Citations

Clear

6052 citation(s) found for "Vu, Peter".

Topical Issues for the Future of Radiation Protection
Nelson, Kevin, Czarwinski, Renate , Wilson, Charles , LeGuen, Bernard, Chen, Jing, Vandenhove, Hildegarde Annie, Niu, Shengli, Damilakis, John , Bryant, Peter Alfred, Kevin, Nelson, Vandenhove, Hildegarde , Niu, Shengli, Schneider, Thierry

Mayo Clinic

Health Physics | January 2, 2026 | Volume: 130 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 137-144

10.1097/hp.0000000000002107 | PMID 41481178 Get It

This paper summarizes the presentations and panel discussion provided at Plenary Panel #2 on the first day of the 16 th World Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) jointly organized with the 69th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society (HPS) in Orlando/Florida in July 2024. International organizations that play a key role in radiation protection and are close in contact with IRPA by official agreements or even MoU’s (Memorandum of Understanding) presented highlights of their projects in radiation protection as well as results. Topical issues on their current work program as seen in a list of statements, including future efforts, were presented and discussed. The needs of practitioners were stressed for recognition by the representatives of the international organizations to be included in their projects. Requested and presented topics were: • Key challenges for radiation protection practitioners in the next 10 y. • Potential effects of emerging science on radiation protection. • Challenges for implementation of IAEA Safety Standards in low- and middle-income countries. • Challenges in occupational radiation protection. • Broadening the process of optimization. • Impact of emerging technologies on radiation protection. • Ensuring radiation protection workforce for the future.
Extensive coronary-cameral fistulas and incidental left ventricular papillary fibroelastoma
Almani, Muhammad Usman , AHLUWALIA, VIBHOR, STEMPNIEWICZ, PETER, Chamoun, Antonio J., Ahluwalia, Vibhor, Yousuf, Muhammad , Alzubi, Jafar

Mayo Clinic

BMJ Case Reports | December 31, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e269899

10.1136/bcr-2025-269899 | PMID 41475864 Get It

We report the rare coexistence of extensive coronary-cameral fistulas (CCFs) with aneurysmal dilatation of coronary arteries and an incidental left ventricular papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) in a female in her early 70s who presented with chest pain and lower extremity oedema. Multimodality imaging, including transoesophageal echocardiography, cardiac CT and coronary angiography, confirmed the diagnosis. The PFE was surgically resected to prevent embolic complications, while the CCFs were managed conservatively due to their haemodynamic insignificance. This case demonstrates that even extensive CCFs may be haemodynamically insignificant, while a small PFE can pose a significant embolic threat, justifying disparate management strategies guided by multimodality imaging and haemodynamic assessment.
The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2025/26: Catalytic receptors
Alexander, S P H , Fabbro, Doriano , Peach, Chloe J. , Gibb, Alasdair J. , Kelly, Eamonn , Mathie, Alistair , Veale, Emma L. , Armstrong, Jane F , Faccenda, Elena , Harding, Simon D , Beuve, Annie, Brouckaert, Peter, Burnett, John C., Friebe, Andreas, Garthwaite, John, Hobbs, Adrian J., Koesling, Doris, Kuhn, Michaela, Leitinger, Birgit , Potter, Lincoln R., Russwurm, Michael, Schmidt, Harald H. H. W., Stasch, Johannes‐Peter, Waldman, Scott A., Alexander, Stephen P H , Mathie, Alistair A , Southan, Christopher , Davies, Jamie A , Bryant, Clare , Farndale, Richard W , Jarvis, Gavin E , Kilpatrick, Laura , Leitinger, Birgit , MacEwan, David , Monie, Tom P , Veale, Emma L , Armstrong, Jane F , Faccenda, Elena , Harding, Simon D , Peach, Chloe J. , Gibb, Alasdair J. , Kelly, Eamonn , Beuve, Annie , Brouckaert, Peter, Burnett, John C., Farndale, Richard, Friebe, Andreas , Garthwaite, John, Hobbs, Adrian J., Koesling, Doris , Kuhn, Michaela, Potter, Lincoln R., Russwurm, Michael, Schmidt, Harald , Stasch, Johannes‐Peter, Waldman, Scott A.

Mayo Clinic

British Journal of Pharmacology | December 30, 2025 | Volume: 182 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/bph.70233 | PMID 41461584 Get It

The Concise Guide to Pharmacology 2025/26 marks the seventh edition in this series of biennial publications in the British Journal of Pharmacology. Presented in landscape format, the guide provides a comparative overview of the pharmacology of drug target families. The concise nature of the Concise Guide refers to the style of presentation, being clear, accessible, and well‐structured, rather than the scope of the content, which spans approximately 500 pages. The Concise Guide summarises the key pharmacological properties of around 1900 human drug targets, and nearly 7000 interactions, involving around 4400 ligands. While the content is a substantially condensed version of the more detailed information and links available at the www.guidetopharmacology.org website, the printed guide serves as a permanent, citable, point‐in‐time record, that remains stable despite ongoing updates to the online database. The full contents of this publication can be found at https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.70233 . The Concise Guides provide expert‐curated recommendations of ‘Gold Standard’ selective pharmacological tools, available either commercially or as donations, which enable the identification of individual drug targets or families of drug targets. While the Concise Guide offers a more streamlined overview, more comprehensive information, including detailed pharmacological profiles and links to multiple online databases, is available through the Guide to Pharmacology website. The 2025/26 edition of the Concise Guide is based on material current as of mid‐2025, and supersedes all previous editions, including the 2023/24 Guide, and earlier Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC‐IUPHAR), and as such provides official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where applicable. Catalytic receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: G protein‐coupled receptors, ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, enzymes and transporters. Each section includes nomenclature guidance, concise summaries, information of the best available pharmacological tools, key references, and suggestions for further reading.
Shared TCRs in peripheral blood offer robust celiac disease classification independent of gluten Intake
Elyanow, Rebecca , Marietta, Eric, Bharanikumar, Ramit, Zhou, Wenyu , Chen-Harris, Haiyin, Bhagat, Govind , Green, Peter H., Howie, Bryan, Robins, Harlan , Murray, Joseph A., Bhagat, Govind , Choung, Rok Seon , Chen‐Harris, Haiyin , Green, Peter H., Howie, Bryan, Neuhausen, Susan L. , Murray, Joseph A.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | December 27, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2025.12.26.696039 Get It

Abstract Background and Aims Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic digestive autoimmune disorder affecting approximately 1% of the worldwide population. It is driven by T cells activated by specific HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 molecules leading to the destruction of intestinal villi. We aimed to characterize shared CeD-specific T cells in patients on and off a gluten-free diet (GFD) from a large cohort of cases and controls. Methods We performed bulk TCRβ immune sequencing of the peripheral blood of 1,604 biopsy-confirmed CeD patients (1,339 on GFD, 265 on normal diet) and 1,100 controls. We identified over 300 TCRβs enriched in CeD cases versus controls in an HLA-aware manner, controlling for CeD risk alleles. Results CeD-associated TCRβs were found to be more predictive of disease than previously characterized gliadin and glutenin-binding TCRs in a validation cohort. Furthermore, the clonal breadth of these TCRβs was associated with increased intestinal damage. Immune sequencing of the peripheral blood also uncovered repertoire-level differences between CeD patients and controls. CeD patients displayed significantly higher productive clonality compared to age-matched controls as well as expansion of TCRβs specific to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Conclusions These findings underscore the value of unbiased immune repertoire sequencing to identify novel biomarkers for autoimmune disease and to discover new disease mechanisms which can improve both diagnosis and treatment of disease.
Clinical associations of CSF TMEM106B in familial and sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Olzinski, Molly, Saloner, Rowan, Rajbanshi, Binita, Webb, Julia D, Li, Jingyao, Worringer, Katie, Heuer, Hilary W. , Ljubenkov, Peter A. , Staffaroni, Adam M. , Lago, Argentina Lario , Barragan, Eden V., Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Cook, Casey , Petrucelli, Leonard, Rademakers, Rosa, Boeve, Brad F, Rosen, Howard J., Boxer, Adam L., Cobigo, Yann , Saloner, Rowan , Loureiro, Joseph , VandeVrede, Lawren , Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark , Barragan, Eden V. , Petrucelli, Leonard , Rademakers, Rosa , Rosen, Howard J. , Rojas, Julio C., Boxer, Adam L.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 26, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_103985 Get It

Abstract Background TMEM106B encodes a lysosomal protein and is a genetic susceptibility factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Aptamer‐based proteomics quantifies TMEM106B protein levels in CSF. The associations of CSF TMEM106B with measures of disease severity have not been previously evaluated, and the value of CSF TMEM106B as a clinical biomarker is unknown. Method CSF TMEM106B and NfL protein levels were quantified with aptamer‐based proteomics in participants from two independent cohorts: sporadic FTLD with neuropathology‐confirmed FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP, clinically diagnosed PSP‐Richardson Syndrome, and controls (UCSF MAC, n = 95; mean age = 69 ± 6 yrs; 48% female) and familial FTLD comprised of presymptomatic and symptomatic FTLD mutation carriers with family non‐carrier controls (ALLFTD, n = 179; mean age = 49 ± 13 yrs; 53% female). The association between biomarkers and diverse measures of disease severity, including the CDR®+NACC‐FTLD and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes, were determined with linear regressions or mixed linear models. Associations with brain volumes were determined within the framework of voxel‐based morphometry. Result In both cohorts, at baseline, CSF TMEM106B did not differ by sex, age, FTLD phenotype, or CSF NfL. CSF TMEM106B was lower in cases with worse disease severity (Figure 1) and in participants with the protective TMEM106B rs1990622 G/G genotype, regardless of pathological diagnosis or FTLD‐causing mutation. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe longitudinal worsening in FTLD disease severity (Figure 2), basic and instrumental function, global cognition, executive function, and depression scores. These associations were weaker than those of NfL. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with low brain volumes in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) (Figure 3A). CSF NfL negatively correlated (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) with brain volumes in frontotemporal regions (Figure 3B). Conclusion CSF TMEM106B concentrations are influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, and correlate with disease severity and brain volume in both genetic and sporadic FTLD. Lower levels of CSF TMEM106B correlate with more severe disease and brain atrophy. Disease severity is more strongly associated with CSF NfL, while brain volumes are more strongly associated with CSF TMEM106B. CSF TMEM106B may have value as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in FTLD.
Validation of Amyloid Chronicity in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease
Christian, Bradley T, Schultz, Stephanie A. , Barthélemy, Nicolas R., Ryan, Natalie S. , Renton, Alan E., Vermunt, Lisa, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly, Shirzadi, Zahra , Strain, Jeremy F. , Chrem, Patricio, Daniels, Alisha , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cruchaga, Carlos, Ibanez, Laura, Jucker, Mathias, Day, Gregory S, Lee, J.R, Supnet‐Bell, Charlene, Xiong, Chengjie, Schindler, Suzanne E., Wang, Guoqiao, Li, Yan, Koeppe, Robert A., Jack, Clifford R., Morris, John C., Bateman, Randall J., Benzinger, Tammie L.S., Gordon, Brian A., (DIAN), The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Wisch, Julie K. , McKay, Nicole S. , Zammit, Matthew D. , Christian, Bradley T. , Millar, Peter R , Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Renton, Alan , Vermunt, Lisa , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Cruchaga, Carlos , Ibanez, Laura , Jucker, Mathias , Day, Gregory S. , Xiong, Chengjie , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Aguillon, David , Roh, Jee Hoon , Xiong, Chengjie , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Wang, Guoqiao , Li, Yan , Koeppe, Robert A., Jack, Clifford R. , Morris, John C. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Gordon, Brian A.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 26, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_103008 Get It

Abstract Background Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology evolves over decades, and understanding this progression is critical to the understanding of the disease and timing therapeutic interventions. Since individuals with Autosomal Dominant AD (ADAD) develop symptoms around the same age as their parent, it is possible to predict symptom onset and stage individuals by their estimated years to symptom onset (EYO). This approach does not generalize to other forms of AD, thus there is a pressing need for the timecourse of ADAD to be defined in broadly relevant terms. The objective of this project is to validate the Sampled Iterative Local Approximation (SILA) algorithm in a cohort with a known disease timecourse. SILA generates an estimate of time from amyloid positivity (A time ) based on longitudinal PET data. Method We evaluated A time in a longitudinal ADAD sample ( N = 316) with PET PiB data in three ways. First, we compared predicted age at amyloid positive (A+) to observed age at A+ for individuals who became A+ during enrollment. Next, using linear regression, we compared estimated age at A+ to estimated age at symptom onset (EYO=0). Finally, we used generalized additive models to compare the amount of variance in concurrent cognitive performance explained both A time and EYO. Result We observed a mean average error of 1.15 years between actual age at A+ ( N = 26) and the SILA‐predicted A time . Across all participants, SILA‐estimated age at A+ explained 39% of the variance in estimated age at symptom onset ( β = 0.918, p < 0.0001). Finally, we observed a nonlinear association between cognition and both A time and EYO. A time explained 19% of the variance in the general cognitive composite while EYO explained 43% of the variance. Conclusion SILA produces a valid estimate of time‐from‐amyloid positivity in ADAD. This work allows for disease stage in ADAD to be compared to staging for broad forms of AD, which was not previously possible using EYO. However, this work also illustrates that there is a high degree of heterogeneity in preclinical disease duration that is not explained by amyloid alone.
Genetic and Pathological Characteristics of Frontotemporal Dementia with Right Anterior Temporal Predominance: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Ulugut, Hülya , Spinelli, Edoardo G., Samancı, Bedia , Santillo, Alexander , Waldö, Maria Landqvist , Riedl, Lina , Stock, Jan Van den, Vandenbulcke, Mathieu, Vandenberghe, Rik, Laforce, Robert, Ducharme, Simon , Pressman, Peter , Tartaglia, Carmela M., Caramelli, Paulo, Souza, Leonardo Cruz de, Takada, Leonel Tadao, Morin, Alexandre , Schroeter, Matthias L, Kim, Eun‐Joo, Moon, So Young, Agosta, Federica, Filippi, Massimo, Gürvit, Hakan, Galimberti, Daniela, Miller, Bruce L., Sturm, Virginia E. , Miyagawa, Toji , Whitwell, Jennifer L., Boeve, Brad F, Rohrer, Jonathan D., Tempini, Maria Luisa Gorno , Josephs, Keith A., Warren, Jason D. , Rankin, Katherine, Group, International rtvFTD Working, Agosta, Federica , Spinelli, Edoardo Gioele , Agosta, Federica , Younes, Kyan , Bertoux, Maxime , Montembeault, Maxime , Fumagalli, Giorgio , Ghirelli, Alma , Jung, Na‐Yeon , Illán‐Gala, Ignacio , Thompson, J. C. , Kobylecki, Christopher , Englund, Elisabet , Stock, Jan Van den , Vandenbulcke, Mathieu , Vandenberghe, Rik , Laforce, Robert , Caramelli, Paulo , Souza, Leonardo Cruz de , Takada, Leonel Tadao , Schroeter, Matthias L , Kim, Eun‐Joo , Moon, So Young , Canu, Elisa , Filippi, Massimo , Gurvit, Hakan I. , Diehl‐Schmid, Janine , Galimberti, Daniela , Lebouvier, Thibaud , Miller, Bruce L. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Rohrer, Jonathan D. , Josephs, Keith A. , Snowden, Julie S. , Rankin, Katherine P. , Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70857_103987 Get It

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with right anterior temporal lobe (RATL) predominant atrophy is an emerging area of interest. Recent findings by the International Working Group (IWG) have identified this subtype as having a distinct clinical profile within the FTD spectrum (Ulugut et al., 2024, A&D). However, its genetic and pathological underpinnings remain unexplored in large, multicultural cohorts. Methods Retrospective analyses encompassing clinical, genetic, pathological, and neuroimaging data from 23 IWG sites across 13 countries in Asia, Middle East, Europe, North and South America were conducted. The study included 444 patients with FTD exhibiting predominant RATL atrophy. Results Genetic screening was performed on 51% ( n = 225) of the cohort for at least the major frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) mutations including microtubule‐associated protein tau ( MAPT ), progranulin ( GRN ), and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 ( C9orf72 ), or dementia panels encompassing extended sets of genes. Of these, 81% were sporadic, showing negative results for the screened genes and a modified Goldman Score of ≥ 3, indicating a negative family history for dementia. The MAPT mutation was the most common genetic variant, identified in 7% of the screened cases (Figure 1). Pathological confirmation was available for 63 patients. Among the sporadic cases, transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 type C (TDP‐C) pathology was most prevalent (60%, n = 32), while tau‐MAPT pathology was most common in the genetic cases (38%, n = 16). Fifteen cases did not fit neatly into genetic or sporadic categories, displaying heterogeneous pathologies (Figure 2). At the initial visit, compared to genetic cases, patients with TDP‐C pathology were older, and more frequently exhibited semantic deficits, with less frequent attention difficulties and executive dysfunction. No differences were observed in sex distribution, symptom duration or disease severity between genetic and sporadic TDP‐C cases. However, left handedness was more common in TDP‐C cases (14%) compared to genetic cases (5%). Conclusion While FTD with RATL atrophy primarily appears sporadic, a significant proportion of cases exhibit genetic variants. These sporadic and genetic subtypes display distinct neuropathological features and clinical manifestations. Given the implications for therapeutic strategies, precise clinical and molecular subtyping is critical for enhancing patient management and ensuring appropriate enrollment in clinical trials.
Sex Differences in Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Associated with Agitation in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Sakran, Celine N., Dimal, Nico Paulo, Cortez, Kasey, Heuer, Hilary W. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Barmada, Sami J. , Clark, David G., Darby, Ryan, Dickerson, Brad C., Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko, Galasko, Douglas R., Geschwind, Daniel H., Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Grant, Ian , Irwin, David J., Honig, Lawrence S., Kantarci, Kejal, Litvan, Irene, Mackenzie, Ian R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , MENDEZ, M, Onyike, Chiadi, Pascual, Belén , Pressman, Peter , Ramos, Eilana, Rogalskı, Emily , Boeve, Brad F, Boxer, Adam L., Rosen, Howard J., Tartaglia, Carmela M., Pascual, Belen , Barmada, Sami , Vargas‐González, Juan‐Camilo , Dimal, Nico , Appleby, Brian S. , Bozoki, Andrea C , Clark, David G., Cobigo, Yann , Dickerson, Brad C., Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Galasko, Douglas R., Geschwind, Daniel H. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Irwin, David J. , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Honig, Lawrence S. , Kantarci, Kejal , Léger, Gabriel C. , Litvan, Irene , Masdeu, Joseph C , Mendez, Mario F. , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Roberson, Erik D. , Boxer, Adam L. , Rosen, Howard J.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70857_103036 Get It

Abstract Background Agitation is a clinically significant symptom contributing to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) but is poorly understood across the different syndromes related to Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). This study investigates sex differences in agitation across FTLD‐related syndromes and its relationship to various neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Method We analyzed data from 1,654 participants (916 males, 738 females; average ages 65.8 and 65.9, respectively) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study with a FTLD‐related syndrome: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (non‐fluent variant (nfvPPA), semantic variant (svPPA)), Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Participants’ symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios were computed to assess the likelihood of NPS comorbidities when agitation was present in males and females. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify NPS associated with agitation and how they varied by sex. Result Males were more likely to experience anxiety (bvFTD: p <0.001, CBS: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.0001), apathy (nfvPPA: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.01), depression (bvFTD: p <0.0001, PSP<0.01), disinhibition (nfvPPA: p <0.0001), PSP: p <0.001), and motor symptoms (bvFTD: p <0.01, CBS: p <0.01) when agitation was present. In contrast, females had a higher likelihood of experiencing disinhibition in svPPA ( p <0.001). These findings suggest that agitation is associated with a wider range of NPS in males than in females. Agitation and NPS are especially prominent in males with PSP. Conclusion This study reveals significant sex differences in NPS in FTLD‐related syndromes when agitation is present. Males and especially PSP, are more likely to experience a broader range of NPS in association with agitation. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences, particularly focusing on the neurobiological impact of agitation, the recognition of symptoms in the presence of greater behavioral disturbances, and potential variations from informant reports. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into the role of agitation in the presentation of NPS across FTLD‐related syndromes. Ultimately, addressing these gaps will enhance our ability to effectively treat and manage agitation in both male and female patients with FTLD‐related syndromes.
Female Informants are associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores in patients with Frontotemporal Dementia
Alotibi, Hessah A , Cortez, Kasey, Dimal, Nico Paulo, Heuer, Hilary W. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Barmada, Sami J. , Clark, David G., Darby, Ryan, Dickerson, Brad C., Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko, Galasko, Douglas R., Geschwind, Daniel H., Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Grant, Ian , Irwin, David J., Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin, Honig, Lawrence S., Kantarci, Kejal, Litvan, Irene, Mackenzie, Ian R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , MENDEZ, M, Onyike, Chiadi, Pascual, Belén , Pressman, Peter , Ramos, Eilana, Rogalskı, Emily , Knopman, D S, Boeve, Brad F, Boxer, Adam L., Rosen, Howard J., Tartaglia, Carmela M., ALLFTD, Pascual, Belen , Barmada, Sami , Vargas‐González, Juan‐Camilo , Dimal, Nico , Appleby, Brian S. , Bozoki, Andrea C , Clark, David G., Cobigo, Yann , Dickerson, Brad C., Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Galasko, Douglas R., Geschwind, Daniel H. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Irwin, David J. , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Honig, Lawrence S. , Kantarci, Kejal , Léger, Gabriel C. , Litvan, Irene , Masdeu, Joseph C , Mendez, Mario F. , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Roberson, Erik D. , Knopman, David S. , Boxer, Adam L. , Rosen, Howard J.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70857_100828 Get It

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.
Clinical application and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neuropsychiatric disorders: an international overview
Yriarte, Jose, Zecca, Chiara, Logroscino, Giancarlo, Koertvelyessy, Peter, Tumani, Hayrettin, Olsen, Dorte Aalund , Alcolea, Daniel, Blennow, Kaj, Fortea, Juan M., Lleó, Alberto, Santos, Gustavo A A, Borelli, Wyllians Vendramini, Amar, Elodie Bouaziz, Bigot‐Corbel, Edith, Bjerke, Maria , Pérez, Mercedes Carretero, Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Chapman, Miles, Cusato, J, Fourier, Anthony , Galimberti, Daniela, Gezen‐Ak, Duygu, Florez, Silvia de las Heras, Sánchez, Juan José Hernández, Imperiale, Daniela, Kaczorowski, Flora, Khalil, Michael, Kuhle, Jens, Lewczuk, Piotr, Tsolaki, Magda, Blanc, M, Mroszko, Barbara, Rodríguez‐Álvarez, Jose, Kulczynska‐Przybik, Agnieszka, Nogueira, Léonor, Paquet, Claire, Baiardi, Simone, Parnetti, Lucilla, Garay, Raquel Perez, Quillard‐Muraine, Muriel, Borja, Enrique Rodriguez, Schraen‐Maschke, Susanna, Terracciano, Daniela , Bachhuber, Franziska , Tzartos, Socrates, Tzartos, John , Unterwalder, Nadine, Vermunt, Lisa, Zetterberg, Henrik, Teunissen, C., Lehmann, Sylvain , Delaby, Constance , Ladang, Aurélie , Zecca, Chiara, Logroscino, Giancarlo , Köertvelyessy, Pèter, Tumani, Hayrettin , Parchi, Piero , Quadrio, Isabelle , Hart, Melanie , Alcolea, Daniel , Blennow, Kaj , Fortea, Juan , Lleó, Alberto , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia , Ayrignac, Xavier , Bedel, Aurélie , Borelli, Wyllians Vendramini , Bouaziz-Amar, Élodie , Baldeiras, Inês , Bigot‐Corbel, Edith , Casoli, Tiziana , Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Cusato, Jessica , Dursun, Erdinç , Galimberti, Daniela , Gezen‐Ak, Duygu , Gordon, Brian A. , Gouju, Julien , Flórez, Silvia de las Heras , Herwerth, Marina , Kasuga, Kensaku , Keshavan, Ashvini , Khalil, Michael , Kühle, Jens , Leithner, Christoph , Lewczuk, Piotr , Letournel, Franck , Tsolaki, Magda , Giuffrè, Guido Maria , Rodrı́guez-Álvarez, José , Musso, Giulia , Kulczyńska‐Przybik, Agnieszka , Paquet, Claire , Baiardi, Simone , Gaetani, Lorenzo , Parnetti, Lucilla , Poesen, Koen , Schraen‐Maschke, Susanna , Halbgebauer, Steffen , Tzartos, S J, Vermunt, Lisa , Wellington, Cheryl L. , Zetterberg, Henrik, Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Lehmann, Sylvain

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_104274 Get It

Abstract Background The quantification of Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has proven valuable for diagnosing and prognosing various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, and ischemic damage. However, there is considerable variability in clinical and laboratory practices between centers, primarily due to different contexts of use (COU), analytical methods, and the application of cutoffs or scales. Additionally, for the same biochemical profile, the interpretation and reporting of results may vary from one center to another, raising concerns about the commutability of the tests. To date, no consensus has been reached among laboratories to define the most appropriate use of cutoffs or conclusions/comments based on NfL profiles. Method This international project involves 38 laboratories across 18 countries, all specialized in the biochemical diagnosis of neurological disorders. Using a questionnaire, we obtained descriptions from each center regarding their COU, pre‐analytical and analytical protocols (including the biological fluid and methods used to quantify NfL). Through a consensus approach, we developed a harmonized strategy for the use and reporting of NfL results across different centres according to their respective COU. Results Among the centers, 63% quantified NfL in the CSF, 87% in blood and 53% in both fluids. COU were as follow: frontotemporal dementia (71%), Alzheimer disease (71%), multiple sclerosis (61%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (61%), psychiatric syndrome (45%), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (32%), Parkinson disease (39%), peripheral neuropathy (29%), traumatic brain injury (21%), Huntington's disease (13%), amyloid transthyretin related (11%) and cardiac arrest (8%). Most of the centers define pathological cutoffs based on publications (50%) and take age into account for this purpose (42%). Reporting is mostly transmitted through numeric results (95%). Conclusion Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice.