients (pts) with advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and initial efficacy of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with TIS. Eligible pts, ≥18 years with an ECOG PS 0-1 and advanced solid tumors, will be enrolled in dose escalation at 5 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W), 3 different dose cohorts in combination with TIS (Q4W), or in dose expansion following determination of safety. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: A total of 39 pts have been enrolled, 27 pts in monotherapy and 12 pts in combination. All pts received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 23 pts (59%) had prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in either the monotherapy or combination arms. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 44% of monotherapy and in 50% of combination pts, with pruritis (11%), tremor (7%), fatigue (7%), asthenia (7%) and nausea (7%) being the most common TRAEs. No ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs were reported, and there were no drug discontinuations due to TRAEs. Preliminary HFB200301 PK analysis demonstrated non-linear clearance of HFB200301, with dose-proportional maximum concentration [Cmax], achieving sufficient exposures for peripheral target engagement in all tested doses. Emerging PD data demonstrates evidence of immune activation and expansion of CD8+ T cells, but not Tregs, in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood. Single cell RNAseq analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated PD modulation in TNFR2 positive immune cell types post-HFB200301 treatment. Early response evaluation reveals ongoing durable clinical responses (> 6 months) in a PD-L1+ pleural mesothelioma pt and an EBV+ gastric cancer pt from combination cohorts. Conclusions: HFB200301 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK, with PD and preliminary clinical activity in monotherapy and in combination with TIS in pts with heavily pre-treated refractory solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05238883 .

3053 Background: Recently, early studies have identified circulating stromal cells (CStCs), i.e. Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs), in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed invasive cancers, which are phagocytic myeloid immune cells emanating from primary tumors. However, no study has evaluated CAMLs as a pan solid tumor screening tool nor their clinical impact on pt outcomes. We analyzed the blood of untreated newly diagnosed cancer pts (n=441), or in non-malignant conditions (i.e. pancreatic cysts, n=77), or healthy controls (n=100). We found that CAMLs are prevalent (82%) in cancer pt blood, absent in healthy controls (0%) and less common in non-malignant conditions (36%), with correlations to worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Anonymized peripheral blood was taken from n=441 pts before or after confirmation of invasive malignancy [stage I (n=105), stage II (n=125), stage III (n=114), stage IV (n=97) with pathologically confirmed lung (n=84), pancreas (n=61), breast (n=73), prostate (n=65), esophageal (n=34), Renal Cell (n=29), Sarcoma (n=27), or Other (n=68). In addition, anonymized blood was taken from pts with untreated non-malignant conditions including benign breast masses (n=19), Lupus (n=11), liver Cirrhosis (n=6), rising PSA (n=24), or other benign mass (n=17); and from healthy control volunteers (n=100). CAMLs were isolated by CellSieve microfiltration, defined as enlarged polyploid cells with cytokeratin+ and/or CD45/CD14+. Pts were monitored for 0-8 years (median=2.6) for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: CAMLs were found in 82% of all cancer pts averaging 5.4 CAMLs, specifically, in 66% of Stage I, 85% Stage II, 84% Stage III, and 92% Stage IV. No CAMLs were found in any healthy controls, but were in 36% of non-malignant pts. CAML sensitivity in cancer vs healthy was 82% (CI95% 78-85%), specificity=100% (CI95% 96-100%), PPV=100% (CI95% 99-100%), NPV=55% (CI95% 50-60%). CAML sensitivity in cancer vs benign was 82% (CI95% 78-85%), specificity=64% (CI95% 32-44%), PPV=93% (CI95% 90-95%), NPV=38% (CI95% 32-44%). CAML presence was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=2.0, 95%CI 1.4-2.9, p<0.0001) & OS (HR=2.2, 95%CI 1.4-3.3, p=0.0004), with engorged phagocytic CAMLs (>50um), highly significant for worse PFS (HR=3.3, 95%CI 2.5-4.5, p<0.0001) & OS (HR=3.0, 95%CI 2.1-4.3, p<0.0001). Further, in benign pts positive for CAMLs, 2 pts were in situ, 16 had histologies with increased cancer risk (i.e. IPMN, atypical hyperplasia), and 5 pts died within 3 years. Conclusions: CAMLs appear to be a highly sensitive blood based biomarker that can identify invasive carcinoma in all stages of cancer regardless of subtype, but are not found in healthy controls & rare in non-malignant conditions. Further, enlarged phagocytic CAMLs appeared to correlate with shorter PFS and OS prior to treatment induction.

Background and Aims: We compared the safety and efficacy of bintrafusp alfa (BA) in combination with gemcitabine+cisplatin (GemCis), to those of GemCis alone, in patients with biliary tract cancer. Approach and Results: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive design phase 2/3 trial (NCT04066491) included adults who are treatment-naive with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients (N = 297) were randomized to receive an IV infusion of BA (2400 mg once/3 wk) plus GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 +cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8/3 wk; 8 cycles) (BA group, n = 148) or placebo+GemCis (placebo group, n = 149). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). For adaptation analysis (phase 2-phase 3; data cutoff: May 20, 2021), efficacy was assessed in the first 150 patients who were antibiotic-naive when 80 progression-free survival events had occurred and ≥ 19 weeks of follow-up had been completed (BA, n = 73; placebo, n = 77). Median OS (95% CI) for the BA (11.5 mo [9.3–not estimable]) and placebo (11.5 mo [10.0–not estimable]) groups was comparable (hazard ration 1.23 [95% CI 0.66–2.28]; p = 0.7394); OS data maturity was 27.2% (41 events/151 patients). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was anemia (BA, 26.0%; placebo, 22.8%). Bleeding adverse events were reported more frequently in the BA group (28.8%) versus the placebo group (7.4%). Deaths within 60 days of the first dose were reported in 7.5% and 1.3% of patients in the BA and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusions: BA+GemCis did not provide a clinically meaningful benefit compared with GemCis alone as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer, and the study was discontinued early (terminated: August 20, 2021).

2531 Background: The immune co-stimulatory receptor OX40 is expressed on CD4+ T cells, including regulatory T cells (Tregs). First generation OX40 agonists faced limitations from interference with endogenous OX40-OX40L binding, leading to decreased surface OX40 levels on T cells. Distinguished by its unique epitope on OX40, the novel next generation IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) HFB301001 facilitates agonistic activity without impeding endogenous OX40 ligand binding. This allows for effective co-stimulation of T cells without diminishing OX40 levels. Additionally, HFB301001 exhibited superior in vivoanti-tumor activity and ability to enhance effector CD8+ T cell function compared to a benchmark first generation OX40 agonist in preclinical studies. Here, we report initial data of an ongoing dose-escalation study (NCT05229601) of HFB301001 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HFB301001. Eligible pts ≥18 years old (ECOG PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumors are enrolled in 4 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W) dose escalation. Solid tumor types were selected using Drug Intelligent Science (DIS®), employing integrative bulk and single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) analyses to confirm and prioritize prospective targets in specific immune cell types. Sequential analysis of peripheral blood and tumor tissue biomarkers is performed. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: As of January 06, 2024, 26 pts were enrolled, all having received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 81% received prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The majority of pts (77%) were male, median age was 62.5 years (range 41-78). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 34.6% of pts, none ≥ grade 3. Common TRAEs included rash (19%), pruritis (12%) and arthralgia (8%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Preliminary results demonstrate dose-proportional increases in maximum concentration, typical mAb volume of distribution, and nonlinear clearance. On treatment biopsies revealed expansion of both natural killer and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, with no notable expansion of Tregs. Analysis of peripheral blood by scRNAseq and immunophenotyping revealed expansion of cytotoxic CD8+T cells relative to CD4+ T cells post treatment. Preliminary efficacy analysis indicates a disease-control rate (DCR) of > 60% with greatest effect seen in hepato-cellular and renal cell carcinoma. Median time on treatment was 1.9 months (range 0.9-17 months). Conclusions: HFB301001 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK and PD immunomodulation, and DCR in heavily pretreated solid tumors. HFB301001 warrants further evaluation and expansion in specific tumor types is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05229601 .

11562 Background: High-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) pose a therapeutic challenge due to the high risk of recurrence, even following complete resection. Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking angiogenesis pathways of VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR. Given a promising efficacy for treating patients with unresectable advanced STS in previous trials, we evaluated the role of anlotinib as adjuvant therapy for completely resected high-grade STS. Methods: In a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, eligible patients were those adults who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after complete resection of high-grade STS. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral 12 mg anlotinib or placebo once daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks as a cycle, with up to six cycles until disease recurrence, unmanageable toxicity or death. The primary endpoints included 1-year, 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Between June 2019 and November 2023, 88 patients were randomly assigned to receive anlotinib (n=44) or placebo (n=44). With a median follow-up of 25.99 months at data accrual cutoff on Jan 15, 2024, the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were 88% and 77% in the anlotinib group, compared to 64% and 58% in the placebo group. Compared to patients in the placebo group, patients in the anlotinib group had a reduced risk of disease recurrence (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.22~1.00, P= 0.0445]). The median DFS was not reached. Based on tumor histology, the greatest improvement in DFS with anlotinib versus placebo was observed in patients with myxofibrosarcoma (1-year DFS rate: 82% versus 61%; 2-year DFS rate: 64% versus 43%, HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.17~1.65], P= 0.2698) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (1-year DFS rate: 86% versus 67%; 2-year DFS rate: 78% versus 67%, HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.12~2.87], P= 0.4971). Thirty-eight patients experienced adverse events (AEs; 34 with grade 1~2, 4 with grade 3): 28 patients (64%) in the anlotinib group versus 10 patients (23%) in the placebo group ( P<0.001). Three patients discontinued anlotinib, including two for proteinuria/hematuresis (2/44, 5%) and one for secondary poor surgical wound healing (1/44, 2%). Conclusions: Current results suggest anlotinib could lower disease recurrence risk in patients with completely resected high-grade STS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03951571 . [Table: see text]

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP) score and rate of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) progression and cognition. Methods: Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Florida Familial Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry (2011-2020) with 2 brain-MRI scans at least 1 year apart were included. The primary outcome was annual change in WMH volume (cm3/year) stratified as fast versus slow (above vs. below median). Cognition was assessed using a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, 0-30). FSRP score (0 to 8) was calculated by summing the presence of age 65 years or older, smoking, systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mmHg, diabetes, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and antihypertensive medication use. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between FSRP and WMH progression, and cognition. Results: In all, 207 patients were included, with a mean age of 60±16 y and 54.6% female. FSRP scores risk distribution was: 31.9% scored 0 to 1, 36.7% scored 2 to 3, and 31.4% scored ≥4. The baseline WMH volume was 9.6 cm3 (IQR: 3.3-28.4 cm3), and the annual rate of WMH progression was 0.9 cm3/year (IQR: 0.1 to 3.1 cm3/year). A higher FSRP score was associated with fast WMH progression (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22-1.72; P<0.001) and a lower MMSE score (23.6 vs. 27.1; P<0.001). There was a dose-dependent relationship between higher FSRP score and fast WMH progression (odds ratios, 2.20, 4.64, 7.86, 8.03 for FSRP scores 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively; trend P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between higher FSRP scores and accelerated WMH progression, as well as lower cognition.

Abstract Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.

7558 Background: Survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) continues to improve with the newer therapies, but there is no clear evidence of a cure and patients continue to relapse. However, most patients have the most extended period without progression with their first-line therapy, and subsequent therapies often provide a shorter duration of response due to the use of drugs with overlapping mechanisms of action and, more importantly, a shorter first remission, pointing toward more aggressive disease biology. With newer immunotherapies being used at 1st relapse, this may change. We designed this study to explore the natural history of MM after the 1st relapse and define the predictors of outcome after the initial relapse. Methods: We identified all patients in the Mayo Clinic database diagnosed between Jan 2004-June 2019 who had had initial disease progression. The study cohort included 2005 patients. We explored the overall survival (OS) from the time of documented disease progression or the start of second-line treatment in patients who had not met IMWG criteria before second-line therapy. Front-line therapy was grouped into those with either an IMiD or PI, both IMiD and PI, daratumumab with IMiD and PI, and none of these agents. The IMiD and PI were always used with dexamethasone with or without an alkylator. Results: The median age was 63 (range 24-95) years and 60% were male. The median estimated follow-up from diagnosis for all patients was 86 mos. (95% CI; 82, 88) and the median time to progression from the start of therapy was 25 mos. (95% CI; 24, 26). The median OS from the first progression was 45 mos. (95% CI; 42, 50), 36 mos. for those diagnosed before 2009, and 52-53 mos. for those diagnosed later. On univariate analysis, age <70 at 1st relapse, RISS I, novel agents in initial therapy, CR in the first line, diagnosis after 2009, initial remission >18 mos, and initiation of therapy before IMWG progression were all associated with improved OS after 1st relapse (Table). On multivariate analysis, age <70, RISS I, initial remission >18 mos, and initiation of therapy before IMWG progression were all associated with improved OS after 1st relapse. Conclusions: The study provides an estimate of the outcomes and significant predictors of outcomes after 1st relapse in patients with MM. These factors should be taken into consideration when designing clinical trials in this patient population. In particular, these factors identify a high-risk group of patients not always identified by baseline characteristics and should be the focus of future trials. [Table: see text]