Citations

Showing 10 of 107969 citations.

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with stenting versus stenting alone in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Ramai, Daryl , Maida, Marcello , Smith, Eric , Wang, Yichen , Chandan, Saurabh , Huang, Yuting , Tokmak, Salih , DuBroff, Jason, Ko, Christopher , Morris, John D., Marasco, Giovanni , Crinò, Stefano Francesco , Khashab, Mouen A., Chandan, Saurabh , Huang, Yuting , Tokmak, Salih , Marasco, Giovanni , Crinò, Stefano Francesco , Facciorusso, Antonio , Mangiavillano, Benedetto , Wang, Yichen , Spadaccini, Marco , Previtera, Melissa J. , Bhandari, Peter , Facciorusso, Antonio , Khashab, Mouen A.

Mayo Clinic

Endoscopy | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 03 | Pages: 272-281

10.1055/a-2378-9533 | PMID 39094769 Get It

AbstractEndoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a palliative treatment for patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of RFA on stent patency, patient survival, and adverse events.Major databases were searched through December 2023 for patients who had undergone stenting with or without RFA for extrahepatic MBO. A random-effects model was used for analysis, with results expressed as relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95%CIs.Nine RCTs involving 750 subjects with MBO (374 RFA plus stent vs. 376 stent only) were included. Meta-analysis revealed similar risks of stent patency at 3 months (RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.92–1.11; I 2 = 4%) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Meta-analysis showed improved survival at 6 months (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.73–0.96; I 2 = 21%; P = 0.01) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Subgroup analysis comparing plastic vs. uncovered metal stents showed that stent patency was unaffected at 3 months (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.91–1.23; I 2 = 17%). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with cholangiocarcinoma experienced an overall survival benefit with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone (P < 0.001); however, stent patency remained unaffected (P = 0.08). An increased incidence of cholecystitis was noted with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone (5.1% [95%CI 3.1%–7.8%] vs. 0.3% [95%CI 0.01%–1.5%], respectively).Combining endoluminal RFA and stenting may improve overall survival in patients with MBO. RFA did not significantly impact stent patency.
Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant-led Cardiovascular Surgery Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Staffing Model
Perry, Ralph T., Weimer, John, Pratt, Carrie, Newcome, Marci, Bagameri, Gabor, Weimer, John W. , Newcome, Marci D., Bohman, John K , Bohman, J. Kyle

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 178-183

10.1177/08850666241268458 | PMID 39094588 Get It

Objectives To determine whether a nurse practitioner and physician assistant (NP/PA)-led rapid staffing. Model in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can optimize resource utilization without compromising safety or increasing hospital length of stay (LoS). Design Retrospective observational cohort study comparing before-and-after implementation of an NP/PA-led rapid recovery pathway. Setting A large tertiary referral academic cardiac surgery ICU. Participants There were 116 patients in the prerapid recovery cohort and 153 in the postimplementation rapid recovery phase. Interventions Low-risk cardiac surgery patients were selected for postoperative care by an NP/PA-led ICU staffing model. Measurements and Main Results Mean hospital LoS in the prerapid recovery cohort was 5.7 days compared to 5.2 days in the rapid recovery pathway cohort ( P = .02). Thirty-day hospital readmission in the prerapid recovery pathway cohort was 7.8% compared with 2.0% in the rapid recovery cohort ( P = .04). The ICU readmission rate for prerapid recovery cohort was 4.3%, while the rapid recovery percentage was 2.0% ( P = .30). Conclusions Overall, implementation of an NP/PA-led postcardiac surgical ICU team ( rapid recovery pathway) was associated with similar ICU LoS, hospital LoS, ICU readmission rates, 30-day readmission rates, and no significant signal of increased adverse events or safety concerns.
Pulsed Vibro-Acoustic Analysis Technique for Monitoring Bone Health in Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study
Chaudhary, Pradeep Kumar , Rosen, David , Larson, Nicholas B. , Brumbaugh, Jane E. , Fatemi, Mostafa , Gu, Juanjuan, Rosen, David P , Fatemi, Mostafa , Larson, Nicholas B , Brumbaugh, Jane E , Gu, Juanjuan , Alizad, Azra

Mayo Clinic

IEEE Access | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 106707-106719

10.1109/access.2024.3437375 | PMID 39148928 Get It

Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Compliance With Utilization of a Mail-In Semen Analysis Kit
Gu, Catherine , Belarmino, André , Nolte, Daniel, Civello, Daniel, Honig, Stanton, Kenfield, Stacey A. , Smith, Daron , Mehta, Akanksha , Punjani, Nahid , Lerner, Lori B.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 212 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 899-906

10.1097/ju.0000000000004185 | PMID 39093876 Get It

Efficacy and safety of combining short-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with envafolimab in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with microsatellite stability: a phase II PRECAM experimental study
Lai, Chuanxi , Lv, Yiming , Zhang, Feixiang , Shi, Liming , Wang, Yunfei , Shen, Yanbin , Xu, Lingna , Hu, Peng , Tang, Wen, Xu, Dengyong, Cao, Gaoyang , Shan, Lina , Jia, Xiya, Chen, Yiyi , Wang, Da , Lao, Weifeng , Sun, Xiaonan , Wang, Fei , Hu, Peng, Larson, David W. , Gu, Hongcang , Huang, Xuefeng , Dai, Sheng

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Surgery | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 334-345

10.1097/js9.0000000000001960 | PMID 39093871 Get It

Background: Conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) yields a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 15–30% for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study ventures to shift this paradigm by incorporating short-course nCRT with immunotherapy, specifically Envafolimab, to achieve improved treatment efficacy and possibly redefine the standard of care for LARC. Materials and methods: The PRECAM study is a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial for LARC in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Participants received short-course radiotherapy (25Gy/5f), followed by two cycles of CAPEOX chemotherapy and six weekly doses of Envafolimab, a PD-L1 antibody, before total mesorectal excision surgery. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. Results: From April to December 2022, 34 patients were enrolled, of whom 32 completed the study, each diagnosed with an MSS rectal adenocarcinoma. All patients underwent preoperative CRT combined with Envafolimab. Remarkably, a pCR rate of 62.5% (20/32) was attained, and a significant pathologic response rate of 75% (24/32) was achieved. Additionally, 21 of 32 participants achieved a neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score below 8, suggesting an effective treatment response. Common adverse events included tenesmus (78.1%), diarrhea (62.5%), and leukocyte decrease (40.6%). Two Grade 3 adverse events were noted, one related to liver function abnormality and the other to a decrease in platelet count. Surgical procedures were performed in all cases, with minor complications, including ileus, infections, and anastomotic leakage. As of this report, there have been no reported cases of recurrence or death during the follow-up period, ranging from 12 to 20 months. Conclusion: In LARC patients exhibiting MSS tumors, combining short-course nCRT with Envafolimab demonstrated favorable efficacy, leading to a significant pCR rate. Minor adverse effects and surgical complications were observed. These preliminary but promising results underscore the potential of this approach and call for further exploration and validation through a randomized controlled trial.
Impact of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel outcomes in adults with B-cell ALL
Aldoss, Ibrahim , Roloff, Gregory W. , Kopmar, Noam E. , Lin, Chenyu , Advani, Anjali S. , Dekker, Simone E. , O’Connor, Timothy E. , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Muhsen, Ibrahim N. , Valtis, Yannis K. , Zhang, Amy , Miller, Katharine, Sutherland, Katherine C. , Ahmed, Mohamed , Zambrano, Héctor, Bradshaw, Danielle , Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Kubiak, Michal Jakub , Mukherjee, Akash , Mountjoy, Luke , Malik, Shahbaz A. , Shaughnessy, Paul , Ladha, Abdullah , Stefan, Maryann, Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Moore, Jozal , Connor, Matthew P. , O’Dwyer, Kristen M. , Hill, LaQuisa C. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Sasine, Joshua , Solh, Melhem , Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Blunk, Betsy, Oliai, Caspian , Park, Jae H. , Bachanová, Veronika , Galal, Ahmed , Bishop, Michael R. , Pullarkat, Vinod , Muffly, Lori , Lin, Chenyu , Advani, Anjali S , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Dykes, Kaitlyn C , Chen, Evan , Bradshaw, Danielle , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai R , Majhail, Navneet S , Logan, Aaron C , Ladha, Abdullah , Hilal, Talal , Moore, Jozal , Connor, Matthew , Hill, LaQuisa C , Sasine, Joshua , Lee, Catherine J , Leonard, Jessica T , Frey, Noelle V , Luskin, Marlise R , Muffly, Lori , Bachanova, Veronika , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Muhsen, Ibrahim N , Sutherland, Katherine , Roloff, Gregory W , Faramand, Rawan , Gupta, Vishal , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Mercadal, Santiago , Schwartz, Marc, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Majhail, Navneet S. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Mathews, John, Hilal, Talal , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Tsai, Stephanie B., Kota, Vamsi , Oliai, Caspian H , Frey, Noelle V. , Bishop, Michael Russell , Stock, Wendy , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Shah, Bijal

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 6139-6147

10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013747 | PMID 39093952 Get It

Abstract The effect of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) outcomes remains unclear in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 189 patients with relapsed/refractory ALL treated with brexu-cel. Over half of the patients received InO before brexu-cel (InO exposed). InO-exposed patients were more heavily pretreated (P = .02) and frequently had active marrow disease before apheresis (P = .03). Response rate and toxicity profile after brexu-cel were comparable for InO-exposed and InO-naïve patients; however, consolidation therapy after brexu-cel response was used at a higher rate in InO-naïve patients (P = .005). With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, InO-exposed patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = .013) and overall survival (OS; P = .006) in univariate analyses; however, prior InO exposure did not influence PFS (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.03) in multivariate models. Within InO-exposed patients, InO responders had superior PFS (P = .002) and OS (P &lt; .0001) relative to InO-refractory patients. The timing of administering InO did not affect brexu-cel outcomes, with comparable PFS (P = .51) and OS (P = .86) for patients receiving InO as bridging therapy or before apheresis. In conclusion, although InO exposure was associated with inferior survival outcomes after brexu-cel in unadjusted analyses, these associations were no longer significant in multivariate analyses, suggesting it is unlikely that InO negatively affects brexu-cel efficacy. Our data instead imply that InO-exposed recipients of brexu-cel tend to be higher-risk patients with intrinsic adverse leukemia biology.
The Evolving Role of Genetic Testing in Monogenic Kidney Stone Disease: Spotlight on Primary Hyperoxaluria
Breeggemann, Matthew C. , Wood, Kyle D. , Harris, Peter C. , Lieske, John C. , Tasian, Gregory E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 212 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 649-659

10.1097/ju.0000000000004147 | PMID 39093847 Get It

Gender Differences in Autonomy Granted to Residents and Fellows During Procedural Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lund, Sarah , Griffeth, Elaine M. , Williamson, Andrea J.H. , Collings, Amelia T. , Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera , Han, Amy , Kearse, LaDonna , Kratzke, Ian M. , Wilkins, Parvathi , Prokop, Larry J. , Cook, David A. , Williamson, Andrea , Collings, Amelia , Prokop, Larry , Kearse, LaDonna E , Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera

Mayo Clinic

Academic Medicine | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 922-930

10.1097/acm.0000000000005673 | PMID 38412483 Get It

Abstract Purpose Supervisors may be prone to implicit (unintentional) bias when granting procedural autonomy to trainees due to the subjectivity of autonomy decisions. The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy granted to physician trainees based on gender and/or race. Method MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched (search date: January 5, 2022) for studies reporting quantitative gender- or race-based differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy of physician trainees. Reviewers worked in duplicate for article selection and data abstraction. Primary measures of interest were self-reported and observer-rated procedural autonomy. Meta-analysis pooled differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy based on trainee gender. Results The search returned 2,714 articles, of which 16 were eligible for inclusion. These reported data for 6,109 trainees (median, 90 per study) and 2,763 supervisors (median, 54 per study). No studies investigated differences in perceptions of autonomy based on race. In meta-analysis of disparities between genders in autonomy ratings (positive number favoring female trainees), pooled standardized mean differences were −0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.19 to −0.04; P = .003; n = 10 studies) for trainee self-rated autonomy and −0.05 (95% CI, −0.11 to 0.01; P = .07; n = 9 studies) for supervisor ratings of autonomy. Conclusions Limited evidence suggests that female trainees perceived that they received less procedural autonomy than did males. Further research exploring the degree of gender- and race-based differences in procedural autonomy, and factors that influence these differences is warranted.
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
Barbier, Emilie, Burmeister, Bryan , Cunningham, David , Grilli, Maurizio , Hofheinz, Ralf‐Dieter , Kieser, Meinhard , Langley, Ruth E. , Lordick, Florian , Mauer, Murielle , Michalski, Christoph , Nankivell, Matthew , Stahl, Michael , Urba, Susan G., Lanschot, Jan van, Vordermark, Dirk , Walsh, T. N. , Proctor, Tanja, Vey, Johannes A. , Cunningham, David , Ronellenfitsch, Ulrich , Friedrichs, Juliane , Bass, Gary Alan , Eyck, Ben M. , Kleeff, Jorg H. , Klevebro, Fredrik , Lutz, Manfred Paul , Michl, Patrick , Nilsson, Magnus , Seide, Svenja , Shah, Manish A , Shi, Qian , Ychou, Marc

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 8 | Pages: e2425581

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25581 | PMID 39093560 Get It

ImportanceThe prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG) is poor. From current evidence, it remains unclear to what extent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy achieve better outcomes than surgery alone.ObjectiveTo assess the association of preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy in patients with AEG with overall survival and other outcomes.Data SourcesLiterature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was performed from inception to April 21, 2023.Study SelectionTwo blinded reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative CRT plus surgery with preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery, 1 intervention with surgery alone, or all 3 treatments. Only data from participants with AEG were included from trials that encompassed mixed histology or gastric cancer. Among 2768 initially identified studies, 17 (0.6%) met the selection criteria.Data Extraction and SynthesisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for extracting data and assessing data quality by 2 independent extractors. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the 2-stage approach.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOverall and disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.ResultsThe analyses included 2549 patients (2206 [86.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.4] years) from 17 trials (conducted from 1989-2016). Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.62-0.90]; 3-year difference, 105 deaths per 1000 patients) and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78 [95% CrI, 0.64-0.91]; 3-year difference, 90 deaths per 1000 patients) showed longer overall survival than surgery alone. Comparing the 2 modalities yielded similar overall survival (HR, 1.04 [95% CrI], 0.83-1.28]; 3-year difference, 15 deaths per 1000 patients fewer for CRT). Similarly, disease-free survival was longer for both modalities compared with surgery alone. Postoperative morbidity was more frequent after CRT plus surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.94 [95% CrI, 1.01-8.59]) than surgery alone. Postoperative mortality was not significantly more frequent after CRT plus surgery than surgery alone (OR, 2.50 [95% CrI, 0.66-10.56]) or after chemotherapy plus surgery than CRT plus surgery (OR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.08-2.00]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this meta-analysis of patients with AEG, both preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy were associated with longer survival without relevant differences between the 2 modalities. Thus, either of the 2 treatments may be recommended to patients.
Digital Storytelling Intervention for Hemoglobin A 1c Control Among Hispanic Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Hernandez, Valentina, Ford, Becky R., Gonzalez, Crystal, Kavistan, Silvio, Iteghete, Sheila, Njeru, Jane W. , O'Byrne, J, Novotny, Paul J. , Goodson, Miriam, Capetillo, Graciela Porraz, Patten, Christi A. , Lohr, Abby M. , O'Byrne, Jamie, Sia, Irene G. , Wieland, Mark L. , Vickery, Katherine Diaz , O’Byrne, Jamie, Singh, Davinder , Larkey, Linda

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 8 | Pages: e2424781

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24781 | PMID 39093566 Get It

Importance Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are more likely to develop complications and die from the disease than the US general population. Digital storytelling interventions are narrative-based videos elicited through a community-based participatory research approach to surface the authentic voices of participants overcoming obstacles to health-promoting behaviors that perpetuate health inequities; research on the effect of digital storytelling on T2D outcomes among Hispanic adults is lacking. Objective To assess the impact of a digital storytelling intervention on glycemic control and its acceptability among Hispanic patients with poorly controlled T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted within 2 primary care networks in Minnesota and Arizona among Hispanic adults with poorly controlled T2D (hemoglobin A 1c level ≥8%). Enrollment and follow-up were conducted between February 14, 2019, and November 1, 2023. Intervention The intervention group viewed a 12-minute digital storytelling video. The video included 4 Spanish-language stories that reinforced 4 diabetes self-management behavioral goals (healthful diet for diabetes, physical activity, medication adherence, and glucose self-monitoring). The control group received printed, culturally tailored T2D education materials. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to 3 months for hemoglobin A 1c levels, adjusting for baseline hemoglobin A 1c , age, gender, education, and income. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were assessed through questionnaires. Results There were 451 study participants, with 227 (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.3] years; 158 [69.3%] women) randomized to the intervention group and 224 (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [9.1] years; 156 [69.3%] women) to the control group. Of these, 390 completed 3-month follow-up of the primary outcome (86% retention). There was a small improvement in the mean (SD) hemoglobin A 1c level in the intervention group compared with the control group in the adjusted model (9.1% [1.7] to 8.4% [1.6] vs 9.4% [1.8] to 8.8% [2.0]; P = .04] but not in the unadjusted model. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were high. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, a digital storytelling intervention developed with and for Hispanic adults with T2D was highly acceptable and feasibly implemented within primary care settings and resulted in a modest improvement of glycemic control. This was a highly scalable intervention that may be integrated into clinical practice as part of a longitudinal diabetes self-management program for Hispanic adults. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03766438