Citations

OBJECTIVES: Vasoplegia is a common complication of cardiac surgery that uses cardiopulmonary bypass and contributes to morbidity and mortality, yet a consensus definition does not exist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic criteria and definitions used to characterize vasoplegia and how different criteria influence incidence estimates. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform clinical trials registry. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting on vasoplegia in adults undergoing any type of cardiac surgery that used cardiopulmonary bypass. DATA EXTRACTION: Proportional meta-analysis using a random-effects model and the inverse variance method was used to calculate the pooled incidence of vasoplegia and its clinical outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 68 studies encompassing 56,580 patients were identified, from which 63 unique vasoplegia definitions were used. Blood pressure ( n = 57 studies, 84%) and cardiac output ( n = 50 studies, 74%) were among the most common criteria used in vasoplegia definitions; however, there was a vast variety of threshold values applied within these criteria and all other criteria comprising the definitions. The pooled incidence of vasoplegia was 21% (95% CI, 17–25%), acute kidney injury was 32% (95% CI, 21–45%), and mortality was 12% (95% CI, 9–16%). Subgroup analysis revealed that transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation surgeries, and those with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% had a significantly greater incidence of vasoplegia. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature varies greatly in the criteria used to define vasoplegia associated with on-pump cardiac surgery. Generation and adoption of a unified definition for vasoplegia must be an international priority.

ABSTRACT Background Intracranial and extracranial hemorrhages are significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Emergency medicine pharmacists (EMPs) can play a crucial role in anticoagulation reversal by identifying patients on anticoagulation, selecting the optimal anticoagulation reversal agent, and ensuring adequate dosing and prompt administration. The goal of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the impact EMPs have on time to anticoagulation reversal and patient outcomes in anticoagulation‐associated hemorrhages. Methods A medical librarian performed a literature search in EBSCO CINAHL, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to January 2025 for all types of oral anticoagulants and for life‐threatening bleeding that required emergent reversal. Newcastle‐Ottawa was used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the level of certainty of the evidence. Random effects models estimating mean differences and 95% confidence intervals are reported. Results There were 2445 titles and abstracts screened, with 44 undergoing full‐text evaluation. Six observational studies including 219 patients who received an anticoagulation reversal agent with the presence of an EMP and 198 patients who received a reversal agent without an EMP were included. Time from emergency department (ED) presentation to anticoagulation reversal agent administration (75.60 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −101.7 to −49.5) and time from medication order to administration were faster with an EMP (−18.7 min, 95% CI: −23.5 to −14.0). There was no difference in short‐term mortality. The included studies had a high risk of bias and were deemed very low quality of evidence. Conclusion EMP involvement in patient care during anticoagulation reversal of acute hemorrhages improved time to anticoagulation reversal agent administration. Larger scale, higher‐quality studies are necessary to assess the value of EMPs in improving patient‐centered outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization recommends daily antithrombin monitoring and supplementation to achieve > 50%–80% activity during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Evidence supporting this practice is uncertain, and whether it confers clinical benefit or harm is unclear. Methods This was a systematic review with meta‐analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antithrombin supplementation during ECMO. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing patients on ECMO who received antithrombin supplementation to those who did not. Random effects meta‐analysis was performed. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two investigators. A priori subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore reasons for heterogeneity. Results A total of 11 studies were identified. In the pooled meta‐analysis, antithrombin supplementation resulted in no difference in bleeding events (OR 1.38, 95% CI, 0.88–2.17, p = 0.16), thrombotic events (OR 1.57, 95% CI, 0.84–2.90, p = 0.15), or mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 0.81–1.81, p = 0.35) when compared to those who did not receive antithrombin. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference in bleeding events or mortality in pediatric or adult patients; however, pediatric patients that received antithrombin were more likely to experience a thrombotic event (OR 1.70, 95% CI, 1.51–1.91). Sensitivity analysis in only low risk of bias studies confirmed these findings. Conclusions Antithrombin supplementation was not associated with differences in mortality or hemostatic outcomes during ECMO support and may be associated with harm in pediatric patients on ECMO.

Background The natural history of asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) remains uncertain, with conflicting reports about its progression and surgical timing. We aimed to quantify adverse outcomes under conservative management and evaluate the association of aortic valve replacement/repair (AVR) with mortality. Methods Systematic searches (inception–July 2025) identified cohort studies of asymptomatic moderate/severe AR. Random-effects models estimated pooled incidence rates of adverse events; fixed-effects models were used for hazard ratios (HRs) of AVR vs conservative management. Results Twenty-seven studies (4720 patients; mean age 49 years; mean follow-up 3.9 years) were included. Pooled incidence rates per 100 person-years were 1.75 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.41) for all-cause mortality, 1.29 for cardiac death, 0.29 for sudden death, 4.30 for new symptoms and 7.01 for AVR. Asymptomatic low left ventricular ejection fraction occurred in only 0.9 per 100 person-years. Mortality rates were more than double those of the general population across age groups—2.45 (1.90 to 3.18) per 100 person-years for cohorts with mean age ≥50 years versus 0.59 (0.29 to 1.21) for younger cohorts. Early AVR was associated with lower mortality (pooled HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.37). Conclusion Asymptomatic moderate/severe AR carries significant excess mortality irrespective of age, contradicting its historically benign reputation. Given the rarity of asymptomatic LV dysfunction, earlier intervention guided by more sensitive markers of LV damage may improve outcomes, although heterogeneity and study quality warrant cautious interpretation. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024522683.

This systematic review examined multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted during the Sepsis-3 era that evaluated pharmaceutical and mechanistic interventions in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock, with a focus on identifying interventions that demonstrated mortality benefit. A comprehensive search was performed across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and Web of Science for trials published since 2016. Studies were included if they enrolled adult patients with sepsis or septic shock using Sepsis-3 criteria and reported mortality as either a primary or secondary outcome. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and included trial design characteristics, funding source, randomization methods, and reported outcomes. Among the 31 eligible multicenter RCTs enrolling over 7,000 patients across 550 centers, only four trials showed a mortality benefit. These included three studies from China—two evaluating herbal anti-inflammatory compounds and one evaluating aminophylline—and one European study assessing corticosteroid therapy in vasopressor-dependent septic shock. The remaining 27 trials reported no mortality benefit, and substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient populations, sepsis definitions, and outcome reporting. Median mortality in control arms was 31.6% (IQR 24.1–45.5), and 35.4% (IQR 25.7–49.6) in intervention arms. These findings suggest that despite extensive efforts, most interventions have not reduced mortality in multicenter sepsis trials. Future research should focus on optimizing trial design, refining patient selection, and incorporating patient-centered outcomes beyond mortality.

ABSTRACTBackgroundEsophageal‐pericardial fistula (EPF) is rare with an incidence of 0.016%–0.04%. With novel procedures involving intracardiac or esophageal instrumentation in the last few decades, including atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, further understanding of this unique entity is warranted. In this systematic review, we summarize the etiology, diagnostic features, management, and outcomes of EPF.MethodsA librarian conducted a systematic literature review of case reports/series describing adults diagnosed with EPF through 7 major databases/registries from inception to 7/30/2024.ResultsOne hundred twenty patients from 115 papers met the inclusion criteria. Median age(IQR) was 57(44–67) years, with a male predominance (73.7%). The primary etiology of EPF shifted from benign esophageal diseases before 2000 to AF ablation on/after 2000. Median time(IQR) from AF ablation to EPF presentation/diagnosis was 17(13–23) days. Chest pain (70.8%) and pneumopericardium (90.0%) were, respectively, the most common presenting symptom and pericardial finding. Water‐soluble contrast esophagram (WSCE) had the highest diagnostic sensitivity (82.8%). Management included surgery (47.5%), stent placement (22.5%), combined surgery/stenting (19.2%), and conservative (10.8%). Overall mortality was 37.5%; median(IQR) time to death was 20(9–41) days. EPF from malignancy had poorer survival than those from benign esophageal causes (HR 2.65 [1.36–5.17]; p = 0.004) and cardiac ablation (HR 5.74 [2.41–13.65]; p < 0.0001). Patients who received any intervention (HR 0.28 [0.13‐0.57]; p = 0.0005) or had confirmed EPF resolution (HR 0.27 [0.12–0.59]; p = 0.0009) demonstrated better survival. There was no difference in survival between surgery and stenting alone (p = 0.91).ConclusionsAF ablation is now the leading etiology of EPF. Given its high mortality, a high degree of clinical suspicion is essential in those presenting with key signs/symptoms following AF ablation to enable urgent diagnosis and multi‐disciplinary management. WSCE may be the diagnostic modality to perform, given its high sensitivity. Future studies are warranted to investigate whether stenting should be the primary management given possible non‐inferiority to surgery.

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing DTIs to heparin in humans receiving ECMO. A total of 28 studies were identified, most of which (n = 25) used bivalirudin, while the rest (n = 3) used argatroban. In random-effects meta-analysis, DTIs achieved the therapeutic anticoagulation range faster (mean difference = −6.96 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −11.98 to −1.95, p = 0.006) and maintained the therapeutic range for a greater proportion of time (mean difference = 18.6%, 95% CI = 8.78–28.42, p < 0.001) than heparin. Subgroup analysis revealed these effects were similarly significant in adult patients and when bivalirudin was the DTI; however, they were not significant in pediatric patients or when argatroban was the DTI. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the primary findings in only low-risk of bias studies and in only studies published as full papers. In summary, DTIs—specifically bivalirudin—were associated with faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and maintained the goal range for a greater percentage of time than heparin during ECMO support.

Background and importance Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids’ benefits and risks. Objective Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation. Design, settings, and participants We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria. Outcomes measure and analysis The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized. Main results Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: −12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22–3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Conclusions Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01–1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12–15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1–1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82–1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90–1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98–19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58–6.17) among BE patients. DISCUSSION: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.