Citations

Clear

28 citation(s) found for "Riddle, Meghan".

Amyloid PET in Sporadic Early‐ Versus Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease: Comparison of the LEADS and ADNI
Lagarde, Julien , Blazhenets, Ganna , Zhang, J. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Allen, Isabel Elaine , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Raya, Maison Abu , Smith, Karen, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Rocha, Salma, Hammers, Dustin B. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Kirby, Kala, Aisen, Paul, Koeppe, Robert, Landau, Susan, Carrillo, María C. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Raman, Rema , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Blazhenets, Ganna , Soleimani-Meigooni, David , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Abu Raya, Maison , Vrillon, Agathe , Nudelman, Kelly N , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon , Wingo, Thomas S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Maiti, Piyush , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Hammers, Dustin B , Nudelman, Kelly , Kirby, Kala, Vemuri, Prashanthi , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T., Womack, Kyle , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Neurology | March 17, 2025 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 236-248

10.1002/ana.27233 | PMID 40091774 Get It

Objective Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) differ in many respects. Here, we address the issue of possible differences in fibrillar amyloid pathology as measured by positron emission tomography (PET), which remains unresolved due to the lack of large‐scale comparative studies. Methods Three hundred ninety‐nine cognitively impaired participants younger than 65 years of age from the multicenter Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and 450 cognitively impaired participants older than 65 years from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent clinical assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and amyloid PET and were included in this study. We compared amyloid PET outcomes (positivity rate based on visual read and quantified tracer uptake expressed as Centiloids [CLs]) between the 2 cohorts and studied their association with age, sex, APOE genotype, and cognition. Results The amyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74–82) than in ADNI (71%, 95% CI = 67–75, p = 0.02). Lower Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and APOE4 genotype increased the odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts. Visually positive scans had higher CLs in LEADS (EOAD, mean = 95.3 ± 26.1) than in ADNI (LOAD, mean = 80.9 ± 36.8, p < 0.0001), predominantly in parietal cortex/precuneus, superior temporal, and frontal cortices. In amyloid‐positive patients, (1) CLs were higher in female patients in both cohorts; (2) APOE4 carriership was associated with lower CLs in EOAD, which was not observed in LOAD; and (3) correlations between CLs and MMSE scores were significantly stronger in EOAD than in LOAD. Interpretation Differences in the burden of amyloid pathology may contribute to differences in clinical and anatomic patterns in sporadic EOAD and LOAD, and have implications for optimizing therapeutic strategies in each group. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:236–248
Dissociable spatial topography of cortical atrophy in early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A head‐to‐head comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts
Katsumi, Yuta , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Eloyan, Ani , Eckbo, Ryan, Zaitsev, Alexander, Joie, Renaud La , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Jack, Clifford R. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Hammers, Dustin B. , Newell, Kathy L. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Kramer, Joel H. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Lagarde, Julien , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly , Foroud, Tatiana , Hammers, Dustin B , Ghetti, Bernardino , Murray, Melissa E. , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | February 19, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14489 | PMID 39968692 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) have distinct clinical manifestations, with prior work based on small samples suggesting unique patterns of neurodegeneration. The current study performed a head‐to‐head comparison of cortical atrophy in EOAD and LOAD, using two large and well‐characterized cohorts (LEADS and ADNI). METHODS We analyzed brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired from 377 sporadic EOAD patients and 317 sporadicLOAD patients who were amyloid positive and had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia (i.e., early‐stage AD), along with cognitively unimpaired participants. RESULTS After controlling for the level of cognitive impairment, we found a double dissociation between AD clinical phenotype and localization/magnitude of atrophy, characterized by predominant neocortical involvement in EOAD and more focal anterior medial temporal involvement in LOAD. DISCUSSION Our findings point to the clinical utility of MRI‐based biomarkers of atrophy in differentiating between EOAD and LOAD, which may be useful for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. Highlights Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset AD (LOAD) patients showed distinct and overlapping cortical atrophy patterns. EOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in widespread neocortical regions. LOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in the anterior medial temporal lobe. Regional atrophy was correlated with the severity of global cognitive impairment. Results were comparable when the sample was stratified for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.
White matter abnormalities in association with amyloid and tau deposition in a diverse cohort with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease
Blujus, Jenna K, Rego, Eliza, Bica, Sarah, Riddle, Meghan C., Wing, Rena R. , Salloway, Stephen , DeCarli, Charles , Landau, Susan, Oh, Hwamee , Initiative, for the U.S. POINTER Study Group and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Demos, Kathryn E. , Lee, Athene , Maillard, Pauline , Fan, Audrey Peiwen , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Lockhart, Samuel N. , Baker, Laura D. , Initiative, for the U.S. POINTER Study Group and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.091833 Get It

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aβ) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aβ and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N=608; age=68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aβ+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N=291; age=72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aβ+) (Table). Aβ‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aβ‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aβ‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aβ‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aβ‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.
White matter abnormalities in association with amyloid and tau deposition in a diverse cohort with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease
Blujus, Jenna K, Rego, Eliza, Bica, Sarah, Riddle, Meghan C., Wing, Rena R. , Salloway, Stephen , DeCarli, Charles , Landau, Susan, Oh, Hwamee , Demos, Kathryn E. , Lee, Athene , Maillard, Pauline , Fan, Audrey Peiwen , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Lockhart, Samuel N. , Baker, Laura D.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.094009 Get It

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aß) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aß and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N = 608; age = 68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aß+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N = 291; age = 72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aß+) (Table). Aß‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aß‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aß‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aß‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aß‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.
Longitudinal cognitive performance of participants with sporadic early onset Alzheimer's disease from LEADS
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David W. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Carrillo, María C. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Reman, Rema, Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, S. J. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14439 | PMID 39713873 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) manifests prior to the age of 65, and affects 4%–8% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current analyses sought to examine longitudinal cognitive trajectories of participants with early‐onset dementia. METHODS Data from 307 cognitively normal (CN) volunteer participants and those with amyloid‐positive EOAD or amyloid‐negative cognitive impairment (EOnonAD) were compared. Cognitive trajectories across a comprehensive cognitive battery spanning 42 months were examined using mixed‐effects modeling. RESULTS The EOAD group displayed worse cognition at baseline relative to EOnonAD and CN groups, and more aggressive declines in cognition over time. The largest effects were observed on measures of executive functioning domains, while memory declines were blunted in EOAD. DISCUSSION EOAD declined 2–4× faster than EOnonAD, and EOAD pathology is not restricted to memory networks. Early identification of deficits is critical to ensure that individuals with sporadic EOAD can be considered for treatment using disease‐modifying medications. Highlights Represents the most comprehensive longitudinal characterization of sporadic EOAD to date. The trajectory of cognitive declines was steep for EOAD participants and worse than for other groups. Executive functioning measures exhibited the greatest declines over time in EOAD.
Differences in baseline cognitive performance between participants with early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: Comparison of LEADS and ADNI
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul , Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14218 | PMID 39711228 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) share similar amyloid etiology, but evidence from smaller‐scale studies suggests that they manifest differently clinically. Current analyses sought to contrast the cognitive profiles of EOAD and LOAD. METHODS Z‐ score cognitive‐domain composites for 311 amyloid‐positive sporadic EOAD and 314 amyloid‐positive LOAD participants were calculated from baseline data from age‐appropriate control cohorts. Z‐ score composites were compared between AD groups for each domain. RESULTS After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD displayed worse visuospatial, executive functioning, and processing speed/attention skills relative to LOAD, and LOAD displayed worse language, episodic immediate memory, and episodic delayed memory. DISCUSSION Sporadic EOAD possesses distinct cognitive profiles relative to LOAD. Clinicians should be alert for non‐amnestic impairments in younger patients to ensure proper identification and intervention using disease‐modifying treatments. Highlights Both early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants displayed widespread cognitive impairments relative to their same‐aged peers. Cognitive impairments were more severe for EOAD than for LOAD participants in visuospatial and executive domains. Memory and language impairments were more severe for LOAD than for EOAD participants Results were comparable after removing clinical phenotypes of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (lv‐PPA), and frontal‐variant AD.
Baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms and psychotropic medication use midway through data collection of the Longitudinal Early‐ Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS) Cohort
Wonderlin, Ryan J., Hammers, Dustin B. , Garcia, Alex Pena, Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Gao, Sujuan , Kirby, Kala, Aisen, Paul , Griffin, Percy , Iaccarino, Leo, Kramer, Joel H. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Rumbaugh, Malia, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan C., Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Dickerson, Brad C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Wang, Sophia , Logan, Paige E. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Foroud, Tatiana , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kukull, Walter A. , Joie, Renaud La , Mundada, Nidhi S. , Murray, Melissa E. , Nudelman, Kelly , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Atri, Alireza , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S24 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.083140 Get It

AbstractBackgroundWe examined neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and psychotropic medication use at the midway point of data collection of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS). We compared amyloid‐positive early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) participants and amyloid‐negative early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s disease [EOnonAD]) participants across NPS domains and psychotropic medication categories.Method282 participants enrolled in LEADS were compared across diagnostic groups – amyloid‐positive EOAD (n = 212) and amyloid‐negative EOnonAD (n = 70). All participants were between ages 40 and 64 at baseline. NPS were measured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) and Geriatric Depression Scale – Short Form (GDS‐SF). Medications were categorized into psychotropic category (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines). Groups were compared on NPI‐Q using binary logistic regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, on GDS‐SF using linear regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, and on psychotropic medication use using Chi square or Fisher’s exact test.ResultDemographic data are presented in Table 1. Average total NPI‐Q score was higher in EOnonAD than EOAD (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). Regardless of diagnostic group, informants endorsed Affective behaviors most frequently (76.2%). EOAD informants endorsed fewer Distress‐Tension behaviors (p = .02, OR = .498) and Impulse Control behaviors (p = .01, OR = .438). EOAD informants also endorsed apathy (p < .001, OR = .316), irritability (p = .02, OR = .498), and disinhibition (p = .04, OR = .476) at lower frequency than EOnonAD. GDS‐SF showed that the EOnonAD participants self‐reported more symptoms of depression than the EOAD group (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). (Table 2A). A minority of participants, regardless of diagnostic group, reported psychotropic medication use (35%). There was higher use in EOnonAD (38%) than EOAD (24%) (p = .03, Cohen W = .14) (Table 2B).ConclusionNPS burden and psychotropic medication use were higher in EOnonAD than EOAD participants, despite EOnonAD being less severely impaired. LEADS continues to collect data. Future studies will examine etiologies that may be larger drivers of NPS than AD neuropathology, mediators (e.g., race, ethnicity) in the association between NPS and diagnostic group classication, compare NPS in EOAD vs. LOAD, and examine longitudinal changes in neuropsychiatric profiles.
Cognitive Clusters of Early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s disease
Kim, Hee Jin , Lane, Kathleen A. , Gao, Sujuan , Hammers, Dustin B. , Aisen, Paul , Eloyan, Ani , Iaccarino, Leo, Kramer, Joel H. , Rumbaugh, Malia, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Taurone, Alexander, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan C., Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Dickerson, Brad C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Hammers, Dustin B , Logan, Paige E. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Foroud, Tatiana , Grinberg, Lea T. , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kukull, Walter A. , Joie, Renaud La , Mundada, Nidhi S. , Murray, Melissa E. , Nudelman, Kelly , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Atri, Alireza , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S24 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.083061 Get It

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 10‐25% of amnestic early‐onset dementia are negative for amyloid (Early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s Disease, EOnonAD). EOnonAD is a heterogenous group with various etiologies. In order to better understand the traits of EOnonAD, we clustered amnestic EOnonAD individuals according to cognitive patterns.MethodCognitive data of 62 EOnonAD individuals from the Longitudinal Early‐onset AD study (LEADS) were Z‐normalized to 91 intact individuals after adjusting for age, sex, and education. This led to domain‐averaged composite Z‐scores for memory, language, speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function. Cluster analysis using the Ward method on the residuals for the five composites was performed. We used Scree plot using the pseudo T‐squared to determine the optimal number of clusters. We compared demographics, imaging biomarkers (amyloid and tau PET SUVR, hippocampal volume), plasma (pTau231, Aß40, Aß42, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain (NfL)), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aß42/40, NfL, Neurogranin, Visinin‐like protein, YKL‐40, and Synaptosome Associated Protein 25) across the clusters after adjusting for age, sex, and education. We compared gray matter density of each EOnonAD cluster to controls (n = 84) using voxel‐wise multiple linear regressions in SPM12, adjusting for age, sex, education, and intracranial volume.ResultScree plot using the pseudo‐T‐squared suggested three clusters. Cluster 1 (38/62, 61.3%) was characterized by having the mildest cognitive impairment in all domains. Cluster 2 (19/62, 30.6%) was characterized by more severe memory and language impairment. Cluster 3 (5/62, 8.1%) was characterized by more severe impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function (Table 1). Cluster 3 showed significantly higher NfL for both plasma (Cluster 1 vs 3, p<0.001; Cluster 2 vs 3, p < 0.004) and CSF (Cluster 1 vs 3, p = 0.001). Other biomarkers did not show significant difference (Table 1). Only Cluster 3 showed significant atrophy in the bilateral fronto‐parietal areas at p<0.01, uncorrected (Figure 1).ConclusionWe identified heterogeneity in cognitive patterns among amnestic EOnonAD individuals. Cluster 1 had mildest cognitive impairment; Cluster 2 had predominant impairment in memory and language; and Cluster 3 had predominant impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function, with significant fronto‐parietal atrophy and high NfL indicating active neurodegeneration.
The Sporadic Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Signature Of Atrophy: Preliminary Findings From The Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) Cohort
Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Katsumi, Yuta , Brickhouse, Michael , Zaitsev, Alexander, Eckbo, Ryan, Aisen, Paul, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Ghetti, Bernardino , Griffin, Percy , Hammers, Dustin B. , Jack, Clifford R. , Kramer, Joel H. , Joie, Renaud La , Mundada, Nidhi S. , Kukull, Walter A. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Rumbaugh, Malia, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Jack, Clifford R , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Ghetti, Bernardino F , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Beckett, Laurel , Foroud, Tatiana , Hammers, Dustin B , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Koeppe, Robert A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Nudelman, Kelly , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 18, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.13466 | PMID 37850549 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research has advanced our understanding of neurodegeneration in sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) but studies include small samples, mostly amnestic EOAD, and have not focused on developing an MRI biomarker. METHODS We analyzed MRI scans to define the sporadic EOAD‐signature atrophy in a small sample (n = 25) of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) EOAD patients, investigated its reproducibility in the large longitudinal early‐onset Alzheimer's disease study (LEADS) sample (n = 211), and investigated the relationship of the magnitude of atrophy with cognitive impairment. RESULTS The EOAD‐signature atrophy was replicated across the two cohorts, with prominent atrophy in the caudal lateral temporal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and posterior cingulate and precuneus cortices, and with relative sparing of the medial temporal lobe. The magnitude of EOAD‐signature atrophy was associated with the severity of cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION The EOAD‐signature atrophy is a reliable and clinically valid biomarker of AD‐related neurodegeneration that could be used in clinical trials for EOAD. Highlights We developed an early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD)–signature of atrophy based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. EOAD signature was robustly reproducible across two independent patient cohorts. EOAD signature included prominent atrophy in parietal and posterior temporal cortex. The EOAD‐signature atrophy was associated with the severity of cognitive impairment. EOAD signature is a reliable and clinically valid biomarker of neurodegeneration.
Etiology of White Matter Hyperintensities in Autosomal Dominant and Sporadic Alzheimer Disease
Shirzadi, Zahra , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Yau, Wai‐Ying Wendy , Fitzpatrick, Colleen , Levin, Raina, Kantarci, Kejal , Preboske, Gregory M., Jack, Clifford R. , Farlow, Martin R. , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C. , Xiong, Chengjie , Levey, Allan I. , Gordon, Brian A. , Salloway, Stephen , Perrin, Richard J. , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C. , Goate, Alison , Day, Gregory S. , Chui, Helena C., Berman, Sarah , Mori, Hiroshi , Ruthirakuhan, Myuri , Wu, Che‐Yuan , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Martins, Ralph N. , Johnson, Keith A. , Greenberg, Steven M. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Initiative, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Weiner, Michael W. , Aisen, Paul, Petersen, Ronald , Jack, Clifford R., Jagust, William J. , Trojanowki, John Q., Morris, John C., Shaw, Leslie M. , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Carrillo, Maria, Potter, William Z., Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan , Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma C. , Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Sacrey, Diana Truran, Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Raman, Rema , Jiménez, Gustavo , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Sloan, Brittany, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles, Knaack, Alexander , Chen, Stephanie Rossi, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan, Cairns, Nigel J., Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michael, Neu, Scott, Apostolova, Liana G. , Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley, Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Lind, Betty, Crissey, Rachel, Carter, Raina, Dolen, Sara, Schneider, Lon S. , Pawluczyk, Sonia, Becerra, Mauricio, Teodoro, Liberty, Dagerman, Karen, Spann, Bryan M., Brewer, James B., Vanderswag, Helen, Ziolkowski, Jaimie, Heidebrink, Judith L. , Zbizek-Nulph, Lisa, Mason, Sara S., Albers, Colleen S., Johnson, Kris , Villaneuva-Meyer, Javier, Pavlik, Valory , Pacini, Nathaniel, Lamb, Ashley, Kass, Joseph S. , Doody, Rachelle S., Shibley, Victoria, Chowdhury, Munir , Rountree, Susan, Dang, Mimi, Mintz, Akiva , Winkfield, David, Carroll, Maria , Stobbs-Cucchi, Georgia , Oliver, Angela , Creech, Mary L., Mintun, Mark A., Schneider, Stacy, Geldmacher, David , Love, Marissa Natelson , Griffith, Randall, Clark, David, Brockington, John, Marson, Daniel , Grossman, Hillel, Goldstein, Martin , Mitsis, Effie, Samuels, Patricia, Duara, Ranjan , Greig‐Custo, Maria T., Rodriguez, Rosemarie, Albert, Marilyn, Onyike, Chiadi, Farrington, Leonie, Rudow, Scott, Brichko, Rottislav, Kielb, Stephanie , Smith, Amanda , Raj, Balebail Ashok, Fargher, Kristin, Shulman, Melanie , Faustin, Arline , Rao, Julia, Castro, Karen M. , Ulysse, Anaztasia, Chen, Shannon, Sheikh, Mohammed O., Singleton-Garvin, Jamika, Doraiswamy, P. Murali , Petrella, Jeffrey R. , James, Olga, Borges‐Neto, Salvador , Karlawish, Jason , Vaishnavi, Sanjeev , Clark, Christopher M. , Arnold, Steven E. , Smith, Charles D. , Khouli, Riham El , Raslau, Flavius D., Oakley, MaryAnn, Simpson, Donna M., Martin, Kim, Kowalski, Nancy, Keltz, Melanie, Goldstein, Bonnie S., Makino, Kelly M., Ismail, M. Saleem , Brand, Connie, Thai, Gaby , Pierce, Aimee, Witbracht, Megan , Mathews, Dana, Quiceno, Mary , Hajjar, Ihab , Cellar, Janet S., Swerdlow, Russell H. , Kremen, Sarah , Tingus, Kathleen, Lu, Po H. , Bartzokis, George, Woo, Ellen, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Parfitt, Francine, Poki-Walker, Kim, Hake, Ann Marie , Matthews, Brandy R., Herring, Scott, Dyck, Christopher H. van , Mecca, Adam P. , Good, Susan P., MacAvoy, Martha G., Carson, Richard E. , Varma, Pradeep, Chertkow, Howard , Vaitekunis, Susan, Hosein, Chris, Mudge, Benita, Assaly, Michele, Rachinsky, Irina, Kertesz, Andrew, Drost, Dick, Rogers, John, Grant, Ian , Muse, Brittanie, Rogalskı, Emily , Robson, Jordan, Mesulam, M.‐Marsel, Kerwin, Diana , Wu, Chuang‐Kuo, Johnson, Nancy E., Lipowski, Kristine, Weıntraub, Sandra , Bonakdarpour, Borna , Hernando, Raymundo, Sarrael, Antero, Rosen, Howard J., Johnson, Kathleen, Reynolds, Brigid, Poe, Jessica, Sperling, Reisa A., Marshall, Gad A. , Yesavage, Jerome A. , Taylor, Joy L. , Chao, Steven, Coleman, Jaila, White, Jessica D. , Lane, Barton , Rosen, Allyson , Tinklenberg, Jared, Belden, Christine M. , Clark, Kelly, Zamrini, Edward , Sabbagh, Marwan, Kowall, Neil W. , Budson, Andrew E. , Ntekim, Oyonumo, Wolday, Saba, Khan, Javed , Nwulia, Evaristus , Nadarajah, Sheeba , Lerner, Alan J. , Ogrocki, Paula, Tatsuoka, Curtis , Fatica, Parianne, Olichney, John , Bates, Vernice, Capote, Horacio, Rainka, Michelle, Borrie, Michael, Lee, T‐Y, Asthana, Sanjay , Carlsson, Cynthia M., Perrin, Allison, Burke, Anna , Kataki, Maria , Hart, David , Zimmerman, Earl A. , Celmins, Dzintra, Smith, Karen Ekstam, Shim, Hyungsub , Nam, Ki Won , Schtulz, Susan K., Williamson, Jeff D. , Craft, Suzanne , Cleveland, Jo, Ott, Brian R. , Drake, Jonathan, Tremont, Geoffrey , Daiello, Lori A. , Ritter, Aaron, Bernick, Charles , Munic, Donna, O’Connell, Abigail, Mintzer, Jacobo , Wiliams, Arthur, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Shi, Jiong , Garcia, Angelica, Newhouse, Paul , Salloway, Steven, Malloy, Paul, Correia, Stephen , Kittur, Smita, Blank, Karen, Anderson, Karen, Flashman, Laura A. , Seltzer, Marc, Hynes, Mary L. , Santulli, Robert B. , Relkin, Norman , Chiang, Gloria, Lee, Athena, Lin, Michael, Ravdin, Lisa , Sood, Ajay, Blanchard, Kimberly S., Fleischman, Debra , Varon, Daniel, Greig, Maria T., Martin, Kimberly S., Reist, Christopher , Sadowsky, Carl, Villena, Teresa, Rosen, Howard, Peskind, Elaine R. , Li, Gail, Vöglein, Jonathan , Méndez, Patricio Chrem, Ikonomović, Snežana, Nadkarni, Neelesh K. , Ramírez, Laura, Leon, Yudy Milena, Ramos, Cláudia , Alzate, Diana, Baena, Ana , Londono, Natalia, Laske, Christoph , Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Gräber‐Sultan, Susanne, Preische, Oliver, Hofmann, Anna, Ishii, Kenji , Senda, Michio , Riddle, Meghan C., Menard, William, Bodge, Courtney, Surti, Mustafa, Sanchez-Gonzalez, VJ, Orozco-Barajas, Maribel, Esposito, Bianca, Fernanadez, Victoria, Jerome, Gina, Herries, Elizabeth, Seyfried, Nicholas T. , Bechara, Jacob , Chen, Allison , Hantler, Nancy, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Jarman, Steve, Keefe, Sarah , Koudelis, Deborah, Massoumzadeh, Parinaz , Nicklaus, Joyce , Pulizos, Christine, Mishall, Sheetal, Sabaredzovic, Edita, Deng, Emily , Candela, Madison, Smith, Hunter , Scott, Jalen , Gremminger, Emily, Ma, Yinjiao , Bui, Ryan , Lu, Ruijin , Daniels, Alisha , Courtney, Laura, Supnet, Charlene , Xu, Jinbin , Ringman, John M. , Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Jack, Clifford R , Gordon, Brian A , Kantarci, Kejal , Day, Gregory S , Vöglein, Jonathan , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Goate, Alison M , Supnet-Bell, Charlene , Berman, Sarah , Levey, Allan I , Kremen, Sarah , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Jucker, Mathias , Xiong, Chengjie , Karch, Celeste M. , Schofield, Peter R. , McDade, Eric , Cruchaga, Carlos , Allegri, Ricardo , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chui, Helena C. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Lee, Jae‐Hong , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Swardfager, Walter , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Bateman, Randall J. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Schultz, Aaron P. , Initiative, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Jack, Clifford R., Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Green, Robert C. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Morris, John C., Barnes, Lisa L. , González, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Donohue, Michael , Smith, Stephanie R. , Harvey, Danielle , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Reid, Robert I. , Malone, Ian B. , Thompson, Paul M. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Fletcher, Evan M. , Tosun, Duygu , Yushkevich, Paul A. , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Chen, Kewei , Mathis, Chet, Nho, Kwangsik T. , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Silbert, Lisa C. , Kaye, Jeffrey , Carter, Raina, Quinn, Joseph F. , Lord, Joanne L. , Knopman, David S. , Stern, Yaakov , Honig, Lawrence S. , Ances, Beau M. , Goldstein, Martin A., Greenberg, Jonathan, Shah, Raj C. , Lamar, Melissa , Duara, Ranjan , Sadowski, Martin , Wısnıewskı, Thomas , Wong, Terence Z. , Wolk, David A. , Jicha, Gregory A. , López, Oscar L. , Porsteinsson, Anton P. , Yanez, Beatriz, Sosa, Elizabeth M. , Kelley, Brendan , Nguyen, Trung Dung , Womack, Kyle , Lah, James J. , Burns, Jeffrey M. , Brooks, William Miles , Silverman, Daniel H.S. , Teng, Edmond , Brosch, Jared R. , Black, Sandra E. , Stefanovic, Bojana , Heyn, Chris , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Kim, Ellen , Sossi, Vesna , Feldman, Howard , Finger, Elizabeth C. , Pasternak, Stephen , Miller, Bruce L. , Perry, David C. , Turner, Raymond Scott , MCCann, Kelly, Sperling, Reisa A., Atri, Alireza , Killiany, Ronald , Stern, Robert A. , Mez, Jesse , Obisesan, Thomas O. , Maillard, Pauline , Carmichael, Owen , Bartha, Robert , Johnson, Sterling C. , Carlsson, Cynthia M. , Scharre, Douglas W. , Tarawneh, Rawan M. , Miller, Del D. , Ponto, Laura L. Boles , Koleva, Hristina , Yang, Mia , Sink, Kaycee M. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Potkin, Steven G. , Salloway, Steve , Pearlson, Godfrey D. , Sood, Ajay, Arfanakis, Konstantinos , Varón, Daniel , Martínez, Walter Fabián , Petrie, Eric C. , Noble, James M. , Surace, Ezequiel , Lopera, Francisco Javier , Aguillon, David , Londono, Natalia, Moreno, Sonia, Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Kasuga, Kensaku , Niimi, Yoshiki , Cash, David M. , Roh, Jee Hoon , Takada, Leonel Tadao , Renton, Alan , Marsh, Jacob A. , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Brooks, William S. , Chen, Charles , Flores, Shaney , McCullough, Austin , McKay, Nicole S. , Wáng, Qīng , Candela, Madison, Hobbs, Diana A. , Wang, Peter , Xu, Xiong, Li, Yan , Sosa, Ana Luisa , Smith, Jennifer A.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | October 16, 2023 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1353

10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3618 | PMID 37843849 Get It

ImportanceIncreased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume is a common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding in both autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) and late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD), but it remains unclear whether increased WMH along the AD continuum is reflective of AD-intrinsic processes or secondary to elevated systemic vascular risk factors.ObjectiveTo estimate the associations of neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis with WMH accumulation and investigate whether systemic vascular risk is associated with WMH beyond these AD-intrinsic processes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used data from 3 longitudinal cohort studies conducted in tertiary and community-based medical centers—the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN; February 2010 to March 2020), the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; July 2007 to September 2021), and the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS; September 2010 to December 2019).Main Outcome and MeasuresThe main outcomes were the independent associations of neurodegeneration (decreases in gray matter volume), parenchymal amyloidosis (assessed by amyloid positron emission tomography), and vessel amyloidosis (evidenced by cerebral microbleeds [CMBs]) with cross-sectional and longitudinal WMH.ResultsData from 3960 MRI sessions among 1141 participants were included: 252 pathogenic variant carriers from DIAN (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.2] years; 137 [54%] female), 571 older adults from ADNI (mean [SD] age, 72.8 [7.3] years; 274 [48%] female), and 318 older adults from HABS (mean [SD] age, 72.4 [7.6] years; 194 [61%] female). Longitudinal increases in WMH volume were greater in individuals with CMBs compared with those without (DIAN: t = 3.2 [P = .001]; ADNI: t = 2.7 [P = .008]), associated with longitudinal decreases in gray matter volume (DIAN: t = −3.1 [P = .002]; ADNI: t = −5.6 [P &amp;lt; .001]; HABS: t = −2.2 [P = .03]), greater in older individuals (DIAN: t = 6.8 [P &amp;lt; .001]; ADNI: t = 9.1 [P &amp;lt; .001]; HABS: t = 5.4 [P &amp;lt; .001]), and not associated with systemic vascular risk (DIAN: t = 0.7 [P = .40]; ADNI: t = 0.6 [P = .50]; HABS: t = 1.8 [P = .06]) in individuals with ADAD and LOAD after accounting for age, gray matter volume, CMB presence, and amyloid burden. In older adults without CMBs at baseline, greater WMH volume was associated with CMB development during longitudinal follow-up (Cox proportional hazards regression model hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.72-4.03; P &amp;lt; .001).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings suggest that increased WMH volume in AD is associated with neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis but not with elevated systemic vascular risk. Additionally, increased WMH volume may represent an early sign of vessel amyloidosis preceding the emergence of CMBs.