Nasr, Samih H.

ABSTRACT Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal B cell or plasma cell proliferative disorders that cause kidney injury without meeting criteria for overt malignancy. Advances in diagnostic techniques have enhanced the identification and classification of MGRS lesions. Clone-directed therapies such as proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are now central to treatment, targeting a deep haematologic response that is strongly associated with improved renal outcomes and reduced risk of recurrence following kidney transplantation. Despite these advances, management remains challenging in patients without detectable clones. This review highlights recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of MGRS, with an emphasis on therapeutic strategies, transplant considerations and evolving clinical challenges.

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate a large cohort of gallbladder amyloid cases to determine clinical and morphologic features. Methods Cholecystectomy specimens (N = 118) typed using proteomics-based techniques between 2008 and 2023 were identified. Clinical and morphologic features were reviewed. Results Six amyloid types were identified: ATTR (n = 63, 53.4%), AL (n = 46, 39.0%), AA (n = 4, 3.4%), AApoA1 (n = 2, 1.7%), ALECT2 (n = 2, 1.7%), and AEFEMP1 (n = 1, 0.8%). Amyloidogenic mutations were detected in 3 ATTR cases and 2 AApoA1 cases. Morphologic review (n = 26) revealed perimuscular vessel involvement in all cases. Amyloidosis was an unexpected diagnosis first made on the cholecystectomy specimen in half of the patients with clinical information (n = 10). All 9 patients with follow-up had evidence of systemic disease. In 2 patients, cholecystic involvement was initially missed and only retrospectively identified after the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Conclusions In patients with clinical data, amyloidosis was often unexpected, the gallbladder was commonly the first tissue sampled with amyloidosis, and all patients had systemic disease. Thorough review of cholecystectomy specimens with careful inspection of perimuscular vessels, coupled with a low threshold for ordering Congo red stain in elderly individuals and amyloid typing using a robust method such as proteomics, can prevent a delay in amyloid diagnosis and management.

Purpose of review Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID), is a disease defined by the presence of glomerulonephritis with nonorganized mono-isotypic immunoglobulin (Ig) deposits. This review will discuss the pathogenesis of PGNMID and address novel techniques for detection of monoclonal Ig and pathologic B-cell clones and for distinguishing monoclonal from oligoclonal Ig deposits. Recent findings Because of low detection rate of circulating monoclonal Ig and nephritogenic B-cell clones and emerging reports of PGNMID-IgG in children, it has been recently argued that many PGNMID-IgG3 cases may not be monoclonal lesions. A mass spectrometry-based method, serum matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, has been shown to have superior sensitivity than immunofixation for detection of monoclonal Ig in PGNMID and other monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) lesions. Two novel sequencing techniques, RNA-based immunoglobulin repertoire sequencing and single-molecule real-time sequencing of monoclonal immunoglobulin, enable identification of the full-length variable sequence of monoclonal Ig, even in MGRS patients with low tumor burden and undetectable monoclonal Ig by conventional methods. Finally, staining of kidney biopsy for Ig light chain variable domain subgroups may allow for separation of true monoclonal from oligoclonal PGNMID. Summary Novel sequencing, mass spectrometry, and immunofluorescence techniques have the potential to increase the detection rate of nephritogenic monoclonal Ig/B-cell clone and distinguish monoclonal from oligoclonal deposits in PGNMID.

Abstract Kidney disease is a common complication of monoclonal immunoglobulin (MIg)–secreting B-cell disorders and predominantly occurs in patients who do not meet the criteria for an overt hematological disease. To distinguish this situation from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, which lacks organ damage, the term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced to depict the association of a small, otherwise indolent B-cell clone, with renal disease induced by the secreted MIg. The spectrum of renal disorders in MGRS is wide, encompassing both tubular and glomerular disorders, classified according to the composition of deposits and their ultrastructural pattern of organization. Renal lesions, independent of the tumor burden, are mostly governed by the molecular characteristics of the MIg variable domain and involve either direct (deposition or precipitation) or indirect (autoantibody activity, complement activation) mechanisms. The diagnosis, often suggested by careful analysis of renal and extrarenal symptoms, almost always requires histological confirmation by a kidney biopsy with light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy studies. Most patients do not have a known monoclonal gammopathy at presentation. Hematologic investigations should include serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, serum-free light chain measurements, and bone marrow studies with flow cytometry and cytogenetics to determine the nature of the pathogenic clone (most commonly plasmocytic). Early diagnosis before the development of severe chronic kidney disease and rapid achievement of deep hematological response through clone-targeted chemotherapy (currently based on proteasome inhibitor and monoclonal anti-CD38 antibody–based combinations for plasma cell clones) are the main factors influencing long-term renal and patient outcomes.

Abstract Objectives Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutation of UBA1 and affects multiple organ systems. Involvement of the kidneys is not well characterized. We aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors and histopathologic features of acute kidney injury (AKI) in VEXAS syndrome. Methods Patients with genetically confirmed UBA1 mutation consistent with VEXAS were included. Charts were manually reviewed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with time-to-first AKI event. For patients with a kidney biopsy, histopathologic findings were reviewed. Results Eighty-one patients were included, all white men, with a mean age of 66.3 ± 8.6 years. Median (IQR) follow up was 3.5 (2.1–5.2) years during which 20 (25%) developed AKI and 22% died. AKI relapsed in 90% of cases for a median of 6 times during the follow up period. Cumulative incidence estimates (95% CI) for AKI at 1, 3 and 5 years were 6.2% (0.80–11.3%), 16.7% (7.5–25.0%) and 27.9% (14.9–38.9%), respectively. Age and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly associated with time-to-first AKI event. Six patients underwent a kidney biopsy. Findings included, plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis (n = 3), neutrophilic-rich interstitial inflammation (n = 1), leukocytoclastic peritubular capillaritis (n = 1) and acute tubular injury (n = 1). AKI responded well to treatment with glucocorticoids but had relapse upon tapering. Conclusion AKI is an underrecognized feature of VEXAS occurring in 25% of patients in this cohort. Age at diagnosis and CRP were associated with time to first AKI event during follow up. Plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis was the most common histopathologic finding.

Abstract Background and Aims Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) has a poor renal prognosis and a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation, up to 90%, typically within the first-year post-transplant. Nearly 50% of patients lose their renal allograft within 3 years of recurrence. It has been suggested that pretreatment therapy (with B cell depleting or plasma-cell directed therapy) can help prevent recurrence or modulate the course of disease post-transplant. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of pretreatment therapy given within 6 months prior to kidney transplant on outcomes including PGNMID recurrence and all cause graft loss. Method Between 1996 and 2022, a total of 28 patients with biopsy-proven PGNMID as the cause of end stage kidney disease received a total of 31 kidney transplants. All patients had at least one year of follow-up data, for all but one patient this included surveillance kidney transplant biopsies completed at our center. Recurrence was defined histologically by immunofluorescence finding of monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, independent of other histological or clinical parameters. The incidence of recurrence and all cause graft loss were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots. Results Median age of patients at transplant was 57 years, 87% were white, 65% were male, 74% received living donor transplant, 59% received thymoglobulin induction, 81% received maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Median follow up time was 80 months. A total of 9 patients received pretreatment within 6 months of transplant, 8 received Rituximab and one received Daratumumab. The pretreatment group was generally younger at transplant (53 years vs 57 years) and had a shorter median follow up time (65 months vs 96.5 months), but neither were statistically significant. Overall recurrence rate was 78% for pretreatment and 91% for control, though difference in time to recurrence was not statistically significant (Fig. 1). The difference in all cause graft loss between groups was not statistically significant, however, none in the pretreatment group had graft loss by 60 months (Fig. 2). One patient who received daratumumab had no recurrence by 1 year post-transplant. Conclusion In kidney transplant recipients with PGNMID, pretreatment (primarily with rituximab) may be modulating the post-transplant course of disease. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this effect and if plasma-cell directed vs B-cell directed therapy may be superior.