McAndrew, Natalie S.

ABSTRACT Aims This study aimed to describe how emergency nurses (ENs) experience secondary traumatic stress (STS) within their practice environments, focusing on the strategies they use to cope and the supportive resources they draw upon to manage its impact on their lives. Design This paper presents the qualitative findings from a larger mixed‐methods survey study on STS among ENs. Methods A geographically diverse U.S. sample of ENs was recruited through social media to participate in an online survey. All participants ( n = 275) were asked to respond to open‐ended survey questions, and 118 of these participants provided answers to at least one open‐ended question. A self‐selected sample of 20 ENs completed semi‐structured interviews. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse open‐ended survey responses and interview transcripts. Results Three themes reflected ENs' experiences with STS: STS Is Real—It's Going to Affect Your Life; Something Must Be Wrong With Me: A Culture of Disconnection; and It's a Systems Issue, but We're in It Together. Participants described individual, unit, and organizational factors that influenced their experiences of STS and their access to and use of coping strategies and supportive resources. Conclusion ENs and nurse leaders acknowledged the impact of STS on their personal and professional lives and emphasized how the practice environment shaped their experiences. They perceived the accessibility of organizational resources, leadership behaviours, and team culture as influencing the individual strategies ENs use to manage the effects of repeated exposure to others' traumatic experiences. STS is a predictable occupational hazard for ENs; thus, healthcare organizations must invest in nurse‐identified supports to preserve workforce well‐being and clinical expertise. Implications for the Profession Assessing organizational readiness to address STS is recommended to ensure ENs receive effective, timely support. In response to these assessments, healthcare organizations should develop and implement policies that prioritize the mental health and well‐being of ENs, including proactive support systems and accessible mental health resources. Impact This study identifies participant‐perceived individual, team, leadership, and organizational conditions that may hinder or support ENs' management of STS. These findings identify potential targets for organizational assessment and support strategies intended to foster healthier practice environments and promote safe, high‐quality care. Reporting Method Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Patient or Public Contribution This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) entails prolonged recovery, serious complications, functional limitations, psychological distress, and extended isolation to prevent infection. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment disruptions, restricted caregiver access, and intensified isolation compounded these transplant-specific burdens. The longer-term influence of the pandemic experience on HCT recovery and survivorship remains poorly understood. Methods In this qualitative descriptive study, adults with AML who underwent allogeneic HCT from March through September 2020 participated in virtual semi-structured interviews from July 2022 through April 2023, approximately two years post-transplant. Participants were identified through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Zoom or phone interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis to describe survivorship experiences and opportunities to improve supportive care. Results A total of 25 AML survivors (ages 24-78, 56% male) were interviewed approximately two years post-transplant. Three themes were found: (1) Transplant is an arduous journey; (2) The COVID-19 pandemic shaped the transplant experience in complex and far-reaching ways; (3) Transplant demands sustained personal and relational investment throughout the transplant journey. Conclusions This study enhances our understanding of the stressors associated with transplantation during periods of heightened adversity, while also identifying opportunities to strengthen healthcare systems and supportive care services for this population. Situating these experiences within the context of a global health emergency offers a rare lens into how external stressors can exacerbate the already demanding nature of HCT survivorship. By understanding survivors’ experiences, healthcare systems can better anticipate and address the evolving needs of transplant survivors.

Feeding children is part of family caregiving. Children with Down syndrome have increased risks for feeding problems, but there is limited literature on caregiving specific to feeding children with Down syndrome. The purpose of this study is to understand mothers’ experiences related to feeding their 3- to 10-year-old children with Down syndrome within family and sociocultural contexts. This was a qualitative study using interviews and photo-elicitation. Twenty-nine mothers of children with Down syndrome in the United States participated. Three themes were identified: (a) Feeding Challenges and Foodwork Related to the Child’s Feeding Attributes, (b) Family Dynamics and Routines that Impact Foodwork, and (c) Influence of Family and Sociocultural Norms on Feeding Experiences. Mothers engage in complex family caregiving work to feed their children with Down syndrome. Feeding can be influenced by child and family characteristics and by sociocultural contexts. Findings have implications for clinical practice and research.

ABSTRACT Background Feeding is an important health consideration for children with Down syndrome due to their increased risks for feeding challenges and overweight/obesity. Healthcare providers play an important role in providing feeding guidance to families; however, there is limited research on feeding children with Down syndrome and the role of healthcare providers. The purpose of this study is to explore how interactions with healthcare providers contribute to mothers' experiences feeding their children with Down syndrome. Methods In this qualitative study, 29 mothers of children with Down syndrome aged 3–10 years completed semi‐structured interviews. Results Three themes were identified: (1) Access, provider expertise and maternal concerns, (2) Infant feeding experiences matter and (3) Mothers are experts on and advocates for their children. Conclusion Gaps in care were identified for children with Down syndrome and their families. Findings have implications for clinical practice and research related to feeding children with Down syndrome.

Abstract Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.