Citations

Abstract Introduction: Sexual health is an important part of overall well-being for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). AYAs have unique sexual health needs as they navigate development, relationships, and identity formation. AYA patients may experience sexual dysfunction due to conditioning chemotherapy/radiation therapy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), changes in body image, mental health effects, relationship shifts, and the challenges of dating with a serious illness. We surveyed both pediatric and adult HCT providers at our institution to assess current practices of discussing sexual health needs with AYAs as well as barriers to these discussions in order to guide interventions to improve communication. Methods: Adult and pediatric HCT physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurse coordinators in the Mayo Clinic Rochester HCT program completed an online survey to understand their perspectives about addressing sexual health needs in AYA HCT survivors. This survey covered current practice patterns in discussing sexual health and managing sexual health needs, barriers to providing sexual health care, and recommendations for provider education. Results: This survey included responses from 25 HCT providers (35% response rate): 22 adult providers and 3 pediatric providers. The respondents comprised of 10 physicians (40%), 8 advanced practice providers (32%), and 7 nurses (28%). Most of the providers saw 6-10 AYA patients per month (48%), while others reported: 1-5 AYAs (36%), 11-15 AYAs (12%), and 16-20 AYAs (4%); no provider saw 21 or more. While all respondents felt sexual health was an important topic for AYA HCT patients, most (80%) also reported rarely (44%) or only sometimes (36%) discussing sexual health with AYA patients. Primary barriers included inadequate knowledge of resources for referrals (72%), insufficient training on this topic (60%), limited time for discussion (56%), discomfort discussing sexual health with AYAs (32%), and concern about patient discomfort (28%). When it came to screening for GVHD, 28% of respondents reported not regularly screening for genitourinary GVHD and 40% indicated feeling uncomfortable or very uncomfortable managing it. Frequently discussed topics included fertility (64%) and contraception (52%). Almost all respondents (96%) expressed interest in further education. Topics of interest included an overview of common sexual health issues in AYA HCT survivors (88%), medical management of sexual health concerns such as erectile dysfunction, low libido, and vaginal dryness (72%), management of psychosocial concerns impacting body image and relationships (64%), cultural considerations for addressing sexual health (56%), providing inclusive care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer or questioning (LGBTQ) AYAs (56%), genitourinary GVHD (56%), and safer sex practices during and after transplant (52%). Discussion: Although regular sexual health assessment in HCT survivors is recommended, most providers at our institution did not routinely discuss sexual health with AYAs. While genitourinary GVHD is an important HCT-specific sexual health topic, screening for this condition is not consistently performed. Providers were eager for further education and identified several topic areas for future educational interventions. Our data will aid in the development of an educational intervention for providers covering key sexual health issues in AYA HCT survivors, including medical and psychosocial management of sexual health concerns, as well as inclusive care for intercultural and LGBTQ AYAs, with the aim of improving frequency of sexual health discussions and provider confidence. Time constraints were identified as a key barrier, so patient-focused educational interventions that can occur outside of the clinical appointment may be an opportunity to deliver information and empower patients to raise specific concerns during their visits. In combination with healthcare provider-focused education, this may promote critical sexual health-related discussions during appointments.

Abstract Prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is influenced by various factors, most importantly, patient clinical status and cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. Within those factors, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is considered a poor prognostic indicator in AML patients. Our study aims at exploring the different factors associated with elevated LDH and their impact on overall survival (OS). After obtaining IRB approval, we reviewed the charts of 381 AML patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between the years of 2016 and 2023. All data was recorded at the time of AML diagnosis. Patients with no cytogenetic and molecular data were excluded from this study. LDH levels were recorded if measured within 10 days of diagnosis and treatment for AML was not yet given. Both risk stratification and response evaluation were done following the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. OS was calculated from the date of AML diagnosis to the date of last follow-up or death. We used BlueSky Statistics V 10.3.4 for statistical analysis. We identified 299 patients (78.4%) who had elevated LDH levels (normal ≤ 222 U/L) at the time of diagnosis with a median of 417 U/L (range, 223-7989). The median age for those patients was 68 years (range, 18-94), with 78 (26.1%) of them having a prior myeloid disease (MDS, MPN, or MDS/MPN) before AML diagnosis. By risk stratification, more than half of the patients had an adverse risk profile (n=171, 57.2%), while 71 (23.7%) and 57 (19.1%) had an intermediate and favorable risk, respectively. Most of those patients had an abnormal karyotype (n=204, 68.7%), with complex karyotype (n=103, 34.7%) being the most common abnormality, followed by monosomy 7 (n=50, 16.8%) and trisomy 8 (n=46, 15.5%). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 268 (89.6%) patients with elevated LDH, and the most common mutations were TP53 (n=60, 22.3%), FLT3-ITD (n=59, 21.1%), and NPM1 (n=51, 18.5%). TP53 mutations were more common in patients with normal/low white blood cell count (WBC) in contrast with FLT3 and NPM1, which were the most common mutations in patients with high WBC. After grouping the patients according to their LDH levels (group 1: 223-444 U/L, group 2: 444-666 U/L, group 3: > 666 U/L), we found that FLT3-ITD mutations were more likely to occur at higher LDH levels i.e. groups 2 and 3 (p= 0.002). The majority of patients with elevated LDH (n=262, 87.6%) received therapy following diagnosis, with the most common treatment regimens being a combination of a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA+VEN) (n=97, 37%) and a (7+3)-based induction therapy (n=77, 29.4%). When comparing patients with elevated LDH (n=299, 78.4%) to patients who had non-elevated LDH (n=82, 21.5%), no difference in both median age at diagnosis and risk stratification was found. We noticed an increase in WBC (median, 7.7 vs. 2.1) (p<0.001) along with an increase in peripheral blasts (median, 28% vs. 7%) (p<0.001) in elevated LDH patients. Among patients with non-elevated LDH, 21% (n=17) had a complex karyotype compared to 34.7% (n=103) in the elevated LDH group (p=0.022). The molecular profile was different between the 2 groups, where the most common mutations in patients with non-elevated LDH were IDH2 (n=19, 25.3%), RUNX1 (n=17, 23%), and DNMT3A (n=16, 21.6%). All patients (n=82, 100%) in the non-elevated LDH group received therapy after diagnosis. There was no difference in terms of treatment regimens used between the 2 groups. Moreover, no statistical difference in remission rates after one line of therapy was found between those groups where non-elevated LDH patients had a 65.9% remission rate compared to the 55.3% remission rate in patients with elevated LDH (p=0.098). Patients with elevated LDH had a shorter OS than patients with non-elevated LDH (9.5 vs. 26.4 months, p=0.0008). However, median OS was similar across the different groups of elevated LDH. Using univariate analysis in our cohort (n=381), age, HSCT, risk stratification, FLT3 mutation, and LDH elevation all had an impact on OS. However, when comparing those variables using multivariate analysis, age and FLT3 mutation lost their significance (p-value of 0.25 and 0.84, respectively).Complex karyotype and FLT3 mutations were more common in patients with elevated LDH. These patients tend to have higher WBC and peripheral blasts. Elevated LDH had a negative impact on patients' OS regardless of patients' risk classification.

Summary We investigated the outcomes of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell therapy (alloHCT) in the US. Twenty‐seven adult (median age, 58 years) patients with AdvSM received alloHCT from 2014 to 2021. Most patients were white (93%), male (63%) and had systemic mastocytosis (SM) with associated haematological neoplasm (SM‐AHN, 70%), received peripheral blood grafts (89%) and non‐myeloablative regimens. KIT mutation was detected in 14 of the reported 16 patients (87.5%). Post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was used in approximately 50% of the cohort. Approximately 1 year after alloHCT, median bone marrow mast cell burden decreased from 15% pre‐alloHCT to 1.5% (range 0–8) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. The median serum tryptase decreased from 55 ng/mL (range 3–400 ng/mL) pre‐alloHCT to 18 ng/mL (range 0–481 ng/mL) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. At 1 year, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%–77%) and 74% (95% CI, 56%–89%) respectively. In the subset of patients with SM‐AHN, 1‐year PFS and OS were 74% (52%–91%) and 79% (95% CI, 58%–94%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression for the entire population of patients with SM ( n = 27) was 4% (95% CI, 0–14) at 100 days and 15% (95% CI, 4–31) at 1 year. For the subset of patients with AHN, the cumulative incidence was 11% (95% CI, 1–28) at 100 days and 21% (95% CI, 6–42) at 1 year. Relapse/progression was the cause of death in six of 12 patients (5 died of AHN and 1 died of SM progression). Eighteen and nine patients received a KIT inhibitor before alloHCT and after alloHCT respectively. In addition, six patients received a KIT inhibitor for the treatment of relapse/progression of SM after alloHCT. Although it is difficult to delineate the exact effect of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors because of the size of the study in this era, the use of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors pre‐ and post‐ alloHCT is increasing. In the near future, larger studies are required to provide further insights into this subject.

OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), using routinely available clinical data at ICU admission. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using latent class analysis. SETTING: ICUs across three Mayo Clinic campuses (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona). PATIENTS: A total of 166 adult patients who developed ARDS within 120 days following HCT (96 allogeneic, 70 autologous). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Model selection was based on multiple metrics including Bayesian information criteria, entropy, and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio testing. A two-class model optimally described the cohort. Class 1 (n = 81) was characterized by worse hypoxemia (P/F ratio 157 vs. 210, p = 0.002), higher Pco 2 (41 vs. 36 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and higher bilirubin (1.4 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared with class 2 (n = 85). Both classes included a mix of transplant types, transcending a simple autologous/allogeneic dichotomy, although class 1 had more allogeneic recipients (70.4% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001). Although time-from-transplant was not a class-defining variable, class 1 occurred later after transplant (30.0 vs. 11.9 d, p < 0.001) with higher frequency of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (14.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004). Class 2 had more frequent neutropenia (leukocytes 0.4 vs. 5.9 × 109, p < 0.001) and higher frequency of peri-engraftment respiratory distress syndrome (29.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005). Outcomes were significantly worse for class 1 (90-d mortality: 72.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001). An exploratory parsimonious model had good classification accuracy (0.90) using just six variables: leukocyte count, platelet count, bilirubin, Pco 2, body mass index, and temperature. CONCLUSIONS: ARDS after HCT comprises two distinct phenotypes with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes. These phenotypes align with recognized post-HCT lung injury syndromes and may reflect different underlying biological processes. This framework provides a foundation for investigating targeted therapeutic approaches.

Abstract RAS pathway (RASp) mutations induce proliferative features, and promote transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the unique clonal landscape and hierarchy of distinct RASp mutations remain unexplored. To characterize the landscape, architecture, and implications of unique RASp mutations in CMML, we evaluated a cohort of 814 patients with CMML. We identified 461 RASp mutations among 342 patients (42%). N/KRAS and CBL mutations were the most common, frequently involved the P-loop or RING domains, respectively, and frequently appeared as dominant events (63% and 65%, respectively). BRAF, NF1, and PTPN11 mutations spanned throughout the gene structure, and frequently appeared as subclonal events (75%, 64%, and 59%, respectively). CBL mutations frequently occurred in codominance with SRSF2 and multihit TET2, and were enriched for KIT mutations. PTPN11 mutations more frequently co-occurred with SETBP1 and DNMT3A mutations, and were infrequently codominant with TET2 or ASXL1. RASp mutations predicted for shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.07; P = .0075) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.20; P = .0011), influenced outcomes of myelodysplastic and TET2 mutant CMML, and cooperated with IDH2 and RUNX1 mutations to induce shorter LFS. These data set the bases for refined genomic classifications of CMML, and underscore the need to develop RAS-directed therapies for patients with CMML.

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only curative option in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). We retrospectively analyzed 138 CMML patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic. Patients who transitioned to ASCT while in chronic phase (Group A) displayed superior post-transplant survival (PTS), compared to those in whom ASCT was performed after blast transformation (BT; Group B) (median 95 vs. 16 months; p=0.01). In Group A, PTS was superior in patients with <5% bone marrow (BM) blasts at time of ASCT (median 164 vs. 13.5 months; p=0.01). Other predictors of superior PTS included day-100 BM blast <5% or normal cytogenetics (median 164 vs 18 months; p=0.01) or presence of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD; median 164 vs. 26 months; p=0.01). Pre-ASCT hypomethylating agent exposure (HR=2.03; p=0.03), and receiving more than one line of pre-ASCT chemotherapy (p=0.01) predicted inferior PTS. In multivariable analysis, predictors of superior GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) included the use myeloablative conditioning and the absence of morphologically or cytogenetically apparent disease at day-100. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was associated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p=0.02) and numerically inferior PTS (p=0.1). Group B patients also appeared to benefit from achieving BM blast <5% at time of ASCT (p=0.4) as well as at day-100 (p=0.01), in terms of PTS, while full chimerism and normal cytogenetics at day-100 were associated with superior GRFS. These observations support the value of ASCT in CMML, especially if performed prior to BT and in the presence of <5% BM blasts at time of ASCT. Additionally, the observed detrimental impact of PTCy requires additional studies to confirm and investigate the underlying mechanisms.