Citations

Abstract Background Duplicate measurements can be used to characterize assay imprecision, identify outliers, and estimate error rates. The benefits of duplicate analysis, however, need to be balanced against the increased financial cost. The objective of this study was to evaluate the need for continued replicate measurement in a laboratory developed assay measuring anti-drug antibodies to infliximab (ATI). To this end, duplicate patient sample measurements from the ATI assay over a two-year period were analyzed to calculate outlier and error frequencies. Methods ATI were measured by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) on the MesoScale Discovery (MSD) platform, with a standard curve from 20–1250 U/mL using commercially available monoclonal ATIs. All patient samples tested for ATI over a 27-month period of time (n = 9582) were subject to inclusion in this study. Only patient samples with ATI levels within the analytical measuring range (AMR) of the assay, however, were selected for further analysis. Samples were divided equally into 7 bins across the measuring range based on mean replicate concentration. Within-run imprecision was determined for each bin using the standard deviation (combined from all replicates using sum of squares) and mean concentration derived from all replicates. Outliers were defined as replicate measurements with a percent difference greater than ±3 SD of the calculated assay imprecision. Errors were defined as samples which had replicate values on opposite sides of the clinical cutoff of positive ATI (≥50 U/mL) and a percent difference greater than 3SD of the assay imprecision. Results Of the 9582 total patient samples analyzed, 2467 had ATI values within the AMR and 1655 had levels over the clinical cut-off of 50 U/mL (17.3% positivity rate). Within-run imprecision determined from the mean and combined SD of the duplicate measurements ranged from 15.7% at the lowest concentration bin (20–27.5 U/mL) to 10.0% at the highest concentration bin (358–1243 U/mL). The mean percentage of outliers in each bin ranged from 0.8%–3.4% resulting in an overall outlier frequency of 2.1% when considering all samples within the AMR. There were 66 samples within the AMR which demonstrated qualitative discrepancies between the replicates. However, only 21 (31.8%) of these samples, had a percent agreement greater than 3SD of the assay imprecision resulting in an overall error rate of 0.2% when considering all 9582 samples. Conclusion In this study, the analysis of replicate patient samples enabled the establishment of a precision profile and estimation of error rates for a laboratory developed test measuring ATI. The calculated error rate of 0.2%, however, is well within the reported range of most clinical assays indicating that the continued practice of duplicate measurement may not be necessary. Additionally, updating the laboratory protocol to eliminate replicate testing would have positive impact in laboratory workflow, cost, and turn-around-time for results.

Abstract Background Hemolysis is a pre-analytic issue that challenges clinical laboratories. When a specimen with significant hemolysis is obtained in our laboratory, tests where the hemolysis threshold is exceeded are not reported and blood is recollected. Unfortunately, in a subset of patients, the recollected specimen is also hemolyzed (termed “recurrent hemolysis”). In these cases, the second recollection utilizes special collection and handling protocols (i.e., hand-carried to lab, plasma collection, etc.) to mitigate preventable causes of hemolysis. Lipemia is also a known contributor to specimen hemolysis. Mayo Clinic Rochester experienced an increased rate of hemolysis as well as recurrent hemolysis during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2022). The objective of this study was to investigate the increased rate of recurrent hemolysis and compare to a rate prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2019). Methods Retrospective data analysis was performed for January 2019 (negative control) and January 2022. The number of Mayo Clinic Rochester hospital admissions, admitting diagnosis, medications administered, and number of test collections performed were obtained using reporting functionality in our Electronic Health Record (EHR), Epic. The Laboratory Information System, SoftLab, was utilized to obtain recollection rates due to hemolysis. Data were normalized to total patient admissions for the specified period to account for inter-year variability. R/R Studio was utilized to analyze and visualize the data. Pearson’s Chi-squared test for independence was performed on categorical variables (significance defined as P < 0.05). Results A 28% decrease in hospital admissions (n = 3958:Jan-22 vs n = 5517:Jan-19) and a 23% decrease in total specimens collected on hospitalized patients (n = 40 557:Jan-22 vs n = 52 373:Jan-19) was observed between Jan-19 to Jan-22. However, the laboratory observed a 6% increase in hemolyzed specimens (n = 256:Jan-22 vs n = 241:Jan-19). Recurrent hemolysis occurred in 24% (n = 62/256) of Jan-22 and 17% (n = 43/241) of Jan-19 hemolyzed specimens and required special handling protocols. COVID positive patients comprised 48% (n = 30/62) of those requiring special handling protocols in Jan-22. Further examination revealed 34% (n = 21/62) of Jan-22 and 12% (n = 5/43) of Jan-19 cases of recurrent hemolysis were due to lipemia (P < 0.01). Chart review highlighted a potential source of lipemia from the administration of propofol, a lipophilic sedative emulsion. Of those COVID positive cases with recurrent hemolysis due to lipemia (n = 15/30), 93% (n = 14/15) were receiving propofol at the time of collection (P < 0.001). Conclusion We observed increased rates of specimen hemolysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. While most hemolysis resolves upon specimen recollection, patients with recurrently hemolyzed specimens often require special specimen collection and handling protocols to mitigate hemolysis. Approximately half of the recurrent hemolysis cases in Jan 2022 were COVID-19 positive patients. Lipemia-induced hemolysis was also more frequent in this patient population presumably due to the administration of propofol, a lipophilic emulsion sedative commonly used for COVID positive patients requiring sedation and ICU-level care. It is critical to understand the variety of factors which may contribute to recurrent hemolysis, as intervening with specialized collection and handling protocols to reduce observed pre-analytical hemolysis is required to provide accurate and timely laboratory results.

Abstract Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is used to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and to manage lipid-lowering therapy. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin (type 9) serine protease (PCSK9) inhibitors decrease LDL-C by up to 70% when used in conjunction with statins. Due to cost, insurance companies restrict their use. To be eligible for PCSK9 therapy, a patient must have pre-existing ASCVD and LDL-C > 70 mg/dL, while on a maximally tolerated dose of statins. Most clinical laboratories calculate LDL-C by the Friedewald Equation (FWLDL-C), which utilizes results from the standard lipid panel (total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)). However, this often leads to an underestimation of LDL-C, especially when TG concentrations are elevated. More accurate equations have recently been developed, such as the Martin (MLDL-C), Sampson-NIH (SLDL-C) and extended Martin (ext-MLDL-C) equations. Using LDL-C determined by the beta-quantification reference method (BQ), we developed the following enhanced version of the Sampson-NIH Equation (eSLDL-C), which includes apoB as an independent variable: eSLDL-C = TC/1.15-(HDL-C)/1.25-TG/6.98-(TG × NonHDL-C)/1115 + TG2/8903.23 + (TG × ApoB)/1237 + ApoB/4.54–4.73 Methods Results for clinically ordered ApoB, BQ, and lipid panels were used. To test the accuracy of the various equations, we compared BQLDL-C to FWLDL-C, MLDL-C, extMLDL-C, SLDL-C and eSLDL-C by regression analysis (N = 12 101, TG < 800). Accuracy of each equation was compared to the BQ reference method for classifying patients (LDL-C ≤ 150, n = 9374) as either being below or above the 70 mg/dL treatment decision threshold for PCSK9 therapy. Results The eSLDL-C equation performed substantially better than the other equations for estimating low LDL-C (BQLDL-C ≤ 100 mg/dL, TG 5–800 mg/dL, n = 4115), with a mean absolute difference (MAD) of 3.80 mg/dL (compared to SLDL-C: 6.05; FWLDL-C: 8.71; MLDL-C: 6.43; extMLDL-C: 6.39). It also had the best overall normalized Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient (nMCC) for the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients that are above the 70 mg/dL treatment threshold (eSLDL-C-94.7% (92.2% spec, 98.5% sen), SLDL-C-90.7% (94.8% spec, 95.5% sen), FWLDL-C-88.2% (98.0% spec, 92.7% sen), MLDL-C-90.3% (88.9% spec, 96.5% sen), and extMLDL-C-90.1% (88.4% spec, 96.5% sen)). In our dataset with 1125 subjects being below the 70 mg/dL threshold by BQLDL-C, FWLDL-C misclassified an additional 601 subjects below this threshold (Negative Predictive Value 65%). MLDL-C and extMLDL-C misclassified 289 subjects falsely low, whereas eSLDL-C only has 126 subjects falsely classified lower than the 70 mg/dL threshold. Conclusion We show that the enhanced Sampson-NIH equation, which includes apoB, estimates low LDL-C more accurately than other equations. The use of the new equation would improve access to those patients who might benefit from PCSK9 therapy but have falsely low LDL-C by the FWLDL-C equation or other LDL-C equations. The new equation is also more specific than the MLDL-C and extMLDL-C equations and would, therefore, also reduce the overutilization of PCSK9 therapy by these particular equations for those patients who do not require it, according to the reference BQ method and current guidelines.

Abstract Background Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic (ASCVD) events and associates with aortic stenosis. Accurate immunochemical measurement of Lp(a) is complicated by heterogeneity of Lp(a) molecular size. The objective of this study was to validate the analytical performance of an electrophoretic assay for measurement of ApoB-containing lipoprotein particles including Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P and to compare results to other standard clinical methods. Method Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P were quantified by electrophoretic serum separation followed by immuno-staining with an ApoB antibody using the SPIFE Touch (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX). Stability was evaluated by comparison to results at time zero (n = 10). Precision was assessed by 5 measurements twice daily for five days. Limit of quantitation (LoQ) was determined by 20 replicate measurements. Linearity was assessed by mixing high and low concentrations at various ratios. Accuracy was assessed by split sample comparison (n = 126) with Helena Laboratories. Lp(a)-P and LDL-P results were compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using a Bruker Ascend 600 NMR (Bruker, Billerica, MA) with AXINON software (numares, AG, Regensberg, Germany) (n = 114). Lp(a)-P is included with LDL-P by NMR. Therefore, the SPIFE Lp(a)-P + LDL-P was compared to NMR LDL-P. SPIFE Lp(a)-P was compared directly to Roche cobas c501 Lp(a) immunoassay calibrated to molar units (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) (n = 126). Results The analytical performance of Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P measured on the SPIFE Touch met all acceptance criteria. Bias to the reference method was <20% with R2 > 0.98. All analytes were stable 14 days refrigerated and 14 days frozen. Lipoprotein particle measurements on SPIFE Touch correlated to those obtained by both NMR and Roche assays. Conclusion The analytical performance of the SPIFE Touch for measuring the concentration of ApoB-containing lipoproteins is acceptable. Further studies are needed to determine clinical implications and utility compared to NMR and Roche assays.

Abstract Background Diagnosis of neurosyphilis (NS) is challenging due to nonspecific clinical symptoms and the lack of a sensitive and specific laboratory test. The non-treponemal Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL-CSF) assay is a commonly used test in diagnosing NS. An important limitation of the VDRL-CSF is limited specificity, in part due to the inability to differentiate between intrathecally produced antibodies vs passive antibody diffusion into the CSF due to blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption. Here, we compared the intrathecal synthesis antibody index (AI) of anti-Treponema pallidum IgG antibodies to results from the VDRL-CSF assay in routinely submitted clinical samples for evaluation of suspected NS. Methods Paired serum and CSF residual clinical samples from 98 patients with previous VDRL-CSF results were collected. For each pair, the serum and CSF were drawn within 24 h. No additional clinical information and limited supporting clinical test results were available. Thirty-one positive and 67 negative paired samples were tested by an anti-T. pallidum IgG ELISA (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). The AI was calculated using Reiber’s method, with intrathecal total IgG synthesis corrected using the Reiber recommended albumin quotient calculation. Results were compared for positive, negative and overall agreement between methods. Results The anti-T. pallidum AI showed a positive, negative and overall agreement of 71.0% (22/31), 100% (67/67) and 90.8% (89/98), respectively, compared to VDRL-CSF. Of note, all nine discordant samples showed abnormally elevated albumin levels in CSF (range: 27.4 to 215 mg/dl; median = 41.7 mg/dl; normal value =<27 mg/dl), indicating a compromised BBB which likely resulted in false-positive VDRL-CSF results. The range and median value for CSF albumin in the 22 concordant samples was 12.4 to 168 mg/dl and 37.2 mg/dl, respectively. In total, 83.9% (26/31) of VDRL-CSF positive samples showed elevated CSF albumin levels which suggests a high percentage of BBB impairment in this patient population. This demonstrates the advantage in specificity that is offered by AI testing compared to use of the VDRL-CSF assay, given the ability of AI to differentiate intrathecally produced vs passively diffused syphilis-specific antibodies. No potential increase in sensitivity was observed in AI testing as 100% negative agreement was obtained. Conclusion Our data suggests that establishment of an AI using a treponemal assay to detect intrathecal antibody synthesis provides improved specificity compared to the current commonly performed VDRL-CSF antibody test as an aid in the diagnosis of NS. Further evaluation of sensitivity is warranted using samples from patients with clinically diagnosed NS.

Abstract Background Ma-2 is a neuronal nucleolar protein with purported involvement in RNA transcription and apoptosis regulation. Patients with Ma2 antibodies present with autoimmune encephalitis (limbic or brainstem). Ma-2 antibodies are a high-risk marker for paraneoplastic neurologic cause for autoimmune encephalitis (>75% of patients having either testicular cancer or non-small cell lung cancer). In older patients, there is a higher frequency of small cell lung cancer or other cancers especially when Ma 1 antibodies are also detected. Identification of Ma2 antibodies is important to help diagnose autoimmune encephalitis, guide the cancer search and aid treatment selection. The objective of this study was to develop and document the performance of a qualitative enzymatically amplified sandwich-type Ma2 Antibody ELISA. Methods The Ma2 ELISA was produced in-house utilizing commercially available protein and was performed on a Hamilton Star liquid handling instrument equipped with a plate washer and plate reader. Each assay plate included patient samples along with 3 independent negative serum calibrators and 4 quality controls (Both positive and negative controls per matrix [CSF or serum]) each tested in duplicate. Mean optical densities (OD) for patient specimens were compared to the average OD of the negative serum calibrators to generate a ratio. A ratio cut-off of 8 was selected for reporting positivity based on preliminary studies and was validated during the method performance assessment. To assess assay performance we measured precision (3 positive pools at or above the cut-off ratio for each specimen type were tested 20 times in one assay and in duplicate across 10 independent assays), accuracy comparing to the current reference method at Athena® Diagnostics (N = 10 positives / 40 negatives), analytical specificity (20 samples with high titer autoantibodies directed against other proteins), and the impact of common interferences (lipids, bilirubin, hemolysate were spiked into 2 positive and 1 negative sample per interference). Clinical performance of the assay for differentiating healthy donors without disease (N = 140) and those with non-Ma2 neurological autoimmunity (N = 23) from those with clinical phenotypes consistent with Ma-2 associated encephalitis (N = 8) was measured. Results Serum intra-assay imprecision (coefficient of variation; %CV) ranged from 3.0–6.5%. Inter-assay imprecision ranged from 21–29%. CSF intra-assay imprecision ranged from 3.5–10%. Inter-assay imprecision ranged from 13–15.5%. Accuracy was assessed via qualitative comparison to a reference method [western blot or nanoliter scale immunoassay]. There was perfect agreement between methods. To assess analytical specificity, samples with high concentrations of immunoglobulins (hypergammaglobulinemia [N = 10] or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [N = 10]) were tested in serum (and spiked into CSF); all were negative. Interference studies were conducted on 2 positive Ma2 serum and CSF samples, spiked for highly hemolytic (1000 mg/dL), lipemic (2000 mg/dL) and icteric (60 mg/dL) conditions. All samples remained positive under given interferents. A negative sample was tested for each matrix, both remained negative. Clinical specificity was 100% with all samples from patients without Ma-2 encephalitis testing negative (N = 183). All ELISA positives identified in this study had phenotypes consistent with Ma-2 autoimmune encephalitis (N = 8). Conclusion The performance of the Ma2 ELISA was acceptable for clinical laboratory implementation.

Hyponatraemia on hospital admission is associated with increased length of stay, healthcare expenditures and mortality. Urine studies collected before fluid or diuretic administration are essential to diagnose the underlying cause of hyponatraemia, thereby empowering admitting teams to employ the appropriate treatment. A multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) team led by internal medicine residents performed a QI project from July 2020 through June 2021 to increase the rate of urine studies collected before fluid or diuretic administration in the emergency department (ED) in patients admitted with moderate to severe hyponatraemia. We implemented two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles to address this goal. In PDSA Cycle #1, we displayed an educational poster in employee areas of the ED and met with nursing staff at their monthly meetings to communicate the project and answer questions. We also obtained agreement from ED attending physicians and nursing leaders to support the project. In PDSA Cycle #2, we implemented a structural change in the nursing triage process to issue every patient who qualified for bloodwork with a urine specimen container labelled with a medical record number on registration so that the patient could provide a sample at any point, including while in the waiting area. After PDSA Cycle #1, urine specimen collection increased from 34.5% to 57.5%. After PDSA Cycle #2, this increased further to 59%. We conclude that a combination of educational and structural changes led to a significant increase in urine specimen collection before fluid or diuretic administration among patients presenting with moderate-to-severe hyponatraemia in the ED.

Objective To evaluate long-term effects of COVID-19 on auditory and vestibular symptoms in a diverse cohort impacted by the initial 2020 COVID-19 infection in the pandemic's epicenter, before vaccine availability. Study Design Cohort study of individuals with confirmed COVID-19 infection, diagnosed in the March–May 2020 infection wave. A randomized, retrospective chart review of 1,352 individuals was performed to identify those with documented new or worsening auditory (aural fullness, tinnitus, hyperacusis, hearing loss) or vestibular (dizziness, vertigo) symptoms. Those with documented symptoms (613 of the 1,352 initial cohort) were contacted for a follow-up telephone survey in 2021–2022 to obtain self-report of aforementioned symptoms. Setting Academic tertiary hospital system in Bronx, NY. Patients Adults 18 to 99 years old with confirmed COVID-19 infection, alive at time of review. One hundred forty-eight charts were excluded for restricted access, incomplete data, no COVID-19 swab, or deceased at time of review. Intervention Confirmed COVID-19 infection, March to May 2020. Main Outcomes Measures Auditory and vestibular symptoms documented in 2020 medical records and by self-report on 2021 to 2022 survey. Results Among the 74 individuals with documented symptoms during the first 2020 COVID-19 wave who participated in the 2021 to 2022 follow-up survey, 58% had documented vestibular symptoms initially in 2020, whereas 43% reported vestibular symptoms on the 2021 to 2022 survey (p = 0.10). In contrast, 9% had documented auditory symptoms initially in 2020 and 55% reported auditory symptoms on the 2021 to 2022 survey (p < 0.01). Conclusions COVID-19 may impact vestibular symptoms early and persistently, whereas auditory effects may have more pronounced long-term impact, suggesting the importance of continually assessing COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Carditis is a rare complication of Lyme disease and usually presents in the early dissemination phase, several weeks after exposure to a tick bite. Conduction abnormalities are the most common manifestation of Lyme carditis. The presentation can vary from atrioventricular conduction delay (first-degree atrioventricular conduction block) to life-threatening situations, such as a complete heart block. Although such manifestations occur late, our case report describes an interesting case where the patient developed a complete heart block in the setting of acute Lyme disease. An elevated IgM with negative IgG Lyme serology titer, an unusual finding, initially led us to face a diagnostic dilemma. Our suspicion of a tick bite was affirmed when we detected a positive titer for Babesia microti, an organism carried by the same tick and a common co-infection with Lyme disease. The patient improved with antibiotic therapy and temporary pacemaker support during the initial few days of admission.