Carter, Jason R.

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a widely utilized approach for investigating cardiovascular health and human performance. Methodological approaches, analyses, and interpretations of HRV can vary extensively, and scientific debates on HRV reliability and utility remain. These debates have been amplified in recent years by the rapid growth and ubiquity of wearable devices, and their incorporation into scientific research studies. The present guidelines paper takes an evidence-based approach to propose more consistent and rigorous measurement and interpretation of HRV within human cardiovascular research and application. First, HRV has some utility as a cardiovascular risk stratification tool, but is not appropriate to employ as a specific marker of cardiac sympathetic outflow or sympathovagal balance. While time-domain and spectral analysis can more accurately reflect respiratory modulation of cardiac vagal (parasympathetic) activity, caution is necessary to avoid overinterpretation, particularly with respect to the concept of “vagal tone”. Numerous experimental, demographic, and environmental factors influence HRV assessment, interpretation, and reliability. Specifically, it is critical to account for non-modifiable (age, sex, race/ethnicity, etc.) and modifiable (i.e., exercise, physical fitness, etc.) factors within participant samples. Furthermore, technical approaches such as the HRV input signal (e.g., electrocardiography vs. photoplethysmography), length of recording, location of recordings (i.e., laboratory vs. field), respiratory rate and depth, and analytical approaches (i.e., time vs. frequency domain) can all impact rigor, reliability, and study interpretations. Finally, with respect to the rapid advancements of HRV assessment using wearable technology, investigators should interpret and contextualize findings within the limitations outlined in this guideline review.

Increases in aortic wave reflection and aortic pulsatile load are known contributors to hypertension, cardiovascular risk, and pulsatile stress to end organs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that evening binge alcohol consumption increases heart rate, aortic pulsatile load, and aortic augmentation index the following morning when compared with fluid control. These findings highlight the deleterious overnight cardiovascular effects of binge alcohol consumption in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption is associated with cardiovascular disease, and the sympathetic nervous system is a suspected mediator. The present study investigated sympathetic transduction of muscle sympathetic nerve activity to blood pressure at rest and in response to cold pressor test following evening binge alcohol or fluid control, with the hypothesis that sympathetic transduction would be elevated the morning after binge alcohol consumption. METHODS: Using a randomized, fluid-controlled (FC) crossover design, 26 healthy adults (12 male, 14 female, 25±6 years, 27±4 kg/m 2 ) received an evening binge alcohol dose and a FC. All participants underwent next-morning autonomic-cardiovascular testing consisting of muscle sympathetic nerve activity, beat-to-beat blood pressure, and heart rate during a 10-minute rest period and a 2-minute cold pressor test. Sympathetic transduction was assessed at rest and during the cold pressor test in both experimental conditions. RESULTS: Evening alcohol increased heart rate (FC: 60±9 versus alcohol: 64±9 bpm; P =0.010) but did not alter resting mean arterial pressure (FC: 80±6 versus alcohol: 80±7 mm Hg; P =0.857) or muscle sympathetic nerve activity (FC: 18±9 versus alcohol: 20±8 bursts/min; P =0.283). Sympathetic transduction to mean arterial pressure (time×condition; P =0.003), diastolic blood pressure (time×condition; P =0.010), and total vascular conductance (time×condition; P =0.004) was augmented after alcohol at rest. Sympathetic transduction during the cold pressor test was also elevated after evening binge alcohol consumption ( P =0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that evening binge alcohol consumption leads to augmented morning-after sympathetic transduction of muscle sympathetic nerve activity to blood pressure, highlighting a new mechanism whereby chronic or excessive alcohol consumption contributes to cardiovascular disease progression via altered end-organ responsiveness to sympathetic neural outflow. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03567434 ; Unique identifier: NCT03567434.

The present study investigated the independent association between actigraphy-based sleep duration, efficiency, and measures of blood pressure, heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in adult males and females. Contrary to our hypothesis, the findings do not support an independent association between habitual sleep and cardiovascular or sympathetic neural activity. However, these findings do not preclude a potential association between these parameters in populations with sleep disorders and/or cardiovascular disease.

Anxiety is associated with development of cardiovascular disease. Although the sympathetic nervous system is a likely mediator of this relationship, populations with chronic anxiety have shown little, if any, alteration in resting levels of directly recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). The present study is the first to reveal an independent relationship between trait anxiety, resting blood pressure, and MSNA in a large cohort of healthy males and females devoid of cardiometabolic comorbidities.

The antihypertensive influence of fish oil is controversial, and mechanisms remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that fish oil reduces mean arterial pressure (MAP) via reductions in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Because the inverse relation between fish oil and hypertension appears to be dependent on the degree of hypertension, we also tested the hypothesis that fish oil would elicit more dramatic reductions in MAP and MSNA in prehypertensive (PHT) compared to normotensive (NT) subjects. Resting MAP, MSNA, and heart rate (HR) were examined before and after 8 wk of fish oil (9g/day) or placebo (olive oil; 9g/day) in 38 NT (19 fish oil; 19 placebo) and 29 PHT (15 fish oil; 14 placebo) volunteers. Fish oil did not alter resting MAP, MSNA, or HR in either NT (71±2 to 71±2 mmHg; 11±2 to 10±1 bursts/min; 80±1 to 80±1 beats/min) or PHT (88±2 to 87±1 mmHg; 11±2 to 10±2 bursts/min; 73±2 to 73±2 beats/min) subjects. However, when NT and PHT groups were consolidated, a significant correlation was observed between changes in MAP and changes in MSNA in the fish oil group (r=0.354, p=0.035). In conclusion, fish oil did not alter neural cardiovascular control in NT or PHT. However, interindividual MAP responses to fish oil appear to be moderately associated with changes in MSNA, suggesting that the sympathetic nervous system may contribute to the inconsistent antihypertensive response of fish oil. Supported by NIH (HL‐088689).

Some studies report an increase of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during the midluteal (ML) phase of the menstrual cycle when compared to the early follicular phase (EF), while others do not. The inconsistent findings may be due, in part, to variable surges in estradiol and progesterone. We tested the hypothesis that the degree of sympathoexcitation during the ML phase (ΔMSNA) is associated with changes in estradiol (ΔE 2 ) and progesterone (ΔP). Retrospective analysis of previous studies with recordings of mean arterial pressure (MAP), MSNA, E 2 , and P during both EF and ML phases yielded 30 eumenorrheic women (age, 18–51 yrs). ML phase increased E 2 (37±2 to 117±9 pg/ml; p<.001), P (1±0 to 11±1 ng/ml; p<.001), and MSNA (12±1 to 15±1 bursts/min; p=.02), but did not alter MAP (83±2 to 83±2 mmHg; p=.91). ΔMSNA was correlated to ΔE 2 (r=−.50, p=.005) and ΔE 2 /ΔP (r=−.52, p=.004), but not ΔP (r=.21, p=.26). There was no association between ΔMAP and ΔE 2 (r=−.13, p=.49), ΔP (r=−.04, p=.83), or ΔE 2 /ΔP (r<.01, p=.98). In conclusion, sympathoexcitatory responses to the ML phase appear to be associated with the degree of sex steroid surges. While E 2 had a stronger influence on MSNA than P, it is worthy to note that a strong association with ΔMSNA persisted when both ΔE 2 and ΔP were considered. This dynamic interaction between E 2 , P, and MSNA likely explains previously reported inconsistencies in the field. Supported by NIH.

Omega‐3 fatty acids found in fish oil have been suggested to protect against cardiovascular disease, yet underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Given the well documented links between mental stress (MS) and cardiovascular risk, we hypothesized that fish oil would blunt blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responsiveness to MS. Neural and cardiovascular responses to a 5 min mental arithmetic protocol were recorded in 67 non‐hypertensive subjects before and after 8 wks of fish oil (9g/day; n=33) or placebo (olive oil; 9g/day; n=34). Fish oil blunted HR reactivity to MS (group × condition × time interaction, P=0.012), but did not alter BP reactivity (interactions, P>;0.05). Fish oil blunted total MSNA reactivity to MS (interaction, P=0.039), but did not alter MSNA burst frequency and burst incidence reactivity (interactions, P>;0.05). Finally, fish oil significantly blunted calf vascular conductance (CVC) reactivity to MS (interaction, P=0.013), but did not alter forearm vascular conductance reactivity (interaction, P>;0.05). In conclusion, 8 wks of fish oil supplementation significantly attenuated HR and total MSNA reactivity to MS, and elicited a paradoxical blunting of CVC. These findings support and extend the growing evidence that fish oil may have positive health benefits regarding neural cardiovascular control in humans. Supported by NIH (HL‐088689).

Endogenous female sex hormones influence muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), a regulator of arterial blood pressure and important factor in hypertension development. Although ≈80% of American women report using hormonal contraceptives sometime during their life, the influence of combined oral contraceptives (OCs) on MSNA and systemic hemodynamics remains equivocal. The goal of this study was to determine whether women taking OCs have altered MSNA and hemodynamics (cardiac output and total peripheral resistance) at rest during the placebo phase of OC use compared with women with natural menstrual cycles during the early follicular phase. We retrospectively analyzed data from studies in which healthy, premenopausal women (aged 18–35 years) participated. We collected MSNA values at rest and hemodynamic measurements in women taking OCs (n=53; 25±4 years) and women with natural menstrual cycles (n=74; 25±4 years). Blood pressure was higher in women taking OCs versus those with natural menstrual cycles (mean arterial pressure, 89±1 versus 85±1 mm Hg, respectively; P =0.01), although MSNA was similar in both groups (MSNA burst incidence, 16±1 versus 18±1 bursts/100 heartbeats, respectively; P =0.19). In a subset of women in which detailed hemodynamic data were available, those taking OCs (n=33) had similar cardiac output (4.9±0.2 versus 4.7±0.2 L/min, respectively; P =0.47) and total peripheral resistance (19.2±0.8 versus 20.0±0.9 U, respectively; P =0.51) as women with natural menstrual cycles (n=22). In conclusion, women taking OCs have higher resting blood pressure and similar MSNA and hemodynamics during the placebo phase of OC use when compared with naturally menstruating women in the early follicular phase.