Citations

e16579 Background: Recent results from EV 302 and CheckMate 901 have transformed the treatment landscape of untreated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (Ia/mUC). Here, we present the most up-to-date evidence of comparative efficacy and safety of first line (1L) treatment options in Ia/mUC with emphasis on Enfortumab vedotin (EV)-pembrolizumab (P) and gemcitabine (Gem)-cisplatin (Cis)-nivolumab (N). Methods: This living systematic review used the living interactive evidence (LIvE) synthesis framework. Full-text and abstract publications of phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing 1L immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO+C) or immunotherapy alone (IO) regimens with platinum-based chemotherapy (Plat) in Ia/mUC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events (≥G3 TRAE). Mixed treatment comparisons were made using network meta-analysis. P-scores were computed to assess relative treatment rankings. Results: A total of 5 trials (8 references) with 4,749 patients and 9 unique treatments were included. EV-P and Gem-Cis-N were ranked first and second in terms of OS and PFS improvement. EV-P improved OS compared to Gem-Cis-N (HR: 0.60; 0.45-0.81), Gem-Plat-atezolizumab(A) (0.55; 0.42-0.72), durvalumab(D)- tremelimumab(T) (0.55; 0.42-0.72), Gem-Plat-P (0.55; 0.42-0.72), P (0.51; 0.39-0.68), D (0.47; 0.36-0.63), A (0.48; 0.36-0.63) and Gem-Plat (0.47; 0.38-0.58). EV-P also improved PFS compared to Gem-Cis-N (0.63; 0.48-0.82), Gem-Plat-A (0.55; 0.43-0.69), D-T (0.42; 0.33-0.53), Gem-Plat-P (0.58; 0.45-0.74), P (0.34; 0.26-0.44), D (0.35; 0.27-0.44) and Gem-Plat (0.45; 0.38- 0.54). For ≥G3 TRAE, A was ranked first with the lowest adverse events compared to others. EV-P (rank 5) had significantly fewer events compared to Gem-Plat, Gem-Plat-A, Gem-Cis-N and Gem-Plat-P. Gem-Cis-N was ranked last with significantly greater events compared to A, P, D, D-T, Gem-Plat, EV-P, and Gem-Plat-A (Table with ranks [p-scores]). Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that patients with untreated la/mUC experience improved survival and slower disease progression with EV-P when compared to other contemporary options. Gem-Cis-N may be a reasonable alternative in patients who are cisplatin-eligible. Cost and access to these treatments are crucial and should be considered to facilitate shared decision making. [Table: see text]

e16531 Background: Hypoxia-inducible Factor-2α (HIF-2α) is a transcription factor that accumulates in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and is responsible for genes involved in oncogenesis. Belzutifan is a HIF-2α inhibitor that has shown promising anti-tumor effects in patients with ccRCC. Our objective is to summarize the available literature on the safety and efficacy profile of the drug. Methods: An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane from inception till January 31st, 2024. We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years with ccRCC who received Belzutifan. We extracted data on objective response rate, complete response rate, any grade adverse effect (AE) and grade ≥3 AE. Data was analyzed using R (v.4.3) and reported as proportions with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) on forest plots. Results: Three studies (n=168 patients) were identified that reported the use of Belzutifan in ccRCC. Our analysis showed that pooled proportion of objective response rate and complete response rate was 35% (95% CI: 24% – 47%) and 1% (95% CI: 0% – 5%) respectively. Pooled proportion of patients experiencing any grade AE and grade ≥3 AE was 98% (95% CI: 95% – 99%) and 49% (95% CI: 29% – 69%) respectively. Conclusions: Belzutifan is a novel drug that inhibits HIF-2α which in turn results in anti-tumor effects of the drug against ccRCC. The drug has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile from limited data but more studies are needed to establish a complete picture of drug’s adverse effects and clinical benefits. Pooled proportion of patients developing (A) Objective Response, (B) Complete response (C) Any adverse effect and (D) Grade ≥3 adverse effects. [Table: see text]

PURPOSE Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E cytotoxic payload. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539536 ) aimed to identify the optimal c-Met protein–overexpressing non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population for treatment with Teliso-V (stage I) and expand the selected group for efficacy evaluation (stage II). Stage II enrolled patients with nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-wildtype NSCLC. METHODS Eligible patients had locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–overexpressing NSCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy (including ≤1 line of systemic chemotherapy). c-Met protein overexpression in nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining (high [≥50% 3+]; intermediate [≥25%–<50%]). Teliso-V was administered at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. RESULTS In total, 172 patients with nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC received Teliso-V in stages I and II. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 21.7 to 36.2; c-Met high, 34.6% [95% CI, 24.2 to 46.2]; c-Met intermediate, 22.9% [95% CI, 14.4 to 33.4]). The median duration of response was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3; c-Met high, 9.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 13.0]; c-Met intermediate: 7.2 [95% CI, 5.3 to 11.5]). The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.9 to 16.6; c-Met high, 14.6 [95% CI, 9.2 to 25.6]; c-Met intermediate, 14.2 [95% CI, 9.6 to 16.6]). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.9; c-Met high, 5.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3]; c-Met intermediate: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1]). Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%); the most common grade ≥3 AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSION Teliso-V was associated with durable responses in c-Met protein–overexpressing nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC, especially in those with high c-Met. AEs were generally manageable.

Abstract Rationale Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Our previous studies have identified that nocturnal hypoxemia causes skeletal muscle loss (i.e., sarcopenia) in in vitro models of COPD. Objectives We aimed to extend our preclinical mechanistic findings by analyzing a large sleep registry to determine whether nocturnal hypoxemia is associated with sarcopenia in patients with COPD. Methods Sleep studies from patients with COPD (n = 479) and control subjects without COPD (n = 275) were analyzed. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea, as defined by apnea–hypopnea index ⩾ 5, were excluded. Pectoralis muscle cross-sectional area (PMcsa) was quantified using computed tomography scans performed within 1 year of the sleep study. We defined sarcopenia as less than the lowest 20% residuals for PMcsa of control subjects, which was adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) and stratified by sex. Youden’s optimal cut-point criteria were used to predict sarcopenia based on mean oxygen saturation during sleep. Additional measures of nocturnal hypoxemia were analyzed. The pectoralis muscle index (PMI) was defined as PMcsa normalized to BMI. Results On average, males with COPD had a 16.6% lower PMI than control males (1.41 ± 0.44 vs. 1.69 ± 0.56 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.001), whereas females with COPD had a 9.4% lower PMI than control females (0.96 ± 0.27 vs. 1.06 ± 0.33 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.001). Males with COPD with nocturnal hypoxemia had a 9.5% decrease in PMI versus COPD with normal O2 (1.33 ± 0.39 vs. 1.47 ± 0.46 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.05) and a 23.6% decrease compared with control subjects (1.33 ± 0.39 vs. 1.74 ± 0.56 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.001). Females with COPD with nocturnal hypoxemia had an 11.2% decrease versus COPD with normal O2 (0.87 ± 0.26 vs. 0.98 ± 0.28 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.05) and a 17.9% decrease compared with control subjects (0.87 ± 0.26 vs. 1.06 ± 0.33 cm2/BMI; P &lt; 0.001). These findings were largely replicated using multiple measures of nocturnal hypoxemia. Conclusions We defined sarcopenia in the pectoralis muscle using residuals that take into account age, BMI, and sex. We found that patients with COPD have a lower PMI than patients without COPD and that nocturnal hypoxemia was associated with an additional decrease in the PMI of patients with COPD. Additional prospective analyses are needed to determine a protective threshold of oxygen saturation to prevent or reverse sarcopenia due to nocturnal hypoxemia in COPD.

The present study investigated the independent association between actigraphy-based sleep duration, efficiency, and measures of blood pressure, heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in adult males and females. Contrary to our hypothesis, the findings do not support an independent association between habitual sleep and cardiovascular or sympathetic neural activity. However, these findings do not preclude a potential association between these parameters in populations with sleep disorders and/or cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Blood volume (BV) profiles vary markedly in patients with heart failure (HF), but how HF phenotypes and patient sex impact volume profiles remain to be explored. The aim of the study was to differentiate BV, plasma volume, and red blood cell mass profiles by phenotypes of preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and assess the impact of patient sex on profile heterogeneity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and BV data was undertaken in patients with chronic New York Heart Association II–III heart failure. BV was quantitated using the nuclear medicine indicator-dilution methodology. RESULTS: A total of 530 BV analyses (360 HF with reduced ejection fraction and 170 HF with preserved ejection fraction) were identified in 395 unique patients. Absolute BV was greater in HF with reduced ejection fraction (6.7±1.8 versus 5.9±1.6 liters: P <0.001); however, large variability in frequency distribution of volume profiles was observed in both phenotypes (−22% deficit to +109% excess relative to normal volumes). HF with reduced ejection fraction was characterized by a higher prevalence of BV expansion ≥+25% of normal (39% versus 26%; P =0.003), and HF with preserved ejection fraction was characterized a by more frequent normal BV (42% versus 24%; P <0.001). Male sex in both phenotypes was associated with a larger absolute BV (7.0±1.6 versus 5.1±1.3 liters; P <0.001) and higher frequency of large BV and plasma volume expansions above normal (both P <0.001), while females in both phenotypes demonstrated a higher prevalence of normal BV and plasma volume (both P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support significant differences in BV, plasma volume, and red blood cell mass profile distributions between heart failure phenotypes, driven in large part by sex-specific factors. This underscores the importance of identifying and distinguishing individual patient volume profiles to help guide volume management strategies.

How the KRAS oncogene drives cancer growth remains poorly understood. Therefore, we established a systemwide portrait of KRAS- and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)–dependent gene transcription in KRAS-mutant cancer to delineate the molecular mechanisms of growth and of inhibitor resistance. Unexpectedly, our KRAS-dependent gene signature diverges substantially from the frequently cited Hallmark KRAS signaling gene signature, is driven predominantly through the ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, and accurately reflects KRAS- and ERK-regulated gene transcription in KRAS-mutant cancer patients. Integration with our ERK-regulated phospho- and total proteome highlights ERK deregulation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and other components of the cell cycle machinery as key processes that drive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) growth. Our findings elucidate mechanistically the critical role of ERK in driving KRAS-mutant tumor growth and in resistance to KRAS-ERK MAPK targeted therapies.