Lee, Jeyeon

Abstract Background Neuroinflammation plays a crucial role in neuronal damage, synaptic dysfunction, and impaired neurogenesis, significantly contributing to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression. To address this, we assessed ER176's effectiveness in detecting neuroinflammation in cognitively unimpaired (CU) A–, CU A+, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD participants, with a particular focus on their amyloid and tau status. This research aims to help identify suitable candidates for specialized treatment when adversely impacted by neuroinflammation. Method Participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging were recruited for this study. The study included four participant groups: CU A– ( n = 25), CU A+ ( n = 25), MCI A+ ( n = 25), and AD ( n = 15). We explored the variations in neuroinflammation PET results among different groups. Result When compared to CU A–, both CU A+ and MCI A+ groups (Figure 1) showed greater regional neuroinflammation. AD exhibited more widely affected regions with neuroinflammation (temporal, occipital, and parietal lobes) than CU A‐ over the PVC spectrum (Figure 1). Minimally more neuroinflammation was seen (temporal lobes) in MCI A+ than CU A+ (Figure 1). AD had more widespread regional neuroinflammation vs CU A+ (Figure 1) than in MCI A+ vs CU+. The least difference in neuroinflammation is seen in MCI A+ vs AD (Figure 1). For A+ vs A‐, A+ showed more widespread neuroinflammation (Figure 2). T+ (tau>=1.29) vs T‐ (tau<1.29) showed more neuro inflammation with T+ (Figure 2). Comparisons varied modestly in significance level with PVC method (Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion The findings demonstrate that neuroinflammatory changes are associated with AD pathology. Even at early stages, neuroinflammation is associated with CU+. As the condition progresses, neuroinflammation extends to more brain regions and is associated with increased A+ and T+ pathology in MCI A+ and AD. These results suggest an early and persistent role of neuroinflammation in the progression AD pathology, indicating that therapy options could include early anti‐inflammatory intervention, even prior to clinical symptoms, along with treatment during clinical manifestations. PVC methods used may provide somewhat variable results.

Abstract Background Some data suggest that neuroinflammation may be associated with pro‐inflammatory states in the body. Systemic, proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL‐1, IL‐6, etc.) are produced by a variety of comorbidities. Neuroinflammation has been shown to be associated with the accumulation of amyloid in the brain (Becher, Heneka). We hypothesized that systemic cytokine production could be associated with neuroinflammation and thereby be related to brain amyloid accumulation. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neuroinflammation, amyloid accumulation and systemic cytokines. Method 90 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) received a fasting cytokine panel over a 5‐year span where IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFa levels were measured. Participants were divided into four groups: cognitively unimpaired with normal levels of amyloid (CU A‐, n = 25), cognitively unimpaired with elevated amyloid (CU A+, n = 25), and mild cognitively impaired (MCI) with amyloid positive (MCI A+, n = 25), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) with elevated amyloid (AD A+, n = 15). To compare regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from neuroinflammation PET based on amyloid status (A+ vs A‐) and the four cytokines, Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations were used to assess pairwise group differences. Result Using Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations, no strong relationship was found between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. While comparing CUA‐ vs CUA+ in Figure 1, three regions (supplementary motor area, frontal superior medial lobe, and middle cingulate cortex) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05). However, Figure 2 showed an overarching trend bias towards significance across most regions in IL10, IL6, and TNFa. Conclusion Although significant relationships between systemic inflammation, brain amyloid and neuroinflammation were limited, the data show an overarching trend bias in broad brain regions, suggesting that further analyses are needed, possibly with larger sample sizes, to assess the relationship of regional neuroinflammation and amyloid to systemic inflammation. Future analyses could also regress out factors like sex, age, and genotype to further proinflammatory cytokine research.

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the relationship between AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few longitudinal or neuropathological comparisons have been reported. We assessed the relationship of AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers in a large community cohort.MethodParticipants 50+ years with coincident AβPET and AβCSF biomarkers (pTau181/Aβ42, n=505, and Aβ42/40, n=54) were included. Of these participants, a subgroup was identified that had neuropathology data (n=47) of which many had longitudinal AβPET and CSF testing. The relationships of AβPET and CSF biomarkers were assessed cross‐sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in those with autopsy data. Analyses were performed using AβPET Meta‐ROI and AβPET early‐Aβ‐deposition ROIs (ROIs with early Aβ deposition: fusiform, angular, inferior temporal, middle temporal, middle occipital, and calcarine).ResultIn biomarker tests performed at the same time, more participants were AβPET+ and CSF‐ than AβPET‐ and CSF+ using Meta‐ROI AβPET. This discordance occurred more frequently when using early‐Aβ‐deposition regions (Figure 1). Of 47 participants with autopsy data, 35 had Thal stage ≥1. The sensitivity for earliest detection of cortical Aβ neuropathology by AβPET was 89% (31/35) and by CSF was 66%, (23/35). Eight of these 35 had positive AβPET findings and negative coincident CSF tests at the first time tested. Of these, 5/8 were Meta‐ROI and early AβPET ROI positive. The other 3/8 were only positive on early‐Aβ AβPET ROIs. Four of the 8 with negative CSF and positive AβPET had subsequent testing and 2/4 became positive on CSF tests after 1.5 years while 2/4 continued to be negative on subsequent testing.ConclusionAβPET is more sensitive for detection of early cortical Aβ deposition than CSF biomarkers in cross‐sectional or autopsy data. While the assessment of AβPET by standard Meta‐ROI AβPET methods showed cortical Aβ deposition occurring when not indicated by CSF biomarkers, AβPET ROIs for early Aβ deposition detected additional participants that were AβPET positive and AβCSF negative. These findings have implications for detecting early Aβ neuropathology among CU participants in Aβ prevention trials when robust detection is needed. Further work is needed to compare Aβ plasma biomarkers and AβPET using these methods.

AbstractBackgroundSleep’s crucial role in maintaining brain health is increasingly recognized, particularly due to the rising prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases. It not only supports cognitive function but also aids in clearing brain metabolic waste through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. During sleep, especially in the non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) phase, CSF flow increases, essential for removing neurotoxic substances like amyloid‐beta proteins. This study explores the link between sleep respiratory patterns and CSF flow promotion.MethodElectroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were simultaneously acquired during sleep from Gu, et al. (n = 29) (Gu et al. 2022). Respiration, measured via a respiratory belt, calculated respiratory volume (RV) as the standard deviation within a 5 second sliding window. EEG data processed delta band power (1‐4Hz) averaged across channels. Parcellated fMRI data using the brain template followed by the calculation of the averaged gray matter (GM) blood‐oxygen‐level‐dependent (BOLD) signal using the GM mask. CSF inflow was manually extracted from the fMRI’s bottom slice at the foramen magnum level. Subsequently, all signals were temporally aligned to the peak of the CSF inflow signal.ResultAt the time of CSF inflow (time = 0 sec. in the Figure 1A‐D), we observed an earlier increase in RV and EEG delta power, followed by changes in the GM BOLD signal (Figure 1). EEG and RV changes preceded the BOLD signal changes, which, in turn, preceded changes in CSF flow. Sensitivity to detect RV involvement during MRI varied with the placement of the respiratory belt, being least sensitive on the chest and more on the abdomen.ConclusionThese findings raise an interesting question on the role respiratory patterns during sleep, particularly in the NREM phase. Speculatively, RV change may influence CSF circulation during NREM sleep (Figure 1E). This enhancement in CSF flow is crucial for the clearance of metabolic waste from the brain, potentially reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Our findings indicate that respiratory volume may serve as a significant marker for CSF circulation during sleep.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONUnderstanding the relationship between amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few population‐based or neuropathologic comparisons have been reported.METHODSParticipants 50+ years with Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers (phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181/Aβ42, n = 505, and Aβ42/40, n = 54) were included from the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging. From these participants, an autopsy subgroup was identified (n = 47). The relationships of Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers were assessed cross‐sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in autopsy data.RESULTSCross‐sectionally, more participants were Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− than Aβ PET− versus Aβ CSF+ with an incremental effect when using Aβ PET regions selected for early Aβ deposition. The sensitivity for the first detection of Thal phase ≥ 1 in longitudinal data was higher for Aβ PET (89%) than p‐tau181/Aβ42 (64%).DISCUSSIONAβ PET can detect earlier cortical Aβ deposition than Aβ CSF biomarkers. Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− findings are several‐fold greater using regional Aβ PET analyses and in peri‐threshold‐standardized uptake value ratio participants.Highlights Amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) has greater sensitivity for Aβ deposition than Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in early Aβ development. A population‐based sample of participants (n = 505) with PET and CSF tests was used. Cortical regions showing early Aβ on Aβ PET were also used in these analyses. Neuropathology was used to validate detection of Aβ by Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe implications of positive tau positron emission tomography (T) with negative beta amyloid positron emission tomography (A) are not well understood. We investigated cognitive performance in participants who were T+ but A‐.METHODSWe evaluated 98 participants from the Mayo Clinic who were T+ and A‐. Participants were matched 2:1 to A‐ and T‐ cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls. Cognitive test scores were compared between different groups.RESULTSThe A‐T+ group demonstrated lower performance than the A‐T‐ group on the Mini‐Mental Status Exam (MMSE) (p < 0.001), Wechsler Memory Scale‐Revised Logical Memory I (p < 0.001) and Logical Memory II (p < 0.001), Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) delayed recall (p = 0.004), category fluency (animals p = 0.005; vegetables p = 0.021), Trail Making Test A and B (p < 0.001), and others. There were no significant differences in demographic features or apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 genotype between CU A‐T+ and CI A‐T+.DISCUSSIONA‐T+ participants show an association with lower cognitive performance.

AbstractBackgroundDecreased image self‐similarity of repeated FDG‐PET scans has been suggested to indicate increased risk for disease progression. Here, we compared several self‐similarity measures based on conventionally used voxel‐ and ROI‐based approaches and those based on patterns of cortical metabolism.MethodFrom the MCSA/ADRC, we included 376 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals and those with a clinical diagnosis of MCI (n = 55) or AD (n = 20) who had two FDG‐PET images within 2‐3 years and clinical follow‐up available. We compared image self‐similarity for three approaches: voxel, ROI and “eigenbrain” (Fig.1). For the voxel approach, FDG‐PET images were normalized to template space, grey matter masked, and intensity normalized to the pons to create standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) for each voxel. From these images, mean SUVR were extracted for 122 ROIs (MCALT‐ADIR122) for the ROI approach. For the “eigenbrain” approach, the SUVR images were transformed to a latent space embedding composed of 253 components (“eigenbrains”) and reflecting metabolism patterns, that was generated in an independent sample of 7008 FDG‐PET images. For each approach, image self‐similarity between baseline and follow‐up values (voxel, ROI or eigenbrain) was determined using three metrics (Pearson correlation, cosine, Euclidean distance). We computed AUC to determine which approach and metric would best discriminate between groups. We used Cox regression analyses to assess whether the metrics could predict disease progression.ResultComparing each distance metric across approaches, AUC was highest in differentiating clinical diagnoses using self‐similarity measures based on eigenbrains, then voxels, then ROIs (e.g., Euclidean distance CU vs AD AUC eigenbrain: 0.86, voxel: 0.75, ROI: 0.71; Fig.1). Across all approaches, Euclidean distance always discriminated best between classes. Eigenbrain‐based Euclidean distance was associated with risk for progression to MCI in CU (HR [95%CI]: 1.25 [1.05, 1.49]), and eigenbrain‐based cosine and Euclidean distances were associated with risk for progression to AD in MCI (1.61 [1.1, 2.34] and 1.53 [1.01, 2.31], respectively), while we found no associations for voxel‐ or ROI‐based distance measures.ConclusionEigenbrain‐based measures outperformed other, more conventional approaches in discriminating clinical diagnoses, and were associated with risk for disease progression. Our results suggest that decreased self‐similarity in metabolism patterns informs on disease stage and prognosis.

AbstractBackgroundThe implications of a positive tau (T) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with a negative beta amyloid (A) PET are not well understood. We investigated cognitive performance in participants who were positive on tau PET but negative on beta amyloid PET.MethodWe evaluated 98 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) who were positive for Flortaucipir (FTP) and negative for PiB PET. Participants were classified as A‐ and T+ based on Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVr) of FTP and PiB PET scans, and were matched 2:1 to amyloid negative and tau negative cognitively unimpaired controls from the MCSA. Cognitive test scores were compared between the combined ADRC/MCSA group and MCSA only group. We also examined clinical diagnoses in our cohort. The most common were Alzheimer’s Disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) amongst others.ResultThere were no significant differences in demographic features or PiB SUVr between groups. There were significant differences in APOE genotype between groups. In the combined ADRC/MCSA group, 25% of A‐T‐ and 13% of A‐T+ were APOE e4 carriers (p = 0.016), and in the MCSA only group, 27% of A‐T‐and 10% of A‐T+ were APOE e4 carriers (p = 0.010). In the combined ADRC/MCSA group, the A‐T+ group demonstrated lower performance than the A‐T‐ group on the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) (p<0.001), Wechsler Memory Scale‐Revised Logical Memory I (p<0.001) and Logical Memory II (p<0.001), Auditory verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall (AVLT) (p = 0.004), Category fluency animals (p = 0.005), Category fluency vegetables (p = 0.021), Trailmaking test A (p<0.001), Trail making test B (p<0.001), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale‐IV (WAIS‐IV) (p = 0.002), and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) (p = 0.003). In the MCSA only group, the A‐T+ group had lower scores on Logical Memory II (p = 0.022), AVLT delated recall (p = 0.04), and WAIS‐R block design (p = 0.035) compared to the A‐T‐group.ConclusionPositive tau PET in the absence of beta‐amyloid positivity is associated with lower cognitive performance.

AbstractBackgroundBoth 11C‐Pittsburgh compound‐B (PiB) and 18F‐Flutemetamol (FMT) have off‐target white matter (WM) signal that increases with age, but WM uptake is stronger with FMT than PiB. Although their WM patterns are comparably associated with age, the difference between them may impact visual and quantitative assessments of cortical amyloid‐β uptake. Our objective was to determine whether PiB PET and FMT PET visual assessments agree with quantitative cortical amyloid‐β evaluations.MethodA cohort of cognitively unimpaired (CU) younger adults with median (range) of 39 (30, 48) years (N = 30), CU older adults with age of 67 (61, 83) years (N = 30) and older adults with AD dementia with age of 67 (54‐84) years (N = 23) underwent MRI, PiB PET and FMT PET. PiB‐PET and FMT PET scans were evaluated visually by two nuclear medicine specialists blinded to participant information. Disagreements were reconciled with a second, joint round of visual reads. Readers applied standard visual assessment criteria using the absence of regional gray matter (GM) and WM contrast as an indication of a positive scan. The global cortical PiB standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) was obtained referencing to cerebellar crus uptake and converted to centiloid values. Participants were classified as PiB positive/negative using a centiloid cut‐off of 22.ResultPiB and FMT visual positivity agreed with quantitative positivity on PiB‐based centiloid values in 69/83 for PiB and 78/83 for FMT. There were 10 disagreements with PiB, 1 disagreement with FMT and 4 disagreements with both. Few disagreements occurred near the centiloid threshold. Interestingly, all disagreements between visual reads (amyloid‐β positive) and centiloid (amyloid‐β negative) in the CU younger were with PiB. FMT disagreements were always in the CU older and AD groups.ConclusionDisagreements between amyloid‐β positivity on visual reads and quantitative measurements (centiloid) may depend on age and tracer. PiB WM uptake is lower than FMT WM uptake, which may lead to reduced contrast between GM and WM (part of the standard criteria for visual reads), especially in younger ages. In contrast, WM uptake increases at older ages, and increased WM signal may bleed more into cortical regions, hiding subtle, near‐threshold cortical uptake, especially with FMT.

AbstractBackgroundThe cardiac and respiratory cycles have been suggested as major drivers of cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) flow. The glymphatic system, one of the mechanisms for the clearance of amyloid‐beta and tau proteins, relies heavily on the movement(flow) of the CSF, and thus, investigating the forces that modulate the CSF flow is essential for understanding the glymphatic flux. Because breathing is trainable through exercise and self‐directed methods, various breathing methods may enhance the CSF flow.MethodReal‐time phase‐contrast MRI(pc‐MRI) was used to measure the CSF flow at the foramen magnum on a 3T. Fast resting‐state fMRI(rsfMRI;TR400ms) was conducted on a compact 3T. Under an IRB‐approved protocol, participants were instructed to breathe slowly and deeply, and subsequently switch to their spontaneous breathing. For rsfMRI data preprocessing, we performed motion correction, skull stripping, spatial smoothing(4mm), temporal filtering(0.01 to 0.1Hz), and linear and quadratic temporal trends removal. fMRI time courses were then normalized to Z‐score at each voxel before being averaged. On the pcMRI, the phase was summed in a CSF region‐of‐interest and plotted vs time. Additionally, we confirmed for possible confounding effects such as head motion or motion‐induced susceptibility changes.ResultrsfMRI findings showed that deep breathing promoted large oscillations in the CSF flow in the ventricles, while spontaneous breathing did not(Figure 1). Additionally, deep breathing resulted in large oscillations in lobar cortical regions. Similar results were observed in the pcMRI, with larger CSF velocity through the foramen magnum during the deep breathing compared to the spontaneous breathing(Figure 2A‐B). The cumulative summation result showed that the volume of CSF flow was increased during deep breathing(Figure 2C).ConclusionThis study provides new evidence that slow and deep breathing promotes CSF flow and global brain BOLD signal, which may be useful in promoting circulation in the brain. The study’s findings also open new avenues for research in the field of neurovascular coupling and mechanisms associated with glymphatic clearance. As hampered CSF flow and/or worsen glymphatic clearance have been shown to associate with pathological aging and dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, future research is needed explore the potential of breathing training methods as a non‐pharmacological intervention to support brain health.