Citations

AbstractBackgroundMany proposed clinical decision support systems (CDSS) require multiple disparate data elements as input, which makes implementation difficult, and furthermore have a black‐box nature leading to low interpretability. Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG‐PET) is an established modality for the diagnosis of dementia, and a CDSS that uses only an FDG‐PET image to produce a reliable and understandable result would ease both of these challenges to clinical application.MethodA deep variational autoencoder (VAE) was used to extract a latent representation of each image through prior training from FDG‐PET brain images (n=2000). This unsupervised VAE has a novel graph convolutional architecture that makes it applicable to masked template space images. A logistic regression model was used to classify each image. A parametric study of the latent space revealed the imaging features that were used in the logistic regression model to differentiate each class. A separate dataset of participants labeled with their clinical diagnosis (n=1239) was used to assess the logistic regression model’s diagnostic accuracy of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n=679) and between common dementia subtypes: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n=310), Lewy body dementia (DLB) (n=151), and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n=99). The logistic regression classifier was evaluated using receiver‐operator characteristic (ROC‐AUC) curves.ResultROC‐AUC curves for CU and each dementia subtype are illustrated in Figure 1a. A k nearest neighbors model was used to develop a graphical representation of the latent space where nodes are images and edges are drawn between nearest neighbors, illustrated in Figure 1b. The graph of the latent space demonstrates a comparison between dementia subtypes and CU images.ConclusionIn this study, we developed a proof‐of‐concept VAE that can achieve differential diagnosis with 84.8% balanced accuracy. The model architecture provides visual interpretability, and shows that the hippocampi, parietal lobes, and cerebellum, were useful for distinguishing AD, the frontal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampi were useful for distinguishing DLB, and prefrontal pole, subcortical structures, and occipital lobe were useful for distinguishing bvFTD. These regions of metabolism align with clinical pathology and metabolic patterns.

AbstractBackgroundParkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies are characterized by abnormal iron deposition in the substantia nigra, which can be measured with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) on MRI. However, neuropathologic validation of the increased QSM in the substantia nigra associated with Lewy body disease (LBD) is lacking. We compared substantia nigra QSM on antemortem MRI between patients with and without Lewy‐related pathology which was confirmed by autopsy in all cases.MethodWe studied cases with antemortem QSM who underwent autopsy from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n=54). Immunohistochemistry was performed with rabbit NACP antibody against the amino acids 98‐115 of the α‐synuclein protein to detect Lewy‐related pathology. After neuropathologic evaluation, cases were classified as LBD‐present (n=13) if they had Lewy‐related pathology and LBD‐absent (n=42) if they did not have Lewy‐related pathology. Alzheimer’s disease co‐pathology was present in 9 of the LBD‐present cohort (70%). QSM was calculated for the whole substantia nigra and the two sub‐regions: pars compacta and pars reticulata. Non‐parametric Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to compare substantia nigra QSM values between LBD‐present and LBD‐absent cases. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses tested the accuracy of QSM to distinguish the two groups.ResultsLBD‐present group had higher QSM values in the substantia nigra than LBD‐absent group. Furthermore, sub‐regional analyses showed that the LBD‐present group had higher QSM in the substantia nigra pars compacta (p=0.008) but not in the pars reticulata than the LBD‐absent group (Figure 1). QSM of the substantia nigra pars compacta distinguished LBD‐present and LBD‐absent cases with good accuracy (AUC=0.74; p=0.006; Figure 2).ConclusionThis study provides neuropathologic insight into the relevance of QSM of substantia nigra pars compacta as an in‐vivo biomarker of autopsy‐confirmed LBD. These findings indicate that imaging evidence of abnormal iron deposition in the substantia nigra may serve as a biomarker of Lewy‐related pathology in patients with primary LBD (i.e., Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies) and patients with potential LBD co‐pathology (e.g., patients with Alzheimer disease).

AbstractBackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) frequently co‐occurs with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathologies, exacerbating disease progression. Biophysical models of diffusion imaging data, such as Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI), may reveal novel insights into the neurobiological substrates of AD on cortical and white matter microstructural injury.MethodA cohort of 57 DLB patients on the DLB spectrum (33 clinically probable DLB and 14 prodromal DLB) and 57 cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls underwent NODDI and PET imaging with [18F]‐Flortaucipir and [11C]‐PiB (Table 1). NODDI parameters were derived from white matter tracts and grey matter regions using the JHU “Eve” and Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template atlases, respectively. Conditional logistic models were used to compare these parameters between the two groups, accounting for the 1:1 matching on age and sex. The associations of tau and amyloid‐β with NODDI parameters across the white matter tracts were examined with linear regressions. A region‐by‐region approach was adopted to evaluate the relationships of tau and amyloid‐β with grey matter NODDI, adjusting for age, APOE, and local grey matter volumes.ResultDLB spectrum patients exhibited extensive white matter abnormalities relative to CU, including lower fractional anisotropy, higher mean diffusivity (MD), and lower tissue‐weighted neurite density (tNDI). In grey matter, these deficits were paralleled with higher MD and lower tNDI and ODI, primarily in the temporoparietal and posterior cortices. Regression models revealed significant associations of elevated [18F]‐Flortaucipir uptake with deficits in temporal and limbic white matter tracts and a temporal‐lobe pattern of higher MD and lower tNDI in the cortex (Figure 1). No associations were observed with [11C]‐PiB in the DLB spectrum.ConclusionThese findings demonstrated an in vivo relationship between tau deposition and neurite deficits that spatially aligned with the canonical AD “cortical signature” of neurodegeneration in both white matter tracts and grey matter regions in DLB. Our study underscores the detrimental impact of AD pathology in DLB and provides a rationale for further investigations into the underlying mechanisms of AD in DLB. Future longitudinal studies tracking the progression of these changes could inform therapeutic strategies for DLB in the presence of AD pathologies

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the relationship between AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few longitudinal or neuropathological comparisons have been reported. We assessed the relationship of AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers in a large community cohort.MethodParticipants 50+ years with coincident AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers (pTau181/Aβ42, n=505, and Aβ42/40, n=54) were included. Of these participants, a subgroup was identified that had neuropathology data (n=47) of which many had longitudinal AβPET and CSF testing. The relationships of AβPET and CSF biomarkers were assessed cross‐sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in those with autopsy data. Analyses were performed using AβPET Meta‐ROI and AβPET early‐Aβ‐deposition ROIs (ROIs with early Aβ deposition: fusiform, angular, inferior temporal, middle temporal, middle occipital, and calcarine).ResultIn biomarker tests performed at the same time, more participants were AβPET+ and CSF‐ than AβPET‐ and CSF+ using Meta‐ROI AβPET. This discordance occurred more frequently when using early‐Aβ‐deposition regions (Figure 1). Of 47 participants with autopsy data, 35 had Thal stage ≥1. The sensitivity for earliest detection of cortical Aβ neuropathology by AβPET was 89% (31/35) and by CSF was 66%, (23/35). Eight of these 35 had positive AβPET findings and negative coincident CSF tests at the first time tested. Of these, 5/8 were Meta‐ROI and early AβPET ROI positive. The other 3/8 were only positive on early‐Aβ AβPET ROIs. Four of the 8 with negative CSF and positive AβPET had subsequent testing and 2/4 became positive on CSF tests after 1.5 years while 2/4 continued to be negative on subsequent testing.ConclusionAβPET is more sensitive for detection of early cortical Aβ deposition than CSF biomarkers in cross‐sectional or autopsy data. While the assessment of AβPET by standard Meta‐ROI AβPET methods showed cortical Aβ deposition occurring when not indicated by CSF biomarkers, AβPET ROIs for early Aβ deposition detected additional participants that were AβPET positive and AβCSF negative. These findings have implications for detecting early Aβ neuropathology among CU participants in Aβ prevention trials when robust detection is needed. Further work is needed to compare Aβ plasma biomarkers and AβPET using these methods.

Abstract Background Many proposed clinical decision support systems (CDSS) require multiple disparate data elements as input, which makes implementation difficult, and furthermore have a black‐box nature leading to low interpretability. Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG‐PET) is an established modality for the diagnosis of dementia, and a CDSS that uses only an FDG‐PET image to produce a reliable and understandable result would ease both of these challenges to clinical application. Method A deep variational autoencoder (VAE) was used to extract a latent representation of each image through prior training from FDG‐PET brain images (n=2000). This unsupervised VAE has a novel graph convolutional architecture that makes it applicable to masked template space images. A logistic regression model was used to classify each image. A parametric study of the latent space revealed the imaging features that were used in the logistic regression model to differentiate each class. A separate dataset of participants labeled with their clinical diagnosis (n=1239) was used to assess the logistic regression model’s diagnostic accuracy of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n=679) and between common dementia subtypes: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n=310), Lewy body dementia (DLB) (n=151), and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n=99). The logistic regression classifier was evaluated using receiver‐operator characteristic (ROC‐AUC) curves. Result ROC‐AUC curves for CU and each dementia subtype are illustrated in Figure 1a. A k nearest neighbors model was used to develop a graphical representation of the latent space where nodes are images and edges are drawn between nearest neighbors, illustrated in Figure 1b. The graph of the latent space demonstrates a comparison between dementia subtypes and CU images. Conclusion In this study, we developed a proof‐of‐concept VAE that can achieve differential diagnosis with 84.8% balanced accuracy. The model architecture provides visual interpretability, and shows that the hippocampi, parietal lobes, and cerebellum, were useful for distinguishing AD, the frontal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampi were useful for distinguishing DLB, and prefrontal pole, subcortical structures, and occipital lobe were useful for distinguishing bvFTD. These regions of metabolism align with clinical pathology and metabolic patterns.

AbstractBackgroundLimbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a neuropathologically‐defined disease, and it is frequently comorbid with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC). However, the neurological syndrome associated with LATE neuropathological change (LATE‐NC) is not defined. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic‐predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS) that is highly associated with LATE‐NC. These criteria assess degree of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low) based on features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, a mild clinical syndrome, impaired semantic knowledge, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau. We operationalized these criteria using two large datasets with clinical and pathologic outcomes.MethodWe screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and ADNI cohorts and applied the LANS criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; ADNI, n = 53). We compared frequencies of neuropathological diagnoses across LANS likelihoods, compared longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories across LANS likelihoods, and stratified ADNC/LATE‐NC patients according to their LANS likelihood and compared their longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories to those with ADNC or LATE‐NC.ResultADNC, ADNC/LATE‐NC and LATE‐NC accounted for 35%, 37% and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30%, 22%, and 9% of cases in the ADNI cohort, respectively (Fig. 1). ADNC cases had the lowest LANS likelihoods, LATE‐NC patients had the highest likelihoods, and ADNC/LATE‐NC patients had intermediate likelihoods. Patients with high LANS likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo‐limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods (Fig. 2). ADNC/LATE‐NC patients with higher likelihoods had more temporo‐limbic degeneration and a slower rate of cognitive decline, and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo‐parietal degeneration and a faster rate of cognitive decline (Fig. 3).ConclusionThe implementation of LANS criteria has implications for disambiguating the different driving etiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age to guide prognosis, treatment, and clinical trial design and enrollment. The development of in vivo biomarkers specific to TDP‐43 pathology are needed to further refine molecular associations between LANS and LATE‐NC and precise antemortem diagnoses of LATE.

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose In idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow is typically evaluated with a cardiac‐gated two‐dimensional (2D) phase‐contrast (PC) MRI through the cerebral aqueduct. This approach is limited by the evaluation of a single location and does not account for respiration effects on flow. In this study, we quantified the cardiac and respiratory contributions to CSF movement at multiple intracranial locations using a real‐time 2D PC‐MRI and evaluated the diagnostic value of CSF dynamics biomarkers in classifying iNPH patients. Methods This study included 37 participants: 16 iNPH, 10 Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 11 cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls. Anatomical and real‐time (non‐gated) PC images were acquired in a 3T Philips scanner. CSF flow was assessed at the foramen magnum, fourth ventricle, Sylvian fissure, lateral ventricle, and cerebral aqueduct. We calculated three CSF dynamics biomarkers: mean velocity amplitude, cardiac signal power, and respiratory signal power. Biomarkers from each location were evaluated for classifying iNPH versus AD and CU using support vector machine (SVM). A p ‐value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Results The velocity amplitude and cardiac signal power were significantly reduced in iNPH compared to CU ( p < 0.005) and AD ( p < 0.05) at the lateral ventricle. The SVM model using biomarkers from the lateral ventricle performed significantly better at classifying iNPH than the other locations in terms of accuracy ( p < 0.005) and diagnostic odds ratio ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Evaluation of CSF movement beyond the cerebral aqueduct may aid in identifying patients with and understanding the pathophysiology of iNPH.

Abstract Genome-wide DNA methylation signatures correlate with and distinguish central nervous system (CNS) tumor types. Since the publication of the initial CNS tumor DNA methylation classifier in 2018, this platform has been increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for CNS tumors, with multiple studies showing the value and utility of DNA methylation-based classification of CNS tumors. A Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) Working Group was therefore convened to describe the current state of the field and to provide advice based on lessons learned to date. Here, we provide recommendations for the use of DNA methylation-based classification in CNS tumor diagnostics, emphasizing the attributes and limitations of the modality. We emphasize that the methylation classifier is one diagnostic tool to be used alongside previously established diagnostic tools in a fully integrated fashion. In addition, we provide examples of the inclusion of DNA methylation data within the layered diagnostic reporting format endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. We emphasize the need for backward compatibility of future platforms to enable accumulated data to be compatible with new versions of the array. Finally, we outline the specific connections between methylation classes and CNS WHO tumor types to aid in the interpretation of classifier results. It is hoped that this update will assist the neuro-oncology community in the interpretation of DNA methylation classifier results to facilitate the accurate diagnosis of CNS tumors and thereby help guide patient management.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) manifests prior to the age of 65, and affects 4%–8% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current analyses sought to examine longitudinal cognitive trajectories of participants with early‐onset dementia. METHODS Data from 307 cognitively normal (CN) volunteer participants and those with amyloid‐positive EOAD or amyloid‐negative cognitive impairment (EOnonAD) were compared. Cognitive trajectories across a comprehensive cognitive battery spanning 42 months were examined using mixed‐effects modeling. RESULTS The EOAD group displayed worse cognition at baseline relative to EOnonAD and CN groups, and more aggressive declines in cognition over time. The largest effects were observed on measures of executive functioning domains, while memory declines were blunted in EOAD. DISCUSSION EOAD declined 2–4× faster than EOnonAD, and EOAD pathology is not restricted to memory networks. Early identification of deficits is critical to ensure that individuals with sporadic EOAD can be considered for treatment using disease‐modifying medications. Highlights Represents the most comprehensive longitudinal characterization of sporadic EOAD to date. The trajectory of cognitive declines was steep for EOAD participants and worse than for other groups. Executive functioning measures exhibited the greatest declines over time in EOAD.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) share similar amyloid etiology, but evidence from smaller‐scale studies suggests that they manifest differently clinically. Current analyses sought to contrast the cognitive profiles of EOAD and LOAD. METHODS Z‐ score cognitive‐domain composites for 311 amyloid‐positive sporadic EOAD and 314 amyloid‐positive LOAD participants were calculated from baseline data from age‐appropriate control cohorts. Z‐ score composites were compared between AD groups for each domain. RESULTS After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD displayed worse visuospatial, executive functioning, and processing speed/attention skills relative to LOAD, and LOAD displayed worse language, episodic immediate memory, and episodic delayed memory. DISCUSSION Sporadic EOAD possesses distinct cognitive profiles relative to LOAD. Clinicians should be alert for non‐amnestic impairments in younger patients to ensure proper identification and intervention using disease‐modifying treatments. Highlights Both early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants displayed widespread cognitive impairments relative to their same‐aged peers. Cognitive impairments were more severe for EOAD than for LOAD participants in visuospatial and executive domains. Memory and language impairments were more severe for LOAD than for EOAD participants Results were comparable after removing clinical phenotypes of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (lv‐PPA), and frontal‐variant AD.