Roddy, Gavin W.

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is commonly linked to obesity. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and bariatric surgery may improve outcomes beyond conventional therapy, but comparative evidence is limited. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from inception until June 2025. Eligible randomized and observational studies compared GLP-1RAs or bariatric surgery (each plus conventional care) against conventional management. Primary outcomes were the change in papilledema, visual acuity, and visual field. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, monthly headache days, and risks of papilledema, visual disturbance, and headache. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses and frequentist network meta-analysis ( P -scores) were performed. Results: Out of 429 records, 8 studies were included. Versus conventional therapy, GLP-1RAs reduced BMI (mean difference −1.55 kg/m 2 ; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.13 to −0.97) and lowered risks of papilledema (relative risk [RR]: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.34–0.65), visual disturbance (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24–0.98), and headache (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69–0.88). Changes in papilledema severity and RNFL thickness were not different; visual acuity favored GLP-1RAs at the end of follow-up, whereas visual field values were worse at some time points. In indirect comparisons with bariatric surgery, no significant differences were detected across outcomes. Conclusions: Adjunctive GLP-1RA therapy may be associated with weight loss and improved clinical/ophthalmic outcomes in IIH relative to conventional care, with a signal for worse visual fields at certain time points. Indirect comparisons suggest comparable efficacy to bariatric surgery. High-quality randomized trials are needed to define comparative effectiveness, safety, and optimal use.

Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Obesity, a key component of metabolic syndrome (MetS), may represent a modifiable risk factor for cataracts. However, the evidence regarding the association between MetS or its components and cataracts remains controversial. Therefore, our meta-analysis aims to clarify the relationship between MetS or its components and cataracts. A search was conducted until February 2024 via the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoint included the association between MetS or its components, including body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), and dyslipidemia (DLP), and cataracts. Secondary endpoints included the association between levels of blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profiles and cataracts. A total of 27 studies were included with a total of 1,010,014 patients (134,498 with cataracts and 875,516 without cataracts). Of these, there were 2 prospective cohort studies, 6 case–control studies, and 19 cross-sectional studies. The prevalence of cataracts was 13.3%. MetS was significantly associated with cataracts with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–1.77, I 2 = 93%). Among MetS components, high BMI and being diagnosed with DM, HT, and DLP were associated with cataracts with ORs of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.33–1.58, I 2 = 80%), 1.77 (95% CI: 1.69–1.85, I 2 = 51%), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.19–1.28, I 2 = 62%), and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.30–1.46, I 2 = 0%). Among the metabolic parameters, high total cholesterol, high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with cataracts with ORs of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.04–1.49, I 2 = 48%), 1.05 (95% CI: 1.04–1.06, I 2 = 68%), 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01–1.13, I 2 = 0%), and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.10–1.53, I 2 = 71%), respectively. MetS, obesity, DM, HT, and DLP are associated with cataracts. Prevention or treatment of MetS or its components likely represent a modifiable risk factor in cataract development.

Radiation exposure to the eye during cancer treatment can lead to ocular radiation injury (ORI), a devastating condition that can have a profound and permanent impact on vision-related quality of life. Rodent models do not have adequate ocular anatomy to accurately simulate human ORI, and modeling in non-human primates is limited by logistical and ethical concerns. To improve future translational research investigating ways to treat or prevent ORI, we developed protocols for a tree shrew model of ORI. Northern tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri) were obtained by our laboratory. Custom housing and handling methods were developed, including custom body suits to maintain the tree shrew’s body temperature during procedures. Radiation delivery was optimized to accurately deliver radiation, and imaging was performed to observe fundus changes from ORI. Optimization of tree shrew handling, housing, anesthesia approaches, radiation delivery, and clinically-relevant ocular imaging permitted successful induction and assessment of ORI in tree shrews. With these protocols, tree shrews can be used as a highly relevant model organism with key anatomic features similar to humans to study ORI.

ImportanceSpecialized ophthalmology terminology limits comprehension for nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, hindering interdisciplinary communication and patient care. The clinical implementation of large language models (LLMs) into practice has to date been relatively unexplored.ObjectiveTo evaluate LLM–generated plain language summaries (PLSs) integrated into standard ophthalmology notes (SONs) in improving diagnostic understanding, satisfaction, and clarity.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized quality improvement study conducted from February 1, 2024, to May 31, 2024, including data from inpatient and outpatient encounters in a single tertiary academic center. Participants were nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals and ophthalmologists. The single inclusion criterion was any encounter note generated by an ophthalmologist during the study dates. Exclusion criteria were (1) lack of established nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals for outpatient encounters and (2) procedure-only patient encounters.InterventionAddition of LLM-generated plain language summaries to ophthalmology notes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was survey responses from nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals assessing understanding, satisfaction, and clarity of ophthalmology notes. Secondary outcomes were survey responses from ophthalmologists evaluating PLS in terms of clinical workflow and accuracy, objective measures of semantic quality, and safety analysis.ResultsA total of 362 (85%) nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals (33.0% response rate) preferred the PLS to SON. Demographic data on age, race and ethnicity, and sex were not collected. Nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals reported enhanced diagnostic understanding (percentage point increase, 9.0; 95% CI, 0.3-18.2; P = .01), increased note detail satisfaction (percentage point increase, 21.5; 95% CI, 11.4-31.5; P < .001), and improved explanation clarity (percentage point increase, 23.0; 95% CI, 12.0-33.1; P < .001) for notes containing a PLS. The addition of a PLS was associated with reduced comprehension gaps between clinicians who were comfortable and uncomfortable with ophthalmology terminology (from 26.1% [95% CI, 13.7%-38.6%; P < .001] to 14.4% [95% CI, 4.3%-24.6%; P > .06]). PLS semantic analysis found high meaning preservation (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers score mean F1 score: 0.85) with greater readability than SONs (Flesch Reading Ease: 51.8 vs 43.6; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 10.7 vs 11.9). Ophthalmologists (n = 489; 84% response rate) reported high PLS accuracy (90% [320 of 355] a great deal) with minimal review time burden (94.9% [464 of 489] ≤1 minute). PLS error rate on ophthalmologist review was 26% (126 of 489). A total of 83.9% (104 of 126) of errors were deemed low risk for harm and none had a risk of severe harm or death.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, use of LLM-generated PLSs was associated with enhanced comprehension and satisfaction among nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, which might aid interdisciplinary communication. Careful implementation and safety monitoring are recommended for clinical integration given the persistence of errors despite physician review.

Précis: Damage to disposable selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) lenses correlated with the amount of total laser energy. Furthermore, greater lens damage was associated with diminished patient treatment response. Purpose: Disposable SLT lenses have been observed to be damaged during use by laser, potentially affecting therapeutic response. This study sought to identify factors associated with the magnitude of lens damage and its effect on treatment outcomes. Patient and Methods: We analyzed 113 eyes from 82 patients who underwent SLT between 2020 and 2021 at an American academic medical center. For each procedure, we recorded baseline patient characteristics, procedure settings, physician age (as a possible factor causing laser defocus due to accommodation), and area of lens damage. Treatment response was calculated as the difference between preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: Area of lens damage was associated with greater total laser energy (r=0.34, P<0.001) and greater mean energy per application (r=0.37, P<0.001). IOP reduction decreased with increasing lens damage (r=−0.19, P=0.022). Lens damage was not associated with patient characteristics indicative of glaucoma severity or user settings (physician age and slit lamp used). Greater IOP reduction was associated with higher preop IOP (r=0.46, P<0.001) and a smaller cup-to-disc ratio (r=0.22, P=0.036). IOP reduction was not associated with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, patient age, or the number of glaucoma medications. Conclusions: Increased laser damage to disposable SLT lenses was associated with diminished treatment effect. The amount of damage was correlated with total and average laser energy, but not patient or physician factors. Overall, these findings call for reconsideration of using disposable SLT lenses as part of routine practice.

Précis: When comparing patients on systemic immunosuppressive therapy to those without, there was no difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) early after SLT; however, at 1 year following SLT, IOP was higher in the immunosuppression group compared with controls. Purpose: To determine whether patients taking systemic immunosuppressive medications have a different IOP-lowering response to selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) compared with a control group of patients. Methods: All patients who underwent SLT at Mayo Clinic 2017–2021 were identified. Patients on systemic immunosuppressive medications at the time of SLT were compared with control patients not receiving systemic immunosuppressive medications. The primary endpoints of this study were the percentage IOP reduction at 1 to 2, 3 to 6, and 12 months. Additional analyses included the percentage of patients who did not require additional therapy at each time point. Results: There were 108 eyes of 72 patients that underwent SLT in the immunosuppressed group and 1997 eyes of 1417 patients in the control group. There was no significant difference in age-adjusted change in IOP between groups at the first postoperative visit 1 to 2 months following SLT (−18.8±20.7% vs. −16.0±16.5%, P=0.256) or 3–6 months following SLT (−15.2±21.6% vs. −18.3±23.2%, P=0.062). However, at 12 months following SLT, the IOP reduction in the immunosuppressive therapy group was significantly less compared with the control group (−15.1±21.2% vs. −20.3±22.9%, P=0.045). There was no difference between groups in the number of additional treatments during the study intervals. Conclusion: Patients in the systemic immunosuppressive therapy group showed equivalent early IOP-lowering after SLT compared with a control group, but the treatment response was diminished at 1 year. Further studies investigating IOP regulation after SLT in immunosuppressed patients are needed.

Purpose To determine whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a risk factor for various forms of optic neuropathy including non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Methods This population-based analysis identified patients ≥40 years of age in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA using the Rochester Epidemiology Project 2005–2018. Patients with MetS were identified if three or more of the five standard criteria for diagnosing MetS were present: systemic hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hypoalphalipoproteinaemia) and central adiposity defined by increased body mass index. Charts of patients identified as having an optic neuropathy were reviewed to record specific diagnoses and compared with patients without ocular pathology other than cataract. The odds ratio (OR) of association with MetS was calculated and adjusted for age, sex and race with multivariate analysis for the various optic neuropathies. Results Patients with MetS were more likely to have an optic neuropathy than those without (OR 2.2, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex and race, the only optic neuropathy found to be significantly associated with MetS was NAION (OR 6.17, p=0.002). For patients with NAION, though each individual component of MetS was individually significantly associated with MetS, further analysis suggested that hypertriglyceridaemia, hypoalphalipoproteinaemia and hyperglycaemia were likely the key drivers in the overall significance between NAION and MetS. Conclusion Patients with MetS were more likely to have NAION. Further studies are needed to determine whether MetS is a modifiable risk factor for NAION.