Citations

BackgroundApolipoprotein E ɛ4 (APOE ɛ4) allele carrier status has been well established as a risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease. However, the specific influence of APOE ɛ4 allele status on cognitive and functional rates of decline in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is poorly understood. We examine the prospective association of APOE ɛ4 allele status on measures of cognitive and functional decline in subjects with amnestic MCI (aMCI).MethodsA total of 516 aMCI participants aged 55–90 years who received placebo or vitamin E from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study's MCI treatment trial were evaluated. During the 36‐month study period, neurocognitive and functional measures were collected. These measures were assessed over time for change and association with APOE ɛ4 status. Generalized Estimating Equations were performed to model each outcome measure over the study period.ResultsAPOE ɛ4 status had a significant impact on cognitive and functional decline on multiple measures; those who were APOE ɛ4 positive had significantly more rapid decline in performance on all cognitive and functional measures except Number Cancellation and Maze tracing (P < .05). The greatest decline was seen in global measures of cognition and function including the Clinical Diagnostic Rating scale, followed by the Mini‐Mental State Examination, Global Deterioration scale, and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale‐Cognitive Subscale.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that APOE ɛ4 genotype is predictive of increased general rates of decline with global measures of cognition and function most affected. With accelerated declines in common clinical trial primary efficacy measures, APOE ɛ4 status needs to be accounted for in treatment trials of MCI.

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be separated for prognostic purposes using gene expression profiling (GEP) into 2 subgroups: germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell phenotypes. However, GEP is impractical for routine clinical use, and immunophenotyping is an imperfect surrogate. Therefore, we studied the relationship between expression of the purported germinal center marker LMO2 and the presence of IGH-BCL2 fusions, BCL6 translocations, and LMO2 translocations. In addition, we investigated the usefulness of LMO2 expression as a marker of GCB subtype in DLBCL. Immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were successfully performed on 101 cases of de novo DLBCL that had been incorporated into a tissue microarray. There was a statistically significant association between IGH-BCL2 fusion and LMO2 protein expression (P = .02) but not between BCL6 translocations and LMO2 expression. LMO2 translocations were not identified. Although uncommon, all cases that had both IGH-BCL2 fusion and BCL6 translocations expressed LMO2. The findings suggest LMO2 as a potential marker for the GCB phenotype.