Citations

Introduction: Influenza infection is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Many observational and clinical trials suggested that influenza vaccine can reduce cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library (inception through May 24th, 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating influenza vaccine and its association with cardiovascular outcomes. We used Mantel-Haenszel method with Paule-Mandel estimator of tau2 and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment (due to the small number of the included studies) to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Eight RCTs with a total of 14,420 patients were included in our analysis. Influenza vaccine as compared with control/placebo was associated with significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up [RR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.57; 0.97; I2:56%] [Figure]. There was no significant difference between influenza vaccine and placebo/control in terms of all-cause mortality [RR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.54; 1.33; I2:50%], cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.39; 1.50; I2:57%], or myocardial infarction [RR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.52; 1.10; I2:0%]. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that influenza vaccine compared with control/placebo was associated with lower rates of MACE without a significant difference in the mortality or myocardial infarction rates.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Optimal management of AF in heart failure (HF) patients remains a controversy. Recent studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes of catheter ablation versus medical therapy. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate whether catheter ablation achieves better outcomes as compared to rate control. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE was conducted using PRISMA guidelines with the search terms “rate control”, “atrial fibrillation”, and “ablation.” Studies were included if they compared a catheter ablation strategy versus rate control medical therapy in HF patients. Multiple endpoints were extracted from the articles including LVEF, 6MWD, change in BNP, and Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes using the Cochrane manual. Revman 5.4 was used to aggregate the outcomes and compute statistics using a random effects model to create forest plots. Results: A total of 7 studies with 1065 patients were included in this analysis. LVEF increased by 5.69% [4.80, 6.58] p<0.00001, 6MWD increased by 24.82m [2.69, 46.94] p=0.03, BNP decreased -102.54 [-174.68, -30.40] p=0.005, and QoL outcomes using the MLHFQ improved -8.10 [-15.73, -0.48] p=0.04. Conclusions: Catheter ablation improves outcomes in HF patients with atrial fibrillation as compared to a rate control only strategy. Further large-scale randomized studies are needed to quantify improvements in outcomes.

Introduction: Testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended for patients with new-onset heart failure (HF). There are limited data on the association between testing for CAD during index hospitalization for patients with the new-onset HF and early readmission rates and readmission mortality. Hypothesis: CAD testing for new-onset HF during index hospitalization may reduce 30-day readmission rates and readmission-related mortality. Methods: Patients hospitalized for new-onset HF were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database of the United States. Clinical characteristics, 30-day readmission rates, readmission-related mortality were compared in patients with or without testing for CAD during index hospitalization. CAD testing includes coronary angiography, coronary CT angiography, cardiac MRI, nuclear imaging or cardiac stress test. Results: Between January 2016 and November 2019, of 151,172 patients hospitalized for new-onset HF, 30,444 (20.1%) patients underwent testing for CAD during index hospitalization. Younger patients, males, and patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had more frequent testing for CAD. Only 9.5% of CAD-tested patients received percutaneous coronary intervention during the index hospitalization. Patients with CAD testing had lower 30-day readmission rates than those without testing (11.4% vs 14.3%, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.87). Patients with CAD testing had lower 30-day readmission-related mortality rates than those without testing (0.5% vs 0.9%, P<0.001; adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04). Readmission rate for HF at 30 days was 2.3% for patients with CAD testing vs 3.5% for those without testing (P<0.001; adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.76). There was a significant interaction between HF type (HFrEF vs HF with preserved EF) and CAD testing on 30-day readmission rates (P for interaction <0.001). Conclusions: Testing for CAD during index hospitalization for patients with new-onset HF was associated with reduced 30-day readmission rates. There was substantial decrease in readmission for HF and readmission-related mortality in patients who underwent CAD testing during index hospitalization.

Abstract Evaluation of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) involves tangential biopsies of a suspicious lesion that is sent for frozen sections and evaluated by a Mohs micrographic surgeon. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have made possible the development of sophisticated clinical decision support systems to provide real-time feedback to clinicians that could have a role in optimizing the diagnostic workup of BCC. There were 287 annotated whole-slide images of frozen sections from tangential biopsies, of which 121 contained BCC, that were used to train and test an AI pipeline to recognize BCC. Regions of interest were annotated by a senior dermatology resident, an experienced dermatopathologist and an experienced Mohs surgeon, with concordance of annotations noted on final review. Final performance metrics included a sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.88, respectively. Our results on a relatively small dataset suggest the feasibility of developing an AI system to aid in the workup and management of BCC.

Abstract Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal masses detected on imaging performed for reasons other than suspected adrenal disease. In most cases, adrenal incidentalomas are nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas but may also require therapeutic intervention including that for adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, hormone-producing adenoma, or metastases. Here, we provide a revision of the first international, interdisciplinary guidelines on incidentalomas. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system and updated systematic reviews on 4 predefined clinical questions crucial for the management of incidentalomas: (1) How to assess risk of malignancy?; (2) How to define and manage mild autonomous cortisol secretion?; (3) Who should have surgical treatment and how should it be performed?; and (4) What follow-up is indicated if the adrenal incidentaloma is not surgically removed? Selected Recommendations: (1) Each adrenal mass requires dedicated adrenal imaging. Recent advances now allow discrimination between risk categories: Homogeneous lesions with Hounsfield unit (HU) ≤ 10 on unenhanced CT are benign and do not require any additional imaging independent of size. All other patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary expert meeting, but only lesions &gt;4 cm that are inhomogeneous or have HU &gt;20 have sufficiently high risk of malignancy that surgery will be the usual management of choice. (2) Every patient needs a thorough clinical and endocrine work-up to exclude hormone excess including the measurement of plasma or urinary metanephrines and a 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (applying a cutoff value of serum cortisol ≤50 nmol/L [≤1.8 µg/dL]). Recent studies have provided evidence that most patients without clinical signs of overt Cushing's syndrome but serum cortisol levels post dexamethasone &gt;50 nmol/L (&gt;1.8 µg/dL) harbor increased risk of morbidity and mortality. For this condition, we propose the term “mild autonomous cortisol secretion” (MACS). (3) All patients with MACS should be screened for potential cortisol-related comorbidities that are potentially attributably to cortisol (eg, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus), to ensure these are appropriately treated. (4) In patients with MACS who also have relevant comorbidities surgical treatment should be considered in an individualized approach. (5) The appropriateness of surgical intervention should be guided by the likelihood of malignancy, the presence and degree of hormone excess, age, general health, and patient preference. We provide guidance on which surgical approach should be considered for adrenal masses with radiological findings suspicious of malignancy. (6) Surgery is not usually indicated in patients with an asymptomatic, nonfunctioning unilateral adrenal mass and obvious benign features on imaging studies. Furthermore, we offer recommendations for the follow-up of nonoperated patients, management of patients with bilateral incidentalomas, for patients with extra-adrenal malignancy and adrenal masses, and for young and elderly patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Finally, we suggest 10 important research questions for the future.

Introduction: Heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently have co-morbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), although the impact of OSA treatment remains unclear in this patient population. We assessed the association between adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and healthcare resource utilization in patients with OSA and HFpEF. Methods: Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy usage data from patients with OSA and HFpEF were used to measure the association of PAP adherence and healthcare resource utilization, defined by hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits. US Medicare defines PAP compliance as use for at least 4 hours/night for 70% of nights in a consecutive 30-day period over 90 days. PAP adherent patients met this criteria for all 4 90-day periods, while PAP non-adherent patients did not meet this criteria for any 90-day period over one year. Propensity score methods were used to create well matched groups with differing PAP adherence levels. Results: The study cohort consisted of 4,237 eligible patients (54.0% female, mean age 64.1 years), of whom 40% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (30% intermediate-adherent, 30% non-adherent). After propensity score matching on prior year covariates, during the year after PAP prescription, PAP adherent patients had fewer hospital visits than non-adherent patients, with a 57% reduction in hospitalizations and a 36% reduction in ER visits for PAP adherent patients (Table 1a). These results remained consistent with inverse probability weighting, and furthermore showed a significant difference in hospitalizations between intermediate-adherent and non-adherent patients, but no significant difference in ER visits (Table 1b). Conclusions: Treating OSA with PAP therapy in patients with HFpEF is associated with a reduction in hospitalizations and ER visits. Adherence to PAP therapy is required to realize these clinical benefits.

Abstract Reoperative surgery following magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is rare. The clinical indications include the removal of MSA for dysphagia, the recurrence of reflux, or the issues of erosion. Diagnostic evaluation follows that of patients with recurrent reflux and dysphagia following surgical fundoplication. Procedures following the complications of MSA can be performed in a minimally invasive fashion, either endoscopically or robotic/laparoscopically, with good clinical outcomes.