Mauch, Emily E

ABSTRACT Background Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently described chronic prothrombotic condition characterized by monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies that are detected above the polyclonal antibody background in patient sera (i.e. present as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, MGUS). Due to conflicting data in the published literature on antibody clonality in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), we evaluated clonality and abundance of anti-PF4 antibodies in HIT, including investigating whether an MGUS, if present in HIT, represents the causative anti-PF4 antibody. Methods Blood samples from 15 patients with HIT were subject to Platelet Factor 4-dependent antigen-based and functional tests. The unmanipulated serum antibody repertoire and isolated anti-PF4 antibodies were subjected to mass spectrometric evaluation. Results Two of the 15 HIT patients had an IgG MGUS. Notably, anti-PF4 antibodies were not synonymous with the MGUS antibody in either of the two patients. Eight of the 15 patients demonstrated monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies, however, none of the anti-PF4 antibodies were detectable as an MGUS upon evaluation of the entire serum antibody repertoire, reflecting their low abundance. In the seven patients with multiple anti-PF4 antibodies, non-monoclonality was confirmed by analysis of deglycosylated antibody heavy chains. Conclusions Anti-PF4 HIT antibodies are monoclonal in approximately 50% of HIT patients, however, antibody abundance is low such that they are not detectable over the polyclonal IgG background (i.e. are MGUS-negative), differentiating HIT from MGTS. This observation helps explain the transient nature of HIT relative to the persistent prothrombotic state seen in MGTS.

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

Summary This nutshell review discusses the pathophysiology, diagnostic features, treatment strategies and avenues for future research in a recently identified thrombotic entity, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). MGTS is an anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody‐mediated disorder distinct from heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine‐induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), as it involves the production of persistent, monoclonal anti‐PF4 antibodies. Several subtypes of MGTS, including ‘HIT‐like’, ‘VITT‐like’ and ‘non‐HIT/VITT‐like’, exhibit unique serological profiles that can complicate diagnosis. Recognition of ‘HIT‐like’ MGTS is critical to avoid heparin exposure in these patients, which can result in adverse effects like those seen in heparin‐exposed HIT patients. ‘Non‐HIT/VITT‐like’ MGTS antibodies have only been detected in PF4‐enhanced functional testing; therefore, we recommend using these platelet‐based tests as the front‐line assay for detecting MGTS antibodies. Mass profiling using mass spectrometry is critical for the ‘fingerprinting’ of monoclonal antibodies to establish a diagnosis of MGTS. Treatments used in HIT and VITT, such as non‐heparin anticoagulants and intravenous immunoglobulin G, are typically insufficient for managing MGTS. Emerging MGTS therapies, such as plasma cell‐directed drugs and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are discussed. The review concludes with an emphasis on areas of future research in MGTS.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.