Figdore, Daniel J.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 reliably identify non‐Hispanic White individuals with symptomatic and pre‐clinical AD. However, performance across ethnoracially diverse groups remains unknown. METHODS Cognitively normal Black, Hispanic, and non‐Hispanic White participants completed cognitive evaluations, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET), and measures of kidney function. Plasma p‐tau217 and Aβ42 were measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. Pre‐clinical AD detection was evaluated using symptomatic and cohort‐derived optimized cutoffs. RESULTS Among 191 participants (57 Black, 46 Hispanic White, 88 non‐Hispanic White), age‐adjusted plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 performed similarly in detecting amyloid‐positive individuals (≥ 25 Centiloids), regardless of race/ethnicity. Both measures independently correlated with amyloid deposition, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated solely with p‐tau217. Pre‐clinical AD optimized cutoffs (p‐tau217 ≥ 0.132 pg/ml; p‐tau217/Aβ42 ≥ 0.0059) outperformed cutoffs established in symptomatic individuals (sensitivity: 83% vs. 57%; 77% vs. 63%; negative predictive value [NPV] > 93%). DISCUSSION Plasma biomarkers performed similarly across ethnoracially diverse cohorts. Optimized cutoffs may improve early detection and trial enrollment.

This cross-sectional study evaluates the performance of the US Food and Drug Administration–cleared phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) to β-amyloid 42 ratio cut points used to detect amyloid pathology associated with Alzheimer disease.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Determining apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 allele status, a key genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), requires molecular genotyping infrastructure not widely accessible beyond specialized centers. METHODS A fully automated high‐throughput apoE E4 proteotyping immunoassay was evaluated for clinical performance (460 participants across three cohorts) and analytical validity. Concordance with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based genotyping and measures of analytical validity were reported. RESULTS The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.4% to 99.9%) concordance with PCR‐based APOE ε4 genotype results across the pooled clinical cohort; 100.0% (95% CI: 97.1% to 100.0%) in those with AD ( N = 127) and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8% to 99.8%) in those without AD (333). The assay met analytical validity criteria for E4 isoform specificity, interference, precision, and stability. DISCUSSION The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated high concordance with PCR‐based genotyping and robust analytical validity, offering an accessible alternative for APOE ε4 zygosity assessment. Highlights A novel high‐throughput plasma‐based proteotyping immunoassay for APOE ε4 zygosity classification was developed and evaluated for clinical performance and analytical validity. The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated high concordance (99.6%) with PCR‐based APOE ε4 genotyping across a diverse international cohort, and a robust analytical profile. An apoE E4 immunoassay may offer a more cost‐effective and accessible alternative to DNA genotyping approaches currently used for AD risk evaluation and anti‐amyloid treatment decisions.

Abstract Background Decreased kidney function, indicated by a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), may affect interpretation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers, including phosphorylated tau ( p ‐tau) and amyloid‐beta (Aβ) peptides, due to altered clearance. However, there is limited data available to determine the influence of eGFR on these biomarkers and whether it differs by biomarker or assay type, especially in racially diverse studies of community‐based older adults. Methods We used data from 557 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (Rochester, MN n = 182; age 79±8 years; 36.3% Female, White participants) and the UMMC MIND Center‐Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (Jackson, MS n = 375; age 69±8 years; 73% Female 27% Black participants). eGFR was determined using the 2021 CKD‐EPI Creatinine equation. Plasma biomarkers were measured using the Lumipulse immunoassays for p ‐tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40 (Fujirebio Diagnostics; n = 420); or the mass spectrometry‐based PrecivityAD2 assay (C2N Diagnostics; n = 253) for p ‐tau217, np‐tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40. Common ratio values were calculated. Aβ42/40 measures were inverted so higher values are worse for all biomarkers. Log base‐2 transformed regression analysis related eGFR to each single analyte and ratio; coefficients (95% CI) reflect estimated doubling in biomarker per doubling in eGFR. Group specific [MN White ( n = 182), MS White ( n = 224), MS Black ( n = 151) participants] estimates are reported, as the distribution of social determinants of health can vary across populations and locations. Results Lower eGFR was associated with higher (worse) AD‐plasma biomarkers, and group stratified estimates were mostly consistent (Figure 1). Ratios of biomarkers diminished but did not entirely alleviate associations with eGFR. For example, MN White participants’ C2N p ‐tau217 association of ‐1.47 (‐1.94, ‐1.00), was attenuated to ‐0.67 (‐1.11, ‐0.22), when using p ‐tau217/np‐tau217. Conclusions Kidney function may be associated with AD‐plasma biomarker values, even with common ratio corrections. There was not strong evidence for highly differential associations of eGFR by race/site categories, though sample sizes are currently limited. The implications for diagnosis and risk classification need to be explored further to support health equity. Optimal consideration of comorbidities on blood biomarker concentrations must continue to be informed by investigation in large, racially and ethnically diverse, community‐based studies.

Abstract Background Plasma p ‐tau217 represents a promising alternative to PET‐ and CSF‐based biomarkers of AD in well‐characterized research cohorts. However, the performance of this accessible biomarker in outpatient clinics comprised of patients with multiple causes of cognitive impairment has yet to be established. Method Plasma Aβ42/40 and p ‐tau217 concentrations were measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays in patients evaluated within a subspecialty memory clinic at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Syndromic and etiologic diagnoses were established by consensus, integrating clinical data and findings from MRI ( n = 484), FDG‐PET ( n = 117), and CSF AD biomarkers ( n = 440). Plasma biomarker performance was evaluated using established diagnostic cutpoints to identify patients with “positive/elevated”, “intermediate”, or “negligible” levels of cerebral amyloid pathology on amyloid‐PET. Result Plasma AD biomarkers were measured in 509 patients (mean 68.6±9.3 years; 47% female; 91.3% non‐Hispanic White), including patients with typical amnestic AD ( n = 237, 46.6%), non‐amnestic presentations of AD ( n = 48, 9.4%), and non‐AD causes of cognitive concerns ( n = 224, 44.0%). “Intermediate” plasma p ‐tau217 and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations were reported in <15% of patients (43% of patients with Aβ42/40), implying the need for further testing to inform the likelihood of AD neuropathologic change in these patients. After excluding these patients, plasma p ‐tau217 reliably distinguished patients with symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measures (ptau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Diagnostic performance was unaffected by age (> vs < 65‐years). Plasma p ‐tau217 (AUC: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.91‐0.96) and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 performance (AUC: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.94‐0.98) were closely aligned with results of established CSF AD biomarkers ( p ‐tau181/Aβ42), outperforming Aβ42/40 (AUC: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.74‐0.83). Reduced kidney function was associated with elevated plasma p ‐tau217 and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations in patients without AD (referencing CSF AD biomarkers). Conclusion Concentrations of plasma p ‐tau217, but not Aβ42/40, strongly associated with clinical diagnoses of symptomatic AD and CSF AD biomarker results. Integration of Aβ42 measures yielded marginal improvements in performance, with increased complexity and cost. These findings support the use of plasma p ‐tau217 in heterogeneous clinical cohorts, including patients with multiple causes of cognitive impairment. Caution is advised when interpreting p ‐tau217 concentrations in patients with decreased kidney function, due to potential elevations in plasma biomarker concentrations.

Abstract Background Black and Latino Americans experience a disparate dementia burden yet remain underrepresented in dementia research, including clinical trials designed to slow or prevent symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accessible and non‐invasive AD blood biomarkers may improve identification and recruitment of underrepresented participants into AD clinical trials. There is a clear need to assess the performance of emergent plasma AD biomarkers for the detection of AD neuropathology in cognitively normal Black and Latino Americans. Method Cognitively normal Black and Latino participants underwent cognitive evaluations and PET (amyloid‐PiB, tau‐flortaucipir) imaging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a p ‐tau217 threshold (≥0.186 pg/mL) known to identify non‐Hispanic White participants with cognitive impairment and “positive” amyloid PET scans (>25 Centiloids). Next, we derived an optimized threshold to identify participants with “positive” amyloid PET using Youden's method. Result The cohort included 58 Black (55%) and 47 Latino‐White (45%) well‐educated (mean 16.1±2.3 years) individuals, with mean age 64.7±8.8 years, and slight female bias (63%). Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with age (rho=0.269, p = 0.004) and declined with MoCA scores (rho=‐0.225, p = 0.027). Sixty‐nine participants completed amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging. Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with amyloid‐ (rho=0.254, p = 0.044) but not with tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratio (rho=0.127; p = 0.334). p ‐tau217 concentrations were ≥0.186 pg/mL in 10/69 participants (14%), including 3/3 amyloid‐ and tau‐PET positive (A+T+) participants, 3/8 A+T‐ participants (sensitivity: 55%), and 4/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 93%). An optimized p ‐tau217 threshold of ≥0.118 pg/mL identified 10/11 A+T± participants (sensitivity 91%), and 16/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 73%). In A‐T‐ participants, estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in participants with ‘false positive’ elevations in plasma p ‐tau217 (mean difference: 67 vs 81 ml/min/1.73m 2 , p = 0.004), emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations in patients with decreased kidney function. Conclusion Plasma p ‐tau217 thresholds validated in participants with symptomatic AD (≥0.186 pg/mL) failed to identify early AD neuropathology in 5/8 cognitively normal Black and Latino participants. Optimized thresholds are required to improve detection of preclinical AD in Black/Latino individuals.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p‐tau217) has emerged as one of the most promising blood‐based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). While rare, heterophilic antibodies (HAb) are a persistent potential confounding factor in immunoassays. METHODS Potential HAb interference in the Lumipulse G pTau217 assay in samples exhibiting concentrations > 10 pg/mL were investigated. Samples were subjected to HAb blocking reagent (HBT), and in some cases, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and serial dilutions. RESULTS In 14 of the 15 suspected HAb cases, HBT treatment greatly reduced measured p‐tau217 concentrations. and in one of three specimens selected for further investigation, reduced Aβ42 concentrations PEG precipitation in the three selected samples also reduced p‐tau217 concentrations, while serial dilution yielded mixed effects. Control specimens were unaffected by sample treatment or dilutions. DISCUSSION HAb may result in falsely elevated p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 ratio. HAb interference should be considered in cases of unusually high p‐tau217 concentrations prior to clinical interpretation. Highlights Potential heterophile antibody (HAb) interference in the Lumipulse p‐tau217 immunoassay was investigated. Investigation was performed using HAb blocking reagent, and in some cases also using PEG precipitation . Patients with p‐tau217 concentrations > 10 pg/mL exhibited positive HAb interference in 14 of 15 cases. HAb interference can lead to falsely positive p‐tau217/Aβ42 ratios.

Abstract Background The polymorphic APOE gene is a susceptibility gene for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The ε4 allele is associated with increased risk for AD, particularly late‐onset disease, in a dose‐dependent manner. Additionally, homozygous ε4/ε4 individuals have increased risk of adverse events when undergoing amyloid lowering treatments. APOE genotyping is considered the gold standard for determination of ApoE4 zygosity. Recently, proteotype assays for ApoE4 have become available for high‐throughput immunoassay analyzers. These assays utilize the same specimen type as AD blood biomarkers and can potentially offer improved turnaround times compared to genotyping. In this study, we compare the performance of two automated ApoE4 proteotype research use only (RUO) immunoassays against APOE genotyping. Method EDTA‐plasma samples ( n = 65) from individuals undergoing ApoE PCR‐based genotyping for clinical purposes were evaluated. Samples were tested with the Beckman Coulter APOE ε4 RUO assay on the Access 2 and DXI 9000 instruments (Beckman Coulter, Inc), which provides algorithm calculated results for determining ApoE4 zygosity. Manufacturer generated data from 300 genotyped samples was used to calculate estimated cut‐points for ApoE4 zygosity for this study with results <0.55 classified as no E4, ≥0.55 to <4.55 as heterozygous E4, and ≥4.55 as homozygous E4. Samples were also tested with the Lumipulse G ApoE4 and Pan‐ApoE RUO assays on the Fujirebio Lumipulse G1200 analyzer. The ratio of ApoE4/Pan‐ApoE was utilized for determining zygosity with results <5% classified as no E4, ≥5% to <75% as heterozygous E4, and ≥75% as homozygous E4, as listed in the manufacturer IFU. Result APOE genotype distributions were (n, %): ε3ε4 (30, 46%), ε3ε3 (18, 28%), ε4ε4 (12, 18%), ε2ε3 (3, 5%), ε2ε4 (2, 3%). ApoE4 zygosity was categorized as no ε4 (21, 32%), heterozygous ε4 (32, 49%), or homozygous ε4 (12, 19%). The Beckman Coulter APOE ε4 RUO assay classified 65/65 (100%) patients correctly using manufacturer generated cut‐points on both instruments. The Lumipulse G ApoE4 and Pan‐ApoE RUO assays classified 61/65 (94%) patients correctly using the manufacturer listed cut‐points. Conclusion ApoE4 proteotype immunoassays may represent simplified and more accessible testing alternatives to genotyping for the assessment of ApoE4 zygosity in individuals being considered for amyloid lowering treatments.

Abstract Background Clinically available plasma p ‐tau217 assays may be utilized in the determination of eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies. Our institution recently introduced a plasma p ‐tau217 assay in clinical practice using a two‐cutpoint approach that optimizes the accuracy while minimizing false positive risk and categorizing ≤20% of results as intermediate. In this study, we prospectively evaluate the performance of a plasma p ‐tau217 assay for detection of amyloid pathology using these predefined cutpoints. Method Patients recruited were being considered for lecanemab therapy at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using the clinically available Fujirebio Lumipulse p ‐tau217 assay at Mayo Clinic, and results (pg/mL) were classified as either negative (≤0.185), intermediate (0.186–0.324) or positive (≥0.325). Amyloid pathology was determined by amyloid‐PET and/or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. Result Ninety‐three patients were recruited between November 2023 and December 2024. Of these, 49 underwent amyloid‐PET, 4 had CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42 measurements, and 40 had both PET and CSF results (with 3/40 discordant cases), for use in the assessment of amyloid pathology. The three discordant cases were considered amyloid positive for purposes of plasma p ‐tau217 comparison. Overall amyloid positivity was 90%. Plasma p ‐tau217 results were positive in 83% (77/93), negative in 6% (6/93), and intermediate in 11% (10/93) of patients. An elevated p ‐tau217 predicted the presence of amyloid positivity with a diagnostic accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90% − 99%). In the intermediate range, 80% of patients were positive for amyloid pathology. In patients with a definitive p ‐tau217 result (positive or negative), the positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 83%. There were three patients with discordant results: one PET+/p‐tau217‐, one PET‐/p‐tau217+, and one CSF‐/p‐tau217+. Clinical presentation of these discordant cases was examined, and relevant findings will be discussed. Conclusion The Lumipulse plasma p ‐tau217 assay exhibited acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the determination of amyloid pathology when compared to either amyloid‐PET or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. This prospective study confirms the utility a two‐cutpoint approach for interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 for the assessment of amyloid pathology eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies in a heterogenous clinical cohort.