Gorsh, Amy P.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spot (DBS) compared with conventional serum Aquaporin‐4‐IgG (AQP4‐IgG) testing.MethodsProspective multicenter diagnostic study was conducted between April 2018 and October 2023 across medical centers in the United States, Uganda, and the Republic of Guinea. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and controls collected blood on filter paper cards along with concurrent serum samples. These samples underwent analysis using flow cytometric live‐cell‐based assays (CBA) and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine AQP4 serostatus. The accuracy of AQP4‐IgG detection between DBS and serum (gold standard) was compared.ResultsAmong 150 participants (47 cases, 103 controls), there was a strong correlation between DBS and serum samples (Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.82). The AUC was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–0.99). AQP4‐IgG detection through DBS showed 87.0% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.74–0.95) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 0.96–1.00) using CBA, and 65.2% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.43–0.84) and 95.2% specificity (95% CI: 0.76–0.99) using ELISA. Serum ELISA demonstrated 69.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) and 98.4% specificity (95% CI: 0.91–0.99). The stability of DBS in detecting AQP4‐IgG persisted over 24 months for most cases.InterpretationThe DBS represents a viable alternative for detecting AQP4‐IgG in resource‐limited settings to diagnose NMOSD, offering high sensitivity and specificity comparable to serum testing. Moreover, DBS has low shipping costs, is easy to administer, and is suitable for point‐of‐care testing.

Abstract Background Autoimmunity targeting GQ1b is associated with group of disorders that includes Miller-Fisher Syndrome (MFS), Bickerstaff Brainstem Encephalitis (BBE) and classic Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) with ophthalmoplegia. Collectively these are referred to as GQ1B-IgG related syndromes. The prevalence of GQ1b-IgG in this population of patients is high and has been reported to be >80% in well-defined clinical cohorts. Clinical phenotypic presentation is diverse and requires highly accurate antibody testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate a newly developed custom GQ1b-IgG assay, using a semi-quantitative ELISA-based method. Methods A GQ1b-IgG ELISA was developed and validated. Patient sera along with assay controls and a single-point calibrator are diluted and incubated in duplicate wells in a 96-well plate coated with GQ1b antigen. The plate is washed and incubated with anti-human-IgG secondary antibody conjugated with HRP. After a colorimetric reaction, optical densities (OD) are read. The OD of patient samples are compared against the calibrator, generating a cut-off index (COI). Samples ≥1.0 COI are considered positive. During the validation phase, analytical and clinical performance characteristics were evaluated. Studies included assessment of imprecision at multiple concentrations of GQ1b-IgG, accuracy using method comparison, analytical sensitivity and specificity, reference range, common interferences, plate drift, and clinical performance in relevant disease and control cohorts. Results Intra-assay imprecision (coefficient of variation; %CV) ranged from 1.0 - 16% across all concentrations of GQ1b-IgG. Inter-assay imprecision (%CV) ranged from 12.4 - 44.5% but was <20% at or above the assay cut-off. We found perfect qualitative agreement with an independent ELISA reference method (20 positive and 20 negative samples selected based on reference method results [reference interval <1:100]). Limit of detection (LOD) was calculated at a COI of 0.22. To assess analytical specificity, 40 samples with high concentrations of immunoglobulins (hypergammaglobulinemia [N=15], IgG M-protein [N=15] and systemic lupus erythematosus [N=10] were tested and all were negative. A reference interval study was performed on 140 healthy donor serums, all were negative. Interference studies were conducted on 2 positive and 2 negative serum samples, spiked for highly hemolytic (1000 mg/dL), lipemic (2000 mg/dL) and icteric (60 mg/dL) conditions. There was no impact on the assay even with high levels of a given interferent. Plate drift on 2 distinct patient pools tested across the plate (COI range 0.7 - 1.3) had overall plate CV’s ≤10%. ROC analysis was performed on a cohort of 278 patient samples (15 MFS cases and 263 controls [suspected demyelinating neuropathy or disease mimics]). A cut-off value of 1.0 (COI) was selected based on the Youden index. At this cut-off, clinical sensitivity for MFS was 87% while clinical specificity was 99.2%. Conclusions The observed performance of the GQ1b-IgG ELISA was acceptable for clinical laboratory implementation. A COI of ≥ 1.0 was selected for clinical use.

Abstract Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by disrupting the function of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at the neuromuscular junction. 85% of MG patients have autoantibodies targeting AChRs, while 6% of MG patients have autoantibodies targeting the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK). MuSK is located on the muscle membrane and is activated by the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) upon the binding with ligand Agrin. Activated MuSK undergoes autophosphorylation and stimulates downstream signaling to cluster AChRs, which is important for the formation and maintenance of neuromuscular synapses. IgG4 antibodies that bind MuSK are thought to directly disrupt the ability of MuSK to cluster AChR. The gold standard methodology for MuSK antibody testing is radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA) using anti-human IgG secondary antibodies. Performing RIA methods in the clinical laboratory is a burden due to radioactive biohazard concerns and the analytical limitations of these assays. This study is to assess the analytical and clinical performance of a live cell-based flow cytometry assay as a potential replacement for the MuSK RIA. Methods HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with a vector co-expressing human MuSK protein and GFP. Patient sera were incubated with a mix of HEK293 cells (GFP-positive cells that express MuSK protein on the cell surface and GFP-negative cells that do no express MuSK) followed by incubation with anti-human IgG4 secondary antibody conjugated with alexa fluor 647 (AF647). An IgG binding index (IBI) was calculated for each sample as the ratio of the median AF647 fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the MuSK-expressing cells (GFP+) to the MFI of the non-MuSK expressing cells (GFP-). An arbitrary positive IBI cut-off of 2.0 was selected. A preliminary assessment of assay imprecision was performed for the flow cytometry assay, as well as a method comparison study to compare this assay to RIA utilizing a cohort of 130 (34 positive and 96 negative) residual samples previously tested by the gold-standard assay. 133 disease control samples were also tested to assess the clinical specificity of the flow cytometry-based assay. Results To assess the imprecision, eight samples with varying IBIs were tested with 5 replicates in each assay over five days. The coefficient of variation (CV) for intra-assay replicates ranged from 1% to 7% for all samples, while CV for inter-assay replicates ranged from 2% to 15%. Based on the 130 samples previously tested by RIA, the Positive Percentage Agreement (PPA) between these two assays was 76.5% and the negative Percentage Agreement (NPA) was 100%. Of the discordant samples (n=8), clinical information was available for only 1 sample (positive by RIA, negative by flow). This patient had a final non-MG diagnosis (ALS). All control samples were negative on the flow cytometry-based assay. Conclusions The live cell-based flow cytometry MuSK IgG4 assay demonstrated encouraging preliminary analytical performance that warrants further development and validation.

Abstract Background Ma-2 is a neuronal nucleolar protein with purported involvement in RNA transcription and apoptosis regulation. Patients with Ma2 antibodies present with autoimmune encephalitis (limbic or brainstem). Ma-2 antibodies are a high-risk marker for paraneoplastic neurologic cause for autoimmune encephalitis (>75% of patients having either testicular cancer or non-small cell lung cancer). In older patients, there is a higher frequency of small cell lung cancer or other cancers especially when Ma 1 antibodies are also detected. Identification of Ma2 antibodies is important to help diagnose autoimmune encephalitis, guide the cancer search and aid treatment selection. The objective of this study was to develop and document the performance of a qualitative enzymatically amplified sandwich-type Ma2 Antibody ELISA. Methods The Ma2 ELISA was produced in-house utilizing commercially available protein and was performed on a Hamilton Star liquid handling instrument equipped with a plate washer and plate reader. Each assay plate included patient samples along with 3 independent negative serum calibrators and 4 quality controls (Both positive and negative controls per matrix [CSF or serum]) each tested in duplicate. Mean optical densities (OD) for patient specimens were compared to the average OD of the negative serum calibrators to generate a ratio. A ratio cut-off of 8 was selected for reporting positivity based on preliminary studies and was validated during the method performance assessment. To assess assay performance we measured precision (3 positive pools at or above the cut-off ratio for each specimen type were tested 20 times in one assay and in duplicate across 10 independent assays), accuracy comparing to the current reference method at Athena® Diagnostics (N = 10 positives / 40 negatives), analytical specificity (20 samples with high titer autoantibodies directed against other proteins), and the impact of common interferences (lipids, bilirubin, hemolysate were spiked into 2 positive and 1 negative sample per interference). Clinical performance of the assay for differentiating healthy donors without disease (N = 140) and those with non-Ma2 neurological autoimmunity (N = 23) from those with clinical phenotypes consistent with Ma-2 associated encephalitis (N = 8) was measured. Results Serum intra-assay imprecision (coefficient of variation; %CV) ranged from 3.0–6.5%. Inter-assay imprecision ranged from 21–29%. CSF intra-assay imprecision ranged from 3.5–10%. Inter-assay imprecision ranged from 13–15.5%. Accuracy was assessed via qualitative comparison to a reference method [western blot or nanoliter scale immunoassay]. There was perfect agreement between methods. To assess analytical specificity, samples with high concentrations of immunoglobulins (hypergammaglobulinemia [N = 10] or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [N = 10]) were tested in serum (and spiked into CSF); all were negative. Interference studies were conducted on 2 positive Ma2 serum and CSF samples, spiked for highly hemolytic (1000 mg/dL), lipemic (2000 mg/dL) and icteric (60 mg/dL) conditions. All samples remained positive under given interferents. A negative sample was tested for each matrix, both remained negative. Clinical specificity was 100% with all samples from patients without Ma-2 encephalitis testing negative (N = 183). All ELISA positives identified in this study had phenotypes consistent with Ma-2 autoimmune encephalitis (N = 8). Conclusion The performance of the Ma2 ELISA was acceptable for clinical laboratory implementation.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was one of the first therapeutic options available for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections and continues to be used selectively for immunosuppressed patients. Given the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants which are resistant to treatment with available monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy, CCP remains an important therapeutic consideration.

Longitudinal studies assessing durability of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) humoral immune response have generated conflicting results. This has been proposed to be due to differences in patient populations, the lack of standardized methodologies, and the use of assays that measure distinct aspects of the humoral response.