Citations

AbstractBackgroundDermatology grand rounds are popular educational activities among dermatologists and trainees, contributing to improved knowledge and skills. Dermatology hospital conferences at Mayo Clinic Dermatology are separate from dermatology grand rounds in that they focus on inpatient consultations and dermatology admissions.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the types of cases presented during dermatology hospital grand rounds and evaluate the educational value of this continuing medical education (CME)‐accredited activity.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed all inpatient dermatology cases presented during hospital grand rounds at Mayo Clinic Dermatology in Rochester, MN from 2019 to 2022; this study also reviewed the compiled surveys of faculty participants at our institution from 2019 to 2022.ResultsA total of 389 cases met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The most common diagnostic category was inflammatory/autoimmune diseases (157 cases, 40%), followed by infection or infestation (73 cases, 19%), drug‐induced eruptions (49 cases, 13%), neoplastic or metastatic diseases (41 cases, 11%), genetic/congenital disorders (21 cases, 5%), depositional/nutritional/metabolic conditions (15 cases, 4%) and wound/traumatic/iatrogenic dermatoses (12 cases, 3%), which were the least common. Most cases were presented for discussion of diagnosis and management (246 cases, 63%), but others focused on the arrival of diagnosis (119 cases, 31%) or management alone (24 cases, 6%). The compiled surveys of faculty participants (n = 50) indicated high satisfaction with dermatology hospital grand rounds, with the majority expressing that evidence‐based research was incorporated and positively impacted their practice. Most respondents indicated that hospital conference participation improved knowledge (97%), competence (64%), clinician performance (54%), patient outcomes (52%) and team performance (50%).ConclusionsThe cases presented during these conferences spanned from challenging inflammatory diseases to simple dermatoses, with over 800 literature references reviewed. Dermatology hospital grand rounds provide high value as a CME‐accredited activity for dermatology faculty, even for those without a specific interest in hospital/inpatient dermatology.

Précis: Damage to disposable selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) lenses correlated with the amount of total laser energy. Furthermore, greater lens damage was associated with diminished patient treatment response. Purpose: Disposable SLT lenses have been observed to be damaged during use by laser, potentially affecting therapeutic response. This study sought to identify factors associated with the magnitude of lens damage and its effect on treatment outcomes. Patient and Methods: We analyzed 113 eyes from 82 patients who underwent SLT between 2020 and 2021 at an American academic medical center. For each procedure, we recorded baseline patient characteristics, procedure settings, physician age (as a possible factor causing laser defocus due to accommodation), and area of lens damage. Treatment response was calculated as the difference between preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: Area of lens damage was associated with greater total laser energy (r=0.34, P<0.001) and greater mean energy per application (r=0.37, P<0.001). IOP reduction decreased with increasing lens damage (r=−0.19, P=0.022). Lens damage was not associated with patient characteristics indicative of glaucoma severity or user settings (physician age and slit lamp used). Greater IOP reduction was associated with higher preop IOP (r=0.46, P<0.001) and a smaller cup-to-disc ratio (r=0.22, P=0.036). IOP reduction was not associated with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, patient age, or the number of glaucoma medications. Conclusions: Increased laser damage to disposable SLT lenses was associated with diminished treatment effect. The amount of damage was correlated with total and average laser energy, but not patient or physician factors. Overall, these findings call for reconsideration of using disposable SLT lenses as part of routine practice.

Abstract Lower income in familial caregivers has been shown to associate with increased distress, depression, and burden during active caregiving. However, findings are less clear on whether lower income associates with changes in well-being that occur after caregiving ends. To investigate this question further, we recruited familial caregivers (CGs) of people with neurodegenerative diseases (PWD; N=36). Emotional well-being was assessed using the SF-36 Emotional Well-being and Energy scales both during active caregiving and after caregiving had ended (predominantly due to the PWD’s death or transition to institutional care, ~10 years later). Household income was measured after active caregiving had ended. Overall, CG’s emotional well-being and energy improved between active caregiving and after caregiving had ended (emotional well-being change: t(35) = 2.22, p = .033; energy change: t(35) = 2.88, p = .007). However, this improvement associated with household income, such that when controlling for levels during active caregiving, income associated with worse emotional well-being (B = -6.72, t(33) = -4.56, p &lt; .001) and energy (B = -8.07, t(33) = -4.99, p &lt; .001) in caregivers after caregiving had ended. During the adjustment period after caregiving ends, lower income may limit opportunities for caregivers to take time away from work to mourn the loss of their loved one or address their own health concerns adequately. Thus, low-income caregivers may experience fewer of the benefits associated with these activities. These findings underscore the importance of providing support for lower income caregivers during the critical period after caregiving ends.

Abstract Aging, a major risk factor for delirium, is associated with accumulation of senescent cells in many tissues of the body. Senescent cells produce a host of proinflammatory and tissue remodeling factors collectively termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which are secreted into circulation. The relationship between increased senescent cell burden and risk of delirium is not known. This study aimed to determine whether changes in circulating SASP proteins are associated with increased risk of postoperative delirium in cognitively intact older adults. Participants were recruited among patients scheduled for surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and blood was obtained at the presurgical visit. SASP factors were measured using commercially available multiplex magnetic bead immunoassays based on Luminex xMAP multianalyte profiling platform and analyzed on a MAGPIX system. Activin A concentration was determined by a Quantikine ELISA kit. Delirium cases were identified by manual chart abstraction, utilizing the problem list, ICD-10 codes, clinical notes, and nursing flowsheets. Eight of 62 (12.9%) of patients within the cohort developed postoperative delirium. Length of stay was significantly longer for patients who developed delirium (10.6 days) versus patients without delirium (6 days). Concentrations of SASP factors Activin A and PAPP-A were significantly higher in plasma of patients with delirium vs. those who did not develop delirium. IL-1 alpha concentration was significantly lower in patients with delirium vs without delirium. Other SASP factors measured were not statistically different between groups. More study is needed to determine whether these changes are directly related to increased senescent cell burden.

Patients with cancer or with a history of cancer often seek nutritional advice. In turn, cancer health care providers are often asked questions related to nutrition and cancer. Should I take high-dose vitamins or other high-dose supplements? Should I take a regular-dose vitamin or other regular-dose nutritional supplements? Will I experience weight loss during postoperative chemotherapy? What should be my weight goals during and after adjuvant therapy? In the setting of advanced cancer, what should I do to keep my appetite and weight up? This review attempts to provide data-driven answers to some of these commonly posed questions.

AbstractPurposeThis paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.MethodsThis was open‐label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28‐day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression‐free survival in the intention‐to‐treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA‐GO sequencing panel.ResultsA total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41–86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression‐free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91‐2.3] p = .935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43–1.14] p = .064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA‐GO panel results were not associated with response.ConclusionThe combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.