Ghusn, Wissam

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the association of long-term, continuous tirzepatide use with cardiometabolic risk parameters and estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in real-world practice. Methods This multicenter retrospective observational study included 1,028 adults with overweight or obesity who received weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide for at least 12 months within the Mayo Clinic Health System from June 2022 through May 2024. ASCVD risk analyses included 275 individuals with complete baseline and 12-month follow-up data. Outcomes were changes in cardiometabolic parameters, estimated 10-year ASCVD risk, and ASCVD risk category. Results At 12 months, median total body weight loss (TBWL) was 12.6%. Fasting glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides, and alanine aminotransferase decreased by 19.5%, 16.0%, 8.5%, and 10.6%, respectively, whereas HDL cholesterol increased by 11.3% (all P < .001). Mean 10-year ASCVD risk did not change significantly overall (mean relative change, −3.7%; P = .18), but changes differed by TBWL category (ANOVA, P < .001). ASCVD risk decreased among individuals achieving 10%–20% TBWL (−9.6%; P = .009) and >20% TBWL (−14.2%; P = .005), but not among those achieving <10% TBWL (+7.7%; P = .22). Low-risk prevalence increased from 38.3% to 46.4% (P < .001), with 11.7% transitioning from higher-risk categories to low risk. Main findings Continuous tirzepatide use for at least 12 months was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in cardiometabolic parameters. Reductions in estimated 10-year ASCVD risk were observed among individuals achieving at least 10% TBWL, supporting greater weight loss as an important marker of cardiovascular risk improvement.

Objective: To compare 1-year changes in estimated 10-year and lifetime atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy among adults with obesity. Summary Background Data: Obesity is a major driver of ASCVD through adverse metabolic and inflammatory pathways. Metabolic and bariatric surgery and GLP-1 receptor agonists represent the most effective contemporary treatments for obesity and are increasingly used to mitigate cardiovascular risk. However, their comparative effects on integrated short-term and lifetime ASCVD risk in real-world clinical practice remain incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) who underwent MBS or initiated GLP-1RA therapy between 2020 and 2023 within a large tertiary health care system in the United States. Participants were identified from electronic health records and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes were 1-year changes in estimated 10-year and lifetime ASCVD risk. Secondary outcomes included percent total body weight loss, blood pressure, and lipid parameters. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for baseline body mass index and baseline ASCVD risk. Results: The final cohort included 812 patients, of whom 579 underwent MBS and 233 initiated GLP-1RA therapy. At baseline, patients receiving GLP-1RAs were older and had higher estimated ASCVD risk. At 1 year, reductions in 10-year ASCVD risk were similar between groups (−0.8% vs. −1.1%; P =.36). In contrast, lifetime ASCVD risk decreased significantly more following MBS than GLP-1RA therapy (−8.6% vs. −1.7%; P <.001). MBS was associated with greater percent total body weight loss (−27.8% vs. −11.1%; P <.001) and more favorable lipid changes, including larger reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and greater increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After adjustment, MBS remained independently associated with a greater reduction in lifetime ASCVD risk compared with GLP-1RA therapy (β −6.92; 95% CI −9.22 to −4.62). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, both MBS and GLP-1RA therapy were associated with improvements in estimated cardiovascular risk, but MBS conferred substantially greater reductions in lifetime ASCVD risk, accompanied by superior weight loss and lipid improvements. These findings highlight the complementary roles of surgical and pharmacologic therapies in obesity management and may inform strategies to optimize long-term cardiovascular risk reduction.

ABSTRACT Objective This study compared the effects of phentermine‐topiramate‐ER (mid‐dose 7.5/46 mg) versus placebo on weight loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk outcomes when used as an adjunct to a digitally enhanced lifestyle intervention (DELI). Methods We conducted a 12‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial at a single tertiary academic center in the United States (June 2020–June 2022). Eighty participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled in the DELI program, consisting of in‐person and telehealth modalities, dietary and physical activity goals, and use of a smartphone application integrated with digital devices (Apple Watch and Bluetooth‐enabled weight scale and blood pressure monitor). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either phentermine‐topiramate‐ER ( n = 42) or placebo ( n = 38) in addition to the DELI. Results At 3 months, the phentermine‐topiramate group lost a mean of 10.82 kg versus 4.04 kg in the placebo group (mean difference −6.78 kg; p = 0.002). At 12 months, weight loss was 15.32 kg versus 5.85 kg, respectively (mean difference −9.48 kg; p < 0.001). Participants receiving phentermine‐topiramate‐ER experienced a 3.35% reduction in the estimated atherosclerotic CVD risk compared to baseline ( p = 0.004). Conclusions Phentermine‐topiramate‐ER, when combined with a DELI, produced significant and sustained weight loss and reduced CVD risk in adults with obesity. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04408586

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is rapidly emerging as the leading cause of chronic liver disease, closely tied to rising global obesity rates. Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs), including endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), intragastric balloons (IGB), duodenal-jejunal bypass liners (DJBL), and duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR), offer minimally invasive interventions that target metabolic dysfunction and weight loss. This review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanisms and hepatic outcomes of EBTs in MASLD, highlighting improvements in hepatic steatosis, liver stiffness, and fibrosis biomarkers across multiple modalities. ESG is consistently associated with reductions in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis scores across multiple studies. IGB therapy improves liver stiffness and reduces hepatic fat as assessed by imaging modalities such as MRI- Proton Density Fat Fraction and ultrasound. DJBL lowers liver enzymes and improves non-invasive markers of steatohepatitis like the Fibroscan-AST score, although its effect on fibrosis appears limited. DMR demonstrates reductions in liver fat, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes, but evidence for histological improvement in MASLD remains inconsistent. Despite their promise, most EBT studies remain limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up. Further randomized trials are needed to validate long-term efficacy and position EBTs alongside or as alternatives to surgical interventions for MASLD.

Obesity is a major global health challenge associated with significant metabolic and gastrointestinal comorbidities. While metabolic and bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for durable weight loss, the desire for additional options has fueled the development of endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) as another tool for weight loss. This review examines established EBTs, including endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), intragastric balloons (IGBs), and transoral outlet reduction (TORe), alongside emerging therapies such as duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR), incisionless anastomosis creation, and fully automated endoscopic gastric remodeling systems. ESG has demonstrated durable weight loss, favorable safety, and superior cost-effectiveness compared to pharmacotherapy alone, while combination strategies using EBTs and anti-obesity medications (AOMs), particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists, have resulted in greater total-body weight loss than either modality alone. Genetic variation, particularly within the leptin–melanocortin pathway, may predict response to endoscopic interventions and guide personalized treatment selection. Novel investigational procedures such as DMR, automated or robotic gastric remodeling, and magnetic or ultrasound-assisted gastric bypass show promising early results. Endoscopic therapies are poised to become increasingly central to the personalized, scalable management of obesity and related metabolic diseases.

Obesity is a global health crisis with profound implications for cancer risk, particularly within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Mounting evidence demonstrates that excess adiposity contributes to the initiation, progression, and poor outcomes of GI malignancies through a constellation of interrelated mechanisms. This review comprehensively examines the biologic pathways linking obesity to cancers of the esophagus, stomach, colon, liver, pancreas, and gallbladder. Chronic low-grade inflammation, driven by adipose tissue-derived cytokines and immune cell infiltration, plays a central role in tumorigenesis via the activation of NF-κB, STAT3, and other pro-oncogenic signaling cascades. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance increase mitogenic IGF-1 signaling, while dysregulated adipokines, particularly elevated leptin and reduced adiponectin, promote cellular proliferation and impair tumor suppression. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome and alterations in bile acid metabolism generate carcinogenic metabolites that contribute to DNA damage and immune evasion. Additionally, obesity-induced tissue hypoxia fosters tumor growth through HIF-1α-mediated pathways. We further highlight organ-specific associations, such as visceral adiposity’s role in Barrett’s esophagus and hepatocellular carcinoma emerging from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Importantly, emerging data suggest that weight loss, achieved via lifestyle, pharmacologic, or surgical interventions, may mitigate these carcinogenic pathways and improve tumor biology. As obesity prevalence continues to rise globally, elucidating its mechanistic ties to GI malignancies is essential for risk stratification, prevention strategies, and personalized care. By integrating epidemiologic and molecular insights, this review underscores the need for multidisciplinary approaches to curb the oncogenic burden of obesity and improve outcomes in GI oncology.

Background and Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), closely associated with obesity, contributes to increased morbidity and mortality due to complications such as cardiometabolic disease. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) in achieving diabetes remission and to examine key predictors influencing remission outcomes. Materials and Methods: This review synthesizes data from studies on MBS and EBT outcomes, focusing on predictors for diabetes remission such as preoperative insulin use, diabetes duration, HbA1c, and C-peptide levels. Additionally, predictive scoring systems, including the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS), DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, ABCD, and Robert et al. scores, were analyzed for their utility in forecasting remission likelihood. Results: Key predictors of T2D remission include shorter diabetes duration, lower HbA1c, and higher C-peptide levels, while prolonged insulin use, and higher insulin doses are associated with lower remission rates. Scoring models like IMS and DiaRem demonstrate that lower scores correlate with a higher likelihood of remission, especially for procedures such as Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). RYGB generally shows higher remission rates compared to sleeve gastrectomy (SG), particularly among patients with mild disease severity, while EBTs like ESG and IGBs contribute 5–20% total weight loss (TWL) and moderate glycemic control improvements. Conclusions: Both MBS and EBTs are effective for T2D management, with predictive scoring models aiding in individualized patient selection to optimize remission outcomes. Further research to validate these predictive tools across diverse populations could enhance treatment planning for both surgical and endoscopic interventions.

Objective: To develop and validate 2 predictive models, the Diabetes Remission Index (DRI) and the Weight loss–adjusted DRI (W-DRI), for assessing type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Background: MBS, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, is highly effective in achieving T2D remission, but outcomes vary across populations. Predicting remission remains critical for individualized patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes. Existing tools focus on general outcomes, and a specific model incorporating weight loss data has been lacking. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with T2D and overweight/obesity (body mass index: ≥27 kg/m 2 ) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 2008 and 2018. Institution 1 (I-1) data (n = 503) were used to develop and internally validate the models, whereas Institution 2 (I-2) data (n = 409) were used for external validation. The DRI model incorporated preoperative variables, and the W-DRI model, in addition, included postsurgical weight loss. Predictive accuracy was assessed using area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve [area under the curve (AUC)], calibration plots, and stratified analyses. Results: In I-1, 44.7% of patients achieved T2D remission, with a DRI model AUC of 0.80. In I-2, 52.6% achieved remission, with a model AUC of 0.78. Incorporating weight loss improved W-DRI predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.82 in I-1, 0.79 in I-2). Calibration plots demonstrated strong agreement between predicted and observed remission rates. An online DRI and W-DRI calculator is available through the Mayo Clinic webpage (https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/dri-calculator/). Conclusions: The DRI and W-DRI models accurately predict T2D remission post-MBS, enabling personalized patient care and informed decision-making. Further validation across diverse populations is warranted.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiovascular disease that significantly impacts public health in the United States. Although numerous clinical trials aim to optimize AF management, concerns about demographic disparities in trial participation persist. This study assesses the representation of age, sex, race, and ethnicity among participants in AF trials conducted in the US, highlighting potential biases that could affect the generalizability of trial outcomes. Methods: An extensive review of clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov involving patients with AF up to April 2024 was performed. The search was filtered to include all completed interventional trials across phases 2 to 4 without restrictions on the initiation or completion dates. Data were extracted concerning mean age, age distribution, sex, and the racial and ethnic composition of the trial participants. Results: From the 173 trials analyzed, a total of 1,355,239 participants were included, with an average age of 64.7 years. The demographic breakdown revealed a participant pool consisting predominantly of older adults (>65 years: 70.8%), with a significant underrepresentation of the younger age group (18-65 years: 29.2%). Males constituted 65.2% of the trial population, highlighting a gender imbalance. Racially, 74.1% of participants were White, while African Americans (7.7%) and Asians (5.9%) and other racial groups were notably underrepresented. Ethnic disparities were also evident, with Hispanic participants making up only 11.5% of the study population. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate significant disparities in the age, sex, race, and ethnic backgrounds of AF clinical trial participants in the US. These imbalances could potentially limit the applicability of trial results across the broader, diverse population. Efforts to enhance the diversity of clinical trial cohorts are essential to ensure more equitable health outcomes and the universal applicability of clinical research findings. Future strategies should focus on targeted recruitment and inclusive study designs to address these disparities.