Nagorney, David

ImportanceTranexamic acid reduces bleeding and blood transfusion in many types of surgery, but its effect in patients undergoing liver resection for a cancer-related indication remains unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether tranexamic acid reduces red blood cell transfusion within 7 days of liver resection.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter randomized clinical trial of tranexamic acid vs placebo conducted from December 1, 2014, to November 8, 2022, at 10 hepatopancreaticobiliary sites in Canada and 1 site in the United States, with 90-day follow-up. Participants, clinicians, and data collectors were blinded to allocation. A volunteer sample of 1384 patients undergoing liver resection for a cancer-related indication met eligibility criteria and consented to randomization.InterventionsTranexamic acid (1-g bolus followed by 1-g infusion over 8 hours; n = 619) or matching placebo (n = 626) beginning at induction of anesthesia.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was receipt of red blood cell transfusion within 7 days of surgery.ResultsThe primary analysis included 1245 participants (mean age, 63.2 years; 39.8% female; 56.1% with a diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases). Perioperative characteristics were similar between groups. Red blood cell transfusion occurred in 16.3% of participants (n = 101) in the tranexamic acid group and 14.5% (n = 91) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.84-1.56]; P = .38; absolute difference, 2% [95% CI, −2% to 6%]). Measured intraoperative blood loss (tranexamic acid, 817.3 mL; placebo, 836.7 mL; P = .75) and total estimated blood loss over 7 days (tranexamic acid, 1504.0 mL; placebo, 1551.2 mL; P = .38) were similar between groups. Participants receiving tranexamic acid experienced significantly more complications compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02-1.60]; P = .03), with no significant difference in venous thromboembolism (odds ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 0.95-3.07]; P = .08).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients undergoing liver resection for a cancer-related indication, tranexamic acid did not reduce bleeding or blood transfusion but increased perioperative complications.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02261415

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesWe assessed the accuracy of preoperative gallium‐68 DOTA‐Tyr3‐octreotate (DOTATATE) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in estimating multifocality and nodal metastases of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (sbNETs).MethodsA multicenter analysis was performed on patients with sbNETs who underwent preoperative DOTATATE PET imaging and surgical resection, with manual palpation of the entire length of the small bowel, between January 2016 and August 2022. Preoperative imaging reports and blinded secondary imaging reviews were compared to the final postoperative pathology reports. Descriptive statistics were applied.ResultsOne‐hundred and four patients met inclusion criteria. Pathology showed 53 (51%) patients had multifocal sbNETs and 96 (92%) had nodal metastases. The original preoperative DOTATATE PET imaging identified multifocal sbNET in 28 (27%) patients and lymph node (LN) metastases in 80 (77%) patients. Based on original radiology reports, sensitivity for multifocal sbNET identification was 45%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 86%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 62%. For the identification of LN metastases, sensitivity was 82%, specificity was 88%, PPV was 99%, and NPV was 29%.ConclusionsAlthough DOTATATE PET imaging is specific and relatively accurate, sensitivity and NPV are insufficient to guide surgical planning. Preoperative use should not replace open palpation to identify additional synchronous lesions or to omit regional lymphadenectomy.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Our group has periodically analyzed (Silverstein et. al. JAMA1974;227(4):424 to Tefferi et. al. Blood2000;95(7):226) presentation, peri-operative and long-term outcomes from splenectomy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) in an attempt to improve patient selection and management. We now report on an additional 91 patients (pts) to see if control of post splenectomy thrombocytosis, and modern techniques, have diminshed morbidity and mortality. Additionally, we provide long-term follow-up on prior cohorts across a twenty-eight year period. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective analysis of presentation, peri-operative and long-term outcomes in a single institution experience with splenectomy in pts with MMM from 1976–2004. RESULTS: Presplenectomy : 314 MMM pts (171 men 54%; 208 (66%) with agnogenic myeloid metaplasia) were included. Presplenectomy 55% of pts presented with a Lille MMM prognostic score of ≥1, 90 pts (29%) failed a prior therapy for splenomegaly and pre-operatively had median spleen size of 20cm below the left costal margin (95%CI 18.7–20.4). Perioperative Outcomes : Pts were splenectomized (1976–1985 (Decade 1(D1)) (n=90 (29%)); 1986–1996 (D2) (n=133 (42%)); 1997–2004 (D3) (n=91 (29%)) a median of 27 months (range 0–389 months) after the diagnosis of MMM (age at diagnosis (median 65 (range 19–83)) with a median splenic mass 2700 gm (range 300–11750)). Primary indication for surgery included mechanical symptoms n=156 (49%), anemia n=78 (25%)), portal hypertension n=47 (15%), or thrombocytopenia n=33 (11%). Peri-operative complications occured in 103 pts (33%) and included infection (n=30), thrombosis (n=34), and bleeding (n=48; 37 required a second laparotomy) of which 28 (9% of all pts) were fatal (30 day mortality (D1=10%, D2=9%, D3=7.7% (p=NS)). Overall length of hospital stay (D3) was median of 8 days (range 3–63), during which 6 pts (7%) required platelet pheresis (1–8 times; for platelet counts of 870–2400 x 109/L) and/or acute platelet lowering agents (n=12; 13%), respectively. Additionally, median post-splenectomy increases in leukocyte and platelet count were 8 x 109/L (range −65 to 190.2) and 127 x 109/L (range −270 to 1221), respectively. Long-Term Outcomes and Survival : Amongst the recent cohort (n=91) 69 pts (76%) experienced a palliative benefit for their primary surgical indication for a median of 12 months (range 1–91). Post splenectomy rates of thrombocytosis (21%), accelerated hepatomegaly (8%), and leukemic transformation (11%) did not vary across the three decades analyzed. Overall survival (n=263 (84%) have expired)) from the diagnosis of MMM and splenectomy was 62 months (95%CI 54–66) and 19 months (95%CI 14–22), respectively. Survival after splenectomy was not significantly different by type of MMM, surgical indication, Lille MMM prognostic score, leukemic transformation or decade performed. However, patients with preoperative thrombocytopenia (<50 x 109//L (p<0.0001) or <100 x 109/L (P=0.006)) clearly had a decrease in survival, although this was independent of the development of peri-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy for MMM remains a procedure with significant peri-operative risks, but potential for palliating symptoms. Decreased survival in thrombocytopenic pts probably arises from advanced disease as opposed to increased complications. The lack of improvement in overall post-splenectomy survival across the study period may not be attributable to peri-operative issues but a reflection on the failure of medical therapy to improve survival in MMM.

AbstractIn a 28‐year period, 39 (7%) patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (median age 66 years, 64% male) underwent a splenectomy at our institution. Primary indications for splenectomy were refractory thrombocytopenia (36%), progressive spleen related symptoms (33%), emergent splenectomy for splenic rupture (21%), refractory anemia (8%), and prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant (3%). Eleven (28%) patients had anemia at the time of splenectomy, of which 3 (27%) were autoimmune. The median time to splenectomy from CMML diagnosis was 6 months (0‐40); perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 13%, while the median postsplenectomy survival was 25 months (11‐38). Durable remission in spleen related symptoms, thrombocytopenia, complications from splenic rupture, and anemia were achieved in 85%, 50%, 62%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Perioperative morbidity (n = 30) included infections/sepsis in 6 (20%), intraabdominal bleeding in 4 (13%), venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 3 (10%), and acute lung injury in 2 (7%) patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days (1‐25), with 5 deaths occurring secondary to respiratory failure (n = 2), multiorgan dysfunction (n = 2) and hemorrhagic shock (n = 1). There was no difference in overall survival between CMML patients that underwent splenectomy, in comparison to those that did not. Unlike in myelofibrosis, portal hypertension was not an indication for splenectomy and no patients developed post‐splenectomy thrombocytosis. In conclusion, apart from being a lifesaving emergent modality in the event of splenic rupture, splenectomy has an important palliative role in patients with CMML, with significant and durable improvements in spleen related symptoms and refractory cytopenias.

Although short‐term risks of living donor hepatectomy have been well defined, little is known about the longterm impact. We aimed to perform a systematic follow‐up to screen for unanticipated health consequences of liver donation. All donors who were more than 1 year from donation were invited for a systematic evaluation including physical and laboratory assessment, quality of life questionnaire, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Those unable to return were offered the questionnaire and laboratory assessment at home. Out of our total of 97 donors, 45 returned for a full assessment and 23 completed labs and survey locally (total n = 68; 70%) after a median of 5.5 years (1.5‐10.9 years) after donation. The only laboratory abnormality was a significant decrease in platelet count (median 198 ×109/L versus 224 ×109/L before donation; P < 0.001), whereas 93% of patients were still above normal limits. No late biliary strictures or other structural abnormalities were found on MRI/MRCP. Liver regeneration was complete. Spleen volume did significantly increase (median 278 cm3 versus 230 cm3 before donation; P < 0.001) without resulting in lowered platelets (P = 0.73). The most common complaints were persistent incisional numbness and changed bowel habits. Seven donors (11%) reported problems obtaining insurance. The vast majority (97%) would have donated again. In conclusion, longterm outcome following liver donation appears satisfactory. None of our donors have developed occult biliary strictures, failure of regeneration, abnormal liver function, or other important health consequences after a median of 5.5 years from surgery. These findings can be used when counseling potential donors in the future. Liver Transplantation 22 934–942 2016 AASLD