Citations

Clear

3557 citation(s) found for "Brigham, T J".

MAGIC Composite Score Predicts Outcomes of Second-Line Therapy for Acute GVHD
Sebastian, Tara, Weber, Daniela, Etra, Aaron M., Vasova, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis, Choe, Hannah K., DeFilipp, Zachariah, Quagliarella, Francesco, Bedirian, Karni, Diniz, Marcio Augusto, Aguayo-Hiraldo, Paibel, Bader, Peter, Baez, Janna, Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya, Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O., Katsivelos, Nikolaos, Kitko, Carrie L., Kraus, Sabrina, Louloudis, Ioannis E., Morales, George, Nakamura, Ryotaro, Olson, Timothy S., Qayed, Muna, Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran, Schechter, Tal, Wang, Tingyu, Wolf, Matthias, Young, Rachel, Zeiser, Robert, Hogan, William J., Levine, John E., Ferrara, James L.M., Sebastian, Tara M. , Weber, Daniela , Etra, Aaron , Vášová, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis , Choe, Hannah , DeFilipp, Zachariah , Quagliarella, Francesco , Bedirian, Karni, Aguayo‐Hiraldo, Paibel , Bader, Peter , Baez, Janna , Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya , Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Katsivelos, Nikolaos , Kitko, Carrie L. , Kraus, Sabrina , Morales, George , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Olson, Timothy S. , Qayed, Muna , Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran , Schechter, Tal , Wölfl, Matthias , Young, Rachel , Zeiser, Robert , Hogan, William J. , Levine, John E. , Ferrara, James L.M.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357664 | PMID 42523406 Get It

ABSTRACT Approximately 30% of patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) develop steroid-refractory disease and have very poor outcomes. Ruxolitinib has become the standard of care for steroid-refractory acute GVHD, but it is unclear which patients derive benefit. The MAGIC Composite Score (MCS), an algorithm that combines clinical symptoms and biomarkers, has been validated to predict outcomes at the start of primary GVHD treatment. Here, we evaluated its performance at the initiation of second-line treatment in 278 patients. MCS stratified patients into three risk groups (MCS1-3), with the majority (88%) classified as intermediate or high risk. Increasing MCS score was associated with progressively higher 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates (16%, 41%, and 73%; p<0.001), lower 1-year survival (77%, 56%, and 24%; p<0.001), and lower complete response (CR) rates at day 28 (47%, 38%, and 20%, respectively; p<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for 1-year NRM was significantly higher with MCS compared to clinical symptoms alone (0.70 vs. 0.63; p=0.023). Among patients treated with ruxolitinib, higher MCS similarly predicted higher NRM and lower survival and CR rates. Patients classified as MCS2/3 had poor outcomes despite ruxolitinib, underscoring the need for novel therapies in this patient population. In conclusion the MCS is an accurate predictor of outcomes for patients who require second-line treatment and may be of use as an eligibility criterion for future clinical trials in this high-risk population. Key Points MAGIC Composite Scores that integrate clinical symptoms and biomarker scores predict outcomes of second-line therapy for acute GVHD more accurately than clinical symptoms alone. MCS identifies patients with high NRM despite treatment with ruxolitinib.
Prospective Validation of the Movement Disorder Society Prodromal Multiple System Atrophy Criteria in Pure Autonomic Failure
Vernetti, Patricio Millar , Palma, Jose‐Alberto , Shibao, Cyndya A. , Freeman, Roy , Gibbons, Christopher H. , Singer, Wolfgang , Coon, Elizabeth A. , Miglis, Mitchell G. , Krismer, Florian , Fanciulli, Alessandra , Millar Vernetti, Patricio , Biaggioni, Italo , Shibao, Cyndya A , Freeman, Roy L. , Gibbons, Christopher , Singer, Wolfgang , Coon, Elizabeth Anne , Miglis, Mitchell G , Krismer, Florian , Fanciulli, Alessandra , Goldstein, David S. , Betensky, Rebecca A. , Kaufmann, Horacio , Palma, Jose-Alberto

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | July 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/mds.70417 | PMID 42444112 Get It

Abstract Background The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) research criteria for possible prodromal multiple system atrophy (PP‐MSA) have not been prospectively validated. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PP‐MSA criteria in a longitudinal cohort of patients with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and to assess whether additional clinical features improve their predictive value. Methods Seventy‐six patients with PAF enrolled across eight centers in the Natural History Study of the Synucleinopathies were followed for ≥6 years or until phenoconversion. Participants were classified according to MDS PP‐MSA criteria and followed for development of MSA, Parkinson's disease, or dementia with Lewy bodies. Diagnostic performance was assessed longitudinally. Analyses were repeated using a stricter olfactory threshold (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]≤28) as an exclusion criterion. Results Thirty‐eight participants met PP‐MSA criteria, of whom 12 phenoconverted to MSA within 6 years. Sensitivity was 100% at year 1 and 92% at year 6, whereas specificity ranged from 56% to 67%. Positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 21% to 34%. Applying a stricter olfactory threshold improved specificity (90%–97%) and PPV (53%–83%), with a modest reduction in sensitivity (to 83%). Participants who phenoconverted to MSA were younger, had more severe urinary dysfunction, and greater orthostatic heart rate responses. Conclusions The PP‐MSA criteria demonstrate high sensitivity but limited specificity in patients with PAF. A stricter olfactory threshold improves diagnostic performance and may enhance cohort enrichment for clinical trials. © 2026 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Using a translational data platform to create clinical-grade genome-informed risk assessments
Morse, Jennifer L, He, Megan, Bangash, Hana , Cortopassi, Joshua, Forman, Sophie, Gordon, Adam S, Hamed, Marwan, Karlson, Elizabeth W. , Kiryluk, K, Kullo, Iftikhar J, Lewis, Adam, Limdi, Nita, Marathe, Priya, McGuffin, Kyle, Odgis, Jacqueline, Perez, Emma, Petrzelka, Jacob, Prows, Cynthia A. , Thomas, Ellis, Wiesner, Georgia L. , Wilson, Travis, Linder, Jodell E. , Liu, Cong , Rasmussen, Luke V , Morse, Jennifer L. , Chung, Wendy K. , Cortopassi, Josh , Gordon, Adam S, Harris, Paul A. , Kenny, Eimear E , Kiryluk, Krzysztof , Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Lewis, Adam J. , Liu, Cong , Marathe, Priya , McGuffin, Kyle, Odgis, Jacqueline A. , Perez, Emma , Rasmussen, Luke V. , Thomas, Ellis, Peterson, Josh F.

Mayo Clinic

JAMIA Open | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag118 | PMID 42445300 Get It

Abstract Objective To describe the development and implementation of an automated platform for genomic risk prediction that integrates multiple data types. Materials and methods Using the REDCap infrastructure, we constructed the R4 (Recruitment, Results, and Risk Reduction) platform to intake data from clinical sites, partner laboratories, participant surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) data across 13 institutions. Results The R4 Portal successfully integrated data to generate genome-informed risk assessments (GIRAs) across 11 conditions for a 23 840 person cohort. Testing phases and quality control led to network-wide protocols ensuring consistency and accuracy. Discussion As the science of estimating disease risk evolves, standardized and high-throughput methods of collecting and manipulating complex data are required. Platforms should be open-source, modular, and reusable, ensuring flexibility, security, and integration across healthcare environments. Conclusion The electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) network successfully generated and returned comprehensive risk profiles using logic and data specific to 11 conditions in a secure and semi-automated fashion employing a customized REDCap database.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 in Participants at Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Miner, A, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Groh, Jenna R., Singh, Alpana, Dieckhoff, Kari, Tripodis, Yorghos, Adler, Charles H., Balcer, Laura J. , Bernick, C L, Peskind, Elaine, Asken, Breton M., Tanner, Jeremy A., Rabinovici, Gil D., Banks, Sarah J., Barr, William B., Wethe, Jennifer V., Cantu, Robert C., Dodick, David W., Mez, Jesse, Palmisano, J, Martin, Brett, Stein, Thor D., McKee, Ann C., Cummings, Jeffrey L., Shenton, Martha E., Reiman, E Bieto, Rc, Stern, Ashton, Nicholas J., Alosco, Michael L., Chen, Kewei, Protas, Hillary, Su, Yi, Boker, Connie, Au, Rhoda, Farrer, Lindsay, Helm, Robert, Kowall, Neil, Mercier, Gustavo, Otis, James, Weller, Jason, Bragg, Tahlia, Simkin, Irene, Trujillo-Rodriguez, Diana, Amerongen, Suzan van , Andino, Alondra, Conneely, Shannon, Diamond, Courtney, Fagle, Tessa, Haller, Olivia, Hunt, Tennyson, Gullotti, Nicole, Kossow, Bailey, Kugelmass, Carrie, Mariani, Megan, Mayville, Brian, McLaughlin, Kathleen, Nanna, Mary, DiPopolo, Marty, Platt, Taylor, Rice, Fiona, Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael, Annis, Douglas, Chaisson, Christine, Dixon, Diane, Finney, Carolyn, Gallagher, Kerrin, Hartlage, Kaitlin , Lu, Jun, Ojo, E O, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani, Baucom, Zachary, Tuz‐Zahra, Fatima , Yhang, Eukyung , Bouix, Sylvain, Fitzsimmons, Jennifer, Lin, Alexander P., Koerte, Inga K., Pasternak, Ofer, Arciniega, Hector , Billah, Tashrif , Bonke, Elena, Breedlove, Katherine M. , Carrington, Holly, Coello, Eduardo , Coleman, Michael J., John, Omar , Jung, Leonard, Liao, Huijun, Loy, Maria, Rizzoni, Elizabeth, Schulz, V. D., Silva, Annelise, Vessey, Brynn, Wiegand, Tim L.T, Miller, Jason, Ritter, Aaron , Sabbagh, Marwan, Cruz, Raelynn de la, Durant, Jan, Golceker, Morgan, Harmon, Nicolette, Kaylegian, Jaeson, Long, Rachelle, Nance, Christine, Sandoval, Priscilla, Staples, Miranda, Clark, Emma F., Serrano, Andrew, Geda, Yonas, Duffy, Amy, Falk, Bryce, Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle , Osgood, Thomas, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick, GOLDBERG, JUDITH, Joseph, Binu , Kirov, Ivan, Lui, Yvonne, Marmar, Charles, Wisniewski, T R, Al-Kharafi, Alhassan, George, Allan, Hasanaj, Lisena, Martin, Sammie, Riley, Edward, Runge, William, Serrano, Liliana , Iliff, Jeffrey, Li, Gail, Janssen, D, Meabon, James, Piantino, Juan, Schindler, Abigail, Thomas, Ronald, Colasurdo, Elizabeth , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Gurney, Jenny , Greenwald, Richard, Johnson, Keith A., Singh, Alpana , Singh, Alpana , Miner, Annalise E., Zetterberg, Henrik , Blennow, Kaj , Groh, Jenna R. , Singh, Alpana, Tripodis, Yorghos , Adler, Charles H. , Bernick, Charles , Peskind, Elaine R. , Asken, Breton M. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Banks, Sarah J. , Barr, William , Wethe, Jennifer V. , Cantu, Robert C. , Dodick, David W. , Mez, Jesse , Stein, Thor D. , McKee, Ann C. , Cummings, Jeffrey L. , Shenton, Martha E. , Reiman, Eric M. , Ashton, Nicholas J. , Alosco, Michael L. , Protas, Hillary , Au, Rhoda, Weller, Jason , Trujillo‐Rodriguez, Diana , Fagle, Tessa, Mariani, Megan, McLaughlin, Kathleen , Pulukuri, Surya Vamsi , Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael D , Annis, Douglas, Finney, Carolyn, Lu, Jun, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani , Baucom, Zachary, Bouix, Sylvain , Koerte, Inga K , Pasternak, Ofer , Bonke, Elena M. , Carrington, Holly , Coleman, Michael J. , Liao, Huijun, Schulz, Vivian, Wiegand, Tim L. T. , II, Robert W. Turner , Marek, Kenneth , Geda, Yonas E. , Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick S.F. , Kirov, Ivan, George, Allan, Meabon, James S. , Piantino, Juan , Thomas, Ronald G. , Colasurdo, Elizabeth A. , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Johnson, Keith A.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2622966

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.22966 | PMID 42440317 Get It

Importance In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), assess its performance as a beta-amyloid (Aβ) biomarker in participants with RHI exposure at risk for CTE, and explore concordance with CTE neuropathology in a postmortem subsample. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study used data from the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of CTE (DIAGNOSE CTE) Research Project, collected from September 2016 to October 2023. Participants were former American football players (case participants) and asymptomatic men unexposed to RHI (control participants). A subsample had available neuropathologic data. Exposures RHI, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses, and levels of CTE certainty. Main Outcomes and Measures Plasma p-tau217 (classified as positive [≥0.63 pg/mL], intermediate [0.40-0.62 pg/mL], and negative [&amp;lt;0.40 pg/mL]), Aβ–positron emission tomography (PET; 18 F-florbetapir; with Aβ-positive defined as a standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] ≥1.10), and tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir). TES diagnoses were assigned by multidisciplinary consensus conference. Analyses of postmortem brains controlled for age, race, and APOE ε4 status. Results Among 231 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.75 [8.25] years), 177 were former football players (117 professional and 60 college) and 54 were unexposed participants. Former football players had higher baseline mean (SD) p-tau217 concentrations than unexposed participants (0.35 [0.26] pg/mL vs 0.27 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008), although this was driven by a higher proportion of Aβ-PET–positive participants among former players. Plasma p-tau217 increased over time across the sample (B = 0.207 [95% CI, 0.117-0.298]; P &amp;lt; .001), with no significant time × exposure group interactions. Among football players, p-tau217 showed no time × group interactions with TES diagnosis, TES-CTE certainty, or RHI metrics. Higher p-tau217 concentration correlated with higher global Aβ-PET SUVR (B = 0.058 [95% CI, 0.053-3.501; P = .01), with a few discordant cases (5 participants were p-tau217–negative and Aβ-PET–positive; 7 participants were p-tau217–positive and Aβ-PET–negative). P-tau217 had similar areas under the curve for projecting Aβ-PET positivity as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 and CSF Aβ40/42 measures (p-tau217: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.96]; CSF p-tau181/Aβ42: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]; CSF Aβ40/42: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]). Among 9 brain donors, 6 had CTE (stages II-IV; none with Alzheimer disease). Seven had negative or intermediate p-tau217, concordant with Aβ-PET. Two p-tau217 outliers with stage III CTE had normal concentrations upon additional testing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that plasma p-tau217 concentration is unlikely to be useful for the detection of CTE, but it does show utility for ruling out Aβ pathology in participants at risk for CTE.
Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade for Relapse Prevention in Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody–Associated Disease
A, Prera Vilaseca, Bilodeau, Philippe, Gakis, Georgios , Savransky, Andrea, Oliveira, Joao Mahler Ferreira, Nguyen, Linda, Hooshmand, Sam I., Satyanarayan, Sammita , Moseley, Carson E., Haley, Leah , Roy-Hewitson, Chantal, Marrodan, M, Casallas, Adriana, Manín, Analisa , Chen, H, Grzezulkowska, Aniela, Contentti, Edgar Carnero, Galleguillos, Lorna, Upchurch, Margaret, Jackson-Tarlton, Caitlin S. , Guo, Joanne Chu-Yueh, Fabian, Michelle, Caparó-Zamalloa, César, Paterno, R, Waubant, Emmanuelle, Boschetti, Laura Ordoñez, Correale, Jorge, Villa, Andrés M., Banwell, Brenda, Marignier, Romain, Pittock, Sean J., Greenberg, Benjamin , Bennett, Jeffrey L., Cho, Tracey, Clardy, Stacey, Solomon, Andrew J., Ja, Gelfand, Obeidat, Ahmed Z., Blackburn, Kyle, Tenembaum, Silvia , Chen, John J., Sotirchos, Elias S., Levy, Michael, Flanagan, Eoin P., Group, and The Americas MOGAD Treatment, Murillo, Fabian, Syc-Mazurzek, Stephanie B., Jiang, Mulan , Rezende, N, Wingerchuk, D M, Horsman, Susan E. , Bilodeau, Philippe‐Antoine , Bilodeau, Philippe A , Vilaseca, Andreu , Hooshmand, Sam , Moseley, Carson E. , Marrodán, Mariano , Vanegas, Adriana Casallas , Hoshina, Yoji , Contentti, Edgar Carnero , Galleguillos, Lorna , Virupakshaiah, Akash , Arrambide, Georgina , Caparó‐Zamalloa, César , Waubant, Emmanuelle L. , Ordóñez-Boschetti, Laura, Villa, Andres Maria , Marignier, Romain , Pittock, Sean J. , Bennett, Jeffrey L. , Cho, Tracey , Clardy, Stacey , Solomon, Andrew , Kister, Ilya , Zamvil, Scott S. , Gelfand, Jeffrey M. , Repovic, Pavle , Obeidat, Ahmed Zayed , Blackburn, Kyle , Chen, John J., Sotirchos, Elias S. , Levy, Michael , Flanagan, Eoin P. , Syc‐Mazurek, Stephanie B. , Cacciaguerra, Laura , Rezende, Nathane Braga da Silva, Wingerchuk, Dean M.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.2220 | PMID 42440328 Get It

Importance Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated disease (MOGAD) lacks proven relapse-preventive therapies. While clinical trials are ongoing, safety data may be limited and approved drugs are costly. Studies of interleukin 6 receptor blocker (IL-6RB) in MOGAD are limited by small numbers and no comparative studies, contributing to low use. Objective To evaluate the impact of IL-6RB therapy on relapse rates in MOGAD and compare relapse frequency with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2025) included a historical IVIG-treated cohort of varying doses. The study took place across sites in North and South America (US, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru). Patients with MOGAD (n = 116, no excluded patients) who received at least 1 dose of an IL-6RB were included. These data were analyzed in January 2026. Exposures Tocilizumab or satralizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures Annualized relapse rate (ARR) during IL-6RB therapy, time to next relapse after treatment initiation, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared with the IVIG cohort using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for age, sex, prior ARR, and concomitant therapies. Results A total of 116 patients with MOGAD (89% relapsing) receiving IL-6RB (tocilizumab, 104 [90%] and satralizumab, 12 [10%]) were included; overall, 60.3% were female, 39.7% were male, and 18% were younger than 18 years. The median (IQR) IL-6RB treatment follow-up was 1.4 (0.7-2.5) years and 23 relapses occurred during 241.8 person-years of IL-6RB therapy. The ARR decreased from 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70) for relapsing MOGAD before IL-6RB to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.14) during IL-6RB treatment (incidence rate ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.16). Adverse events occurred in 58 patients (50%), most commonly mild infections, although 10 (9%) had severe infections. In the IVIG cohort (n = 59), 30 relapses occurred over 133.8 person-years (ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32). After IPTW, IL-6RB was associated with a lower hazard ratio (HR) than the group who underwent IVIG therapy less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.0-9.8), with no significant difference vs the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.8-4.5). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter observational cohort, IL-6RB use in MOGAD was associated with low relapse rates and a favorable safety profile, though severe infections occurred occasionally. Relapse rates were lower than the group who underwent IVIG less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks but not significantly different from the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks. This supports IL-6RB as a potential relapse-prevention therapy in MOGAD; the wide availability and relative affordability of tocilizumab may enable broad global use.
Prognostic Factors in Primary Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large‐Scale, Multi‐Institutional Competing‐Risks Analysis
Girardi, Fábio Muradás , Machado, Cristian David Cardona, Wysong, Ashley, Ran, Nina A., Granger, Emily , Koyfman, Shlomo A. , Vidimos, Allison T. , Carr, David R., Shahwan, Kathryn T. , Hirotsu, Kelsey E. , Carter, Joi B., Mangold, Aaron R., Srivastava, Divya, Brodland, David G., Zitelli, John A., Willenbrink, Tyler J., Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Nijhawan, Rajiv I. , Ruiz, Emily S., Cañueto, Javier , Granger, Emily E , Willenbrink, Tyler J , Wysong, Ashley , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Mangold, Aaron R. , Srivastava, Divya , Zitelli, John A. , Ruiz, Emily S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Surgical Oncology | July 12, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jso.70325 | PMID 42437512 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Current staging systems for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNCSCC), such as AJCC8 and BWH, often fail to adequately stratify high‐risk patients, particularly due to the exclusion of important biological and host factors. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors for HNCSCC outcomes in the largest multi‐institutional retrospective series to date. Methods De‐identified data from 8,610 primary HNCSCC tumors, treated with curative intent surgery across multiple international centers, were analyzed. Outcomes included local recurrence (LR), locoregional metastasis (LM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease‐specific death (DSD). Multivariable Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with robust standard errors clustered at the patient level were fitted to generate exploratory hypotheses regarding independent hazard determinants. Results During a median follow‐up of 31.4 months (IQR 14.2–52.8), the cumulative incidence was 3.3% for LR, 2.7% for LM, 0.5% for DM, and 1.2% for DSD. Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, and large‐caliber perineural invasion (LCPNI) were the strongest predictors, being significantly associated with at least three of the four outcomes. Notably, factors currently excluded from or weighted differently in staging systems also proved critical: Immunosuppression was significantly associated with LR (SHR 2.03) and DSD (SHR 1.70); and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was independently associated with LM (SHR 3.00). Poor differentiation demonstrated high prognostic impact, being a significant predictor for all four endpoints. Conclusion Tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, LCPNI, immunosuppression status, and LVI are the most critical independent factors for HNCSCC prognosis. Our multi‐institutional data provide a robust framework for hypothesis generation, highlighting that incorporating host biological features and non‐anatomic variables could significantly refine future staging system discussions.
Establishing a Specialty Bipolar Clinic: The National Network of Depression Centers Consensus Recommendations
Schneck, Christopher D. , Bond, David J., Burdick, Katherine E. , Frye, Mark A. , Huber, Rebekah S., Mahon, Pamela, McInnis, Melvin G., Nurnberger, John, Öngür, Döst , Ostacher, Michael J., Parikh, Sagar V. , Raj, Kristin S. , Schweizer, Barbara , Soares, Jair C., Sullivan, Aimee E. , Suppes, Trisha , Zandi, Peter P. , Ostacher, Michael J. , Bond, David J. , Burdick, K E , Frye, Mark , Sperry, Sarah , Zandi, Peter P , DePaulo, J Raymond , Bond, David J , Ostacher, Michael J , Almeida, Jorge , Goes, Fernando , Huber, Rebekah S. , Machado‐Vieira, Rodrigo , Mahon, Pamela B. , McInnis, Melvin G. , Nurnberger, John I , Respino, Matteo , Soares, Jair C. , Sperry, Sarah H. , Veldić, Marin

Mayo Clinic

Bipolar Disorders | July 10, 2026 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/bdi.70154 | PMID 42429592 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective To provide expert recommendations for the development of a specialty bipolar clinic that promotes best clinical practices for the delivery of safe and effective care. Methods Members of the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Bipolar Clinics Work Group met in a series of 1‐h monthly video calls over 18 months to discuss all aspects of their respective institution's bipolar clinics, including services provided, administrative processes, staffing models, characteristics of patients treated, patient volumes, finances, and research. The group also invited psychiatrists from outside of the NNDC who ran large bipolar clinics to contribute their thoughts and experiences on the subject. In addition, the NNDC sent a 20‐question survey to all 27 sites asking clinic directors specific questions about their bipolar clinics, if applicable. Further meetings and discussions incorporating results from the survey took place to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations. Results Twenty‐one of 27 NNDC sites (81%) responded to the survey. Twelve of 21 (57%) sites had a specific bipolar clinic, and another 4 (19%) were looking to start one. Clinics were based in university settings. The meetings, clinic survey, and discussions resulted in 10 recommendations describing services and operations for bipolar specialty clinics. Conclusions Given the complexity of bipolar disorder, specialty clinics are important to enhance care. Clinics with a wide array of services that include consultation, medication management, bipolar‐specific psychotherapies, and patient/family psychoeducation provide the most comprehensive care. Challenges to these clinics include maintaining ongoing patient access as well as ensuring long‐term financial stability.
Standardized endpoint definitions for trials of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure: a consensus from the Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium
Garot, Philippe , Mehran, Roxana , Backer, Ole De , Freeman, James V. , Wunderlich, Nina, Hibbert, Benjamin , Tzikas, Apostolos , Nair, Devi, Berti, Sergio, Saw, Jacqueline , Freixa, Xavier, Doshi, Shephal K. , Cruz-Gonzalez, I, Coylewright, Megan, Aminian, Adel, Sanchis, L, Ruff, Christian T, Landmesser, Ulf, Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Alasnag, Mirvat, Yamamoto, Masanori , Iwamoto, Shin, Shiba, Takeshi , Jin, Y Z, Jagadeesan, Vikrant, Krucoff, Mitchell W., Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik, Gibson, C Michael, Gurol, Edip Mahmut, Cutlip, Don E, Leon, Martin B, Holmes, David R. , Morice, M C, Alkhouli, Mohamad, De Backer, Ole , Räber, Lorenz , Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Ellis, Christopher , Yamamoto, Masanori , Schmidt, Boris , Hildick-Smith, David , Oliva, Angelo , Spitzer, Ernest , Holmes, David R , Mehran, Roxana , Hibbert, Benjamin , Freeman, James V , Tzikas, Apostolos , Freixa, Xavier , Cruz‐González, Ignacio , Coylewright, Megan , Aminian, Adel , Price, Matthew J. , Räber, Lorenz , Yao, Xiaoxi , Sanchís, Laura , Ruff, Christian Thomas , Landmesser, Ulf , Ellis, Christopher R. , Alasnag, Mirvat , Ferro, Enrico Giuseppe , Shiba, Takeshi, Jin, Yu, Reddy, Vivek Y. , Spitzer, Ernest , Nielsen‐Kudsk, Jens Erik , Gibson, C. Michael , Gurol, M. Edip , Cutlip, Donald E. , Leon, Martin B. , Alkhouli, Mohamad

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehag482 | PMID 42425446 Get It

Abstract Since its introduction in 2002, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of stroke. Harmonized processes for data collection, analysis, and reporting in LAAC trials are essential to enhance research quality and improve clinical practice. The Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium (LAARC) initiative is an independent collaboration of academic research organizations, cardiology and neurology experts, clinical trialists, and regulatory authorities from the USA, Europe, and Asia. The consortium engaged clinical experts, regulators—including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Notified Bodies, and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)—and industry leaders to define standardized study elements and endpoints for LAAC trials. Key considerations included alignment with prior Academic Research Consortium initiatives, procedural and mechanistic insights, and clinical relevance. Consensus definitions were proposed for mortality, stroke, bleeding, and device performance, along with composite endpoints for safety and effectiveness. The proposed LAARC consensus definitions aim to standardize endpoint reporting, improve comparability across studies, and support regulatory and clinical trial applications for this evolving therapy through broad dissemination in the peer-reviewed literature.
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in HFpEF: Distinguishing Drug-Specific Response from Prognostic Phenotypes Across Randomized Trials
Santana, Clodomir, Katayama, Asuka, Ballal, Aditya , Liem, David A., Chen, C , Nuno, Miriam, Ebong, Imo, Zhang, Xiao-Dong, Izu, Leighton, Alagna, Laura , Borlaug, Barry A., Butler, Javed, Chirinos, Julio A. , Chutkow, William A., Desai, Akshay S., Desvigne-Nickens, Patrice, Givertz, Michael M., Khan, Sadiya S., Kitzman, Dalane W., Lewis, Gregory D., Redfield, Margaret M., Shah, Sanjiv J., Sharma, Kavita, Taylor, Jennifer , Tinsley, Emily, Wong, Renee, Shah, Sanjiv J., Sirish, Padmini , Liem, David A. , Bidwell, Julie T. , Nuño, Miriam , Ebong, Imo , Izu, Leighton T. , Alagna, Laura, Pesce, Lorenzo L. , Sisk, Ryan K. , Borlaug, Barry A. , Butler, Javed , Desai, Akshay S , Desvigne‐Nickens, Patrice , Givertz, Michael M. , Khan, Sadiya S. , Kitzman, Dalane W. , Lewis, Gregory D. , Rasmussen‐Torvik, Laura J. , Redfield, Margaret M. , Sharma, Kavita , Taylor, Jennifer L., Shah, Sanjiv J , López, Javier E. , Chiamvimonvat, Nipavan , Cadeiras, Martín

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.06.26357251 | PMID 42465912 Get It

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome comprising multiple pathophysiological phenotypes. HFpEF trials have largely enrolled diverse populations and reported average treatment effects, consistently yielding neutral results that may obscure drug-specific benefits within distinct subgroups. To address this issue, we employ an interaction-based that incorporates treatment-by-variable interactions to uncover drug-specific responses. Methods We leveraged four HFpEF clinical trials (TOPCAT, RELAX, NEAT-HFpEF, INDIE-HFpEF) and developed a framework comprising two complementary approaches. The first employed a prognostic responder model to evaluate whether conventional responder definitions reflect treatment-specific benefit or instead capture favorable clinical trajectories common to both treatment and placebo groups. The second used an interaction-based individual treatment effect (ITE) modeling to identify baseline variables that modify therapy effect, distinguishing drug-specific response from prognostic phenotypes. Results Although the prognostic responder model demonstrated good discrimination, further analisys suggested it primarily captured a prognostic signal associated with favorable clinical trajectories common to both treatment and placebo arms. In contrast, the ITE model identified distinct, drug-specific effect modifiers across trials (cardiorenal-inflammatory for spironolactone (TOPCAT), NO-mediated anti-inflammatory for isosorbide mononitrate (NEAT-HFpEF), afterload-reducing for inorganic nitrite (INDIE-HFpEF), and anti–volume-overload for sildenafil (RELAX). Each ITE model demonstrated significance only within its own trial suggesting drug-specific signal. Conclusions The proposed method identifies mechanism-specific effect modifiers, and uncovers clinically meaningful heterogeneity in treatment response, which is not captured by conventional MCID-based approaches. Although exploratory, these findings support phenotype-guided therapy in HFpEF and argue for phenotype-informed trial design to enhance treatment-effect detection and therapy targeting. Graphical Abstract