Citations

Clear

5209 citation(s) found for "Wang, Li-Ju".

Estimation of Various Physiological Parameters Affecting Amyloid Plaque Distribution of a Novel MRI Contrast Agent in the Brain of Alzheimer’s Disease Transgenic Mice
Salian, Vrishali S. , Curran, Geoffry, Podulso, Joseph F., Kandimalla, Karunya K. , Salian, Vrishali , Kandimalla, Karunya K , Wang, Zengtao , Curran, Geoffry L.

Mayo Clinic

Molecular Pharmaceutics | May 5, 2026 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 3243-3253

10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c01565 | PMID 42082924 Get It

Association between bisphenols A and the risk of endometriosis: results from an updated meta-analysis
Chen, Yue, Wu, Junle, Wang, Yuxin , Yang, Qingxin, Zhu, Yan, Zhou, Qin, Li, Panpan, Wang, Fuke, Sun, Chenyu

Mayo Clinic

Frontiers in Public Health | May 4, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3389/fpubh.2026.1817156 | PMID 42158187 Get It

Background Recent studies have disputed the association between bisphenol A (BPA) and endometriosis. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of BPA exposure on endometriosis. Methods This study evaluated BPA exposure and endometriosis risk, analyzing studies from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases (CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, VIP) through August 2025. Methodological quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Tool (AHRQ). Heterogeneity was quantified using I 2 statistics. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were supplemented to validate the overall finding. Results Seven studies comprising 2,488 participants were included in quantitative synthesis. The meta-analyses demonstrated that BPA exposure was associated with a statistically significant increase in endometriosis risk (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13–1.63, p = 0.008). Additionally, subgroup analysis indicated that BPA exposure may further elevate endometriosis risk in cases with different regions, populations, and measurement methods. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the results of these meta-analyses were relatively robust. No publication bias was detected. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251019552 , identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251019552).
Pathogenic PF4 /Polyanion ELISA ‐Negative Antibodies in HIT
Kanack, Adam J. , Splinter, Noah P., Mauch, Emily, Gil, Morayma Reyes, Jasra, Sakshi , Goodwin, Andrew, Smock, Kristi J. , Ahmad, Hadiyah, Ashrani, Aneel A. , Robinson, Nathaniel L. , Jones, Curtis G., Pechauer, Shannon M., yttre, erin , Aster, Richard H. , Kohlhagen, Mindy , Leger, Rachel, Johns, Gretchen, Murray, David , Zhou, Lu, Wang, Demin, Wen, Renren , Chen, Dong, Pruthi, Rajiv K. , Padmanabhan, Anand , Wang, Demin , Zhou, Lu , Mauch, Emily E, Smock, Kristi J , Kohlhagen, Mindy C, Leger, Rachel R, Chen, Dong , Padmanabhan, Anand , Wang, Demin , Tefera, Leben T. , Gil, Morayma Reyes , Casanegra, Ana I. , Johns, Gretchen S., Zhou, Lu

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | May 2, 2026 | Volume: 101 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1790-1798

10.1002/ajh.70333 | PMID 42068120 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.
Beta-Lactam Plus Azithromycin or Doxycycline vs Fluoroquinolones in Adult Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Abusalih, Mohamed, LABBAN, MOHAMAD EL, Haydour, Qusay, Ramachandran, Neha , Wang, Zhen, Frazee, Erin N. , Prokop, Larry, Murad, M Hassan, Odeyemi, Yewande, Labban, Mohamad El , Farah, Magdoleen H , Abusalih, Mohamed , Farah, Wigdan , El Labban, Mohamad , Farah, Magdoleen H. , Farah, Wigdan , Murad, M. Hassan , Odeyemi, Yewande

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofag253 | PMID 42158387 Get It

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant public health concern associated with increased rates of hospital admissions and mortality. The purpose of the current study was to compare beta-lactam plus azithromycin or doxycycline vs fluoroquinolones in adults hospitalized with CAP. Methods We searched several databases from inception to 10 June 2024. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Study quality was assessed in duplicate with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. Meta-analysis was conducted by a random effect model when feasible. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare direct and indirect evidence. The GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was followed to rate the certainty of evidence. Results Twenty studies were included (20 beta-lactam + azithromycin, 7 beta-lactam + doxycycline, 12 levofloxacin, and 4 moxifloxacin): 6 were randomized, enrolling 861 participants (mean age, 61.8 years; 43.2% women), and 14 were nonrandomized, enrolling 185 928 participants (mean age, 65.2 years; 42.9% women). Direct comparison and network meta-analysis results showed no statistically significant differences and likely equal effectiveness between beta-lactam + azithromycin and beta-lactam + doxycycline in terms of in-hospital mortality, need for intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation, or safety outcomes including Clostridioides difficile infection and QT prolongation. Conclusions The current evidence demonstrated no likely difference in outcomes between azithromycin and doxycycline in adults hospitalized with CAP receiving beta-lactam. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials are needed to validate these results.
Trends in Long-Term Survival Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Cancer
Badat, Saad , Lau, Braden, Wang, Ming, Trifiletti, Daniel M. , Rothermel, Luke, Hoehn, Richard, Hsu, Melina, Wang, Ming , Rothermel, Luke D. , Hoehn, Richard S. , Wang, Ming , Trifiletti, Daniel M , Rothermel, Luke , Hoehn, Richard , Hsu, Melina , Spratt, Daniel E , Zaorsky, Nicholas G , Wang, Fang , Spratt, Daniel E. , Zaorsky, Nicholas G.

Mayo Clinic

JCO Oncology Practice | April 30, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1200/op-25-01154 | PMID 42060864 Get It

PURPOSE Although outcomes for nonmetastatic cancers have improved since the 1970s, it remains uncertain whether long-term survival has improved among patients presenting with de novo metastatic disease, defined as cancer presenting with distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. This study evaluated changes in 5-year survival among patients with de novo metastatic cancer diagnosed in 1976 versus 2015, with a minimum 5-year follow-up through 1981 and 2020, respectively. METHODS Population-based data were obtained from the SEER database. Patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic cancer in 1976 (n = 11,864) and 2015 (n = 26,324) were included. Five-year overall survival (OS) was compared between cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression identified demographic and clinical factors associated with survival. RESULTS The 5-year OS increased significantly from 10.6% in 1976-1981 to 23.6% in 2015-2020 ( P < .001). Survival gains were largest in breast cancer (12.6%-34.2%; P < .001), ovarian cancer (14.4%-32.5%; P < .001), colorectal cancer (3.7%-15.0%; P < .001), and hematologic malignancies (24.3%-53.9%; P < .001). Minimal improvement occurred in pancreatic cancer (0.25%-1.6%; P = .007) and small cell lung cancer (0.8%-3.1%; P = .008). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that older age, male sex, and Black race were associated with lower odds of 5-year survival (all P < .01) CONCLUSION Over the past four decades, long-term survival among patients with de novo metastatic cancer has more than doubled; however, progress remains uneven across cancer types. Gains appear concentrated in malignancies with substantial therapeutic advances, whereas others show persistently poor outcomes. Continued efforts are needed to address disparities and improve survival in resistant cancer types.
Surgical Technique for Treating Focal Osteochondral Knee Lesions Using an Aragonite‐Based Biphasic Scaffold
Wang, Eric , Cancio-Bello, Alexandra , Koschmeder, Katelyn T. , Berens, Bryn, Chhabra, Anikar , Cancio-Bello, Alexandra M, Koschmeder, Katelyn , Wang, Eric , Chhabra, Anikar

Mayo Clinic

Arthroscopy Techniques | April 30, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/atn2.70033 | PMID 42519630 Get It

Abstract Osteochondral lesions of the knee, particularly in patients with early osteoarthritic changes, remain a clinical challenge. The Agili‐C implant (CartiHeal, Smith & Nephew), an aragonite‐based osteochondral scaffold, offers a single‐stage, off‐the‐shelf solution designed to regenerate both cartilage and subchondral bone. Unlike cell‐based therapies, Agili‐C eliminates the need for cell harvesting, culturing, or bioreactors, and avoids the morbidity associated with autografts and allografts. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have showed superior functional outcomes and pain reduction with Agili‐C compared to microfracture and debridement, even in patients with early osteoarthritis (Kellgren‐Lawrence grades 0‐3). This Technical Note describes the surgical technique for Agili‐C implantation and highlights key technical pearls to optimize outcomes.
Pan-cancer virtual spatial transcriptomics from routine histology with Phoenix
Tran, Manuel , Gindra, Rushin H. , Putze, Philipp , Senbai, 康森柏 Kang, Kos, Tina, Wang, C, Guo, Ruifeng (Ray), Boxberg, Melanie , Lindner, Lars H., Bergmayr, Linda , Jurmeister, Philipp, Klauschen, F, Homicsko, Krisztian, Gottardo, Raphael, Eckstein, Markus, Matek, Christian , Gindra, Rushin H. , Palla, Giovanni , Šket, Tina , Falcomatà, Chiara , Guo, R., Berclaz, Luc M. , Lindner, Lars Hartwin , Knösel, Thomas , Homicskó, Krisztián , Gottardo, Raphaël , Eckstein, Markus , Möck, Andreas , Theis, Fabian Joachim , Saur, Dieter , Peng, Tingying

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | April 30, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.04.25.720812 Get It

Abstract Spatial transcriptomics links gene expression to tissue architecture, providing a mechanistic view of cellular organization. Yet existing datasets cover few donors and miss the complexity of human disease. Experimental costs remain prohibitive, and large-scale profiling is impractically slow for population-level studies. Accurate computational methods are urgently needed. Predicting gene expression from standard histology, however, remains an open problem, as current approaches transfer poorly to unseen cohorts and diseases. Here, we present Phoenix, a (latent) flow matching generative model that infers pan-cancer spatially resolved single-cell gene expression with high accuracy. Phoenix analyzes treatment response in silico: Applied to 763 head and neck cancer patients, it identified three new spatial biomarkers that we validated across two cancers (breast cancer, n = 84; ovarian cancer, n = 157) and treatment regimens (platinum, trastuzumab). Phoenix generalizes beyond carcinomas: In a large sarcoma cohort (802 tissue microarray cores), it accurately predicted cell-type-specific signatures in held-out samples and captured chemotherapy-induced immune remodeling. Phoenix also extends across species: In a mouse model, it accurately predicted the expression of pancreatic cancer lineage markers and the mutant mKras^G12D allele in silico. In total, we evaluated Phoenix on over 10,000 patients. Our results establish virtual spatial transcriptomics as a scalable framework for studying tissue organization, therapeutic response, and disease mechanisms.
Comparison of three large language models' ability to assess the risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool
Saadi, Samer , Fleti, Farah, Rajjoub, Omar H, Basha, Ayla Shamsi , Firwana, Mohammed, Abideen, Zain, Murad, M Hassan, Shamsi Basha, Ayla, Saadi, Samer , Firwana, Mohammed , Abideen, Zain, Wang, Zhen , Murad, M Hassan

Mayo Clinic

BMJ Digital Health & AI | April 29, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e000034

10.1136/bmjdh-2026-000034 | PMID 42712411 Get It

Objectives This study aims to compare the reliability and accuracy of three large language models (LLMs) (Claude, Gemini and GPT) in assessing the risk of bias of nonrandomised studies using the ROBINS-I tool. Methods and analysis We conducted a secondary analysis of 171 nonrandomised studies previously assessed with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool by two independent human review teams. Only studies with concordant human domain-level ratings were included. Each study was independently assessed twice by Claude, Gemini and Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) using agent-based structured implementations of the ROBINS-I tool. Reliability (agreement between two runs of the same LLM) was evaluated using percent agreement and Gwet’s AC1. Accuracy (agreement with human reviewers) was assessed only for studies with consistent LLM ratings, using the same metrics. Results Claude demonstrated high reliability across all domains (79.5–98.0% agreement, AC1=0.729–0.975). Gemini showed moderate-to-high reliability (agreement 76.7–100%, AC1=0.680–1.0). GPT exhibited lower reliability overall, though domain-level agreement ranged from 70.9–95.6% (AC1=0.596–0.944). In terms of accuracy, Claude showed overall poor agreement with human reviewers (14.4–68.5% agreement; low AC1 values). Gemini demonstrated moderate-to-high accuracy in several domains, including deviations from intended interventions (79.6%, AC1=0.848) and measurement of outcomes (73.9%, AC1=0.702), with the highest overall agreement (40.0%, AC1=0.672). GPT showed variable accuracy, with the highest in measurement of outcomes (62.8%, AC1=0.571) and classification of interventions (57.8%, AC1=0.498), but poor performance in selection (14.3%, AC1 = −0.041) and overall agreement (23.0%, AC1=0.267). Conclusions Claude was internally consistent but poorly aligned with human reviewers. Gemini achieved both high reliability and moderate-to-high accuracy, whereas GPT had lower reliability and mixed accuracy. Current off-the-shelf LLMs cannot reliably perform ROBINS-I risk of bias assessments.
Intra‐Articular Purified Exosome Product and Hyaluronan Attenuate Osteoarthritis Progression in a Minimally Invasive Turkey Model
Lei, Xing , Wang, Lei, Reisdorf, Ramona L., Brosig, Maggie A, Moran, Steven L, Evans, CH, Zhao, Chunfeng, Brosig, Maggie, Moran, Steven L., Evans, Christopher H., Zhao, Chunfeng

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Orthopaedic Research | April 29, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jor.70207 | PMID 42051070 Get It

ABSTRACT Our study aimed to develop a novel, reproducible, minimally invasive turkey knee osteoarthritis (OA) model and evaluate whether intra‐articular hyaluronan (HA) alone or combined with purified exosome product (PEP) attenuates OA‐related functional and structural deterioration. OA was induced arthroscopically by transection of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with resection of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus. Animals received intra‐articular injections of saline, HA, or PEP + HA at postoperative 2–5 weeks. Gait was assessed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and cartilage degeneration, subchondral bone sclerosis, osteophyte formation, synovial fibrosis, heterotopic ossification, and meniscal integrity were evaluated by quantitative CT and histology at week 12. Compared with saline, HA improved lameness, preserved cartilage glycosaminoglycan content, and reduced meniscal rupture, subchondral bone sclerosis, and periarticular heterotopic ossification. PEP + HA provided additional benefits, including prolonged stance phase, reduced synovial fibrosis, and greater chondroprotection than HA alone, while plantar pressure variables, subchondral bone remodeling, and patellar osteophytes did not differ between HA and PEP + HA. This turkey model reliably produces human‐like OA changes and enables longitudinal functional and structural assessment. Intra‐articular HA mitigated OA progression, and the addition of PEP conferred incremental joint protection.
An Immune Dysfunction Signature Score Predicts Survival in MDS Patients: Insights From a Longitudinal, Multicenter Study
Wang, Yu‐Hung , Gurnari, Carmelo, Durmaz, Arda, Lee, Wan‐Hsuan , Yao, Chi‐Yuan, Jérez, Andrés, Gurashi, Kristian , Hou, Hsin‐An, Patnaik, Mrinal, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw, Wiseman, Daniel H., Lin, Chien‐Chin , Lee, Wan-Hsuan , Wiseman, Daniel H , Wang, Yu-Hung , Gurnari, Carmelo , Visconte, Valeria , Durmaz, Arda , Guarnera, Luca , Yao, Chi‐Yuan , Jerez, Andrés , Batta, Kiran , Hou, Hsin‐An , Chou, Wen‐Chien , Wiseman, Daniel H. , Tien, Hwei‐Fang

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Science | April 28, 2026 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1921-1934

10.1111/cas.70405 | PMID 42046464 Get It

ABSTRACT Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are clonal myeloid neoplasms shaped by genetic lesions and immune dysregulation, both of which contribute to disease progression and poor outcomes. Existing prognostic systems, such as IPSS‐R and IPSS‐M, do not incorporate immune alterations. We assessed the biological and clinical relevance of an immune dysfunction signature (IDS) across multi‐center MDS and CMML cohorts. IDS scores, derived from bulk transcriptomic data, were significantly associated with inferior leukemia‐free and overall survival. In multivariable analyses, IDS retained independent prognostic value alongside IPSS‐R, IPSS‐M, and bi‐allelic TP53 inactivation. Incorporation of IDS into existing models improved prognostic discrimination and time‐dependent predictive accuracy. Longitudinal analyses revealed that rising IDS scores paralleled disease progression and acute transformation, whereas declining scores were observed in remission. Biologically, IDS‐high cases demonstrated reduced cytotoxic T‐cell activity, expansion of regulatory T cells, enrichment of primitive progenitor signals, and increased expression of checkpoint pathway genes. These findings were validated across multiple independent MDS cohorts and consistently reproduced in CMML, where IDS also stratified risk and tracked disease evolution. Finally, integration with drug response signatures from the BeatAMLv2 cohort suggested potential therapeutic vulnerability of IDS‐high cases to multikinase and NF‐κB pathway inhibitors. These results establish IDS as a robust and dynamic biomarker in MDS and CMML, with applications in refined risk stratification, longitudinal disease monitoring, and guiding personalized therapeutic strategies targeting immune dysfunction. Trial Registration: #201709072RINC, #202109078RINB, #202207050RINB