Rajbanshi, Binita

Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract Background TMEM106B encodes a lysosomal protein and is a genetic susceptibility factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Aptamer‐based proteomics quantifies TMEM106B protein levels in CSF. The associations of CSF TMEM106B with measures of disease severity have not been previously evaluated, and the value of CSF TMEM106B as a clinical biomarker is unknown. Method CSF TMEM106B and NfL protein levels were quantified with aptamer‐based proteomics in participants from two independent cohorts: sporadic FTLD with neuropathology‐confirmed FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP, clinically diagnosed PSP‐Richardson Syndrome, and controls (UCSF MAC, n = 95; mean age = 69 ± 6 yrs; 48% female) and familial FTLD comprised of presymptomatic and symptomatic FTLD mutation carriers with family non‐carrier controls (ALLFTD, n = 179; mean age = 49 ± 13 yrs; 53% female). The association between biomarkers and diverse measures of disease severity, including the CDR®+NACC‐FTLD and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes, were determined with linear regressions or mixed linear models. Associations with brain volumes were determined within the framework of voxel‐based morphometry. Result In both cohorts, at baseline, CSF TMEM106B did not differ by sex, age, FTLD phenotype, or CSF NfL. CSF TMEM106B was lower in cases with worse disease severity (Figure 1) and in participants with the protective TMEM106B rs1990622 G/G genotype, regardless of pathological diagnosis or FTLD‐causing mutation. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe longitudinal worsening in FTLD disease severity (Figure 2), basic and instrumental function, global cognition, executive function, and depression scores. These associations were weaker than those of NfL. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with low brain volumes in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) (Figure 3A). CSF NfL negatively correlated (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) with brain volumes in frontotemporal regions (Figure 3B). Conclusion CSF TMEM106B concentrations are influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, and correlate with disease severity and brain volume in both genetic and sporadic FTLD. Lower levels of CSF TMEM106B correlate with more severe disease and brain atrophy. Disease severity is more strongly associated with CSF NfL, while brain volumes are more strongly associated with CSF TMEM106B. CSF TMEM106B may have value as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in FTLD.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONPlasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) identify individuals with primary Alzheimer's disease (AD). They may detect AD co‐pathology in the setting of other primary neurodegenerative diseases, but this has not been systematically studied.METHODSWe compared the clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological associations of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (mass spectrometry), p‐tau217 (electrochemiluminescence), and neurofilament light ([NfL], single molecule array [Simoa]), as markers of AD co‐pathology, in a sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohort (n = 620).RESULTSAβ42/Aβ40 showed no clinicopathological associations. High p‐tau217 was present in amnestic dementia (AmD) presumed to be due to FTD, logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and APOEε4 carriers, and correlated with worse baseline and longitudinal clinical scores, lower hippocampal volumes, and more severe AD co‐pathology (Braak Stage). NfL was elevated in all FTD phenotypes, and correlated with clinical scores and frontotemporal brain volumes.DISCUSSIONPlasma p‐tau217 has clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological correlates in sporadic FTD and may identify FTD cases with AD co‐pathology.Highlights Alzheimer's disease (AD) features could be identified with plasma phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Plasma p‐tau217 is a better discriminator of AD co‐pathology and AD‐associated features in FTLD than plasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and neurofilament light (NfL). In FTLD, plasma p‐tau217, but not Aβ42/Aβ40 or neurofilament light, has phenotypical, neurocognitive, and neuroimaging correlates suggestive of AD co‐pathology.

AbstractBackgroundAs new anti‐amyloid immunotherapies emerge for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is clear that early diagnosis of AD pathology is crucial for treatment success. This can be challenging in atypical presentations of AD and, together with our reliance on CSF or PET scans, can, at times, lead to delayed diagnosis. Here, we further explore the possible role of plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (P‐tau217) for the detection of primary AD or AD co‐pathology when frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders are the main clinical presentation.MethodParticipants were recruited through ALLFTD, a North American multisite research consortium for the longitudinal assessment of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. After excluding cases with known FTD‐causing mutations, 573 participants with sporadic disease, mild cognitive/behavioral impairment, or healthy familial controls evaluated between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis (45.8% female, median age 66 years). 39 of those cases underwent neuropathological evaluation. Plasma P‐tau217 was measured with the Eli Lilly electrochemiluminescence‐based assay. P‐tau217 concentrations were compared by phenotype, disease severity, genotype, and, when available, neuropathological diagnosis with non‐parametric tests. Its diagnostic performance was tested with ROC curves. Associations between plasma P‐tau217 concentrations and clinical scales of global cognition, memory, executive function, motor function, and social cognition with linear regressions and non‐parametric tests.ResultPlasma P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and amnestic dementia (AmDem), compared to participants with normal cognition or other FTD phenotypes. P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in APOE e4 carriers, compared to non‐carriers, regardless of phenotype, but were not affected by disease severity. P‐tau217 concentrations showed associations with clinical measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function, but had no associations with measures of motor function or social cognition. Plasma P‐tau217 concentrations were elevated in high and intermediate ADNC scoring, or more advanced Braak stages, even when AD was not the primary pathology.ConclusionEven when FTD is suspected, high plasma p‐tau 217 concentrations are strongly associated with underlying AD as primary pathology or contributing co‐pathology. Plasma P‐tau217 could be a tool to support the development of disease‐modifying therapies for atypical Alzheimer’s disease presentations or for FTD cases with Alzheimer’s disease co‐pathology.

AbstractBackgroundIdentification of useful fluid biomarkers is expected to advance frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders (FTD) care and therapeutic development. The clinical utility of emerging plasma Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers in FTD remains unexplored. This study analyzed ATN patterns by sporadic FTD phenotype, based on amyloid beta1‐42 (Aβ1‐42), amyloid beta1‐40 (Aβ1‐40), phospho‐tau217 (p‐tau217), and neurofilament (NfL) plasma concentrations.MethodThe present study included 625 participants enrolled in ALLFTD (46% female, median age 61 ± 12 years) for whom biomarker data were available. Plasma Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40 measures were determined by immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry whereas plasma p‐tau217 and NfL concentrations were respectively determined by electrochemiluminescence‐ and fluorescence‐based immunoassays. Biomarker concentrations were compared by phenotype and disease severity with ANOVA. Their diagnostic performance was tested with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, and biomarker relationships with measures of clinical severity were tested through linear regressions controlling for age, sex, and APOE genotype.ResultHigher plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ1‐42, levels were observed in logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and amnestic dementia (AmD) cohorts, compared to other FTD groups. These biomarkers were not associated with disease severity but were affected by APOE4 genotype. High plasma NfL level was observed in fully symptomatic patients compared to controls, and as a function of disease severity. Plasma Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40 level was not different between phenotypes and was not affected by clinical severity. P‐tau217 level, but not Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40 or NfL levels showed high discrimination of lvPPA and AmD from other phenotypes (AUC = 0.87 (95% CI 0.77 – 0.96, p < 0.0001, 73% sensitivity, 92% specificity). The p‐tau217/Aβ1‐42 ratio improved this discrimination (AUC = 0.9, 95% CI 0.83 – 1, p < 0.0001, 77% sensitivity, 94% specificity). Plasma Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40, p‐tau217, NfL, p‐tau217/Aβ1‐42, p‐tau217/NfL, and (Aβ1‐42 x p‐tau217)/NfL were associated with cognitive (MoCA, CVLT), motor (UPDRS), and social behavior (RSMS) performances at baseline.ConclusionPlasma p‐tau217/Aβ1‐42 identifies, with high specificity, two phenotypes associated with Alzheimer’s disease: lvPPA and AmD. Pending molecular neuroimaging and neuropathological confirmation, this biomarker could be of value to identify primary Alzheimer’s disease pathology or co‐pathology associated with Alzheimer’s disease when sporadic FTD is suspected.