Capetillo, Graciela Porraz

Abstract Background Immigrant women experience disproportionate psychosocial stress driven by acculturation, socioeconomic hardship, discrimination, and transnational responsibilities. Despite evidence supporting culturally tailored stress‑management interventions, limited formative research has examined program preferences across diverse immigrant communities. Methods Using a community‑based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we conducted three language‑concordant focus groups (Somali, Spanish, English; n = 18) and a mixed‑methods survey (n = 88) with immigrant women in southeast Minnesota. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative methods; quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Results Participants described intersecting stressors including caregiving burdens, financial insecurity, immigration‑related fears, bicultural identity strain, and transnational obligations (e.g., “Every day you are being told of problems back at home”). Barriers to discussing stress included stigma, limited culturally concordant care, religious norms discouraging emotional disclosure, and structural constraints such as lack of insurance (e.g., “How are you gonna pay for a therapist if you don't have health insurance?”). Coping strategies varied culturally but consistently emphasized social support, spirituality, and practical stress‑reduction techniques. Survey findings indicated strong preference for education on stress, stigma reduction, culturally and linguistically aligned support groups, and flexible delivery formats (in‑person, hybrid). Conclusions Immigrant women experience multifaceted stress shaped by minority stress processes and structural inequities. Findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, community‑informed stress‑management interventions that integrate education, social support, and flexible delivery modalities. These results directly inform adaptation of a stress‑management program for Somali, Spanish‑, and English‑speaking immigrant women.

Abstract Background Immigrants to the United States often face challenges from limited healthcare access and less healthy environments which contribute to rising obesity and cardiovascular risk. Purpose To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a community-based social network intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction among Hispanic and Somali adults. Methods A social network-informed, community-based participatory research-derived health promotion intervention was delivered by Hispanic and Somali lay health promoters (HPs) to members of their social networks over 1 year (12 biweekly sessions in months 0-6; 12 biweekly check-ins in months 7-12). Using a closed-cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized design, social networks were randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or after a delay of 1 year. Measurements at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were derived from 6 of the American Heart Association’s “Life’s Simple 7”: BMI, blood pressure, fasting glucose, cholesterol, physical activity and dietary quality (range 0-12, with higher values indicating lower cardiovascular risk). Waist circumference and proportion of participants who achieved >5% body weight loss were also assessed. Results Four hundred seventy-five participants were enrolled among 51 HPs (29 Hispanic; 22 Somali). There was a statistically significant improvement in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group (n = 246) compared with controls (n = 229) at 6 months (0.4 [1.8] vs. −0.1 [1.7]; P = .03) that was not sustained at 12 months (0.5 [1.9] vs. 0.3 [1.8]; P = .38). There was a statistically significant higher proportion of participants who lost >5% of body weight in the intervention group compared with controls at 12 months (37% [15] vs. 18% [7.9]; P = .02). Reductions in weight and waist circumference in the intervention group compared with controls did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusion A social network intervention, delivered by lay HPs was feasible and resulted in a modest improvement of cardiovascular risk and clinically significant weight loss. Clinical Trial Identification Number NCT05136339.

Due to systemic barriers, policymakers in the United States may be unaware of immigrants’ health-related priorities. In response, Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, a 22-year community-engaged partnership, collaborated with 14 Hispanic/Latino and Somali immigrant health promoters in fall 2023 using Photovoice to document their health-related assets and needs. After taking photos, the health promoters reflected, discussed the issues revealed in their images, and developed policy recommendations. Guided by Public Health Critical Race Praxis, we used thematic analysis to analyze health promoters’ reflections. Three themes emerged: healthy choices, inclusion of people and cultural celebrations, and access to opportunity. Health promoters want to expand healthy choices in Southeast Minnesota by growing community garden programming, protecting the environment, making healthy options accessible, and opening an affordable gym. They highlighted the importance of integrating culture and community into youth education, access to culturally appropriate foods, and the need to address Islamophobia. Health promoters wanted increased access to job opportunities, affordable housing, and health care. They saw these opportunities as vehicles for self-improvement but emphasized time management as essential in the United States. Ensuring that immigrants have a meaningful voice in shaping policies that affect health is critical. Policymakers can leverage these findings by demonstrating responsiveness to community-identified priorities and acting on health promoters’ policy recommendations. We encourage future Photovoice researchers to apply explicitly anti-racist frameworks, such as Public Health Critical Race Praxis, to document and challenge systemic oppression.

Background: Patients with non-English Language Preference are at risk of adverse health outcomes, particularly at end of life and during serious illness. Medical interpreters often feel unprepared to interpret conversations about serious illness. Best practice guidelines recommend a pre-encounter huddle between clinician and interpreter to better prepare both providers. The CHECK-IN (Check in for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information) guide is a simple communication tool designed to facilitate this pre-encounter huddle. We describe the results of a pilot feasibility study of the CHECK-IN guide performed in a simulation environment. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary performance of the CHECK-IN guide. Methods: This U.S.-based study is a single-center simulation-based nonblinded randomized pilot feasibility study. Participating clinicians were randomized to usual practice (control) vs. introduction to the CHECK-IN guide (intervention). Clinicians completed pre- and post-session surveys. Participating clinicians were evaluated using the Faculty Observation Rating Scale (FORS), Interpreter Scale (IS), and Interpreter Impact Rating Scale (IIRS). Results: Participants had a highly favorable opinion on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the CHECK-IN tool; 91% of participants agreed/strongly agreed on the acceptability of the tool, 91% agreed/strongly agreed on the appropriateness of the tool, and 100% agreed/strongly agreed on the feasibility of the tool. There were no statistical differences between control and intervention groups for the IS, IIRS, and FORS scores. Conclusion: The CHECK-IN guide is a promising tool to guide a pre-encounter huddle between clinician and interpreter, thereby improving interpreter-mediated communication when having conversations about serious illness.

Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, a 20-year community based participatory research partnership, used photovoice to learn about Hispanic/Latino and Somali immigrants’ health concerns. Participants photographed their health-related priorities, reflected, developed policy recommendations, and shared photographs at a public event and rotating exhibit in 2024. More than 100 people attended the event (19 decision makers, 64 members of the public, 11 immigrant leader participants, 11 research staff). All decision-maker and public survey respondents reported learning something new about the priorities of Hispanic/Latino and Somali immigrants. ( Am J Public Health. 2025;115(S2):S120–S125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308098 )

Abstract Background: Self-efficacy theory proposes that confidence to engage in a health behavior is associated with engaging in that specific behavior. Most research examining self-efficacy has been conducted with white young adult populations. This secondary analysis examined the association of self-efficacy (i.e., confidence) for healthy eating and physical activity in two immigrant communities. Methods: At enrollment into the Healthy Immigrant Community study, a clinical weight management and cardiovascular risk reduction intervention set in southeastern [state], 475 participants completed assessments about their confidence for healthy eating and physical activity. Measurements also included self-reports of dietary quality and intake, physical activity, quality of life, and biometric assessments. Study materials were available in English, Spanish, and Somali. Results In total, 450 adults (Hispanic/Latinx = 267; Somali = 183) completed measures at baseline and were included for analysis. Their average age was 45 years (range 18–87) and 59% were female. Confidence for healthy eating was significantly associated with self-report of eating healthy snacks ( p = < 0.0001) and less consumption of high-calorie drinks ( p = 0.02) and regular soda ( p = < 0.0001). Confidence to be physically active was significantly associated with more self-reported physical activity ( p = < 0.01). Conclusions Confidence to eat healthy and be physically active appears to be associated with having a healthier diet and higher levels of physical activity. Given the large sample size and strength of the associations, it also appears that the theoretical model of self-efficacy can be effectively measured and applied within these immigrant populations. Self-efficacy theory may be useful in understanding potential mediating mechanisms when designing future interventions with immigrant communities. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05136339; April 23, 2022

Importance Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are more likely to develop complications and die from the disease than the US general population. Digital storytelling interventions are narrative-based videos elicited through a community-based participatory research approach to surface the authentic voices of participants overcoming obstacles to health-promoting behaviors that perpetuate health inequities; research on the effect of digital storytelling on T2D outcomes among Hispanic adults is lacking. Objective To assess the impact of a digital storytelling intervention on glycemic control and its acceptability among Hispanic patients with poorly controlled T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted within 2 primary care networks in Minnesota and Arizona among Hispanic adults with poorly controlled T2D (hemoglobin A 1c level ≥8%). Enrollment and follow-up were conducted between February 14, 2019, and November 1, 2023. Intervention The intervention group viewed a 12-minute digital storytelling video. The video included 4 Spanish-language stories that reinforced 4 diabetes self-management behavioral goals (healthful diet for diabetes, physical activity, medication adherence, and glucose self-monitoring). The control group received printed, culturally tailored T2D education materials. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to 3 months for hemoglobin A 1c levels, adjusting for baseline hemoglobin A 1c , age, gender, education, and income. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were assessed through questionnaires. Results There were 451 study participants, with 227 (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.3] years; 158 [69.3%] women) randomized to the intervention group and 224 (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [9.1] years; 156 [69.3%] women) to the control group. Of these, 390 completed 3-month follow-up of the primary outcome (86% retention). There was a small improvement in the mean (SD) hemoglobin A 1c level in the intervention group compared with the control group in the adjusted model (9.1% [1.7] to 8.4% [1.6] vs 9.4% [1.8] to 8.8% [2.0]; P = .04] but not in the unadjusted model. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were high. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, a digital storytelling intervention developed with and for Hispanic adults with T2D was highly acceptable and feasibly implemented within primary care settings and resulted in a modest improvement of glycemic control. This was a highly scalable intervention that may be integrated into clinical practice as part of a longitudinal diabetes self-management program for Hispanic adults. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03766438

Abstract Background Immigrants to the United States, on average, accumulate cardiovascular risk after resettlement, including obesity. There is a need to co-create interventions to address these disparities, and mood may be an important mediating factor.Methods The Healthy Immigrant Community (HIC) study, set in southeast Minnesota, enrolled 475 adult participants in a weight loss intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk. Baseline questionnaires assessed mood, nutrition, physical activity, self-efficacy for healthy eating and physical activity, social support, and cohesion. A single-item mood rating of poor or fair was considered “negative”, while ratings of good, very good, or excellent were considered “positive”.Results A total of 449 HIC participants (268 Hispanic/Latino and 181 Somali) with complete baseline measures and were included in this analysis. Participants endorsing negative mood compared to those endorsing positive mood had lower scores for healthy eating (p = 0.02) and physical activity levels (p = 0.03), lower confidence in eating a healthy diet (p = 0.001), and felt less of a sense of belonging to their community (p = 0.01). Those endorsing negative mood also reported receiving less social support from their family and friends to eat healthy (p = < 0.001) and be physically active (p = 0.01), and less often accessed community resources for healthy eating (p = 0.001) and physical activity (p = < 0.01) compared to participants reporting positive mood.Conclusions Negative mood was associated with less healthy nutrition, lower confidence in eating healthy, sedentary lifestyle, and perceived lack of belonging to the community. Integrating mood management and self-efficacy strategies may enhance the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions among immigrants who report negative mood.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05136339; April 23, 2022

Purpose To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a social network weight loss intervention delivered by lay health promoters (HPs) to immigrant populations. Design Single-arm, non-randomized, pilot study of a social network weight loss intervention developed by a community-based participatory research partnership and delivered by HPs. Setting Community-based setting in Southeastern Minnesota, United States. Sample Somali and Hispanic immigrants to the United States: 4 social networks of adults (2 Hispanic and 2 Somali) with 39 network participants. Intervention Twelve-week behavioral weight loss intervention delivered by HPs (4 weeks in-person and then 8 weeks virtual). Measures Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed by surveys and focus groups with HPs and participants. Behavioral measures included servings of fruits and vegetables, drinking soda, and physical activity. Physiologic measures included weight, blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides. Analysis Paired t-tests of pre- to post-intervention changes at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. Results Recruitment was feasible and post-intervention was 100%. Participants highly rated the intervention on satisfaction, motivation, and confidence to eat a healthy diet, be physically active, and lose weight. Participants were motivated by group social support and cohesion of their social networks. On average, participants lost weight (91.6 ± 15.9 to 89.7 ± 16.6 kg, P < .0001), lowered their systolic blood pressure (133.9±16.9 to 127.2 ± 15.8 mm Hg; P < .001), lowered their diastolic blood pressure (81 ± 9.5 to 75.8 ± 9.6 mm Hg; P < .0001), had more servings of vegetables per day (1.9 ± 1.2 to 2.6 ± 1.4; P < .001), and increased their physical activity (2690 ± 3231 to 6595 ± 7322 MET-minutes per week; P = .02). Conclusion This pilot study of 2 immigrant communities who participated in a peer-led weight loss social network intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability. Participants lost weight, improved their health status, and improved their health behaviors.

Objectives: This study was conducted to assess an intervention that was created by a community–academic partnership to address COVID-19 health inequities. We evaluated a community-engaged bidirectional pandemic crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) framework with immigrant and refugee populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A 17-year community-engaged research partnership adopted a CERC framework in March 2020 to address COVID-19 prevention, testing, and socioeconomic impacts with immigrant and refugee groups in southeast Minnesota. The partnership used bidirectional communication between communication leaders and their social networks to refine messages, leverage resources, and advise policy makers. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation for intervention acceptability, feasibility, reach, adaptation, and sustainability through multisource data, including email communications, work group notes, semistructured interviews, and focus groups. Results: The intervention reached at least 39 000 people in 9 months. It was implemented as intended and perceived efficacy was high. Frequent communication between community and academic partners allowed the team to respond rapidly to concerns and facilitated connection of community members to resources. Framework implementation also led to systems and policy changes to meet the needs of immigrant and refugee populations. Conclusions: Community-engaged CERC is feasible and sustainable and can reduce COVID-19 disparities through shared creation and dissemination of public health messages, enhanced connection to existing resources, and incorporation of community perspectives in regional pandemic mitigation policies.