Citations

Clear

318 citation(s) found for "Murray, Melissa E".

Impact of hippocampal α‐synuclein oligomers on cognitive trajectory in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies
Franke, Lukas, Ono, Daisuke , DeTure, Michael , Ross, Owen A. , McLean, Pamela J. , Ferman, Tanis J. , Sekiya, Hiroaki , Ross, Owen A , Ferman, Tanis J , McLean, Pamela J , Sekiya, Hiroaki , Franke, Lukas, Murray, Melissa E. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 4, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.70374 | PMID 40755115 Get It

AbstractINTRODUCTIONIncreasing evidence indicates that α‐synuclein (αSYN) oligomers are toxic. We sought to determine whether αSYN oligomers were associated with faster cognitive decline in prospectively‐followed patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).METHODSEight autopsy‐confirmed patients with DLB were selected based on rapid or slow cognitive decline determined by the rate of change of Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Quantitative neuropathologic analysis of αSYN oligomers, Lewy‐related pathology, phosphorylated tau, and amyloid‐β was conducted in hippocampal subfields (CA1‐4 and subiculum) and the entorhinal cortex.RESULTSDLB with rapid cognitive decline showed greater CA1 αSYN oligomer burden (p = 0.029) and tau burden (p = 0.029) than DLB with slow decline. The groups showed comparable burden of Lewy‐related pathology and amyloid‐β pathology in the hippocampal formation and entorhinal cortex.DISCUSSIONHippocampal accumulation of αSYN oligomers and phosphorylated tau is associated with rapid cognitive decline in DLB. Therapeutic strategies targeting αSYN oligomers warrant further investigation.Highlights Proximity ligation assay (PLA) and digital pathology for oligomer quantification. Abundant α‐synuclein (αSYN) oligomers in CA1 of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) with rapid decline. First human brain study linking αSYN oligomers to cognitive trajectory. Potential therapeutic implications of targeting αSYN oligomers in DLB.
Substantia Nigra Iron Deposition in Lewy Body Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Neuropathology Study
Diaz‐Galvan, Patricia , Przybelski, Scott A. , Lesnick, Timothy G. , Nguyen, Aivi T. , Reichard, Ross R., Ono, Daisuke , Schwarz, Christopher G., Gunter, Jeffrey L. , Lowe, Val J. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Fields, Julie A. , Savica, Rodolfo , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Jones, David, Day, Gregory S. , Graff‐Radford, Neill, Kremers, Walter K. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Ferman, Tanis J. , Boeve, Bradley F., Kantarci, Kejal , Gunter, Jeffrey, Savica, Rodolfo , Graff-Radford, Jonathan , St Louis, E K , Kantarci, Kejal , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , Ferman, Tanis J , Nguyen, Aivi T , Diaz-Galvan, Patricia , Kremers, Walter K , Murray, Melissa E. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Jones, David, Botha, Hugo , Louis, Erik K. St. , Knopman, David S. , Graff‐Radford, Neill, Petersen, Ronald C. , Boeve, Bradley F.

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | June 23, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2129-2138

10.1002/mds.30265 | PMID 40545947 Get It

Abstract Objective To compare iron deposition in the substantia nigra (SN) as measured with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) on antemortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between individuals with and without Lewy‐related pathology at autopsy. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study including 54 participants who underwent autopsy and antemortem MRI with QSM. Cases were classified as Lewy body disease (LBD)‐present (n = 13) if they had Lewy‐related pathology and LBD‐absent (n = 41) if they did not have Lewy‐related pathology. QSM was calculated for the whole SN and the two subregions: pars compacta (SNc) and pars reticulata (SNr). Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests were used to compare SN QSM values between LBD‐present and LBD‐absent cases. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses tested the accuracy of SN QSM values to distinguish the two groups. Associations of QSM values in the SN and its subregions with clinical features were tested with Spearman's correlations. Results The LBD‐present group had higher QSM values in the SNc ( P = 0.008) than the LBD‐absent group with no differences in SNr. QSM values of the SNc distinguished LBD‐present and LBD‐absent cases with good accuracy (AUC = 0.74) and correlated with the presence of parkinsonism and parkinsonism severity. Conclusions This study provides neuropathological confirmation of the utility of SNc QSM as an in vivo biomarker of Lewy‐related pathology. Imaging evidence of abnormal iron deposition in the SNc could potentially serve as a biomarker for inclusion in emerging research frameworks aimed at defining individuals with LBD based on their biological characteristics. Ultimately, this could facilitate more precise diagnoses and guide treatment strategies in LBD. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 | PMID 40522652 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.
The Neurofibrillary Tangle Maturity Scale: A Novel Framework for Tangle Pathology Evaluation in Alzheimer’s Disease
Moloney, Christina M. , Rutledge, Matthew H., Tranovich, Jessica F., Wood, Ashley , Rothberg, Darren M., Duara, Ranjan, Lachner, Christian , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Carter, Rickey E. , Murray, Melissa E. , Labuzan, Sydney A. , Peng, Zhongwei , Wood, Ashley C., Carter, Rickey E , Murray, Melissa E , Wood, Ashley C., Dickson, Dennis W. , Kanaan, Nicholas M.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | June 6, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1101/2025.06.02.657435 | PMID 40501844 Get It

Abstract Neurofibrillary tangles are dynamic neuropathologic hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease with a hypothesized lifespan morphologically-defined by three maturity levels: pretangles, mature tangles, and ghost tangles. To better understand the progression of tangle pathophysiology, we characterized tangle maturity level predilection of 15 tau antibodies recognizing a broad range of linear, phosphorylation, conformational, and truncation epitopes in the hippocampus of 24 postmortem brains. We developed the tangle maturity scoring system to semi-quantitatively evaluate each tangle maturity level. Based on proportions of tangle maturity levels, we classified antibodies as “early” (mostly pretangles and mature tangles), “middling” (mature tangles with pretangles and ghost tangles), and “advanced” (mostly ghost tangles and mature tangles) tangle maturity markers. To summarize tangle maturity predilection, we developed the tangle maturity scale to integrate individual tangle maturity scores. Correlations showed stronger relationships between tangle maturity scale and subsector thickness for more advanced tangle maturity markers in CA1 and subiculum, whereas Braak tangle stage remained consistently correlated throughout markers of the tangle lifespan. To aid in scoring hippocampi, we used machine learning to recognize tangle maturity levels, which performed comparably to a domain expert and showed similar relationships by Spearman correlation. Pattern recognition software was used to assess tangle and neuritic tau burden separately, which generally correlated with Braak stage and neuronal counts. However, tangle-derived tau burden more consistently correlated with hippocampal subsector thickness. In conclusion, we developed manual and automated scoring systems to evaluate tangle maturity levels, demonstrating early 4R, phosphorylated, and oligomeric tau accumulation preceding more advanced 3R and truncated tau. Our study provides supportive evidence of disease-relevant ordering of tau posttranslational modifications in the brain, which may have implications for theragnostic development. These findings underscore the promise of computerized quantitative analyses (i.e., pathomics) for high-throughput feature extraction from whole-slide images to enhance our understanding of microscopically observed morphologic changes.
Characterizing the expression profile of 3R tau pathology in Pick’s disease
Tamvaka, Nicole , Soto‐Beasley, Alexandra I. , Gavrielatos, Marios , Ren, Yingxue , Udine, Evan, Quicksall, Zachary , Liskey, Delaney , Castanedes‐Casey, Monica , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Josephs, Keith A. , Blitterswijk, Marka van , Murray, Melissa E. , Roemer, Shanu F. , Ross, Owen A. , Wszolek, Z.K. , Quicksall, Zachary S , Castanedes-Casey, Monica , Boeve, Brad , Josephs, Keith A , van Blitterswijk, Marka , Murray, Melissa E , Dickson, Dennis W , Ross, Owen A , Beasley, Alexandra I , Heckman, Michael G. , Udine, Evan , Graff, Caroline , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Science Advances | May 2, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 18 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/sciadv.adt6105 | PMID 40315309 Get It

Pick’s disease (PiD) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder defined by dementia, frontotemporal lobe atrophy, and 3-repeat tau inclusions. To elucidate PiD pathobiology, we performed the first bulk transcriptomics study on PiD using short- and long-read sequencing on the parietal cortex of 28 PiD and 15 control samples. We identified several significantly differentially expressed genes, with CCL2 displaying the strongest association with 3-repeat tau pathology and increased burden in PiD compared to those in 4-repeat tau progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) cases. Investigation of co-expressed genes and pathways suggested the involvement of mRNA processing, mitochondrial function, and immune processes in disease pathobiology. Long-read RNA sequencing on a subset of samples (eight PiD and four control) proposed novel, potentially disease-associated transcripts for AZGP1 , CD44 , HSD11B2 , and WIF1 , predicted to result in truncated proteins. In conclusion, we observed transcriptomic changes in the parietal cortex of patients with PiD that may inform into clinically relevant biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.
2024 Alzheimer's Association criteria for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis are usually anchored to both plaques and tangles, not Aβ alone
Jack, Clifford R. , Knopman, David S., Wiste, Heather J. , Jagust, William J. , Murray, Melissa E., Boon, Baayla D.C. , Lowe, Val J. , Graff‐Radford, Jon, Petersen, Ronald , Murray, Melissa E. , Jack, Clifford R , Murray, Melissa E , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Johnson, Derek R. , Burkett, Brian J. , Cogswell, Petrice M. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Vemuri, Prashanthi

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.70184 | PMID 40276985 Get It