Citations

Health policy influences health and well-being for patients with cancer. Advocating for evidence-based health policies that aim to prevent cancer, promote health, and improve efficiencies in the health care system is crucial to improving care delivery and cancer outcomes nationwide. The role of the ASCO's Government Relations Committee (GRC) is to advocate for policies at a federal and state level that promote high-quality and equitable cancer care, and ASCO volunteer engagement is critical for the success of creating, changing, and adopting policies that support patients with cancer and their care team. Cancer care professionals are uniquely positioned to advocate at all levels of government, local, state, and federal and to serve as invaluable resources for lawmakers as they work to implement policy changes. Lawmakers are highly responsive to cancer care providers as most lawmakers have family or friends who have been diagnosed with cancer. Multiple advocacy strategies that are effective and efficient in their approach have been used, making advocating feasible for cancer care professionals’ busy schedule. To improve patient care, ASCO’s GRC and ASCO volunteers advocate for increased federal funding for research, greater health care access, value in cancer care, and payment reform. ASCO’s GRC has many programs in place to support ASCO members interested in engaging in advocacy to improve the quality of care for their patients and the support for cancer care professionals to thrive in the field.

Abstract VEXAS (vacuoles, E1-ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a recently described autoinflammatory disorder caused by acquired UBA1 mutations in hematopoietic precursor cells. The prevalence, clinical significance, and genomic landscape of UBA1variants in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) remains unexplored. We analyzed the genomic profiles of 86 patients carrying 17 different UBA1variants amongst an unbiased cohort of 8,976 HM patients. Specific genetic and clinical features seen more frequently in patients with UBA1 pathogenic variants (PV) versus those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) included: marked male predominance (98% versus 80%, P=0.002), macrocytic anemia (MCV 105 ± 1.4 fl versus 96 ± 1.4 fl, p=0.01), frequent dominant clones without concurrent somatic variants (53% versus 15%, p=0.004), and association with molecularly distinct low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; 13%) with superior overall survival (OS). Interestingly, while the genetic profiles of UBA1 PV patients resemble patients with clonal cytopenia of unknown significance (CCUS), rapid UBA1 clonal expansion predispose patients to convert to low-grade MDS with a notably hastened progression compared to UBA1 wild-type CCUS. This “clone surge to clinical stability” (CS) is a mechanism that emphasizes the unique pathobiology of UBA1mutations in VEXAS and supports it as a distinct entity.

This cross-sectional study evaluates the prevalence of and characteristics associated with discontinuation of cancer treatment among patients who received a diagnosis of COVID-19 during their treatment planning.

Abstract Background and Aims Despite prior studies on the clinical impact of COVID-19 and the documented efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations in hemodialysis (HD) patients, the exact effects of COVID-19 vaccinations on various clinical biomarkers before and after the diagnosis of COVID-19 have not been established. In particular, the longitudinal trajectories of clinical and laboratory parameters remain unknown. We aim to investigate clinical and laboratory variables around the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and how vaccination impacts population trajectories. Method We studied 53,223 HD patients from Fresenius Kidney Care, a large U.S. dialysis organization, who received COVID-19 vaccination between January 1, 2021 and August 2, 2021. Depending on whether or not COVID-19 diagnosis happened after the first dose of vaccination for Johnson & Johnson or after the second dose for all other vaccines, we created two patient cohorts comprising patients infected before (N = 47,443) and after (N = 5780) full vaccination. A nonparametric cubic spline model for flexibility was fitted to the patient data averaged for each day between 60 days before and 60 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis. Clinical parameters include ones that are recorded at each HD treatment (pre-HD temperature, TEMP; pre-HD systolic blood pressure, SBP; pre-HD weight, WT; pre-HD pulse rate, PULSE; intradialytic weight gain, IDWG) and ones that are recorded less frequently (hemoglobin, HGB; white blood cell, WBC; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, NLR; platelet count, PLA; albumin, ALB). Results All longitudinal trajectory patterns undergo changes in the days before and after the diagnosis of COVID-19. In both the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts, there is an initial increase in TEMP, PULSE, and NLR up to 14 days preceding the diagnosis of COVID-19, followed by a subsequent decrease. Conversely, WT and IDWG exhibit a decline up to 14 days before the diagnosis of COVID-19 and an increase thereafter. ALB maintains a decreasing trend from 14 days prior until 20 days after before increasing again. In the unvaccinated cohort, SBP and WBC start decreasing up to 20 days ahead of diagnosis of COVID-19, whereas the unvaccinated cohort maintains a steady trend, increasing for SBP and decreasing for WBC. The lasting effects of COVID-19 can be found up to 60 days after diagnosis, e.g., WT, PULSE, and HGB. Variations in trend shapes are evident between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts across all variables. Notably, all variables in the vaccinated cohort demonstrate smaller changes around the days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusion We discovered trend changes in multiple variables in the days leading up to COVID-19 diagnosis, corroborating earlier findings. This finding lays the foundation for early detection ahead of regular COVID-19 tests. Prior COVID-19 vaccination mitigates the effect of COVID-19 on several important clinical and laboratory indicators, supporting the need for continued vaccination efforts. Lasting effects from infection are prevalent, extending beyond 60 days after confirmation. Further research is warranted to understand their long-term impact.

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a higher risk of developing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We developed a model of CKD-HFpEF and showed that renal-cardio pathophysiology is associated with decreased expression and availability of vascular endothelial growth factor in both organs. We showed that renal VEGF therapy improved renal function in our model. We hypothesize that cardiac VEGF therapy will improve cardiac function and will investigate whether cardiac protection in CKD also carries recovery of renal function. Method CKD and normal pigs (n = 4 each, 2 males/2 females) were studied for 14 weeks. In addition, CKD-HFpEF (n = 4, 2 males/2 females) were treated after 6 weeks of disease with a single intracoronary (IC) administration of VEGF attached to a drug-delivery vector (ELP-VEGF) that increases cardiac targeting, and effects quantified 8 weeks later. Renal (multi-detector CT) and cardiac (echocardiography, PV loops) morphology and function were quantified in vivo, microvascular (MV) density (3D micro-CT) ex vivo, and cardiac expression of VEGF was quantified by qPCR. Results Cardiac function, VEGF expression, and MV density were improved after IC ELP-VEGF therapy compared to placebo. Notably, renal hemodynamics (expressed as % change) were significantly improved compared to pre-treatment values and to time-matched untreated CKD-HFpEF pigs (Figure). Conclusion Our study suggests strong crosstalk between the heart and the kidney in a pre-clinical model of CKD-HFpEF. Renal and cardiac hemodynamics were significantly improved after cardiac VEGF therapy, conceptually supporting a cardio-renal axis in CKD and showing the extent of beneficial effects of a novel targeted intervention in a translational fashion.

Abstract Background and Aims Biological sex has been associated to a more rapid rate of chronic kidney disease progression (ie, speed of kidney function loss) in male than female [1]. Testosterone can increase oxidative stress, activate the renin angiotensin system, and aggravate renal fibrosis, whereas estrogens inhibit these pathological processes in the diseased kidney [2]. Several factors such as lower disease awareness and surveillance rates as well as disparities in health-care access result in late initiation or lack of kidney replacement therapy among females [3-5]. The impact of sex in the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) with glomerulonephritis (AAV-GN) has not been studied, particularly in patients with severe kidney involvement at presentation (eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73 m2). Method A retrospective cohort study on MPO- or PR3-ANCA positive patients with AAV (MPA or GPA) and eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or ESKD at presentation. Clinical presentation and outcomes (renal recovery, dialysis at presentation, and ESKD) were analyzed according with sex. Results We analyzed 166 patients with biopsy proven active AAV-GN and eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of diagnosis (Fig. 1): 78 (47%) were females and 88 (53%) were males. Arterial hypertension was more frequently present in males (85.2% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.022). Median serum creatinine (SCr) was higher in males when compared with females (5.2 [IQR 4.2-7.4] vs. 3.6 [IQR 2.8-5.1] mg/dL, p < 0.001) but there were no differences in eGFR at presentation. When analyzing only the 71 (24 females and 47 males) patients that started dialysis within 4 weeks, infections at 12 months were more common in females (75.0% vs. 36.2%, p = 0.017). The rate of dialysis initiation or progression to ESKD was not different between males (15, 62.5%) versus females (29, 61.7%) being on dialysis at 12 months. By multivariable logistic regression, factors related with dialysis initiation within 4 weeks in our cohort were SCr (OR1.478, [95% CI 1.231-1.776], p < 0.001), alveolar hemorrhage (OR 2.726, [95% CI 1.099-6.763], p = 0.031) and PR3-ANCA (OR3.155, [95% CI 1.485-6.702], p = 0.003) adjusted to sex). Patients who remained on dialysis at 12 months more often had higher SCr at diagnosis (IRR 1.098 [95% CI, 1.026–1.175], p = 0.007), severe chronicity changes on kidney biopsies (IRR 2.469 [95% CI,1.205–5.061], p = 0.014), higher chronicity score (IRR 1.178 [95%CI, 1.062-1.308], p = 0.002) and lower hemoglobin (IRR 0.824 [95%CI, 0.683-0.994], p = 0.043). Minimal chronicity changes were protective for the achievement of this endpoint (IRR 0.228 [95% CI, 0.070-0.741], p = 0.014). Multivariable Cox regression showed that patients with higher SCr at diagnosis and moderate/severe chronicity changes on biopsy were at higher risk to evolve to ESKD at 12 months compared to patients with lower chronicity grades, even when adjusted to sex. Conclusion In our cohort, male patients presented with higher SCr, and dialysis was started within 4 weeks more frequently. However, this did not result in different outcomes in terms of kidney recovery, overall dialysis rates, and progression to ESKD in patients with AAV-GN and eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 between groups.

Abstract Background and Aims Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) has a poor renal prognosis and a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation, up to 90%, typically within the first-year post-transplant. Nearly 50% of patients lose their renal allograft within 3 years of recurrence. It has been suggested that pretreatment therapy (with B cell depleting or plasma-cell directed therapy) can help prevent recurrence or modulate the course of disease post-transplant. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of pretreatment therapy given within 6 months prior to kidney transplant on outcomes including PGNMID recurrence and all cause graft loss. Method Between 1996 and 2022, a total of 28 patients with biopsy-proven PGNMID as the cause of end stage kidney disease received a total of 31 kidney transplants. All patients had at least one year of follow-up data, for all but one patient this included surveillance kidney transplant biopsies completed at our center. Recurrence was defined histologically by immunofluorescence finding of monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, independent of other histological or clinical parameters. The incidence of recurrence and all cause graft loss were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots. Results Median age of patients at transplant was 57 years, 87% were white, 65% were male, 74% received living donor transplant, 59% received thymoglobulin induction, 81% received maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Median follow up time was 80 months. A total of 9 patients received pretreatment within 6 months of transplant, 8 received Rituximab and one received Daratumumab. The pretreatment group was generally younger at transplant (53 years vs 57 years) and had a shorter median follow up time (65 months vs 96.5 months), but neither were statistically significant. Overall recurrence rate was 78% for pretreatment and 91% for control, though difference in time to recurrence was not statistically significant (Fig. 1). The difference in all cause graft loss between groups was not statistically significant, however, none in the pretreatment group had graft loss by 60 months (Fig. 2). One patient who received daratumumab had no recurrence by 1 year post-transplant. Conclusion In kidney transplant recipients with PGNMID, pretreatment (primarily with rituximab) may be modulating the post-transplant course of disease. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this effect and if plasma-cell directed vs B-cell directed therapy may be superior.

Background: Despite growing interest in delivering high-value orthopaedic care, the costs associated with hip arthroscopy remain poorly understood. By employing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), we aimed to characterize the cost composition of hip arthroscopy for labral pathological conditions and to identify factors that drive variation in cost. Methods: Using TDABC, we measured the costs of 890 outpatient hip arthroscopy procedures for labral pathological conditions across 5 surgeons at 4 surgery centers from 2015 to 2022. All patients were ≥18 years old and were treated by surgeons who each performed ≥20 surgeries during the study period. Costs were normalized to protect the confidentiality of internal hospital cost data. Descriptive analyses and multivariable linear regression were performed to identify factors underlying cost variation. Results: The study sample consisted of 515 women (57.9%) and 375 men (42.1%), with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 37.1 ± 12.7 years. Most of the procedures were performed in patients who were White (90.6%) or not Hispanic (93.4%). The normalized total cost of hip arthroscopy per procedure ranged from 43.4 to 203.7 (mean, 100 ± 24.2). Of the 3 phases of the care cycle, the intraoperative phase was identified as the largest generator of cost (>90%). On average, supply costs accounted for 48.8% of total costs, whereas labor costs accounted for 51.2%. A 2.5-fold variation between the 10th and 90th percentiles for total cost was attributed to supplies, which was greater than the 1.8-fold variation attributed to labor. Variation in total costs was most effectively explained by the labral management method (partial R 2 = 0.332), operating surgeon (partial R 2 = 0.326), osteoplasty type (partial R 2 = 0.087), and surgery center (partial R 2 = 0.086). Male gender (p < 0.001) and younger age (p = 0.032) were also associated with significantly increased costs. Finally, data trends revealed a shift toward labral preservation techniques over debridement during the study period (with the rate of such techniques increasing from 77.8% to 93.2%; P trend = 0.0039) and a strong correlation between later operative year and increased supply costs, labor costs, and operative time (p < 0.001 for each). Conclusions: By applying TDABC to outpatient hip arthroscopy, we identified wide patient-to-patient cost variation that was most effectively explained by the method of labral management, the operating surgeon, the osteoplasty type, and the surgery center. Given current procedural coding trends, declining reimbursements, and rising health-care costs, these insights may enable stakeholders to design bundled payment structures that better align reimbursements with costs. Level of Evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.