Citations

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of infections. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) followed predictable seasonal patterns, which have been recently disrupted. This study aimed to investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of RSV infection in patients with IBD compared with those without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX database to identify patients aged 18 years and older with IBD and SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort) during the 2022 and 2023 RSV seasons. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare patients with IBD but no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort). RESULTS: In the 2022 IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (mean age: 53.7 ± 17.6 years; 59% female; 77% White), the RSV infection risk was 0.47%, higher than 0.19% in the matched IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6). The risk was highest 30–60 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7–4.9), particularly in those aged 60 years and older (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3–4.5). The use of systemic corticosteroids (aOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1–4.6) or immune-modifying therapies (aOR: 3.9; 95% CI: 2–7.1) was associated with higher RSV infection risk. Similar trends were observed during the 2023 RSV season, with no significant differences in RSV-related hospitalizations. DISCUSSION: Adults with IBD have a higher risk of RSV infection after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly those receiving steroids or immune therapies. SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to the recent RSV infection surge in this population, warranting further research.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) before colonoscopy remains a common problem. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk factors associated with IBP. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies that assessed risk factors for IBP after adjustment and reported the data as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and pooled adjusted odds ratios for risk factors reported in ≥ 3 studies were constructed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four studies with 358,257 participants were included. We analyzed 48 unique risk factors. Sociodemographic predictors of IBP were Medicaid insurance, obesity, current tobacco use, age ≥ 65 years, Black race, low education level, male sex, and unmarried status. Comorbidity-related predictors of IBP were any psychiatric disease, cirrhosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3, poor functional status, constipation, diabetes, previous abdominopelvic surgery, and hematochezia. Medication-related predictors of IBP were tricyclic antidepressants, antidepressants, opioids, nontricyclic antidepressants, and calcium channel blockers. Preparation/procedure-related predictors of IBP were brown liquid rectal effluent, any incomplete bowel preparation (BP) intake, lack of split-dose BP, increased BP-to-defecation interval, any nonadherence to dietary instructions, increased BP-to-colonoscopy interval, any BP intolerance, previous IBP, and inpatient status. Although afternoon colonoscopy was a predictor of IBP, subgroup analysis of prospective studies revealed no significant association. DISCUSSION: Our meta-analysis focused on adjusted risk factors to provide precise estimates of the most important risk factors for IBP. Our findings could help develop a validated prediction model to identify high-risk patients for IBP, improve colonoscopy outcomes, reduce the need for repeat colonoscopies, and reduce associated healthcare costs.