Citations

Abstract Background Dysphagia can lead to fatal aspiration pneumonia in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Little is known about the longitudinal progression of dysphagia or whether it differs across PSP clinical variants. Objectives To characterize longitudinal changes in dysphagia across PSP variants and determine relationships with disease severity and rate of atrophy in PSP‐related regions. Methods Sixty‐one PSP patients were recruited and underwent at least two serial evaluations, comprising neurological and videofluorographic exams, and MRI. Variables‐of‐interest were the oral and pharyngeal total sum scores (OTSS/PTSS) from the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and lingual pressure assessments. Rates of change were compared across PSP variants and related to baseline scores, PSP Rating Scale and regional brain atrophy rates. Results Dysphagia progressed longitudinally, particularly with worsening in OTSS and anterior and posterior lingual pressures. Rate of change in OTSS was fastest in PSP with predominant speech‐language disorder. Negative correlations were observed between rates of change and baseline scores for OTSS, PTSS and PAS. Rates of change in lingual pressure measures correlated with rates of change in the PSP Rating Scale. Rate of change in the FOIS correlated with rates of change in OTSS and lingual pressure. Rates of brain atrophy were associated with baseline OTSS, PTSS, and PAS. Conclusions Dysphagia and lingual pressure worsen over time in PSP, with variability in rates of change in the OTSS across PSP variants and evidence that dysphagia is related to rates of atrophy.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Multicomponent non‐pharmacological interventions, such as the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking® program, have shown promise for improving emotional well‐being, functioning, and self‐efficacy in both people with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) and their care partners. However, limited research has examined whether outcomes differ based on type of care partner who co‐enrolls with the pwMCI. METHODS We analyzed data from 875 pwMCI−care partner dyads who completed the HABIT program. Multivariate linear mixed‐effects regression models evaluated changes from baseline in outcomes by care partner type (spouse vs. non‐spouse) at post‐intervention, 6‐months, and 12‐ months. RESULTS At post‐intervention, pwMCI with spousal care partners demonstrated significant improvements across all outcomes from baseline, whereas those with non‐spousal partners improved in five out of seven outcomes. Across subsequent follow‐ups, pwMCI with spousal care partners showed sustained mean reductions in anxiety (post‐intervention: −2.0; 12‐month: −0.9) and increased compliance (post‐intervention: 5.7; 12‐month: 0.9). Everyday functioning in memory (post‐intervention: −0.9; 12‐months: 1.8) and executive functioning (post‐intervention: −0.7; 12‐months: 4.8) improved at post‐intervention but declined thereafter. Spousal care partners reported reduced anxiety (−1.2) and depression (−1.3) at post‐intervention, but by 12‐months they experienced increased burden, anxiety, and depression relative to baseline. Non‐spousal pwMCI–care partner dyads did not show significant change at 6 or 12‐months. DISCUSSION The HABIT intervention may have more favorable outcomes for pwMCI and care partners in spousal compared to non‐spousal dyads. These findings highlight the potential impact of care partner characteristics on both immediate and long‐term response to behavioral interventions for MCI. Highlights At post‐intervention, people with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) with spousal care partners showed significant improvements across all outcomes, while those with non‐spousal partners improved in five of seven outcomes. Gains attenuated over time for both spousal and non‐spousal dyads Spousal care partners reported reduced anxiety and depression at post‐intervention, but by 12 months they experienced increased burden, anxiety, and depression relative to baseline. Non‐spousal pwMCI–care partner dyads did not show significant change at 6 or 12 months.

ABSTRACT Introduction Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among Latinas. Although breast cancer risk assessment models exist and show promise in reducing mortality, few studies have elicited women's interest in and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment, particularly among underserved populations, like Latinas, who are susceptible to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. These disparities stem from factors such as limited access to healthcare services, lower rates of screening utilization, language barriers, and socioeconomic challenges, all of which compound their risk and hinder effective engagement with risk assessment tools. This qualitative study aims to explore Latinas' perspectives regarding breast cancer risk assessment and implications on future behaviors. Methods Twenty‐three under‐ or uninsured Latinas aged 45–65 with no personal history of breast cancer took part in either a focus group ( n = 3, 15 participants) or individual interviews (8 participants). Guided by health behavior theories (Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model), data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using a deductive‐inductive approach to thematic content analysis, resulting in four themes. Results Latinas expressed high interest in knowing their breast cancer risk and reported that the benefits of knowing one's risk outweighed the harms. Latinas also stated that they would continue screening as recommended if found to be at low risk, but that they would speak with their provider or increase screening frequency if found to be at increased risk. Moreover, Latinas described the pivotal role of providers and social networks in influencing interest and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment and preventive behaviors. Conclusion Underserved Latinas viewed breast cancer risk assessment positively and underscored the need for multilevel, culturally tailored strategies to improve breast cancer risk assessment. This study yielded four distinct themes: (1) Interest and Awareness of Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (2) Benefits and Barriers of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (3) Screening Implications of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, and (4) Provider Influence on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Behaviors. Potential strategies include efforts to improve provider engagement and communication and leveraging social networks to increase awareness and encourage preventive behaviors. Trial Registration NCI‐2023‐00465

Abstract Background The association between long-term use of benzodiazepines (BDZs) and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia has not been fully characterized. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between long-term BDZs use and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Methods Data were derived from an observational study of treatment with atypical antipsychotics in Chinese patients with schizophrenia (SALT-C). Fifty-seven patients with long-term use of BDZs (≥ 60 days) were included, and 57 BDZs non-users were matched using propensity scores for age, sex, disease duration, and atypical antipsychotics received. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); psychotic symptoms, illness severity, and psychosocial functioning were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale, and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent-samples t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression. Results The long-term BDZs user group showed a significantly lower total MoCA score [16.02 (6.69)] than the BDZs non-user group [19.33 (7.11)] (P = 0.012). No significant between-group differences were observed in total scores on the PANSS, CGI-S, or PSP (all P > 0.05). Long-term BDZs use was independently associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 7.728, P = 0.017), whereas years of education was negatively associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 0.740, P = 0.007). Conclusions Long-term BDZs use is associated with poorer cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting that cognitive function should be monitored during BDZs treatment in this population.

ABSTRACT Systemic AL amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia, where toxic free light chains (FLCs) lead to vital organ damage, with risk of early mortality despite effective therapies. Notably, there is a paucity of data on the incidence and predictors of early mortality in the daratumumab (Dara) era. We conducted a multi‐center retrospective cohort study to develop and validate a risk‐prediction model for early mortality (all‐cause death within 6 months) in patients treated with Dara‐based frontline regimens. We used univariate analysis to identify covariates for a logistic regression model predictive of 6‐month mortality and generated a clinical risk score. Among 339 patients across eight centers, 36 (10.6%) experienced early mortality. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors: NT‐proBN P > 5300 pg/mL (odds ratio [OR] 3.83, p = 0.006), A ge > 75 years (OR 2.96, p = 0.073), absence of t(11;14) on C ytogenetics (OR 3.0, p = 0.022), and E COG performance status (OR 1.72 per unit increase, p = 0.044). The resulting PACE score stratified patients into three risk groups with a 6‐month mortality of 1.2% (low‐risk), 11.7% (intermediate‐risk), and 50.0% (high‐risk). The PACE score demonstrated superior discrimination (C‐index 0.78) for early mortality compared to Mayo 2004 (0.69) and Mayo 2012 (0.55) staging systems. External validation confirmed robust discrimination (C‐index 0.73) with corresponding 6‐month mortality rates of 4.2%, 15.25%, and 37.04% across respective risk groups. The PACE score provides a clinically applicable tool for early mortality risk stratification in AL amyloidosis patients receiving Dara‐based therapy, and will enable improved patient counseling, clinical trial design, and identification of ultra‐high‐risk patients requiring intensive monitoring and novel therapies.

ABSTRACT Introduction/Aims In severe ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), occasionally surgeons will employ an end‐to‐side (ETS) nerve transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) motor branch of pronator quadratus (PQ) to the ulnar motor component distally (AIN ETS). We used an ultrasound (US)‐guided near‐nerve monopolar needle stimulation of the AIN to determine the specific contribution of the transferred PQ motor branch to the ulnar‐innervated hand intrinsic muscles following AIN ETS in patients with UNE. Methods After inserting the monopolar needle under US guidance, direct stimulation of the AIN was performed while recording from the abductor digiti minimi (ADM), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and flexor pollicis longus (FPL). The presence or absence of a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was noted from each muscle. Results The technique was used in two patients with chronic UNE, one with a cubital tunnel decompression and AIN ETS and the other with a decompression alone. In the patient with decompression and AIN ETS, direct stimulation of the AIN revealed a low amplitude CMAP recorded from the FDI and FPL, suggesting AIN axonal contribution to FDI in the setting of prior AIN ETS. In the patient with decompression alone, near‐nerve stimulation generated an expected CMAP in the FPL but no response in the hand intrinsics. Discussion This study may demonstrate the utility of US‐guided near‐nerve monopolar needle AIN stimulation and suggests that it is a reliable technique to isolate the AIN contribution to hand intrinsic reinnervation following AIN ETS.

ABSTRACT Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) leads to severe renal cysts and progressive kidney dysfunction, with no approved treatments. The absence of such cystic phenotypes in Pkhd1 − / − mice underscores the need for novel models that better recapitulate the human disease. We developed kidney organoid‐on‐chip models that mimic patients’ distal‐nephron cysts, identifying RAC1/c‐FOS as potential therapeutic targets. However, critical questions remain regarding RAC1 activation during cyst formation, cyst origins, and underlying molecular mechanisms. Using a multifaceted approach, organoid‐on‐chip models, transgenic mice, and patient kidney samples, we identified reduced levels of SPTAN1, a cytoskeletal spectrin protein, as a key regulator of RAC1 activation and cystic pathology. SPTAN1‐mutant kidney organoids and mice exhibited distal‐nephron cysts, and elevated RAC1/c‐FOS expression, consistent with ARPKD patients. Transcriptomics and live imaging revealed altered calcium signaling and increased intracellular calcium. Single‐cell RNA‐seq identified SLC8A1, a sodium/calcium exchanger, as a marker distinguishing distal/connecting tubules from collecting ducts in human kidneys, predominantly expressed in cystic epithelia in organoids and human ARPKD kidneys. Restoring SPTAN1 in PKHD1 − / − organoids via CRISPR activation alleviated cystic phenotypes, normalized intracellular calcium, and reduced RAC1/c‐FOS expression. These findings position SPTAN1 as a central player in ARPKD pathogenesis and highlight epigenome editing as a potential therapeutic strategy.

Abstract Background Head and neck cancer represents the seventh most common cancer diagnosis globally. Maintaining sufficient nutrition is important for preventing malnutrition (undernutrition) and muscle wasting, which contribute to worse outcomes, although many patients are unable to maintain adequate oral intake throughout treatment. This guideline provides practice guidance on nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed key questions and scanned results from a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases back to 2001. Recommendations were created for key questions concerning timing and duration of nutrition support (early vs delayed enteral nutrition [EN], postoperative feeding, and perioperative dietitian intervention), frequency of dietitian and speech pathology consultations, nutrition screening and assessment, macronutrient requirements, enteral access devices, adjunctive strategies (appetite stimulants and continuation of oral intake alongside EN), specialized nutrients (arginine, glutamine, ω‐3, and immunonutrition), and interdisciplinary care. Results Ninety‐two studies were included. Recommendations were made supporting early initiation of EN when oral intake is inadequate, nutrition within 24 h after surgery, weekly consultation with a dietitian during radiotherapy, malnutrition screening and assessment with validated tools, interdisciplinary models of care, dietitian involvement before and after surgery, and when to consider use of specialized nutrients. Recommendations are also provided for protein intake (1.2–1.5 g/kg/day) and energy intake (≥30 kcal/kg/day). Conclusion This guideline provides guidance for the nutrition care of patients with head and neck cancer, identifies research gaps, and calls for standardized outcome reporting to further the state of the evidence. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.

ABSTRACT HLA‐DQB1*06:144N differs from HLA‐DQB1*06:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution, introducing a premature stop codon in exon 2.