Citations

ImportanceFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is relatively rare, behavioral and motor symptoms increase travel burden, and standard neuropsychological tests are not sensitive to early-stage disease. Remote smartphone-based cognitive assessments could mitigate these barriers to trial recruitment and success, but no such tools are validated for FTLD.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of smartphone-based cognitive measures for remote FTLD evaluations.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cohort study conducted from January 10, 2019, to July 31, 2023, controls and participants with FTLD performed smartphone application (app)–based executive functioning tasks and an associative memory task 3 times over 2 weeks. Observational research participants were enrolled through 18 centers of a North American FTLD research consortium (ALLFTD) and were asked to complete the tests remotely using their own smartphones. Of 1163 eligible individuals (enrolled in parent studies), 360 were enrolled in the present study; 364 refused and 439 were excluded. Participants were divided into discovery (n = 258) and validation (n = 102) cohorts. Among 329 participants with data available on disease stage, 195 were asymptomatic or had preclinical FTLD (59.3%), 66 had prodromal FTLD (20.1%), and 68 had symptomatic FTLD (20.7%) with a range of clinical syndromes.ExposureParticipants completed standard in-clinic measures and remotely administered ALLFTD mobile app (app) smartphone tests.Main Outcomes and MeasuresInternal consistency, test-retest reliability, association of smartphone tests with criterion standard clinical measures, and diagnostic accuracy.ResultsIn the 360 participants (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [15.4] years; 209 [58.1%] women), smartphone tests showed moderate-to-excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.77-0.95). Validity was supported by association of smartphones tests with disease severity (r range, 0.38-0.59), criterion-standard neuropsychological tests (r range, 0.40-0.66), and brain volume (standardized β range, 0.34-0.50). Smartphone tests accurately differentiated individuals with dementia from controls (area under the curve [AUC], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96]) and were more sensitive to early symptoms (AUC, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.88]) than the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (AUC, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]) (z of comparison, −2.49 [95% CI, −0.19 to −0.02]; P = .01). Reliability and validity findings were highly similar in the discovery and validation cohorts. Preclinical participants who carried pathogenic variants performed significantly worse than noncarrier family controls on 3 app tasks (eg, 2-back β = −0.49 [95% CI, −0.72 to −0.25]; P < .001) but not a composite of traditional neuropsychological measures (β = −0.14 [95% CI, −0.42 to 0.14]; P = .32).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that smartphones could offer a feasible, reliable, valid, and scalable solution for remote evaluations of FTLD and may improve early detection. Smartphone assessments should be considered as a complementary approach to traditional in-person trial designs. Future research should validate these results in diverse populations and evaluate the utility of these tests for longitudinal monitoring.

AbstractBackgroundGiven the rarity of genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD), researchers across the world have come together to form the FTD Prevention Initiative (FPI) in an effort to improve prevention trials design. As this initiative begins to bring together large‐scale data from worldwide cohort series, including ALLFTD in North America and GENFI in Europe and Canada, it is critical for FPI to quantify the level of relatedness between all participants. Here we provide the most recent update to these ongoing analyses.MethodsGenome‐wide SNP genotyping data from 1,684 ALLFTD and 568 GENFI participants was used to perform lineage analyses using PLINK. Briefly, QC was performed similarly in all datasets to remove individuals with low call rate and filter autosomal SNPs for missingness, frequency, and deviation from Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium. Genetic ancestry was inferred by projecting genotyped samples into the principal components of the 1000 Genomes reference panel, using R package bigsnpr. Overlapping ALLFTD and GENFI genotyping data was then used, in a two‐stage approach, to calculate pairwise identity‐by‐descent (IBD) estimates and KING coefficients, followed by family‐network identification and pedigree reconstruction using PRIMUS.ResultsFirst, we calculated IBD estimates among all participants by restricting pairs to those with estimates>0.1875 (up to second‐degree relatives). Overall, we identified a total of 292 second‐degree family networks, including 168 ALLFTD and 120 GENFI families, mostly associated with pathogenic variants in the 3 major FTD‐causing genes. We also identified 4 family networks with participants enrolled in both the ALLFTD and GENFI series, as well as several multi‐site families within the ALLFTD consortium. This first, overall approach allowed us to predict close relationships even between individuals with different ancestral backgrounds, including at least 4 confirmed admixed families. More distant relationships were also detected within ALLFTD and GENFI by performing ancestry‐based analysis among participants with estimated European ancestry, using the KING‐robust algorithm.ConclusionsThese lineage analyses allowed us to identify, otherwise unknown, close (and distant) relatives from different study sites, as well as within the ALLFTD and GENFI series. This dataset will be a crucial resource to increase statistical accuracy and power in upcoming collaborative FPI studies.

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to assess axonal integrity in MAPT mutation carriers and early white matter (WM) neurodegeneration in asymptomatic carriers using traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements, i.e., fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI).MethodWe included available multi‐shell diffusion MRI data from 21 MAPT mutation carriers (16 asymptomatic; 5 symptomatic) and 31 non‐carrier family members as controls from the ALLFTD consortium. We used linear mixed‐effect models to assess WM abnormalities measured with FA and MD, neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), combined across hemispheres. Separate models were conducted in all MAPT mutation carriers relative to controls while accounting for relatedness and age, then in symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers relative to controls. ComBat was used to harmonize data across sites.ResultIn models contrasting all MAPT carriers versus controls, WM alterations involved the cingulum bundle (FA, ODI), fronto‐temporal, entorhinal (FA, MD, NDI), and the inferior temporal WM (FA) after correcting for multiple comparisons (Fig. 1). In models contrasting symptomatic and asymptomatic MAPT carriers versus controls, symptomatic carriers had widespread involvement of the fronto‐temporal WM including the cingulum (FA, ODI), entorhinal (MD, FA, NDI), amygdala (MD, NDI) and inferior temporal (FA) areas after correcting for multiple comparisons. Asymptomatic carriers showed higher entorhinal MD and lower inferior temporal and cingulum FA relative to controls, and a more widespread pattern of higher ODI involved the medial temporal, superior temporal and occipital WM as well as long association and projection fibers including the internal capsule, cingulate bundle and fronto‐occipital fasciculi, although they were not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.ConclusionTraditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements revealed some extent of overlap as well as divergences in patterns of WM abnormalities, indicating axonal loss is a feature of neurodegeneration in MAPT mutation carriers. Our results suggest that traditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements may have different sensitivities to WM alterations in MAPT mutation carriers, and that axon‐based metrics, particularly ODI measurements, may be more sensitive to the early WM involvement during the asymptomatic stage of the disease.

AbstractBackgroundGenetic mutations causative of familial fronto‐temporal lobar degeneration (f‐FTLD) are highly predictive of a specific proteinopathy, but there exists substantial inter‐individual variability in their system‐level pathophysiology, which can be assessed with 18Fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET). Determining data‐driven patterns of network degeneration suggestive of underlying specific FTLD‐related genetic mutations is paramount to guide complex clinical decision making supported by the quantification of FDG‐PET.MethodWe collected clinical and FDG‐PET data from 39 patients with f‐FTLD, including 11 carrying the C9orf72 hexanucleotide expansion (1 asymptomatic, 9 with a predominant behavioral phenotype, 1 with a predominant language phenotype), 12 carrying a GRN mutation (1 asymptomatic, 7 behavioral, 4 language), and 16 carrying a MAPT mutation (6 asymptomatic, 10 behavioral). We performed a spectral covariance decomposition analysis between FDG‐PET images to yield latent patterns reflective of a distribution of metabolism opposing poles of relative hyper‐ and hypo‐metabolism across the entire brain (“eigenbrains” or EBs). We then conducted linear discriminant analyses (LDAs) to perform EB‐based multiclass predictions of genetic mutation and clinical phenotype.ResultThe spectral decomposition analysis yielded five eigenbrains, which explained 58.79% of the covariance between FDG‐PET images (Fig. 1). Gradients indicative of relative hypometabolism in left fronto‐temporo‐parietal areas distinguished GRN mutation carriers from other genetic mutations (EB1, EB2, EB4) and were associated with clinical phenotypes predominantly involving language (EB1, EB2, EB3). Conversely, those indicative of relative hypometabolism in prefrontal areas (EB3) and temporopolar areas (EB2) with a right hemispheric predominance were mostly associated with clinical phenotypes predominantly involving behavior/personality, and EB2 distinguished MAPT mutation carriers from other genetic mutations. The LDAs yielded accuracies of 80% and 75% in predicting genetic status and predominant clinical phenotype, respectively (Fig. 2).ConclusionFive EBs explained a high proportion of covariance in patterns of network degeneration across FTLD‐related genetic mutations. These EBs contained information relevant to the system‐level physiology associated with FTLD‐related pathogenic mechanisms and that allowed the prediction of clinical phenotype with relatively high accuracy. This supports the utility of FDG‐PET to guide the development of tools supporting clinical decision making and ongoing efforts to develop network‐based biomarkers to track disease progression and risk of phenoconversion in f‐FTLD.

AbstractBackgroundTMEM106B, a lysosomal trafficking protein, is an important genetic susceptibility risk factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). In GRN mutation carriers, minor allele homozygosity in the TMEM106B rs1990622 SNP modulates the risk of FTLD. TMEM106B is often the main component of amyloid fibrils in FTLD with TDP43 aggregates. TMEM106B has been quantified in human brain specimens, but its role as a fluid biomarker is unknown. Here, we investigate the clinical value of CSF TMEM106B in FTLD.MethodsCSF TMEM106B was quantified with SOMAmer proteomics (v3.0, SomaLogic®) in an original cohort of C9orf72, GRN and MAPT symptomatic and asymptomatic mutation carriers and family non‐carrier controls, recruited through ALLFTD (n = 182), and a validation cohort of sporadic neuropathology‐confirmed FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP43, clinically‐diagnosed progressive supranuclear palsy – Richardson syndrome (PSP‐RS) and age‐matched controls (n = 96). CSF TMEM106B was correlated with disease severity, measured by the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration module global scores (CDR+NACC/FTLD); brain volume, measured with Bayesian linear mixed‐effect modeling, using age, sex and total‐intracranial volume‐corrected permutations with threshold‐free cluster enhancement; and CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) measured with Simoa. TMEM106B SOMAmer specificity was validated in cell culture overexpression systems and human brain specimens with high TMEM106B burden.ResultsIn both cohorts, there were no differences in CSF TMEM106B by sex, phenotype or neuropathological diagnosis, except for lower levels in PSP‐RS compared to controls (‐0.31 Log2‐fold change, p < 0.001). CSF TMEM106B did not correlate with age. Regardless of disease‐causing mutation, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with worse disease severity (Figure 1 and 2). CSF TMEM106B was lower in homozygous TMEM106B rs1990622 protective allelein C9orf2 and MAPT, but not in GRN mutation carriers (Figures 3). CSF TMEM106B showed a trend for inverse correlation with NfL in the whole sample (r = ‐0.135, p = 0.052), and correlated positively with left frontal volume in symptomatic FTLD mutation gene carriers (p < 0.05).ConclusionCSF TMEM106B is quantifiable in CSF in vivo. CSF TMEM106B levels are affected by an interaction of disease severity and FTLD and TMEM106B genotypes. Further work is needed to determine its value as a clinical biomarker.