Harvey, Danielle

Importance Multidomain lifestyle interventions slow cognitive decline in at-risk older adults, but effects on cerebrovascular injury and whether any effect differs by age or across magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers remain unclear. Objectives To test whether a structured multidomain lifestyle intervention, vs a self-guided program, alters trajectories of cerebrovascular MRI markers and whether baseline diffusion MRI estimates subsequent vascular injury. Design, Setting, and Participants POINTER Imaging was a prespecified secondary imaging analysis of the US POINTER (US Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk) randomized clinical trial conducted at multiple US sites. Starting August 1, 2020, and continuing until March 1, 2023, all newly enrolled US POINTER trial participants who met criteria, including being 60 to 79 years of age and at increased risk for cognitive decline, were given the opportunity to enroll in POINTER Imaging. Annual MRIs were performed at baseline and up to 2 follow-up visits at 12 and 24 months. The imaging study ended May 14, 2025. Interventions Structured multidomain lifestyle arm (supervised exercise, dietary counseling, cognitive and social engagement, and health coaching) vs self-guided educational arm. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were cerebrovascular MRI markers of global white matter free water (FW), fractional anisotropy (FA), peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD), analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) index, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and incident cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Age-group analyses (<70 vs ≥70 years) were prespecified. Linear mixed-effects models tested time, intervention arm, age group, and interactions for continuous outcomes; logistic regression evaluated incident CMBs. All analyses were adjusted for sex, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking and were conducted for the evaluable population. Data were analyzed September 5 to December 11, 2025. Results For 959 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 68 (5) years, and 594 (61.9%) were female. A significant time × arm × age group interaction was observed for FW (β = 0.050; SE = 0.018; P = .006). In participants younger than 70 years, the structured intervention, compared with the self-guided intervention, attenuated the FW increase over time (β = −0.031; SE = 0.012; P = .009); no intervention arm difference was observed in participants aged 70 years or older (β = 0.019; SE = 0.014; P = .18). No intervention-related interactions were detected (eg, time × intervention arm interaction) for WMH (β = 0.002; SE = 0.016; P = .90), FA (β = 0.016; SE = 0.016; P = .30), PSMD (β = −0.011; SE = 0.021; P = .60), or ALPS (β = 0.006; SE = 0.021; P = .79). Overall, greater odds of incident CMBs were associated with higher baseline FW (odds ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.24-2.14]; P < .001) and PSMD (odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.08-1.81]; P < .001). Greater WMH progression was associated with higher baseline FW (β = 0.014; SE = 0.006; P = .02) and lower baseline FA (β = −0.018; SE = 0.006; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary imaging analysis of a randomized clinical trial, FW was the cerebrovascular MRI marker most responsive to lifestyle intervention in adults 60 to 70 years of age, showing attenuated small-vessel disease–related injury. Findings suggested greater microvascular benefit when intensive lifestyle intervention is implemented earlier in late life. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126

Abstract The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) recently celebrated its 20th anniversary, reflecting two decades of major contributions to Alzheimer's research through open data sharing and longitudinal multimodal assessments. This review synthesizes 122 high‐impact studies using ADNI data or biospecimens from 2023 to mid‐2025 to clarify mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Studies describe impairment of glymphatic clearance and the impact of cerebral small vessel disease, trajectories of amyloid beta and tau deposition, inflammation, metabolic disturbances, synaptic dysfunction, and neurodegeneration, leading to cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Multifactorial contributions from genetic and epigenetic influences, co‐pathologies and comorbidities, and mechanisms of resilience modulate disease progression. Finally, heterogeneity of clinical presentation and disease course is described in the context of multiple contributing factors, highlighting the complexity of AD. By integrating imaging, fluid biomarkers, genetics, and clinical measures, ADNI provides a comprehensive research dataset for unraveling mechanisms underlying AD progression.

Abstract INTRODUCTION To examine the generalizability of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker models in real‐world older adults, we examined AD biomarker relationships with cognition in two multicenter cohorts that differ with respect to recruitment approach and health risk factors but were matched on a variety of characteristics. METHODS We compared harmonized health and demographic data, AD and cerebrovascular biomarkers, and cognitive performance in the community‐recruited U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) Imaging substudy and a matched sample from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) which recruited primarily from academic specialty clinics. RESULTS Elevated β‐amyloid (Aβ) and tau were associated with cognitive performance in ADNI but not U.S. POINTER. Findings were consistent across different cohort matching schemes, and were not explained by discrepancies in vascular risk. DISCUSSION The role of Aβ and tau in cognitive performance may be reduced in real world samples compared to academic specialty clinics.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Remote neuropsychological testing can monitor brain health in individuals with or at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated acceptability and validity of the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) for remote administration. METHODS Non‐demented adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) completed the CBB in‐clinic under supervision, then remotely every six months, with annual in‐clinic reassessments. Groups included cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults with normal amyloid (CU Aβ−) or elevated amyloid (CU Aβ+), and individuals with mild cognitive impairment with or without amyloid (MCI Aβ+, MCI Aβ−). Performance was compared across contexts and longitudinal changes were examined. RESULTS At baseline, MCI Aβ+ participants performed worse than CU Aβ−. CBB performance was similar across contexts, with consistent group differences. Over time, MCI Aβ+ participants showed greater decline on remote CBB measures than CU Aβ− adults. DISCUSSION Remote unsupervised CBB assessments are valid, reliable, and sensitive to AD‐related cognitive impairment.

Importance Brain imaging biomarkers may (1) identify underlying mechanisms of intervention effects and (2) define brain characteristics of those most likely to benefit cognitively from the intervention. Objective To test whether (1) a lifestyle intervention is related to brain changes, (2) brain changes are correlated with intervention-specific cognition changes, and (3) brain imaging biomarkers provide information about who is likely to benefit from a lifestyle intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants In this randomized clinical trial, the POINTER Imaging study was an ancillary study of the 2-year, single-blind multicenter US POINTER clinical trial in which neuroimaging data were collected on eligible enrolled participants. The study was conducted from May 2019 to March 2023 (final follow-up, May 14, 2025). Participants were enrolled into the POINTER Imaging study following a standard procedure at 5 clinical sites in the US. Participant eligibility criteria included an age of 60 to 79 years, sedentary lifestyle, and suboptimal diet, plus at least 2 additional risk criteria for cognitive decline and no contraindications for neuroimaging. Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to receive the structured or self-guided intervention. Both interventions emphasized increased physical and cognitive activity, healthy nutrition, social engagement, and cardiovascular health monitoring, but they differed in intensity and accountability. Main Outcomes and Measures There were 4 primary imaging outcomes: global β-amyloid (Aβ) burden, tau burden in the entorhinal cortex (ERC), hippocampal (HC) volume, and white matter hyperintensity volume. The primary cognitive measure was a global cognitive composite. Results Among 1943 parent trial participants who were assessed for eligibility, 983 underwent at least 1 magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography scanning session. The mean (SD) age was 68.4 (5.2) years; 605 participants (61.5%) were female and 378 male (38.5%). Five hundred sixteen participants received the structured intervention and 467 the self-guided intervention. There were no intervention group differences in longitudinal cognitive or imaging outcomes. Intervention group differences were not associated with or moderated by Aβ status or accumulation. There was a negative association between change in ERC tau and change in global cognition in the self-guided group that was attenuated in the structured group (difference in association: 0.289; 95% CI, 0.029 to 0.550; interaction P = .03). Lower baseline HC volume was associated with greater cognitive benefit for participants in the structured group vs the self-guided group (lower HC: 0.077 SD; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.132; higher HC: 0.002 SD; 95% CI, −0.037 to 0.041; interaction P = .03). Conclusion and Relevance This study found that a high-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention did not affect brain biomarker trajectories and was not associated with Aβ pathology, but older adults with specific at-risk brain characteristics, including lower baseline HC volume, showed a greater cognitive benefit of the structured intervention. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126

Abstract Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to pose a major public health challenge. Since its launch in 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has played a pivotal role in advancing the field by providing a comprehensive, open‐access, longitudinal dataset that integrates neuroimaging, biomarker, genetic, and clinical data related to AD. We used standard literature search methods to identify ∼1830 publications from 2023 to mid‐2025 that used ADNI data or samples. This review highlights key ADNI studies with direct clinical applications. We describe how these have impacted the development and validation of plasma biomarkers, improved clinical trials, assessed AD therapies, and developed methods for diagnosis and prediction using clinical, fluid, and imaging biomarkers. These contributions are underlain by an improved understanding of biological mechanisms of disease progression in AD and highlight ADNI's central role in advancing translational research and accelerating progress toward more effective, individualized care for patients with AD.

Abstract Background Extensive evidence links cognition, tau, and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, in U.S. POINTER imaging (a community‐recruited clinical trial cohort selected for high cardiovascular risk, ethnoracial diversity, and increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia) tau PET is more closely linked to cognition than in ADNI. Here, we further explore how ADNI and POINTER differ with respect to relationships between cross‐sectional AD biomarkers, cortical thickness, and different cognitive domains. Method U.S. POINTER imaging (Baseline; N = 775; 68.9±5.2 years, 62.8% female) and ADNI ( N = 405; 69.9±5.4 years, 58% female) were matched by age, sex, clinical status, and APOE4 genotype (Table 1). We examined associations between baseline AD biomarkers (Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) PET in centiloids, harmonized tau PET measures of MK6240 in POINTER and FTP in ADNI), regional cortical thickness, and verbal memory (Delayed Story Recall), executive function (Trail‐Making B), and global cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite scores) across each cohort, controlling for age, sex, and education. Result Aβ burden in ADNI was associated with worse executive function ( p < .001) and global cognition ( p < .001) but not memory, whereas in POINTER Aβ burden was not associated with any cognitive domain (Figure 1A). Among Aβ+ individuals, tau burden was associated with poorer performance across domains in ADNI, but only with poorer verbal memory in POINTER (Figures 1B&1C). Additionally, there were stronger positive associations between cortical thickness and executive function and global cognition compared to verbal memory, particularly in ADNI Aβ+ individuals even after adjusting for entorhinal tau ( p < .01; Figure 2). Conclusion Cognitive performance was linked to all biomarkers (Aβ, tau, cortical thickness) but these associations were consistently stronger in ADNI compared to POINTER, particularly in Aβ+ individuals. The stronger thickness‐cognition relationships in ADNI were not driven by tau, indicating that there is a tau‐independent role of thickness in explaining cognition. In ADNI, there were subtle differences between cognitive domains such that executive function was more closely linked than verbal memory to Aβ and cortical thickness, whereas verbal memory was linked to tau in both cohorts. Our study highlights that frequently‐reported AD biomarker associations may be attenuated in heterogeneous, community‐recruited cohorts.

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.

Abstract The overall goal of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is to optimize and validate biomarkers for clinical trials while sharing all data and biofluid samples with the global scientific community. ADNI has been instrumental in standardizing and validating amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. ADNI data were used for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Fujirebio and Roche Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic tests. Additionally, ADNI provided data for the trials of the FDA‐approved treatments aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. More than 6000 scientific papers have been published using ADNI data, reflecting ADNI's promotion of open science and data sharing. Despite its enormous success, ADNI has some limitations, particularly in generalizing its data and findings to the entire US/Canadian population. This introduction provides a historical overview of ADNI and highlights its significant accomplishments and future vision to pioneer “the clinical trial of the future” focusing on demographic inclusivity. Highlights The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) introduced a novel model for public‐private partnerships and data sharing. It successfully validated amyloid and Tau PET imaging, as well as CSF and plasma biomarkers, for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. ADNI generated and disseminated vital data for designing AD clinical trials.