Citations

INTRODUCTION: Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is an important tool for evaluation of obscure GI bleeding but is a limited resource given time and expertise required. Patient selection is important to help optimize diagnostic yield and subsequent successful management of small bowel bleeding. To maximize the efficiency of DBE performed, our endoscopy group established a screening protocol (Figure) prior to approval of any procedure. We developed a quality improvement project to assess the efficacy of this screening protocol and to evaluate which components of screening were most predictive for procedural success. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent anterograde or retrograde double balloon enteroscopy for suspected GI bleeding from January 2016 to December 2017. Our screening protocol was implemented on February 1 st , 2017. Data was obtained on patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and prior investigation for bleeding evaluation. Endoscopy outcomes were separated into procedural success, defined as lesion identified, and clinical success, defined as resolution of bleeding. Success rates were compared pre and post intervention. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate which components best predicted a successful procedure. RESULTS: We reviewed 114 DBE procedures in 89 patients, 53.5% male (n = 61) with a mean age of 62.8 + 13.3 years. Of these, 86% (n = 98) were performed prior to initiation of the screening protocol. Overall, there was no significant difference in procedural success pre and post intervention as defined by presence of recurrent bleeding, persistent anemia, or transfusion need (Table 1). On univariate analysis of clinical success, defined as lack of recurrent bleeding, gender, anticoagulation use, and presence of lesion on CE were significant (Table 2). Identification and intervention on a lesion during the balloon endoscopy did not impact future anemia, bleeding, or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: The patient screening protocol was successful in decreasing the number of procedures performed but did not improve our lesion detection rate on endoscopy and did not improve clinical outcomes as measured by rebleeding. Patients on anticoagulation and those who had prior lesions identified on capsule endoscopy had higher odds of rebleeding, indicating clinical failure. This data may help modify patient selection to maximize success of DBE procedures in the future.

Abstract Tendon or muscle rupture is a rare complication of statins that could potentially be disabling and result in a significant burden to patients. The co‐administration of statin and gemfibrozil should warrant prescribers’ awareness of tendon‐related complications of statin use, particularly in high‐risk populations with poor renal function or musculoskeletal comorbidities.

Abstract Ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography techniques are used to assess mechanical properties of soft tissues. Tissue stiffness is related to various pathologies such as fibrosis, loss of compliance, and cancer. One way to perform elastography is measuring shear wave velocity of propagating waves in tissue induced by intrinsic motion or an external source of vibration, and relating the shear wave velocity to tissue elasticity. All tissues are inherently viscoelastic and ignoring viscosity biases the velocity-based estimates of elasticity and ignores a potentially important parameter of tissue health. We present attenuation measuring ultrasound shearwave elastography (AMUSE), a technique that independently measures both shear wave velocity and attenuation in tissue and therefore allows characterization of viscoelasticity without using a rheological model. The theoretical basis for AMUSE is first derived and validated in finite element simulations. AMUSE is validated against the traditional methods for assessing shear wave velocity (phase gradient) and attenuation (amplitude decay) in tissue mimicking phantoms and excised tissue. The results agreed within one standard deviation. AMUSE was used to measure shear wave velocity and attenuation in 15 transplanted livers in patients with potential acute rejection, and the results were compared with the biopsy findings in a preliminary study. The comparison showed excellent agreement and suggests that AMUSE can be used to separate transplanted livers with acute rejection from livers with no rejection.

Although short‐term risks of living donor hepatectomy have been well defined, little is known about the longterm impact. We aimed to perform a systematic follow‐up to screen for unanticipated health consequences of liver donation. All donors who were more than 1 year from donation were invited for a systematic evaluation including physical and laboratory assessment, quality of life questionnaire, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Those unable to return were offered the questionnaire and laboratory assessment at home. Out of our total of 97 donors, 45 returned for a full assessment and 23 completed labs and survey locally (total n = 68; 70%) after a median of 5.5 years (1.5‐10.9 years) after donation. The only laboratory abnormality was a significant decrease in platelet count (median 198 ×109/L versus 224 ×109/L before donation; P < 0.001), whereas 93% of patients were still above normal limits. No late biliary strictures or other structural abnormalities were found on MRI/MRCP. Liver regeneration was complete. Spleen volume did significantly increase (median 278 cm3 versus 230 cm3 before donation; P < 0.001) without resulting in lowered platelets (P = 0.73). The most common complaints were persistent incisional numbness and changed bowel habits. Seven donors (11%) reported problems obtaining insurance. The vast majority (97%) would have donated again. In conclusion, longterm outcome following liver donation appears satisfactory. None of our donors have developed occult biliary strictures, failure of regeneration, abnormal liver function, or other important health consequences after a median of 5.5 years from surgery. These findings can be used when counseling potential donors in the future. Liver Transplantation 22 934–942 2016 AASLD