Shir, Dror

Abstract Patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present at a younger age with predominantly non‐amnestic impairments and a more aggressive disease course. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations have not been included in large‐scale clinical trials, which typically focus on late‐onset, sporadic amnestic‐predominant AD. Consequently, treatment options and research efforts specific to atypical AD remain limited. The emergence of amyloid‐targeting therapies that slow disease progression underscores these challenges, as evidence supporting their efficacy in early‐onset amnestic and non‐amnestic AD variants is scarce. This perspective article argues that atypical AD represents an excellent disease model for clinical trials and proposes strategies to address critical gaps in clinical trial design for this population. Key considerations include optimizing participant selection approaches, establishing syndrome‐specific or surrogate biological and clinical endpoints, and fostering advocacy to enhance early and accurate diagnosis, equitable representation, and outcomes for these populations.

AbstractObjectivePrion disease classically presents with rapidly progressive dementia, leading to death within months of diagnosis. Advances in diagnostic testing have improved recognition of patients with atypical presentations and protracted disease courses, raising key questions surrounding the relationship between patterns of neurodegeneration and survival. We assessed the contribution of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG‐PET) imaging for this purpose.MethodsFDG‐PET were performed in 40 clinic patients with prion disease. FDG‐PET images were projected onto latent factors generated in an external dataset to yield patient‐specific eigenvalues. Eigenvalues were input into a clustering algorithm to generate data‐driven clusters, which were compared by survival time.ResultsMedian age at FDG‐PET was 65.3 years (range 23–85). Median time from FDG‐PET to death was 3.7 months (range 0.3–19.0). Four data‐driven clusters were generated, termed “Neocortical” (n = 7), “Transitional” (n = 12), “Temporo‐parietal” (n = 13), and “Deep nuclei” (n = 6). Deep nuclei and transitional clusters had a shorter survival time than the neocortical cluster. Subsequent analyses suggested that this difference was driven by greater hypometabolism of deep nuclei relative to neocortical areas. FDG‐PET‐patterns were not associated with demographic (age and sex) or clinical (CSF total‐tau, 14‐3‐3) variables.InterpretationGreater hypometabolism within deep nuclei relative to neocortical areas associated with more rapid decline in patients with prion disease and vice versa. FDG‐PET informs large‐scale network physiology and may inform the relationship between spreading pathology and survival in patients with prion disease. Future studies should consider whether FDG‐PET may enrich multimodal prion disease prognostication models.

AbstractBackgroundFor blood‐based biomarkers to fulfill their potential to revolutionize diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), additional research in diverse populations remains critical. Here, we analyzed a biracial sample to assess the profiles of blood‐based AD biomarkers and their relationships to cognition and medical comorbidities.MethodsSelf‐reported African‐American (AA; n = 267) and non‐Hispanic White (NHW; n = 268) participants evaluated through the Mayo Jacksonville Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center were matched on age, sex, and clinical diagnosis. Plasma AD biomarkers (Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, GFAP, NfL) were measured using the Quanterix SiMoA HD‐X analyzer. Cognition was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess for differences in plasma biomarker levels by sex. Linear models tested for associations of race, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and vascular risk factors with plasma AD biomarker levels, covarying for age and sex. Additional models assessed for interactions between race and plasma biomarkers in predicting cognition, further covarying for education.ResultsThe sample included adults aged 43‐100 years, with 69% women. Education was higher in NHW participants (median 16 vs. 12 years, p<0.001). APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 positivity was higher in AA participants (43% vs. 34%; p = 0.04). There were no differences in plasma AD biomarker levels between AA and NHW participants. These findings were unchanged after stratifying by cognitive status (unimpaired versus impaired). Although the association between p‐tau181 and cognition appeared stronger in NHW participants while the association between Aβ42/40 and cognition appeared stronger in AA participants, these findings did not survive after excluding individuals with CKD. Women displayed higher GFAP (p = 0.002) and lower p‐tau181 (p = 0.001) levels than men. Diabetes was inversely associated with GFAP levels (p<0.001).ConclusionsIn a biracial, community‐based sample, we observed that sex differences, CKD, and vascular risk factors contributed to variation in plasma AD biomarkers, while self‐reported race did not. Our results reinforce the critical need to account for sex and systemic medical comorbidities in equitably deploying blood‐based AD biomarkers in the general population.