Leger, Rachel

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

Abstract Background Interpretation of multi-analyte laboratory profiles, such as lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing, requires integration of numerous test results and clinical information. However, this process is time-consuming, requires domain knowledge, and has limited scalability. Given that rule-based systems are rigid and difficult to maintain and large language models pose risks of “hallucinations,” we developed and evaluated a novel retrieval-based approach to automate LAC profile interpretation to improve efficiency while maintaining fidelity and reliability for clinical use. Methods Our method processes laboratory values through ensemble random forest (RF) models to retrieve the most similar expert interpretation from a curated database of 347 previously interpreted LAC profiles. The system's performance was assessed through technical accuracy metrics, a work flow efficiency timing study, and expert review of interpretation accuracy for held-out cases. Results Technical validation demonstrated high accuracy in retrieving correct interpretative elements (median: 93% accuracy, interquartile range [IQR]: 67% to 100%). Retrieval accuracy was highly correlated with the prevalence of a given element (ρ = 0.8307). In a timing study of 93 consecutive LAC profiles, ensemble-assisted interpretation achieved a median time of 22 s per report (IQR: 16 s to 31 s), representing a 78.6% total reduction compared to manual interpretation (median: 118 s, IQR: 96 s to 172 s; t = 18.61, P < 0.001). Furthermore, 92.5% of AI-assisted interpretations were completed within 60 s, exceeding the target of 85%. Expert review confirmed 100% concordance for LAC presence/absence. Conclusions The proposed approach significantly improves efficiency of complex laboratory interpretation for LAC profiles, while maintaining consistency and high fidelity. Future studies will explore the method’s inherent extensibility to the interpretation of other multi-analyte laboratory profiles.

Abstract Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently recognized thrombophilia where monoclonal platelet factor 4 (PF4)-specific IgG antibodies initiate a chronic prothrombotic state characterized by recurrent and potentially life-threatening thrombosis. Studies from large data sets demonstrate that patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have a heightened risk of experiencing thromboembolic events without a precise explanatory mechanism. The prevalence of MGTS in MGUS-related thrombosis is unknown; however, the recent identification of MGTS antibodies as a cause of thrombosis suggests a potentially causative mechanism. Emerging evidence indicates that detecting pathogenic MGTS antibodies presents diagnostic challenges due to the insensitivity of FDA-approved diagnostic assays adopted from HIT (HIT ELISAs) and gold-standard functional tests that use heparin-treated platelets, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA). Only PF4-enhanced functional assays, including the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) and PF4-SRA, have proven sensitive for detecting MGTS antibodies. In this study, the PEA was utilized to better define the incidence of pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies among a cohort of MGUS patients with a history of thrombosis. Methods: A search of the Mayo Clinic Dysproteinemia Bank was conducted to identify two cohorts of IgG MGUS patients, one with venous thromboembolism-associated diagnosis code(s) and the other without. A diagnosis of multiple myeloma was exclusionary. Each serum sample was assessed using the PEA. Mayo Clinic's Institutional Review Board approved the research study. Results: Among the 134 patients studied in the thrombosis cohort, 17 (13%) stimulated platelet activation in the PEA (positive cut-off ≥19%), some weakly. Of these, four patients (Patients 1-4) were confirmed to have PF4-dependent platelet-activating antibodies inhibitable with high concentrations of heparin and sensitive to blockade of the IgG receptor on platelets, FcGRIIa. The thrombotic complications experienced included recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) over several years (Patient 1), a single DVT (Patient 2), a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (Patient 3), and a series of thrombotic events, including DVTs, left atrial thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and acute limb ischemia (Patient 4). Notably, longitudinal samples spanning twelve years (Patient 1), six years (Patient 2), three years (Patient 3), and on a single sample date (Patient 4) were confirmed positive by PEA. The prolonged persistence of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies in Patients 1-3 supported a diagnosis of MGTS in these patients. Strikingly, all four patients tested negative in two FDA-approved HIT ELISAs (Immucor PF4 IgG and Zymutest HIA IgG). SRA was negative for Patients 1 and 2, weakly positive for Patient 3 (33%), and positive for Patient 4 (72%). Of the 166 patients in the MGUS minus thrombosis cohort, one patient demonstrated a non-heparin induced HIT-like antibody that was HIT ELISA (Optical Density >1.0) and PEA-positive, and inhibitable using high concentrations of heparin and FcGRIIa blockade. No follow-up samples were available to assess antibody longevity. The patient had no history of thrombosis, and testing demonstrated that the anti-PF4 antibody was not synonymous with the MGUS antibody.Conclusions: Among a cohort of 134 MGUS patients with thrombosis, the prevalence of MGTS was found to be 2.2% (3 patients with persistent platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies). The identification of anti-PF4 antibodies among MGUS patients provides a mechanism contributing to the increased thrombotic risk associated with monoclonal gammopathies. Antibody negativity in HIT ELISA and variable positivity in the SRA highlight the nonclassical serology associated with anti-PF4 antibodies in MGTS and support performing PF4-enhanced functional testing. In addition, some patients appear to produce coincidental (non-monoclonal) platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies without evidence of thrombosis, although the longevity of such antibodies could not be examined in the one patient where it was identified. These findings highlight the need for larger, prospective MGUS studies to validate these observations, further define the interplay between monoclonal gammopathies and thrombotic risk, and to better understand the long-term outcomes of patients with MGTS.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.

Abstract Background The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an important laboratory criterion in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. LAC testing at the Mayo Clinic Special Coagulation Laboratory includes up to 13 tests, which are interpreted by trained physicians to identify the presence of LAC and rule out anticoagulant interferences. This feasibility study explored the use of two deep neural network (DNN) architectures for multilabel classification of LAC profiles as a first step toward automating interpretation. Methods Seven thousand two hundred and two retrospective cases were randomly split (64:16:20) for training, validation, and test, respectively. LAC positivity by dilute Russell's viper venom time (LAC-DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (LAC-APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP) were adjudicated by one expert. DNN architectures included: single-output DNNs using domain-knowledge input feature selection and a single-column multioutput DNN using all 13 inputs. Results Domain-knowledge-naïve multioutput DNN achieved similar or improved performance for all 4 label prediction tasks compared with domain knowledge optimized DNNs: F1 scores of 0.977 vs 0.968 for LAC-DRVVT, 0.954 vs 0.945 for LAC-APTT, 0.961 vs 0.957 for HEP, and 0.995 vs 0.977 for WAR, respectively. Conclusions The comparable performance of the 4 domain knowledge optimized DNNs and the multioutput DNN using all 13 input features suggests that the DNN may learn feature importance or mapping to a task without explicit input selection. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, the multioutput DNN is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.

Abstract Objectives Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–based ADAMTS13 activity assays are critical for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. However, these assays are susceptible to interference. As iodide has been suggested to interfere in laboratory testing via fluorophore quenching or promotion, we aimed to determine whether iodinated contrast (Omnipaque) interferes with the ATS-13 ADAMTS13 Activity Assay 2.0. Methods We evaluated the excitation, emission, and absorbance spectrum of Omnipaque alone and spiked in patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 activity on Omnipaque alone, an abnormal control of patient plasma previously observed to display elevated baseline relative fluorescent units, and variable concentrations of patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity spiked with Omnipaque. Results No atypical fluorescent peaks were observed on any sample (Omnipaque alone or spiked in plasma) between 250 and 700 nm. There was no difference in the mean ADAMTS13 activity among the various concentrations of plasma spiked with Omnipaque or plasma spiked with saline. Conclusions Iodinated contrast does not appear to interfere—either via spectral overlap of the fluorophore or through physiologic inhibition of the ADAMTS13 enzyme—with ADAMTS13 activity FRET-based assays based on the findings from this in vitro analysis. Delaying sample collection for ADAMTS13 activity testing from suspected patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following administration of iodinated radiocontrast agents is not necessary, and recent contrast administration should not yield erroneous ADAMTS13 activity results.

Introduction: Ticagrelor is a widely used reversible platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor used in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary interventions. Ticagrelor treated patients may be concomitantly exposed to heparin treatment for prophylaxis/treatment of thrombosis, and heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a thrombotic thrombocytopenic adverse event may be suspected in such patients. Objective: Here we describe the serological profile of a patient on ticagrelor treatment and strong clinical suspicion of HIT who presented with negative serotonin release assay (SRA) results. A follow up systematic study on the impact of ticagrelor on this gold standard HIT assay is presented. Methods: Remnants from 23 patient samples submitted for clinical SRA testing (5- SRA negative; 6- “low positive” [20-50%]; 5- “moderate positive” [>50 to <90%]; 7- “strong positive” [>90%]) were spiked with ticagrelor in concentrations of 100, 250, 500, and 1000 ng/mL before SRA re-testing. Testing was performed using heat inactivated serum, with low (0.1 units/mL) or high (100 units/mL) heparin and washed platelets (Leger, THSNA 2022). A positive SRA result was defined as ≥20% serotonin release with the low heparin condition and >50% inhibition of serotonin release with high concentration of heparin. A subset of SRA positive patient samples that tested falsely negative upon ticagrelor addition were subsequently incubated with activated charcoal and retested in the SRA to determine if ticagrelor interference was reversible using this methodology. Results: The index patient on ticagrelor had a high 4Ts score, ELISA optical density >1.0 but tested negative in the SRA. Re-testing of this patient with an activated charcoal treated sample demonstrated a striking change in SRA to a strong positive result (91% serotonin release). Upon testing of ticagrelor-spiked samples in the SRA negative patient cohort, as expected, the drug had no effect on results, with all 5 samples persistently staying SRA negative. Of the 6 patients that had low positive SRA results, all converted to SRA negative with ticagrelor concentrations >500 ng/mL. One of these patients became SRA negative at 100 ng/mL and 3 at 250 ng/mL. Of the 5 patients with moderately positive SRA results, 2 converted to SRA negative with ticagrelor concentrations >100 ng/mL, and 4 of 5 patients became negative with spiking at 500 ng/mL. Finally, of the 7 patients with strong positive SRA results, 1 became falsely negative in the SRA at a ticagrelor concentration of 1000 ng/mL. Activated charcoal was incubated with 6 samples that demonstrated negative SRA results with drug concentration of 500 ng/mL. Two samples reverted to SRA positive, while 4 samples remained persistently negative. Conclusion: In preliminary studies, ticagrelor has been shown to interfere with the heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) assay but its impact on the SRA has been relatively unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that patients on ticagrelor may present with spuriously false HIT functional assay testing by the SRA, particularly if the HIT antibody is not strongly platelet activating. Activated charcoal treatment was only able to reverse drug interference in a subset of samples, even at drug concentrations below peak levels recorded in patients (approx. 800ng/mL). Given these findings, we recommend de-emphasizing the utility of the SRA in ticagrelor treated patients with reliance more on criteria such as pre-test probability of HIT (e.g. 4Ts score), and ELISA results in order to facilitate an accurate diagnosis of HIT.

Abstract Background Fibrinogen plays a critical role in hemostasis and is essential to clot formation. Changes in the quantity or activity of fibrinogen can lead to disorders affecting coagulation. Thus, it is essential to precisely quantify fibrinogen levels to differentiate between hyperfibrinogenemia in hypercoagulable disorders and dysfibrinogenemia, hypo/afibrinogenemia, and irregular bleeding. Current diagnostic tests that use antibodies to detect fibrinogen or activity-based measures are susceptible to interference from heparin contamination, hemolysis, and hyperbilirubinemia. Here, we evaluated the use of targeted proteomics for developing a quantitative assay for fibrinogen in plasma samples. Methods Four peptides each for alpha and gamma chains of fibrinogen were synthesized using FMOC chemistry on a Liberty Blue (CEM Corp) peptide synthesizer. A targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) assay was developed and optimized using Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC connected to a TSQ Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Evaluations were conducted using a range of standards, such as pure protein, WHO plasma and commercially available plasma with known fibrinogen amounts for the accurate quantitation of fibrinogen. Calibration curves were generated using different dilutions in various matrices. The repeatability and precision of the assay were evaluated across five different days. The plasma samples were processed and digested in a 96-well plate and subjected to C18 clean-up using a Bravo automated liquid handler (Agilent). All samples were spiked-in with corresponding heavy-labeled peptides prior to digestion with trypsin. Multiple reaction monitoring assays were performed on tryptic digests of plasma samples. Results Calibration curves using commercial plasma for all peptides showed linearity from 20 mg/dl to 1,308 mg/dl. This covers the entire clinical range including normal (200-350 mg/dl), deficient states (<100 mg/dl) and excess production (>350 mg/dl) that can be used for evaluation of bleeding disorders including consumption coagulopathy and hyperfibrinogenemia. Based on the overall performance in terms of linearity, limit of detection/quantitation, carryover and coefficient of variation (CV) across five different days, two peptides per chain were finally selected for developing the quantitative assay. The intra-assay variability was <5% and intra-day CV was ∼20%. This assay is currently being tested on a variety of clinical samples representing a range of fibrinogen levels. Conclusions Our study focused on assessing whether multiplexed MRM assay could be implemented to measure fibrinogen levels in plasma. Our data indicate the feasibility of MRM-based assays for determining fibrinogen levels as an alternative to existing non-mass spectrometry-based activity or antigen assays.

Abstract Background Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is critical for diagnosing antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, a common cause of unprovoked thromboembolic events and pregnancy morbidity. Commonly used clot-based assays for LAC include the dilute Russell’s viper venom time (DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), but these are susceptible to anticoagulant interferences. Despite standardization efforts, LAC interpretation remains challenging due to pre- and post-analytical complexity and limited expertise. This study explored the use of deep neural networks (DNN) to facilitate LAC diagnosis. Methods Retrospective data for LAC profiling with 13 features performed at Mayo Clinic between 2021 and 2022 was collected. The profiles of 7,202 patients were randomly divided into training (n=4608), validation (n=1153), and test cohorts (n=1441). Diagnostic outputs including LAC positivity (determined by DRVVT or APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP), were confirmed by expert assessment. Three DNN architectures were developed and evaluated (Figure 1): (1) four single output DNN models with a domain knowledge driven selection of input features, (2) four single output DNN models using the same 13 inputs across all models, and (3) a multi-output DNN model. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score and the index of balanced accuracy (IBA) for each output label. Results Architecture 1 achieved high diagnostic accuracy with IBA values of 0.989-1.000 for all four outputs and F1 scores of 0.945-0.991. Architecture 2 exhibited F1 scores of 0.902-0.973 and IBA values of 0.935-0.992. Architecture 3 achieved F1 scores of 0.933-0.967 and IBA values of 0.941-0.983. Conclusions All three architectures accurately classify LAC and common anticoagulation effects. The comparable performance of architectures 1 and 2 suggests that manual feature extraction is unnecessary. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, architecture 3 is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.

We identified a patient with a recently described syndrome, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), and three additional patients with high 4Ts scores who were consistently negative in the PF4-polyanion HIT ELISA (Lifecodes PF4 IgG, Immucor). The MGTS patient, with a monoclonal IgG kappa, had recurrent thrombosis, and transient mild thrombocytopenia (nadir in the low 100s) over a period of years, and was noted to have a HIT ELISA optical density (OD) of 0.117. The three HIT patients experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis with ELISA ODs of 0.37, 0.18 and 0.20. All patients were positive in platelet-activation (functional) testing demonstrating PF4 dependence and inhibited with both high concentrations of heparin (100U/mL) and the FcγRIIa blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) IV.3, consistent with the presence of anti-PF4 antibodies in the patient samples ( data not shown). Because the serologic profile of these patients suggested a novel HIT subtype characterized by negative HIT ELISA results, we undertook a functional platelet assay screen of 500 consecutive HIT ELISA-negative patients tested in our diagnostic laboratory. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Of the 500 patients tested, 20 (4.0%) stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression Assay (PEA ≥19%; data not shown). To exclude non-specific activation that can be induced by HLA antibodies, additional testing was performed to evaluate whether platelet activation was PF4-dependent using buffer or PF4-treated platelets. Three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent activation that was inhibited by high heparin concentrations and mAb IV.3, as would be expected for HIT antibodies (ELISA-negative HIT, EN-HIT1-3; Figure 1). On retrospective review, all three patients thus identified had clinical histories and courses consistent with high clinical probability for HIT. To develop tools to study this new class of antibodies, monoclonal HIT antibodies were generated in mice after PF4/heparin immunizations and screened using a novel approach that included simultaneous testing of hybridoma supernatants in the PEA and PF4-polyanion ELISA. This strategy was designed to enabled us to identify mAbs that activated platelets (in the PEA), but that did not bind antigenic targets in the HIT ELISA. A novel mAb 431.4 that was developed using this approach, and the well-characterized HIT-like mAb KKO were evaluated for their abilities to both bind PF4-polyanion targets in ELISA, and to activate PF4-treated platelets in the PEA (Figure 2). In significant contrast to KKO, mAb 431.4 did not bind PF4/polyanion complexes, however, like KKO, strongly activated platelets in a PF4-dependent manner. Activation induced by both KKO and mAb 431.4 was inhibited by high heparin concentrations, as would be expected for HIT antibodies. In vivo murine studies using this novel mAb are pending at this time. In summary, the non-canonical diagnostic profile of HIT ELISA-negative but platelet activation-positive antibodies were found at a relatively high incidence in HIT-suspected patients (0.6%; 3 of 500 ELISA-negative patients). These findings have important diagnostic/management implications and suggest a re-evaluation of ASH's HIT management guidelines as noted in recommendations 2.7 and 2.8 of that document (“In patients with an intermediate (Recommendation 2.7) or high (Recommendation 2.8)-probability 4Ts score and a negative immunoassay, the ASH guideline panel recommends discontinuation of the non-heparin anticoagulant and resumption of heparin, if indicated ”; Blood Adv (2018) 2 (22): 3360-3392). Figure 1. A subset of ELISA-negative HIT-suspected patients harbor anti-PF4 platelet-activating antibodies. Three ELISA-negative (EN) HIT patient samples from a screen of 500 samples demonstrate PF4-dependent platelet activation and inhibition with high heparin concentration and mAb IV.3 incubation. PBS, phosphate buffered saline; IC, isotype control; HDH- high dose heparin (100U/mL). Figure 2. Murine mAb 431.4 serologically mimics pathogenic ELISA-negative HIT/MGTS antibodies. ELISA and PEA testing was performed using the “HIT-like” mAb KKO, novel mAb 431.4, or an isotype control (IC) antibody. PVS-polyvinyl sulfonate (polyanion used in the Immucor IgG ELISA assay).