Citations

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called the LIBERTY extension study. The LIBERTY extension study is a long-term study looking at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in reducing blood loss during menstrual periods in women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual periods. Women were included in the extension study if they finished the 24-week LIBERTY 1 or LIBERTY 2 studies. Heavy menstrual periods were considered to be menstrual blood loss of about one-third of a cup of blood (80 ml) per cycle for two cycles or about two-thirds of a cup of blood (160 ml) during one cycle. The LIBERTY extension study also looked at whether relugolix combination therapy was safe to take for up to 1 year. What were the results? Out of 770 total women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding who took part in the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies, 476 took part in the LIBERTY extension study. From the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies through the end of the LIBERTY extension: 163 women took relugolix combination therapy for 52 weeks 149 women took relugolix alone for 12 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 40 weeks 164 women took placebo for 24 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 28 weeks The LIBERTY extension study showed that most women in all three treatment groups responded to relugolix combination therapy by having less bleeding during their menstrual periods, having improved anemia symptoms, and having stable bone mineral loss. Side effects were similar across treatment groups, and the most common side effects were headaches and hot flushes. What do the results mean? Women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding taking relugolix combination therapy may have fewer uterine fibroid bleeding symptoms for up to 1 year of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) (LIBERTY 1) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03103087 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) (LIBERTY 2) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03412890 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) (LIBERTY extension study)

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of the congenital heart disease (CHD) anatomic/physiologic classification has not been systematically studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether CHD physiologic stage provided improvement in prognostic power (to predict all-cause mortality) beyond conventional clinical risk models. METHODS: Retrospective study of adults with CHD at the Mayo Clinic (2003–2019). The CHD physiologic stage was assessed at baseline and 36 (24–48) months, and patients were classified into stages A to D at these time points. Clinical stability (remaining in the same stage), clinical improvement (moving to less advanced stage), and clinical deterioration (moving to more advanced stage) were determined at 36 months. We defined conventional clinical risk indices as age/sex, functional class, comorbidities, cardiac procedures, hepatorenal dysfunction, and ventricular/valvular dysfunction. RESULTS: Of 5321 patients, 1649 (31%), 1968 (37%), 1224 (23%), and 480 (9%) were in stages A, B, C, and D at baseline. Of 5321 patients, 4588 (86%) also had assessments at 36 months, and of these patients, 3347 (73%), 386 (8%), and 855 (19%) had clinical stability, deterioration, and improvement, respectively. Patients with clinical improvement were more likely to have undergone cardiac procedures between both assessments. Both baseline CHD physiologic stage (hazard ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09–1.17]; P <0.001, per unit increase in stage) and change in CHD physiologic stage (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.32–1.61]; P =0.007, per unit increase in stage) were associated with mortality after adjustments for conventional risk indices and provided incremental improvement in prognostic power beyond conventional clinical risk models as evidence by an increase in C statistic from 0.702 (0.681–0.724) to 0.769 (0.754–0.787). CONCLUSIONS: The CHD physiologic stage can potentially be used for risk stratification, as well as to monitor disease progression and response to therapy.

Abstract Background Vitamin D supplementation is common practice for neonates and infants due to limited stores of vitamin D at birth. Although not commonly encountered, vitamin D toxicity can occur due to over-supplementation. However, toxic concentrations are often not included in method validation experiments, and assays often are not validated in the neonatal population. Methods We compared serial 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] measurements in pre-term neonates receiving 25(OH)D supplementation and identified 12 patients wherein concentrations of 25(OH)D were above 50 ng/mL (125 nM) that required additional investigations as the 25(OH)D results did not match the clinical picture. Available samples were compared across 4 immunoassay platforms (LIAISON XL, Roche Cobas e602, Abbott Alinity i, and Siemens Centaur XP) and LC–MS/MS. Results Concentrations of 25(OH)D observed on one individual immunoassay platform (LIAISON XL) fluctuated substantially between subsequent blood draws in select neonates with elevated concentrations. Serum samples from these patients showed variable agreement between LC–MS/MS and other immunoassay platforms. These fluctuations were not explained by the presence of 3-epimer-25(OH)D or 24,25(OH)2D. Conclusions Although we were unable to identify a cause for the variable elevated results, our findings suggest that neonatal 25(OH)D measurements alone should not be used for assessment of nutritional monitoring, and that clinical correlation and other laboratory parameters including ionized calcium should be considered.

AbstractBackgroundThere are limited national‐level data on the contemporary practices of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use in acute myocardial infarction‐cardiogenic shock (AMI‐CS).MethodsWe utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project‐National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (2005–2017) to identify adult admissions (>18 years) with AMI‐CS. MCS devices were classified as intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We evaluated trends in the initial device used (IABP alone, pLVAD alone or ≥2 MCS devices), device escalation, bridging to durable LVAD/heart transplantation, and predictors of in‐hospital mortality and device escalation.ResultsAmong 327,283 AMI‐CS admissions, 131,435 (40.2%) had an MCS device placed with available information on timing of placement. IABP, pLVAD, and ≥2 MCS devices were used as initial device in 120,928 (92.0%), 8202 (6.2%), and 2305 (1.7%) admissions, respectively. Most admissions were maintained on the initial MCS device with 1%–1.5% being escalated (IABP to pLVAD/ECMO, pLVAD to ECMO). Urban, medium, and large‐sized hospitals and acute multiorgan failure were significant independent predictors of MCS escalation. In admissions receiving MCS, escalation of MCS device was associated with higher in‐hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.38–1.75; p < 0.001). Admissions receiving durable LVAD/heart transplantation increased over time in those initiated on pLVAD and ≥2 MCS devices, resulting in lower in‐hospital mortality.ConclusionsIn this 13‐year study, escalation of MCS in AMI‐CS was associated with higher in‐hospital mortality suggestive of higher acuity of illness. The increase in number of durable LVAD/heart transplantations alludes to the role of MCS as successful bridge strategies.