Citations

Clear

50 citation(s) found for "Arora, Shilpkumar".

A Systematic Review of the Cardiovascular Manifestations and Outcomes in the Setting of Coronavirus-19 Disease
Thakkar, Samarthkumar , Arora, Shilpkumar , Jaswaney, Rahul , Faisaluddin, Mohammed, Shariff, Mariam , Barssoum, Kirolos , Patel, Harsh , Arora, Nirav , Jani, Chinmay , Patel, Kripa , Savani, Sejal, Mulpuru, Siva K. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Kumar, Ashish , Mulpuru, Siva, Shariff, Mariam , Kumar, Ashish , Din, Mohammad Ammad Ud , DeSimone, Christopher V.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology | December 1, 2020 | Volume: 14 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 117954682097719

10.1177/1179546820977196 | PMID 33312009 Get It

The impact of coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19), has been profound. Though COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, it has also been associated with a wide range of cardiovascular (CV) manifestations portending extremely poor prognosis. The principal hypothesis for CV involvement is through direct myocardial infection and systemic inflammation. We conducted a systematic review of the current literature to provide a foundation for understanding the CV manifestations and outcomes of COVID-19. PubMed and EMBASE databases were electronically searched from the inception of the databases through 27 April 2020. A second literature review was conducted to include major trials and guidelines that were published after the initial search but before submission. The inclusion criteria for studies to be eligible were case reports, case series, and observation studies reporting CV outcomes among patients with COVID-19 infection. This review of the current COVID-19 disease and CV outcomes literature revealed a myriad of CV manifestations with potential avenues for treatment and prevention. Future studies are required to understand on a more mechanistic level the effect of COVID-19 on the myocardium and thus provide avenues to improve mortality and morbidity.
Impact of catheter ablation for atrial flutter on mortality and hospital readmission rates in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Harsh , Gonzalez, J, Deshmukh, A, D'Hoit, B, Jani, Chinmay , Thakkar, Samarthkumar , Deshmukh, A D, Patel, R

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal | November 26, 2020 | Volume: 41 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0441 Get It

Abstract Background The effectiveness of catheter ablation as a management modality amongst patients with coexisting atrial flutter (AFL) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is scarcely studied. Methods Appropriate ICD 10 codes were applied to the 2016 and 2017 National Readmission Database (NRD) to isolate patients having coexistent AFL and HFrEF including who had undergone an ablation. All-cause mortality at the end of 1 year was used as a primary outcome. Readmission due to AFL, heart failure (HF) and other causes were secondary outcomes. The hazard ratios were generated using Cox regression analysis while the time to event analysis was demonstrated with the Kaplan Meier curves. Results Out of a total of 9966 patients with AFL and HFrEF, 1980 (24.79%) patients underwent catheter ablation. The primary outcome, all-cause mortality (2.8% vs. 4.6%, HR: 0.610, 95% CI: 0.460–0.808, p=0.001) at the end of 1 year was significantly lower. Significant difference was also noted amongst two groups when it came to secondary outcomes such as readmissions due to AFL (1.6% vs. 6.3%, HR: 0.247, 95% CI: 0.173–0.354, p<0.001), HF (8.2% vs. 11.4%, HR: 0.693, 95% CI: 0.587–0.819, p<0.001) and other causes (29.4% vs. 37.1%, HR: 0.735, 95% CI: 0.673–0.804, p<0.001) Conclusion Ablative intervention amongst AFL patients with concomitant HFrEF showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. It also leads to significant reductions in readmissions due to AFL, HF and other causes at the end of one year. Outcomes of AFL and HFrEF Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Utilization and procedural adverse outcomes associated with Watchman device implantation
Khalil, Fouad , Arora, Shilpkumar , Killu, Ammar M. , Egbe, Alexander C. , Kapa, Suraj , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Mohamad, Alkhouli, Friedman, Paul A. , Holmes, David R. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Mulpuru, Siva, Khalil, Fouad , Kapa, Suraj , Tripathi, Byomesh , DeSimone, Christopher V. , Noseworthy, Peter A. , Gersh, Bernard J.

Mayo Clinic

EP Europace | August 9, 2020 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 247-253

10.1093/europace/euaa219 | PMID 32929501 Get It

AbstractAims The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Watchman device [percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO)] has resulted in the widespread use of this procedure in many centres across the USA. We sought to estimate the nationwide utilization and frequency of adverse outcomes associated with Watchman device implantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Watchman device implantation peri-procedural complications and comparison of the results with the previous studies.Methods and results The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for all hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during the year 2016 with percutaneous LAAO during the same admission (ICD-10 code—02L73DK). The frequency of peri-procedural complications, including mortality, procedure-related stroke, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and pericardial effusion, was assessed. We compared the complication rates with the published randomized controlled trials and the European Watchman registry. An estimated 5175 LAAO procedures were performed in 2016. The majority of procedures was performed in males (59.1%), age ≥75 years (58.7%), and White (83.1%). The overall complication rate was 1.9%. The in-hospital mortality was 0.29%. Pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis was the most frequent complication (0.68%). Bleeding requiring transfusion was noted in 0.1% of device implants. The rates of post-procedure stroke and systemic embolism were 0% and 0.29%, respectively.Conclusion Percutaneous LAAO with the Watchman device in the USA is associated with low in-hospital complications and a similar safety profile to a recently published EWOLUTION cohort. The complication rates were lower than those reported in the major randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We report the frequency of peri-procedural complications of the LAAO using the Watchman device from the NIS database. We also compare the frequency of peri-procedural complications with the previously published RCTs and EWOLUTION cohort. Our findings are in concordance with findings from EWOLUTION cohort and compare favourably with RCTs.
Burden of Arrhythmia in Hospitalized HIV Patients
Abudan, Anas , Vaidya, Vaibhav, Tripathi, Byomesh , Egbe, Alexander , Arora, Shilpkumar , Sridhar, Haarini , DeSimone, Christopher V. , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , DeSimone, Christopher V , Noseworthy, Peter A. , DeSimone, Daniel C.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 16, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.159493215.58844465 Get It

Background: The improved life expectancy observed in patients living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection has made age-related cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias, a growing health concern. We describe the temporal trends in frequency of various arrhythmias and assess impact of arrhythmias on hospitalized HIV patients using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Methods and Results: Data on HIV-related hospitalizations from 2005 to 2014 were obtained from the NIS using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes. Data was further subclassified into hospitalizations with associated arrhythmias and those without arrhythmia. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were determined. Outcomes including in-hospital mortality, cost of care, and length of stay were extracted. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) was utilized for analysis. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of arrhythmias among hospitalized HIV patients. Among 2,370,751 HIV-related hospitalizations identified, the overall frequency of any arrhythmia was 3.01%. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most frequent arrhythmia (2110 per 100,000). The overall frequency of arrhythmias has increased over time by 108%, primarily due to a 132% increase in AF. Arrhythmias are more frequent among older males, lowest income quartile and non-elective admissions. Patients with arrhythmias had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (9.6%). In-hospital mortality among patients with arrhythmias has decreased over time by 43.8%. The cost of care and length of stay associated with arrhythmia-related hospitalizations were mostly unchanged. Conclusions: Arrhythmias are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized HIV patients. AF is the most frequent arrhythmia in hospitalized HIV patients.
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Shankar, Aditi , Patlolla, Sri Harsha , Prasad, Abhiram , Bell, Malcolm R. , Arora, Shilpkumar , Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani, Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani, Jaffe, Allan S. , Holmes, David R. , Barsness, Gregory W. , Dunlay, Shannon M. , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Harsha Patlolla, Sri , Prasad, Abhiram , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani, Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani, Gersh, Bernard J. , Jaffe, Allan S.

Mayo Clinic

ESC Heart Failure | April 2, 2020 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1234-1245

10.1002/ehf2.12652 | PMID 32239806 Get It

Abstract Aims The aim of this study is to evaluate the contemporary use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Methods and results A retrospective cohort of AMI-CS admissions using the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2014) was identified. Admissions with concomitant cardiac surgery or non-AMI aetiology for cardiogenic shock were excluded. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and temporal trends in cohorts with and without PAC use. In the non-PAC cohort, the use and outcomes of right heart catheterization was evaluated. Multivariable regression and propensity matching was used to adjust for confounding. During 2000–2014, 364 001 admissions with AMI-CS were included. PAC was used in 8.1% with a 75% decrease during over the study period (13.9% to 5.4%). Greater proportion of admissions to urban teaching hospitals received PACs (9.5%) compared with urban non-teaching (7.1%) and rural hospitals (5.4%); P < 0.001. Younger age, male sex, white race, higher comorbidity, noncardiac organ failure, use of mechanical circulatory support, and noncardiac support were independent predictors of PAC use. The PAC cohort had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.07 [95% confidence interval 1.04–1.10]), longer length of stay (10.9 ± 10.9 vs. 8.2 ± 9.3 days), higher hospitalization costs ($128 247 ± 138 181 vs. $96 509 ± 116 060), and lesser discharges to home (36.3% vs. 46.4%) (all P < 0.001). In 6200 propensity-matched pairs, in-hospital mortality was comparable between the two cohorts (odds ratio 1.01 [95% confidence interval 0.94–1.08]). Right heart catheterization was used in 12.5% of non-PAC admissions and was a marker of greater severity but did not indicate worse outcomes. Conclusions In AMI-CS, there was a 75% decrease in PAC use between 2000 and 2014. Admissions receiving a PAC were a higher risk cohort with worse clinical outcomes.
Short‐term outcomes associated with inpatient ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation
Sharma, Purnima , Tripathi, Byomesh , Naraparaju, Vamsidhar , Patel, Mayur , Bhagat, Abhishek, Yerasi, Charan , Kumar, Varun , Aujla, Parvir S., Lahewala, Sopan , Arora, Shilpkumar , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Tolat, Aneesh , Singh, Gagandeep

Mayo Clinic

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | March 20, 2020 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 444-455

10.1111/pace.13905 | PMID 32196697 Get It

AbstractBackgroundUtilization of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has steadily increased in recent years. Exploring short‐term outcomes is vital in health care planning and resource allocation.MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014 was queried using the ICD‐9 codes for VT (427.1) and catheter ablation (37.34) to identify study population. Incidence, causes of 30‐day readmission, in‐hospital complications as well as predictors of 30‐day readmissions, complications, and cost of care were analyzed.ResultsAmong 11 725 patients who survived to discharge after index admission for VT ablation, 1911 (16.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Paroxysmal VT was the most common cause of 30‐day readmission (39.51%). Dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), previous CABG, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic pulmonary disease, and anemia predicted increased risk of 30‐day readmissions. The overall in‐hospital complication rate was 8.2% with vascular and cardiac complications being the most common. Co‐existing CKD and CHF and the need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) predicted higher complication rates. Similarly increasing age, CKD, CHF, anemia, in‐hospital use of MCS or left heart catheterization, teaching hospital, and disposition to nursing facilities predicted higher cost.ConclusionApproximately one in six patients was readmitted after VT ablation, with paroxysmal VT being the most common cause of the readmission. A complication rate of 8.2% was noted. We also identified a predictive model for increased risk of readmission, complication, and factors influencing the cost of care that can be utilized to improve the outcomes related to VT ablation.
Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated With Readmissions After Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalizations
Kumar, Varun , Naraparaju, Vamsidhar , Sharma, Purnima , Arora, Shilpkumar , Wojtaszek, Ewelina , Gopalan, Radha , Siontis, Konstantinos C. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Tripathi, Byomesh , Atti, Varunsiri , Gersh, Bernard J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | September 19, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 19 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.119.013026 | PMID 31533511 Get It

Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide. Data regarding 30‐day readmission rates after discharge for atrial fibrillation remain poorly reported. Methods and Results The Nationwide Readmission Database (2010–2014) was queried using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) codes to identify study population. Incidence, etiologies of 30‐day readmission and predictors of 30‐day readmissions, and cost of care were analyzed. Among 1 723 378 patients who survived to discharge, 249 343 (14.4%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. Compared with the readmitted group, the nonreadmitted group had higher utilization of electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation. Atrial fibrillation was the most common cause of readmission (24.1%). Median time to 30‐day readmission was 13 days. Advancing age, female sex, and longer stay during index hospitalization predicted higher 30‐day readmissions, whereas private insurance, electrical cardioversion, catheter ablation, higher income, and elective admissions correlated with lower 30‐day readmission. Comorbidities such as heart failure, neurological disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver failure, coagulopathy, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, and electrolyte disturbance, correlated with increased 30‐day readmissions and cost burden. Trend analysis showed a progressive decline in 30‐day readmission rates from 14.7% in 2010 to 14.3% in 2014 ( P trend, <0.001). Conclusions Approximately 1 in 7 patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, with symptomatic atrial fibrillation being the most common cause. We identified a predictive model for increased risk of readmissions and treatment expense. Electrical cardioversion during index admission was associated with a significant reduction in 30‐day readmissions and service charges. The 30‐day readmissions correlated with a substantial rise in the cost of care.
Burden and trends of arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and its impact of mortality and resource utilization
Khan, Safi U. , Arora, Shilpkumar , Kumar, Varun , Naraparaju, Vamsidhar , Lahewala, Sopan , Sharma, Purnima , Jain, Varun , Shah, Mahek , Ram, Pradhum , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Khan, Safi , Kumar, Varun , Tripathi, Byomesh , Atti, Varunsiri , Patel, Brijesh D.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Arrhythmia | June 29, 2019 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 612-625

10.1002/joa3.12215 | PMID 31410232 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Arrhythmias are considered the main cause of mortality, however, there is paucity of data relating to trends of arrhythmia and associated outcomes in HCM patients.MethodsNationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2014 was analyzed. HCM related hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD9‐CM) code 425.1 and 425.11 in all diagnosis fields.ResultsOverall, there was an increase in number of hospitalizations related to arrhythmias among HCM patients from 7784 in 2003 to 8380 in 2014 (relative increase 10.5%, P < 0.001). The increase was most significant in patients ≥ 80 years and those with higher comorbidity burden. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most frequently occurring arrhythmia however atrial flutter (AFL) witnessed the highest rise during the study period. In general, there was a down trend in mortality with the greatest reduction occurring in patients with ventricular fibrillation/flutter (VF/VFL). The mean length of stay was higher if patients had arrhythmia, which led to increased cost of care from $16105 in 2003 to $19310 in 2014 (relative increase 22.9%, P < 0.001).ConclusionThere is overall decline in HCM related hospitalizations but rise in hospitalization among HCM patients with arrhythmias. HCM with arrhythmia accounts for significant inpatient mortality coupled with prolonged hospital stay and increased cost of care. However, there is an encouraging downtrend in the mortality most likely because of improved clinical practice, cardiac screening and primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in‐hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation
Patel, Nileshkumar, Kumar, Varun , Panakos, Andrew, Narayanan, Mahesh Anantha , Bhardwaj, Bhaskar , Arora, Shilpkumar , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Patel, Nileshkumar , Basir, Mir B. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Kini, Annapoorna , Sharma, Samin K. , Dangas, George , O’Neill, William W. , Alfonso, Carlos E., Patel, Nileshkumar J , Atti, Varunsiri , Kumar, Varun , Anantha Narayanan, Mahesh , Patel, Nish , Basir, Mir B , Cohen, Mauricio G , Kini, Annapoorna S , Sharma, Samin K , Dangas, George

Mayo Clinic

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | February 21, 2019 | Volume: 94 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 578-587

10.1002/ccd.28138 | PMID 30790415 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) is the initial rhythm in a third of in‐hospital cardiac arrest patients. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use remains poorly understood in this population.MethodsWe conducted an observational analysis of temporal trends in the utilization of MCS in VT/VF IHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Using multivariable analysis, we assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge.ResultsAmong 151,628 hospitalizations with VT/VF IHCA, 14,981 (9.9%) received MCS. Intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS (9.1%). From 2008 to 2014, there was significant increase in the utilization of MCS (8.7–11%; ptrend < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, there was 12‐fold increase and three‐fold increase in the utilization of PVAD and ECMO respectively; however, there was no significant change in the use of IABP. Over the seven‐year sample period, there was significant increase in the overall survival to hospital discharge (35.4–43.5%; ptrend < 0.0001). Survival to hospital discharge increased in both MCS and non‐MCS groups.ConclusionThere was significant increase in utilization of MCS after VT/VF IHCA during the study period. IABP was the most commonly utilized MCS. The survival to hospital discharge increased in the overall study population including both MCS and non‐MCS groups. Future studies are needed to identify patient population most likely to benefit from the use of MCS after VT/VF IHCA.
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Arora, Shilpkumar , Lahewala, Sopan , Kumar, Varun , Shantha, Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash , Stulak, John M., Gulati, Rajiv , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Prasad, Abhiram , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Prasad, Abhiram , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Gersh, Bernard J. , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | December 16, 2018 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 22 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.118.010193 | PMID 30571481 Get It

Background There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support ( MCS ) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐ LVAD MCS . There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P =0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. Conclusions In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.