Citations

Rural populations are underrepresented in cognitive impairment research and have limited resources for education about brain and cognitive health, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, or caregiving. As our Outreach, Recruitment, and Engagement team aimed to expand activities into more rural communities, we also wanted to better understand the characteristics of the communities surrounding our center and gain insight into the social exposome of the areas. The goal of the manuscript is to reflect on our experience and share measures that were useful in this effort, which can be further enriched and adjusted by other outreach teams.

ABSTRACT Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have both demonstrated remissions in VEXAS; however, comparative data is lacking. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 66 patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome treated with HMA ( n = 35) or alloHSCT ( n = 31). Baseline characteristics such as genetics, co‐morbidities, and performance status were balanced between the groups, except older age in the HMA group. Median follow‐up from therapy initiation was 18 months (95% CI: 11–26), and 14 (21%) deaths were reported (alloHSCT n = 3; HMA n = 11). Among all evaluable patients within the alloHSCT cohort, all patients achieved molecular remission, and a substantial proportion of patients discontinued glucocorticoids (58%). In contrast, HMA therapy was associated with lower but meaningful rates of molecular remission (22%) and glucocorticoid discontinuation (6%). In a real‐world setting, HMA therapy was associated with a high discontinuation rate related to toxicity or lack of response. On multivariable analysis adjusted for age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, alloHSCT was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.81; p = 0.024). This association remained consistent across multiple ancillary sensitivity analyses, including restriction to transplant‐eligible patients, patients aged ≤ 75 years, 1:1 matching, and propensity score‐based weighted analyses. Although limited by retrospective design, these findings suggest that alloHSCT remains an attractive and potentially curative strategy in selected patients with VEXAS. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.

Background. Pancreas transplantation (PT), historically limited to patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), is currently performed successfully in selected patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, contemporary practice patterns and eligibility criteria for PT in T2D remain incompletely characterized. Methods. The International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Pancreas Transplant Interest Group developed an electronic survey to assess center-level approaches to patient phenotyping, candidacy, and peri- and posttransplant management for PT in patients with T2D. The survey was distributed to international transplant professionals during an International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Pre-Congress meeting on June 15, 2025. Results. Thirty-seven participants completed the survey. Most respondents’ programs offer PT for T2D only when a kidney transplant is also indicated. Fewer respondents’ programs also offer PT alone (10%), evaluate T2D candidates on a case-by-case basis (3%), or do not offer PT to patients with T2D (10%). Total daily insulin requirement and body mass index (BMI) were the most selected factors in determining eligibility. Considerable variability existed in metabolic thresholds: 62% of programs reported no C-peptide cutoff, whereas nearly half required a BMI of <30 kg/m 2 for C-peptide-positive candidates. Respondents frequently recommend weight-optimization strategies, including lifestyle modification, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and bariatric surgery for candidates exceeding acceptable BMI thresholds. Surgical technique, induction, and maintenance immunosuppression and early posttransplant glycemic management were largely uniform between T2D and T1D recipients. Conclusions. International practice reflects broad but heterogeneous adoption of PT for T2D, with most participants restricting its use to candidates requiring kidney transplantation and emphasizing integrated clinical phenotyping approaches.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer, arising from both B and T cell lineages (B-ALL and T-ALL). Current therapy exploits ALL cells’ low expression of asparagine synthetase (ASNS) by using L-asparaginase, a bacterial enzyme that depletes circulating asparagine. However, resistance can emerge through induction of ASNS, mediated in part by the amino acid stress sensor GCN2. In this study, we addressed the efficacy of L-asparaginase in combination with genetic or pharmacological inhibition of GCN2 and the ASNS inhibitor ASX-173. Using a Kras G12D -driven mouse model of T-ALL, we found that GCN2 is dispensable for leukemogenesis. However, genetic inactivation or pharmacologic inhibition of GCN2 sensitized ALL cells to asparagine depletion, correlating with impaired ASNS induction. While GCN2 targeting enhanced sensitivity to asparagine depletion, a subset of Gcn2 –/– T-ALL cells retained high ASNS expression and remained resistant to L-asparaginase. Likewise, some human T-ALL cells with elevated ASNS levels were refractory to GCN2 inhibition even under asparagine-depleted conditions. When combined with L-asparaginase, ASX-173 effectively eliminated ASNS hi leukemic cells in vitro and in vivo. These findings suggest that direct targeting of ASNS provides therapeutic benefit in leukemias that express high levels of ASNS and are resistant to GCN2 inhibition under asparagine-depleted conditions.

ABSTRACT Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with inferior outcomes compared with multiple myeloma (MM). However, studies describing outcomes after first progression and subsequent lines of therapy remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 104 patients with pPCL who progressed after first‐line therapy treated at one comprehensive cancer center between 2006 and 2024. Clinical characteristics, treatments, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods. All pPCL patients received novel agent–based induction. At the time of analysis, 63% had died; median OS was 39 months. High‐risk cytogenetics were present in 71%. The median TTNT after first‐line therapy was 10 months. Symptomatic progression occurred in 29% of patients and was associated with significantly inferior subsequent OS (13 vs. 34 months) compared with those experiencing asymptomatic biochemical progression. The TTNT progressively shortened with subsequent lines of therapy (3rd line: 6 months; 4th line: 4 months; 5th line: 3 months). Notable exceptions included pPCL patients with t (11;14) treated with anti‐BCL‐2‐based regimens, who achieved a median TTNT of 13 months. Additionally, 24 patients received anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy. With a median follow‐up of 21 months, their median TTNT was 32 months. pPCL is characterized by frequent disease progression and diminishing response duration with successive therapeutic lines. Symptomatic progression portends particularly poor outcomes. Anti‐BCL‐2‐based therapy in t (11;14) disease and anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy appear to provide more durable disease control and represent important advances for the management of progressed pPCL.