Citations

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate how differences in case complexity affect information-processing burden, as measured by eye-tracking, as well as the efficiency of electronic health record (EHR) use among healthcare providers in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study recruited providers from 4 U.S. medical centers that use 2 prominent EHR systems (Epic and Oracle). After reporting demographic information, participants reviewed 2 complex cases and 2 standard cases in their institution’s EHR system and then responded to 5 questions about each case, yielding a performance score. Information-processing burden was assessed by measuring the number of eye fixations via eye-tracking software. The efficiency of EHR use was assessed by measuring the task completion time, number of mouse clicks per minute, number of EHR screens viewed, and performance score. Results Eighty-one providers were included for analysis. Providers exhibited significantly more eye fixations (P < .001) and longer task completion times (P < .001) for complex cases than for standard cases. There were also significantly fewer mouse clicks per minute during complex cases (P < .001). Reviewing a complex case first led to significantly more eye fixations (P = .015) and longer task completion times (P < .01) than when a standard case was presented first. Case complexity did not significantly affect performance scores or the number of EHR screens viewed. Discussion Higher case complexity was shown to be associated with greater information-processing burden and less efficient EHR use. These findings have implications for enhancing the efficiency of EHR use, thereby leading to improved clinical decision-making and patient safety. Furthermore, reviewing complex cases first led to a greater information-processing burden, suggesting that providers could benefit from “warming up” with standard cases before reviewing complex cases.

ABSTRACT Objective This study compared the effects of phentermine‐topiramate‐ER (mid‐dose 7.5/46 mg) versus placebo on weight loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk outcomes when used as an adjunct to a digitally enhanced lifestyle intervention (DELI). Methods We conducted a 12‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial at a single tertiary academic center in the United States (June 2020–June 2022). Eighty participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled in the DELI program, consisting of in‐person and telehealth modalities, dietary and physical activity goals, and use of a smartphone application integrated with digital devices (Apple Watch and Bluetooth‐enabled weight scale and blood pressure monitor). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either phentermine‐topiramate‐ER ( n = 42) or placebo ( n = 38) in addition to the DELI. Results At 3 months, the phentermine‐topiramate group lost a mean of 10.82 kg versus 4.04 kg in the placebo group (mean difference −6.78 kg; p = 0.002). At 12 months, weight loss was 15.32 kg versus 5.85 kg, respectively (mean difference −9.48 kg; p < 0.001). Participants receiving phentermine‐topiramate‐ER experienced a 3.35% reduction in the estimated atherosclerotic CVD risk compared to baseline ( p = 0.004). Conclusions Phentermine‐topiramate‐ER, when combined with a DELI, produced significant and sustained weight loss and reduced CVD risk in adults with obesity. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04408586

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), likely driven by systemic inflammation. Treating inflammation may reduce this risk. We aimed to investigate MACE across different therapies in patients with IBD. Methods We used Swedish nationwide registers (2007–2023) to describe MACE rates (ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality) in patients with IBD receiving different therapies. For contextualization, we compared MACE rates during therapy exposure periods in patients with IBD with matched (by age, sex, and residence) general population comparators without IBD. Comparisons included exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapies and periods of different treatments (immunomodulators, TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi), vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and Janus kinase inhibitors). Each patient could contribute with multiple periods, with a new period starting upon switch of therapy. Incidence rates (IRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated by using Cox regression (Model 1: conditioned on matching variables; Model 2: additional adjustment for Charlson Comorbidity Index). Among patients with IBD, we performed 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched analysis, with exposure periods of TNFi or vedolizumab as the reference, to compare MACE rates between advanced therapies. In these comparisons, we adjusted for demographics, disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, prior treatment, and cardiovascular risk factors. Results We included 106,894 patients with IBD with 99,661 exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy, 60,573 exposure periods of immunomodulators, and 71,551 of advanced therapies. Distribution of age, sex and disease duration differed substantially across therapy exposures (data not shown). Compared with the general population, MACE rates in patients with IBD were similar across therapies (IRs=3.0-13.0/1,000 person-years; aHRs=1.02-1.49) (Table 1), and significantly increased only for exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy, immunomodulators, or ustekinumab. In PS-matched comparisons, no significant differences were found between periods of TNFi, vedolizumab and other advanced therapies (Table 2). Conclusion Therapy exposure periods in patients with IBD showed only slightly increased MACE rates compared to corresponding periods in the general population, and significantly so only for periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy and exposure to immunomodulators or ustekinumab. In PS-matched analyses of patients with IBD, no significant differences in MACE rates were observed when comparing exposure periods of different advanced therapies. Conflict of interest: Eriksson, Carl: Served as speaker/advisory board member for Janssen Cilag AB and Tillotts Pharma. Forss, Anders: Served as speaker/advisory board member for Janssen Cilag AB and Tillotts Pharma. Singh, Siddharth: Dr. Singh has research grants from Pfizer. Halfvarson, Jonas: Grant support: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (RB13-0160 to J.H.), the Swedish Research Council (2020-02021 to J.H.), the Örebro University Hospital research foundation (OLL-890291 to J.H.), NordForsk (90569 to J.H.) and Vinnova ( 2019-01185 to JH and 2024-01155 co-applicant), IHI, EU, INTERCEPT (Grant agreement number 101194780, co-applicant), miGut-Health, HORIZON-HLTH-2022, EU (Grant Agreement 101095470, Co-applicant), 3TR, IMI 2, EU, (Grant agreement number 831434, Co-applicant), Janssen, MSD, and Takeda. Consulting and/or advisory board fees from: AbbVie, Alfasigma, Aqilion, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Hospira, Index Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Johnson &amp Johnson, MEDA, Medivir, Medtronic, Merck, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Laboratories Inc., Sandoz, Shire, STADA, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tillotts Pharma, Vifor Pharma, UCB and speaker’s fees from: AbbVie, Alfasigma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Johnson &amp Johnson, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tillotts Pharma and research grant support from Janssen, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme and Takeda. Sun, Jiangwei: No conflicts Söderling, Jonas: Dr. Söderling has worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet and SWIBREG partly financed by grants from Ferring and Janssen. Everhov, Åsa H: Dr Everhov has worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet and SWIBREG, partly financed by grants from Ferring and Janssen. Bröms, Gabriella: Dr. Bröms has served as a speaker for Takeda and Janssen and worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet, partly financed by Janssen, UCB and Pfizer. James, Stefan: Dr. James reports institutional research grants from Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Jansen, Alnylam and proctor fees from Medtronic. Ludvigsson, Jonas: Dr. Ludvigsson has coordinated an unrelated study for the Swedish IBD Quality Register (SWIBREG). That study received funding from Jansen Corporation. Ludvigsson has also received financial support from MSD/Merck for unrelated research on inflammatory bowel disease, and for developing a paper reviewing national healthcare registers in China. Ludvigsson has an ongoing research collaboration with Takeda about celiac disease and is discussing additional collaboration on chronic liver disease with this company. Olen, Ola: Karolinska Institutet has received research grants from Pfizer, Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Ferring, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Alfasigma for projects led by Olén. Ola Olén has also received fees for lectures from Pfizer, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda.

Abstract Background The cerebellar dentate is a known site of iron accumulation and tau deposition in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP); however, detailed iron distribution and localized volume and shape changes remain unclear across PSP clinical variants. Objective The study aimed to clarify details about regional susceptibility distribution, volume, and shape deformation in the cerebellar dentate across PSP clinical variants. Methods Sixty‐seven PSP patients, including 31 PSP‐Richardson syndrome, 12 PSP‐parkinsonism, 10 PSP‐progressive gait freezing, and 14 PSP‐cortical variants (PSP‐frontal, PSP‐speech/language, and PSP‐corticobasal syndrome), and 31 healthy controls underwent 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging to reconstruct quantitative susceptibility maps. Manual dentate segmentation was performed to extract magnetic susceptibility and volume adjusted for total intracranial volume. Shape deformation was assessed using Deformetrica atlas construction. Group comparisons were evaluated with Kruskal–Wallis tests and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Patients with PSP‐Richardson syndrome, PSP‐parkinsonism, and PSP‐cortical variants showed significantly increased dentate susceptibility compared with controls ( P < 0.05). Patients with PSP‐progressive gait freezing showed no significant susceptibility differences. Volume loss was most prominent in PSP‐cortical variants, bilaterally, and PSP‐Richardson syndrome, left hemisphere only ( P < 0.05). Shape analysis revealed subregion‐specific deformation patterns, especially in the anterior and posterior deformation in PSP‐progressive gait freezing and the ventroanterior deformation in PSP‐cortical variants. Conclusions The PSP clinical variants had different patterns of susceptibility, volume, and shape metrics, reflecting distinct neurodegenerative patterns of the cerebellar dentate. These findings contribute to our understanding of the neurobiology of PSP and may help to improve phenotypic differentiation of PSP clinical variants. © 2026 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Abstract Background There is an unmet need for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments that show improved effectiveness while maintaining safety profiles comparable with existing advanced therapies. Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has been proposed as a strategy to combine benefits of different advanced therapies to improve outcomes. The ExiGem study (NCT06095128) aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) and tofacitinib (TOF) in adults with UC. We report results for the induction phase from the first 24 patients. Methods ExiGem is an ongoing phase 4, single-arm, multicentre study including adults with moderately to severely active UC (complete Mayo [cMayo] score of 6–12 with a rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 and centrally read endoscopic subscore ≥ 2). Eligible patients have previously had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to 1 or 2 anti-tumour necrosis factor α treatments. Patients receive induction therapy with intravenous (IV) VDZ 300 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 plus twice-daily oral TOF 10 mg for 8 weeks and then VDZ 300 mg IV monotherapy as maintenance from week 14. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in clinical remission by cMayo score at week 8. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and clinical remission by modified Mayo (mMayo) score at week 8. Changes in faecal calprotectin (FCP) levels and endoscopic improvement were evaluated. Efficacy data were analysed using non-responder imputation. For the final analysis a pre-specified Bayesian approach will be used. The safety profile of DTT was evaluated. Results Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. At week 8, 12/24 patients (50%) and 14/24 patients (58%) had clinical remission assessed by cMayo and mMayo scores, respectively; these rates were higher than pre-specified benchmark rates (Figure 1). Clinical response was observed in 21/24 patients (88%). At week 8, 14/24 patients (58%) showed endoscopic improvement, and 12/21 patients (57%) had normalization of FCP levels (&lt; 250 µg/g). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 10 patients (42%), and 1 serious TEAE was reported (suspected viral infection). One severe adverse event (AE; cough) and 2 moderate AEs (herpes zoster, drug intolerance) were considered related to TOF. No moderate or severe AEs were considered related to VDZ. One patient withdrew from the study before week 8 owing to intolerance to TOF. Conclusion Initial data suggest that induction with a combination of VDZ and TOF can produce improved rates of response and remission in patients with UC with a comparable safety profile to existing advanced monotherapies. Further data, including outcomes of VDZ maintenance as monotherapy, are pending. Conflict of interest: Prof. Dr. Yarur, Andres: Andres Yarur has served as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda. This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Adam Errington PhD of PharmaGenesis Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, and funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Barnes, Edward: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI. Ha, Christina: Christina Ha has served as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Bausch Health, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Takeda, and Sanofi has received educational programming support from AbbVie, Celltrion, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda and has received consulting fees from AbbVie. Hudesman, David: Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax, BMS, Biocon, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer, Prometheus, CorEvitas, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi Research Support: Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Lukin, Dana: Dana Lukin has served as a consultant/advisory board member for AbbVie, AltruBio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Palatin, Pfizer, Prime, PSI, Takeda, and Vedanta has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Johnson & Johnson and serves as a speaker for AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson. Rubin, David T.: Grant support: Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax SA, Altrubio, Athos Therapeutics, Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect BioPharma, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech (Roche) Inc., Iterative Health, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Mirador, Odyssey Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Spyre, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Vedanta Biosciences, and Ventyx. Schreiber, Stefan Wolfgang: Stefan Schreiber has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck, Novartis/Sandoz, Pfizer, Protagonist, Takeda, and Ventyx Biosciences. Gower, Megan: Megan Gower is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Jones, Stephen: Stephen Jones is an independent medical consultant who provides services for Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Robinson, Ian: Ian Robinson is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Sanchirico, Marie: Marie Sanchirico is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Yajnik, Vijay: Vijay Yajnik is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Abstract Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Upadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in the phase 3 U-EXCEED (NCT03345836) and U-EXCEL (NCT03345849) induction, and U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) maintenance trials in patients with moderately to severely active CD. We assessed the effect of UPA maintenance treatment on HRQoL in patients with moderately to severely active CD from the U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods Patients who completed the 52-week U-ENDURE maintenance study were eligible to participate in the LTE study, continuing their previously assigned maintenance treatment. Of the 337 patients receiving UPA (168, UPA 30 mg; 169, UPA 15 mg) in the U-ENDURE maintenance trial, a total of 244 patients (137, UPA 30 mg; 107, UPA 15 mg) were included in this analysis. All 244 patients completed week 96 of the LTE. Endpoints included percentage of patients who achieved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) response (≥16-point increase from induction baseline), IBDQ remission (total score ≥170 points), a meaningful within-person change (MWPC) of ≥ 9point increase from baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) and a MWPC of ≥ 4.1- and ≥3.9-point increase from baseline on the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary score, respectively, at maintenance week 52 and LTE week 96. We also assessed MWPC in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in CD (WPAI-CD) domains defined as a decrease of ≥ 6.1% in presenteeism, ≥6.5% in absenteeism, ≥7.3% in overall work impairment and ≥8.5% in activity impairment. Data were reported using nonresponder imputation. Results The proportion of patients in the UPA 30 mg group achieving HRQoL outcomes was maintained from maintenance week 52 to LTE week 96, including achievement of IBDQ response (61.3% vs 57.7%), IBDQ remission (53.3% vs 53.3%), MWPC improvement in FACIT-F (50.4% vs 40.9%), SF-36 PCS (56.9% vs 56.2%), SF-36 MCS (47.4% vs 40.9%) and MWPC improvements in WPAI-CD domains presenteeism (45.6% vs 48.1%), overall work impairment (49.4% vs 51.9%) and daily activity impairment (57.7% vs 56.9%). Patients in the UPA 15 mg group also maintained achievement of these HRQoL outcomes over time (Table). Conclusion UPA (15 and 30 mg) maintenance treatment over a 3-year period was associated with sustained and clinically meaningful disease-specific and generic HRQoL improvement in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Despite the overall trend favouring UPA 30 mg, differences in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 dose groups were small. Conflict of interest: Panés, Julián: Personal Fees: J. Panés received consultancy fees/honorarium from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mirum, Nimbus, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus, Protagonist, Revolo, Sanofi, Sorriso, Spyre Therapeutics, Surrozen, Takeda, and Wasserman, and has served on data safety monitoring boards for Alimentiv, Mirum, Roche, Sorriso, Sanofi, and Surrozen Louis, Edouard: Education and Reserach Grants for my department: Abbvie, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Celltrion, EG pharma, Sandoz, Falk Personal Fees for conferences, advisory boards and consultancy: Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Galapagos, Celltrion, Arena, BMS, Falk, Biokuris, Fresenius-Kabi, Thabor Bossuyt, Peter: Grant support for research from AbbVie, EG Consulting fee from AbbVie, Bristol Meyers Squibb, CIRC, Galapagos, Janssen, Jeito capital, Lilly, Pentax, Pfizer, PSI-CRO, Roche, Takeda, Tetrameros Speakers fee from AbbVie, AMC ICP, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Benelux, EG, Galapagos, Globalport, Lilly, Medtalks, Materia Prima, Pentax, Springer Media Joshi, Namita: Namita Joshi is a full-time employees/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Xuan, Si: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Shukla, Nidhi: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Dubcenco, Elena: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Aponte, Fernando: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Perkovic, Ashley: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Loftus, Jr, Edward: Grant: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Receptos, Robarts Clinical Trials, Takeda, Theravance, UCB. Personal Fees: AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB.

Abstract Background Global data demonstrate an inverse relationship between hospital ileoanal pouch volume and adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for quality metrics for this technically demanding procedure.1-4 Currently, there are no standardised quality indicators to define high-quality pouch surgery. This study aimed to establish international consensus on key performance indicators (KPIs) in pouch surgery. Methods A modified Delphi process was conducted among an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts. Participants were identified through professional networks, literature review, and direct email invitation; additional participants recruited via a snowball sampling approach over one month. Candidate KPIs were generated from literature review and expert input across 5 domains. Each item was rated on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 9 = critically important); consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% of respondents rating an item 7–9. Items not reaching consensus were re-rated in a second round following anonymized group feedback. Results Round 1 included 312 participants from 37 countries. Demographics (Table 1): 53% were age 45 years, 35.2% were female, and included surgeons (68.6%) and gastroenterologists (31.1%). Most (76.6%) practice at academic or university hospitals, with a median of 11 (5–17) years in practise; 78.9% perform &gt;1 pouchoscopy per month, and 39.5% of surgeons perform 5 pouches/year. Respondents’ regions included North America (51%), Europe (26%), Oceania (9%), Asia (6%), Latin America (4%), and the Middle East/Africa (4%). Seven (18%) countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Malaysia, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Sweden, and Switzerland) reported pouch surgery is already centralised, while 70.6% agreed pouch centralisation should be implemented. Cost/logistics and professional autonomy were the most important barriers to centralisation, whereas capacity and training exposure were least important. Overall, 37/59 (62.7%) candidate KPIs reached consensus after Round 1. The Round 2 response rate was 61%, and 2 additional KPIs reached consensus (preop ileitis and long-term risk of pouchitis). Additionally, 14 of 25 (56%) informed consent items reached consensus, and 64% of respondents felt informed consent for pouch surgery requires 2 or more office visits. Consensus items were used to populate a KPIPS Checklist (Figure 1). Conclusion Through an international Delphi process, the KPIPS study identified a consensus-derived set of key performance indicators to measure quality in pouch surgery. These quality metrics provide a foundation for benchmarking outcomes and represent a critical step towards centralization and the development of designated pouch centres of excellence to improve global standards of care for pouch patients. References: 1. Worley GHT, Fearnhead NS, Brown SR, et al. Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: Lessons learned from the ileoanal pouch registry and the 2017 ileoanal pouch report. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:913–22. 2. Giddings HL, Yang PF, Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Ng KS. Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Systematic review. Br J Surg 2024;111. 3. Hoang CM, Maykel JA, Davids JS, et al. Distribution of elective ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cases for ulcerative colitis: A study utilizing the university health system consortium database. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2613–9. 4. Moojen TB, Visser E, Reijntjes MA, et al. One-year stoma-free survival of ileoanal pouches for uc in european centers: The miracle project. Ann Surg Open 2025;6:e596. Conflict of interest: Prof. Holubar, Stefan: No conflict of interest Soop, Mattias: No conflict of interest Poskus, Tomas: No conflict of interest Neary, Peter: No conflict of interest Uchino, Tairin: No conflict of interest Yang, Song-soo: No conflict of interest Adamina, Michel: No conflict of interest Avellaneda, Nicolas Luis: No conflict of interest Barnes, Edward: No conflict of interest Brouquet, Antoine: No conflict of interest Brown, Steven Ross: No conflict of interest De Buck Van Overstraeten, Anthony: No conflict of interest Buskens, Christianne J.: No conflict of interest Chiorean, Michael: No conflict of interest Clark, David: No conflict of interest Cohen, Benjamin: No conflict of interest El Ouali, Sara: No conflict of interest Faiz, Omar Darius: No conflict of interest Fichera, Alessandro: No conflict of interest Hahnloser, Dieter: No conflict of interest Hancock, Laura: No conflict of interest Herfarth, Hans: No conflict of interest Johnston, Michael: No conflict of interest Kayal, Maia: No conflict of interest Laharie, David: No conflict of interest Liberman, Sender: No conflict of interest Loftus, Jr, Edward: No conflict of interest Moeslein, Gabriela: No conflict of interest Myrelid, Pär: No conflict of interest Poylin, Vitaliy: No conflict of interest Qazi, Taha: No conflict of interest Raffals, Laura: No conflict of interest Rubin, David T.: No conflict of interest Spinelli, Antonino: No conflict of interest Steinhagen, Emily: No conflict of interest Tozer, Philip: No conflict of interest Verstockt, Bram: No conflict of interest Warusavitarne, Janindra: No conflict of interest Wexner, Steven: No conflict of interest Winter, Desmond: No conflict of interest

Abstract Background Endoscopic healing is an important treatment goal in Crohn’s disease (CD), in line with European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation CD guidelines, as it is associated with improved long-term disease outcomes. We assessed the relationship between endoscopic healing and long-term clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and hospitalisations in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active CD receiving upadacitinib (UPA) maintenance treatment in the U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods Pts completing the 52-week U-ENDURE maintenance study were eligible to participate in the LTE study, continuing their previously assigned maintenance treatment. Pts receiving UPA 15 mg or 30 mg once daily in LTE were included in this analysis. Clinical remission based on CD activity index (CDAI &lt;150), CDAI response (≥100-point decrease in CDAI from induction baseline), clinical remission based on stool frequency/abdominal pain (SF/AP) score (average daily soft or liquid SF ≤ 2.8 and average daily AP ≤ 1.0, and neither greater than induction baseline), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) response (≥16-point increase in total IBDQ score from induction baseline) and remission (IBDQ total score ≥170 points), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) response (≥9-point increase from induction baseline), and economic outcomes (CD-related hospitalisations or surgeries) were evaluated at LTE week 96. Outcomes were compared between pts who achieved vs those who did not achieve endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, or ulcer-free endoscopy (endoscopic outcomes defined in Table footnote) at maintenance week 52 using chi-square testing (nominal P values). Pts with missing outcomes at LTE week 96 were imputed as nonresponders. Results Of 244 pts, 153/244 (62.7%), 112/244 (45.9%) and 89/242 (36.8%) achieved endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy, respectively, at LTE week 0. Significantly (all nominal P≤0.05) more pts who achieved endoscopic response, endoscopic remission or had an ulcer-free endoscopy at LTE Week 0 achieved CDAI response, CDAI remission, SF/AP clinical remission, IBDQ response, IBDQ remission and FACIT-F response at LTE week 96 (Table). CD-related hospitalisations or surgeries at LTE week 96, were significantly (nominal P≤0.05) lower in pts with endoscopic remission and ulcer-free endoscopy at LTE week 0, and numerically lower in pts with endoscopic response. Conclusion A significantly higher proportion of pts who achieved endoscopic outcomes at 52 weeks and received up to 3 years of UPA maintenance treatment achieved long-term improvements in clinical and PROs and reduced CD-related hospitalisations or surgeries. Conflict of interest: Loftus, Jr, Edward: Edward V. Loftus, Jr. has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Astellas, Avalo Therapeutics, Biocon, BMS, Celltrion Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead, Iota Biosciences, Iterative Health, Janssen, Merck, Morphic Therapeutics, Ono Pharma, Spyre Therapeutics, Takeda, and TR1X Bio has received research support from AbbVie, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and Takeda and holds stock in Exact Sciences and Moderna. Louis, Edouard: Education and Reserach Grants for my department: Abbvie, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Celltrion, EG pharma, Sandoz, Falk Personal Fees for conferences, advisory boards and consultancy: Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Galapagos, Celltrion, Arena, BMS, Falk, Biokuris, Fresenius-Kabi, Thabor Bossuyt, Peter: Grant support for research from AbbVie, EG Consulting fee from AbbVie, Bristol Meyers Squibb, CIRC, Galapagos, Janssen, Jeito capital, Lilly, Pentax, Pfizer, PSI-CRO, Roche, Takeda, Tetrameros Speakers fee from AbbVie, AMC ICP, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Benelux, EG, Galapagos, Globalport, Lilly, Medtalks, Materia Prima, Pentax, Springer Media Joshi, Namita: Namita Joshi is a full-time employees/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Shukla, Nidhi: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Dubcenco, Elena: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Aponte, Fernando: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Perkovic, Ashley: Full-time employee/contractor of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or options. Panés, Julián: Personal Fees: J. Panés received consultancy fees/honorarium from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mirum, Nimbus, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus, Protagonist, Revolo, Sanofi, Sorriso, Spyre Therapeutics, Surrozen, Takeda, and Wasserman, and has served on data safety monitoring boards for Alimentiv, Mirum, Roche, Sorriso, Sanofi, and Surrozen

Abstract Background We aimed to describe the real-world durability of clinical and endoscopic outcomes of upadacitinib (UPA) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed an ongoing multi-center cohort of UC patients(pts) in the United States who were started on UPA for active disease. Primary outcome was clinical remission at 1yr assessed by partial Mayo score(pMS)(resolution of all UC related symptoms and physician global assessment). Secondary outcomes assessed at various timepoints, including after re-escalation, included clinical response(&gt;50%reduction in symptoms utilizing the pMS), endoscopic response (Mayo endoscopic score≤1or absence of erosions/ulcerations) and histological remission(defined as normal or chronic inactive). Durable secondary outcomes achieved at both 6months and at 1yr and beyond were also assessed. Descriptive statistics were performed. Adverse events(AEs) investigated included cardiovascular events and herpes zoster (HZ). Results 416pts were included(Table 1) with median values for age at initiation of36.00yrs(range27-48), disease duration7.00yrs(range3-14)and follow-up 993days(IQR,672-1103), with206(49.52%)with follow-up at 1yr or beyond. Of these, 66.1%had extensive colitis. Induction duration was8wks in 86.5%and16wks in 4.8 %(20/416). Most received an induction dose of45mg(97.1%)and maintenance dose of30mg(85.8%). Among the evaluable population at1yr and beyond, 62.5%(45/80)were in clinical remission, 75.9%(22/29)in endoscopic response with58.6%(17/29) in remission and66.6%(20/30)in histological remission. At 6months, clinical remission was51.6%(42/93), endoscopic response was 75%(24/32) of which43.75%(14/32)were in remission and histologic remission was seen in 40.8%(20/49).Durable secondary outcomes of clinical remission were seen in 71.4%(30/42), endoscopic improvement in 45.8%(11/24), and histologic remission in35%(7/20). Re-escalation to 45mg occurred in 35pts, of which48.6%(17/35)were re-escalated due to incomplete induction clinical response with all achieving response(11 in remission). The rest(18/35)were re-escalated for clinical relapse after initial remission where72.2%(13/18)were able to recapture remission. After re-escalation,54.3%(19/35)continued on 45mg daily. AEs were reported in12.7%with HZ in 7pts(2.1%). One pt aged53yrs had an episode of TIA after 1yr on UPA at 15mg, without pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors and UPA use is ongoing at the same dose. There were no reported episodes of worsening of pre-existing cardiovascular disease or DVT/PE. Conclusion UPA is durably effective and safe in a real-world clinical setting with re-escalation to 45mg capturing response in a majority of the pts. Ongoing recruitment will provide further evidence on long term effectiveness and safety. Conflict of interest: Ms. Huang, Katherine: No conflict of interest Chandnani, Arun: No conflict of interest Samaan, Sami: None Tan, Tingyi: I have no conflict of interests to declare. Ramesh, Prajith Raj: None Conlon, Caroline: No conflict of interest Klein, Jeremy: None Reddy, Nikhil: No conflict of interest Ayoub, Malek: None Cervantes Limon, Gabriela: none Myers, Melissa: None Bucaram, Martha: No conflict of interest Lieto, Stephen: No conflict of interest Scalzo, Nicholas: No conflict of interest Cohen, Benjamin: Abbvie - consulting and speaking ALPCO - consulting J & J Innovative Medicine - consulting Takeda - consulting and speaking Emmes Biopharma Services LLC - DSMB Pfizer - consulting Mohamed, Islam: nothing to declare Ciorba, Matthew: Advisory Board: Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Geneoscopy Consulting: Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Geneoscopy Grant contracts: Janssen, Pfizer, Incyte Shukla, Richa: Speakers bureau - Abbvie and Lilly Wright, Michael: None Xu, An Tao: No conflict of interest Chowla, Navreet: No conflict of interest Ogholikhan, Sina: Abbvie Medical Director Kujawski, Michelle: Abbvie Scientific Director Dulaney, David: Speaker bureau - Regeneron Speaker bureau - Sanofi Speaker bureau - Takeda Speaker bureau - Eli Lilly Fenster, Marc: none Benson, Caroline: No conflict of interest Alhobayb, Tamara: No conflict of interest Berinstein, Jeffrey: No conflict of interest Shivashankar, Raina: Abbvie and BMS - speaker bureau Janssen and Celltrion - grant for IBD fellowship funding Pfizer - consultant Bishu, Shrinivas: None Patel, Anish: speaker: abbvie, J & J, Lilly, BMS, Pfizer, Phathom, Takeda consultant: abbvie Ungaro, Ryan: Personal Fees: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda Johnson, Amanda: Research grant: Abbvie, Spyre Therapeutics Pekow, Joel R.: CVS Health - Consulting Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson - Stocks Yarur, Andres: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI.