Shantha, Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash

Background There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support ( MCS ) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐ LVAD MCS . There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P =0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. Conclusions In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.

Background Reducing readmission after catheter ablation ( CA ) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is important. Methods and Results We utilized National Readmission Data ( NRD ) 2010–2014. AF was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnostic code 427.31 in the primary field, while first CA of AF was identified via ICD‐9 ‐procedure code 37.34. Any admission within 30 or 90 days of index admission was considered a readmission. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to adjust for confounders. The primary outcomes were 30‐ and 90‐day readmissions and the secondary outcome was AF recurrence. In total, 1 128 372 patients with AF were identified from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2014. Of which 37 360 (3.3%) underwent CA . Patients aged ≥65 years and female sex were less likely to receive CA for AF . Overall, 10.9% and 16.5% of CA patients were readmitted within 30 and 90 days post‐CA, respectively. Most common causes of readmissions were arrhythmia ( AF , atrial flutter), heart failure, pulmonary causes (pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and bleeding complications (gastrointestinal bleed, intracranial hemorrhage). Patients with diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary artery disease ( CAD ), chronic pulmonary and kidney disease, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), female sex, length of stay ≥2 and disposition to the facility were prone to higher 30‐ and 90‐day readmissions post ‐CA . Predictors of increase in AF recurrence post‐ CA were female sex, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary disease, and length of stay ≥2. Trends of 90‐day readmission and AF recurrence were found to improve over the study period. Conclusions We identified several demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of CA in AF , and short‐term outcomes of the same, which could potentially help in the patient selection and improve outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundCatheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in‐hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in‐hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation–related outcomes.MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In‐hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD‐9‐CM) codes.ResultIn‐hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P‐trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17–1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29–3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures).ConclusionOur study noted a decline in AF ablation–related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.

Purpose: In aortic stenosis patients referred for surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR), the evidence of diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has been limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for AVR using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: We searched databases for all diagnostic studies of CCTA in patients referred for AVR, which reported diagnostic testing characteristics on patient-based analysis required to pool summary sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, and negative-likelihood ratio. Significant CAD in both CCTA and ICA was defined by >50% stenosis in any coronary artery, coronary stent, or bypass graft. Results: Thirteen studies evaluated 1498 patients (mean age, 74 y; 47% men; 76% transcatheter AVR). The pooled prevalence of significant stenosis determined by ICA was 43%. Hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated a summary area under curve of 0.96. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive-likelihood and negative-likelihood ratios of CCTA in identifying significant stenosis determined by ICA were 95%, 79%, 4.48, and 0.06, respectively. In subgroup analysis, the diagnostic profiles of CCTA were comparable between surgical and transcatheter AVR. Conclusions: Despite the higher prevalence of significant CAD in patients with aortic stenosis than with other valvular heart diseases, our meta-analysis has shown that CCTA has a suitable diagnostic accuracy profile as a gatekeeper test for ICA. Our study illustrates a need for further study of the potential role of CCTA in preoperative planning for AVR.

Background Sex‐specific effectiveness of rivaroxaban ( RIVA ), dabigatran ( DABI ), and warfarin in reducing myocardial infarction ( MI ), heart failure ( HF ), and all‐cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation are not known. We assessed sex‐specific associations of RIVA , DABI , or warfarin use with the risk of MI , HF , and all‐cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results Medicare beneficiaries (men: 65 734 [44.8%], women: 81 135 [55.2%]) with atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants formed the study cohort. Inpatient admissions for MI , HF , and all‐cause mortality were compared between the 3 drugs separately for men and women using 3‐way propensity‐matched samples. In men, RIVA use was associated with a reduced risk of MI admissions compared with warfarin use (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval ( CI ): 0.59 [0.38–0.91]), with a trend towards reduced risk compared with DABI use (0.67 [0.44–1.01]). In women, there were no significant differences in the risk of MI admissions across all 3 anticoagulants. In both sexes, RIVA use and DABI use were associated with reduced risk of HF admissions (men: RIVA ; 0.75 [0.63–0.89], DABI ; 0.81 [0.69–0.96]) (women: RIVA ; 0.64 [0.56–0.74], DABI ; 0.73 [0.63–0.83]) and all‐cause mortality (men: RIVA ; 0.66 [0.53–0.81], DABI ; 0.75 [0.61–0.93]) (women: RIVA ; 0.76 [0.63–0.91], DABI ; 0.77 [0.64–0.93]) compared with warfarin use. Conclusions RIVA use and DABI use when compared with warfarin use was associated with a reduced risk of HF admissions and all‐cause mortality in both sexes. However, reduced risk of MI admissions noted with RIVA use appears to be limited to men.