Ja, Gelfand

Importance Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated disease (MOGAD) lacks proven relapse-preventive therapies. While clinical trials are ongoing, safety data may be limited and approved drugs are costly. Studies of interleukin 6 receptor blocker (IL-6RB) in MOGAD are limited by small numbers and no comparative studies, contributing to low use. Objective To evaluate the impact of IL-6RB therapy on relapse rates in MOGAD and compare relapse frequency with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2025) included a historical IVIG-treated cohort of varying doses. The study took place across sites in North and South America (US, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru). Patients with MOGAD (n = 116, no excluded patients) who received at least 1 dose of an IL-6RB were included. These data were analyzed in January 2026. Exposures Tocilizumab or satralizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures Annualized relapse rate (ARR) during IL-6RB therapy, time to next relapse after treatment initiation, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared with the IVIG cohort using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for age, sex, prior ARR, and concomitant therapies. Results A total of 116 patients with MOGAD (89% relapsing) receiving IL-6RB (tocilizumab, 104 [90%] and satralizumab, 12 [10%]) were included; overall, 60.3% were female, 39.7% were male, and 18% were younger than 18 years. The median (IQR) IL-6RB treatment follow-up was 1.4 (0.7-2.5) years and 23 relapses occurred during 241.8 person-years of IL-6RB therapy. The ARR decreased from 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70) for relapsing MOGAD before IL-6RB to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.14) during IL-6RB treatment (incidence rate ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.16). Adverse events occurred in 58 patients (50%), most commonly mild infections, although 10 (9%) had severe infections. In the IVIG cohort (n = 59), 30 relapses occurred over 133.8 person-years (ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32). After IPTW, IL-6RB was associated with a lower hazard ratio (HR) than the group who underwent IVIG therapy less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.0-9.8), with no significant difference vs the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.8-4.5). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter observational cohort, IL-6RB use in MOGAD was associated with low relapse rates and a favorable safety profile, though severe infections occurred occasionally. Relapse rates were lower than the group who underwent IVIG less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks but not significantly different from the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks. This supports IL-6RB as a potential relapse-prevention therapy in MOGAD; the wide availability and relative affordability of tocilizumab may enable broad global use.

ABSTRACT Colony stimulating factor‐1 receptor–related disorder (CSF1R‐RD) is a rare, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by loss‐of‐function variants in the CSF1R gene, leading to microglial dysfunction and progressive white matter degeneration. Therapeutic strategies targeting microglial pathways, including activation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), have been proposed to compensate for impaired CSF1R signaling. Iluzanebart (VGL101), a monoclonal antibody TREM2 agonist, has shown promise in preclinical models. We report a longitudinal clinical course, neuroimaging findings, genetic analysis, and postmortem neuropathological examination of a 52‐year‐old patient with genetically confirmed CSF1R‐RD (c.2507G>A, p.Ser836Asn). The patient received iluzanebart as part of a Phase 2 clinical trial. Clinical progression, MRI changes, and histopathological features at autopsy were systematically analyzed. Despite treatment, the patient experienced progressive cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, motor impairment, and seizures, culminating in death. Serial neuroimaging demonstrated worsening white matter degeneration and brain atrophy without evidence of therapeutic response. Neuropathological examination revealed characteristic features of CSF1R‐RD, including severe myelin loss, axonal spheroids, infiltration of Iba1‐positive cells with macrophage‐like morphology, and cortical neuronal abnormalities. There was no histological evidence of treatment‐related benefit or harm. This case represents the first clinicopathological assessment of iluzanebart in CSF1R‐RD and demonstrates no observable clinical, radiological, or neuropathological improvement. These findings highlight the challenges of targeting microglial dysfunction in advanced disease and suggest that TREM2 activation alone may be insufficient to alter disease progression.